Costs of surgical treatment of urinary incontinence in women

Objective: To estimate costs for surgical treatment of urinary incontinence surgery in women by applying retropubic Burch colposuspension or modern sling procedures. Material and methods: A total of 52 procedures were randomly chosen from a cohort of 1329 stress urinary incontinence (SUI) operations...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Przegla̜d menopauzalny 2009-01, Vol.13 (1), p.14
Hauptverfasser: Rechberger, Tomasz, Postawski, Krzysztof, Charachajczuk, Klaudia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng ; pol
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 14
container_title Przegla̜d menopauzalny
container_volume 13
creator Rechberger, Tomasz
Postawski, Krzysztof
Charachajczuk, Klaudia
description Objective: To estimate costs for surgical treatment of urinary incontinence surgery in women by applying retropubic Burch colposuspension or modern sling procedures. Material and methods: A total of 52 procedures were randomly chosen from a cohort of 1329 stress urinary incontinence (SUI) operations performed during 1999-2007 in the 2nd Department of Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin. There were 10 Burch open and 8 laparoscopic version of colposuspension, 10 TVT, 10 IVS-02, 10 IVS-04 and four TVT-O slings. Mean costs in Polish zlotys for each procedure were calculated according to: time of procedure, mode of anaesthesia used and sum of money spent for surgical supplies including disposable kits and surgical procedure kits such as TVT, TVT-O, IVS-02 and IVS-04 sets. Results: The highest mean costs (4158 zl) were obtained for the laparoscopic version of the Burch procedure due to the longest time needed for surgical operation, and the most expensive general anaesthesia used as well as disposable tacking device using to staple the mesh to Cooper's ligament. Mean costs of suburethral slings were comparable, but the TVT-O method was the most expensive (1956.20 zl). Lowest mean costs were noted for the Burch procedure performed as an additional treatment at the end of laparotomy due to uterine or adnexal non-neoplastic diseases. Conclusions: Urinary incontinence surgical treatment in women is associated with substantial costs. In view of the high costs of the laparoscopic version of the Burch procedure and also the lack of long-term results of this operation, we suggest that the procedure should not be a first line of SUI treatment.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1237587371</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2839875861</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_12375873713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNiksKwjAURYMoWD97CDgu5FObFJwVxQU4LyGkJaW-aF6CuHsruABHh3vuWZBCiKYpGZN6SQpeV7LUWtVrskEcGasbwauCnNqACWnoKeY4eGsmmqIz6e4gfW2OHkx8Uw82QPLgwLp50FeYix1Z9WZCt_9xSw6X8629lo8Yntlh6saQI8xXx4VUR62k4vK_6gNk0TlT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1237587371</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Costs of surgical treatment of urinary incontinence in women</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Rechberger, Tomasz ; Postawski, Krzysztof ; Charachajczuk, Klaudia</creator><creatorcontrib>Rechberger, Tomasz ; Postawski, Krzysztof ; Charachajczuk, Klaudia</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To estimate costs for surgical treatment of urinary incontinence surgery in women by applying retropubic Burch colposuspension or modern sling procedures. Material and methods: A total of 52 procedures were randomly chosen from a cohort of 1329 stress urinary incontinence (SUI) operations performed during 1999-2007 in the 2nd Department of Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin. There were 10 Burch open and 8 laparoscopic version of colposuspension, 10 TVT, 10 IVS-02, 10 IVS-04 and four TVT-O slings. Mean costs in Polish zlotys for each procedure were calculated according to: time of procedure, mode of anaesthesia used and sum of money spent for surgical supplies including disposable kits and surgical procedure kits such as TVT, TVT-O, IVS-02 and IVS-04 sets. Results: The highest mean costs (4158 zl) were obtained for the laparoscopic version of the Burch procedure due to the longest time needed for surgical operation, and the most expensive general anaesthesia used as well as disposable tacking device using to staple the mesh to Cooper's ligament. Mean costs of suburethral slings were comparable, but the TVT-O method was the most expensive (1956.20 zl). Lowest mean costs were noted for the Burch procedure performed as an additional treatment at the end of laparotomy due to uterine or adnexal non-neoplastic diseases. Conclusions: Urinary incontinence surgical treatment in women is associated with substantial costs. In view of the high costs of the laparoscopic version of the Burch procedure and also the lack of long-term results of this operation, we suggest that the procedure should not be a first line of SUI treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1643-8876</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2299-0038</identifier><language>eng ; pol</language><publisher>Poznan: Termedia Publishing House</publisher><ispartof>Przegla̜d menopauzalny, 2009-01, Vol.13 (1), p.14</ispartof><rights>Copyright Termedia Publishing House 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rechberger, Tomasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Postawski, Krzysztof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charachajczuk, Klaudia</creatorcontrib><title>Costs of surgical treatment of urinary incontinence in women</title><title>Przegla̜d menopauzalny</title><description>Objective: To estimate costs for surgical treatment of urinary incontinence surgery in women by applying retropubic Burch colposuspension or modern sling procedures. Material and methods: A total of 52 procedures were randomly chosen from a cohort of 1329 stress urinary incontinence (SUI) operations performed during 1999-2007 in the 2nd Department of Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin. There were 10 Burch open and 8 laparoscopic version of colposuspension, 10 TVT, 10 IVS-02, 10 IVS-04 and four TVT-O slings. Mean costs in Polish zlotys for each procedure were calculated according to: time of procedure, mode of anaesthesia used and sum of money spent for surgical supplies including disposable kits and surgical procedure kits such as TVT, TVT-O, IVS-02 and IVS-04 sets. Results: The highest mean costs (4158 zl) were obtained for the laparoscopic version of the Burch procedure due to the longest time needed for surgical operation, and the most expensive general anaesthesia used as well as disposable tacking device using to staple the mesh to Cooper's ligament. Mean costs of suburethral slings were comparable, but the TVT-O method was the most expensive (1956.20 zl). Lowest mean costs were noted for the Burch procedure performed as an additional treatment at the end of laparotomy due to uterine or adnexal non-neoplastic diseases. Conclusions: Urinary incontinence surgical treatment in women is associated with substantial costs. In view of the high costs of the laparoscopic version of the Burch procedure and also the lack of long-term results of this operation, we suggest that the procedure should not be a first line of SUI treatment.</description><issn>1643-8876</issn><issn>2299-0038</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNiksKwjAURYMoWD97CDgu5FObFJwVxQU4LyGkJaW-aF6CuHsruABHh3vuWZBCiKYpGZN6SQpeV7LUWtVrskEcGasbwauCnNqACWnoKeY4eGsmmqIz6e4gfW2OHkx8Uw82QPLgwLp50FeYix1Z9WZCt_9xSw6X8629lo8Yntlh6saQI8xXx4VUR62k4vK_6gNk0TlT</recordid><startdate>20090101</startdate><enddate>20090101</enddate><creator>Rechberger, Tomasz</creator><creator>Postawski, Krzysztof</creator><creator>Charachajczuk, Klaudia</creator><general>Termedia Publishing House</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090101</creationdate><title>Costs of surgical treatment of urinary incontinence in women</title><author>Rechberger, Tomasz ; Postawski, Krzysztof ; Charachajczuk, Klaudia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_12375873713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; pol</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rechberger, Tomasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Postawski, Krzysztof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charachajczuk, Klaudia</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Przegla̜d menopauzalny</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rechberger, Tomasz</au><au>Postawski, Krzysztof</au><au>Charachajczuk, Klaudia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Costs of surgical treatment of urinary incontinence in women</atitle><jtitle>Przegla̜d menopauzalny</jtitle><date>2009-01-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>14</spage><pages>14-</pages><issn>1643-8876</issn><eissn>2299-0038</eissn><abstract>Objective: To estimate costs for surgical treatment of urinary incontinence surgery in women by applying retropubic Burch colposuspension or modern sling procedures. Material and methods: A total of 52 procedures were randomly chosen from a cohort of 1329 stress urinary incontinence (SUI) operations performed during 1999-2007 in the 2nd Department of Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin. There were 10 Burch open and 8 laparoscopic version of colposuspension, 10 TVT, 10 IVS-02, 10 IVS-04 and four TVT-O slings. Mean costs in Polish zlotys for each procedure were calculated according to: time of procedure, mode of anaesthesia used and sum of money spent for surgical supplies including disposable kits and surgical procedure kits such as TVT, TVT-O, IVS-02 and IVS-04 sets. Results: The highest mean costs (4158 zl) were obtained for the laparoscopic version of the Burch procedure due to the longest time needed for surgical operation, and the most expensive general anaesthesia used as well as disposable tacking device using to staple the mesh to Cooper's ligament. Mean costs of suburethral slings were comparable, but the TVT-O method was the most expensive (1956.20 zl). Lowest mean costs were noted for the Burch procedure performed as an additional treatment at the end of laparotomy due to uterine or adnexal non-neoplastic diseases. Conclusions: Urinary incontinence surgical treatment in women is associated with substantial costs. In view of the high costs of the laparoscopic version of the Burch procedure and also the lack of long-term results of this operation, we suggest that the procedure should not be a first line of SUI treatment.</abstract><cop>Poznan</cop><pub>Termedia Publishing House</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1643-8876
ispartof Przegla̜d menopauzalny, 2009-01, Vol.13 (1), p.14
issn 1643-8876
2299-0038
language eng ; pol
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1237587371
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title Costs of surgical treatment of urinary incontinence in women
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T16%3A44%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Costs%20of%20surgical%20treatment%20of%20urinary%20incontinence%20in%20women&rft.jtitle=Przegla%CC%9Cd%20menopauzalny&rft.au=Rechberger,%20Tomasz&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=14&rft.pages=14-&rft.issn=1643-8876&rft.eissn=2299-0038&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2839875861%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1237587371&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true