What river morphology after restoration? The methodology VALURI
This paper proposes a tool which river managers may need to ascertain whether the key idea of River Restoration is valid, i.e. that rivers in more natural status are desirable not only for pure environmental reasons, but also to combat flood and geomorphic risk. The point addressed is how to predict...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of river basin management 2012-03, Vol.10 (1), p.29-47 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 47 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 29 |
container_title | International journal of river basin management |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Nardini, Andrea Pavan, Sara |
description | This paper proposes a tool which river managers may need to ascertain whether the key idea of River Restoration is valid, i.e. that rivers in more natural status are desirable not only for pure environmental reasons, but also to combat flood and geomorphic risk. The point addressed is how to predict the morphology and geometry that a river will assume after the application of a River Restoration project which foresees significant changes in the system of defence and exploitation works as well as morphological adjustments (e.g. reconnection of an incised main channel with the surrounding ex-floodplain). To this aim we developed a semi-quantitative methodology that integrates several differing criteria: from historical analysis of geomorphic evolution, expert-based mechanistic reasoning, checking with empirical qualitative formulas and analytical support from fluvial geomorphology and classic hydraulics. The development of the methodology has taken place on a case study along the 80 km of Chiese River, downstream of Idro lake, in northern Italy. Although the product to be considered is just a pilot one, we see it as a promising tool, which also opens several challenging questions suited for further fascinating research work. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/15715124.2011.640637 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1170926663</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1257788584</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-1468f6e7f05164c7f119e389e0a72d8932c09ebb12bda6475bb5ea8836c2fcad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFb_gYeAFy-pO5v9yqmU4kehIEirx2Wz2bUpSbbupkr_vSnRiwdPMwzP-zI8CF0DngCW-A6YAAaETggGmHCKeSZO0Agk0JRgjk_7vUfSI3OOLmLcYsw4o3iEpm8b3SWh-rQhaXzYbXzt3w-Jdl1_CDZ2Puiu8u00WW1s0thu48sBeZ0t1y-LS3TmdB3t1c8co_XD_Wr-lC6fHxfz2TI1GZddCpRLx61wmAGnRjiA3GYyt1gLUso8IwbntiiAFKXmVLCiYFZLmXFDnNFlNka3Q-8u-I99_5dqqmhsXevW-n1UQJgQUjJJe_TmD7r1-9D23ykAgXPCOc96ig6UCT7GYJ3aharR4aAAq6NV9WtVHa2qwWofmw6xqnU-NPrLh7pUnT7UPrigW1NFlf3b8A3vXHyN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1170926663</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What river morphology after restoration? The methodology VALURI</title><source>Taylor & Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Nardini, Andrea ; Pavan, Sara</creator><creatorcontrib>Nardini, Andrea ; Pavan, Sara</creatorcontrib><description>This paper proposes a tool which river managers may need to ascertain whether the key idea of River Restoration is valid, i.e. that rivers in more natural status are desirable not only for pure environmental reasons, but also to combat flood and geomorphic risk. The point addressed is how to predict the morphology and geometry that a river will assume after the application of a River Restoration project which foresees significant changes in the system of defence and exploitation works as well as morphological adjustments (e.g. reconnection of an incised main channel with the surrounding ex-floodplain). To this aim we developed a semi-quantitative methodology that integrates several differing criteria: from historical analysis of geomorphic evolution, expert-based mechanistic reasoning, checking with empirical qualitative formulas and analytical support from fluvial geomorphology and classic hydraulics. The development of the methodology has taken place on a case study along the 80 km of Chiese River, downstream of Idro lake, in northern Italy. Although the product to be considered is just a pilot one, we see it as a promising tool, which also opens several challenging questions suited for further fascinating research work.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1571-5124</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1814-2060</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/15715124.2011.640637</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Channels ; environmental cost-benefit analysis ; Floods ; Freshwater ; Geomorphology ; hydro-morphological risk assessment ; integrated evaluation ; Methodology ; Morphology ; Po-River basin (Italy) ; Restoration ; River management ; river restoration ; Rivers</subject><ispartof>International journal of river basin management, 2012-03, Vol.10 (1), p.29-47</ispartof><rights>Copyright International Association for Hydro-Environment Engineering and Research 2012</rights><rights>Copyright International Association for Hydro-Environment Engineering and Research</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-1468f6e7f05164c7f119e389e0a72d8932c09ebb12bda6475bb5ea8836c2fcad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-1468f6e7f05164c7f119e389e0a72d8932c09ebb12bda6475bb5ea8836c2fcad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/15715124.2011.640637$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15715124.2011.640637$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,59647,60436</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nardini, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavan, Sara</creatorcontrib><title>What river morphology after restoration? The methodology VALURI</title><title>International journal of river basin management</title><description>This paper proposes a tool which river managers may need to ascertain whether the key idea of River Restoration is valid, i.e. that rivers in more natural status are desirable not only for pure environmental reasons, but also to combat flood and geomorphic risk. The point addressed is how to predict the morphology and geometry that a river will assume after the application of a River Restoration project which foresees significant changes in the system of defence and exploitation works as well as morphological adjustments (e.g. reconnection of an incised main channel with the surrounding ex-floodplain). To this aim we developed a semi-quantitative methodology that integrates several differing criteria: from historical analysis of geomorphic evolution, expert-based mechanistic reasoning, checking with empirical qualitative formulas and analytical support from fluvial geomorphology and classic hydraulics. The development of the methodology has taken place on a case study along the 80 km of Chiese River, downstream of Idro lake, in northern Italy. Although the product to be considered is just a pilot one, we see it as a promising tool, which also opens several challenging questions suited for further fascinating research work.</description><subject>Channels</subject><subject>environmental cost-benefit analysis</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Geomorphology</subject><subject>hydro-morphological risk assessment</subject><subject>integrated evaluation</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Po-River basin (Italy)</subject><subject>Restoration</subject><subject>River management</subject><subject>river restoration</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><issn>1571-5124</issn><issn>1814-2060</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFb_gYeAFy-pO5v9yqmU4kehIEirx2Wz2bUpSbbupkr_vSnRiwdPMwzP-zI8CF0DngCW-A6YAAaETggGmHCKeSZO0Agk0JRgjk_7vUfSI3OOLmLcYsw4o3iEpm8b3SWh-rQhaXzYbXzt3w-Jdl1_CDZ2Puiu8u00WW1s0thu48sBeZ0t1y-LS3TmdB3t1c8co_XD_Wr-lC6fHxfz2TI1GZddCpRLx61wmAGnRjiA3GYyt1gLUso8IwbntiiAFKXmVLCiYFZLmXFDnNFlNka3Q-8u-I99_5dqqmhsXevW-n1UQJgQUjJJe_TmD7r1-9D23ykAgXPCOc96ig6UCT7GYJ3aharR4aAAq6NV9WtVHa2qwWofmw6xqnU-NPrLh7pUnT7UPrigW1NFlf3b8A3vXHyN</recordid><startdate>20120301</startdate><enddate>20120301</enddate><creator>Nardini, Andrea</creator><creator>Pavan, Sara</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120301</creationdate><title>What river morphology after restoration? The methodology VALURI</title><author>Nardini, Andrea ; Pavan, Sara</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-1468f6e7f05164c7f119e389e0a72d8932c09ebb12bda6475bb5ea8836c2fcad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Channels</topic><topic>environmental cost-benefit analysis</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Geomorphology</topic><topic>hydro-morphological risk assessment</topic><topic>integrated evaluation</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Po-River basin (Italy)</topic><topic>Restoration</topic><topic>River management</topic><topic>river restoration</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nardini, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavan, Sara</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>International journal of river basin management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nardini, Andrea</au><au>Pavan, Sara</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What river morphology after restoration? The methodology VALURI</atitle><jtitle>International journal of river basin management</jtitle><date>2012-03-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>29</spage><epage>47</epage><pages>29-47</pages><issn>1571-5124</issn><eissn>1814-2060</eissn><abstract>This paper proposes a tool which river managers may need to ascertain whether the key idea of River Restoration is valid, i.e. that rivers in more natural status are desirable not only for pure environmental reasons, but also to combat flood and geomorphic risk. The point addressed is how to predict the morphology and geometry that a river will assume after the application of a River Restoration project which foresees significant changes in the system of defence and exploitation works as well as morphological adjustments (e.g. reconnection of an incised main channel with the surrounding ex-floodplain). To this aim we developed a semi-quantitative methodology that integrates several differing criteria: from historical analysis of geomorphic evolution, expert-based mechanistic reasoning, checking with empirical qualitative formulas and analytical support from fluvial geomorphology and classic hydraulics. The development of the methodology has taken place on a case study along the 80 km of Chiese River, downstream of Idro lake, in northern Italy. Although the product to be considered is just a pilot one, we see it as a promising tool, which also opens several challenging questions suited for further fascinating research work.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/15715124.2011.640637</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1571-5124 |
ispartof | International journal of river basin management, 2012-03, Vol.10 (1), p.29-47 |
issn | 1571-5124 1814-2060 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1170926663 |
source | Taylor & Francis Journals Complete |
subjects | Channels environmental cost-benefit analysis Floods Freshwater Geomorphology hydro-morphological risk assessment integrated evaluation Methodology Morphology Po-River basin (Italy) Restoration River management river restoration Rivers |
title | What river morphology after restoration? The methodology VALURI |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T04%3A46%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20river%20morphology%20after%20restoration?%20The%20methodology%20VALURI&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20river%20basin%20management&rft.au=Nardini,%20Andrea&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=29&rft.epage=47&rft.pages=29-47&rft.issn=1571-5124&rft.eissn=1814-2060&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/15715124.2011.640637&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E1257788584%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1170926663&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |