Clickers in the Classroom: A Review and a Replication
This article reviews 66 clicker technology–based studies focusing on student perceptions/outcomes. Eight major perceptions/outcomes are noted, including high levels of performance (actual and perceived), student attention span, attendance, and participation, as well as student perceptions of satisfa...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of management education 2012-12, Vol.36 (6), p.822-847 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 847 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 822 |
| container_title | Journal of management education |
| container_volume | 36 |
| creator | Keough, Shawn M. |
| description | This article reviews 66 clicker technology–based studies focusing on student perceptions/outcomes. Eight major perceptions/outcomes are noted, including high levels of performance (actual and perceived), student attention span, attendance, and participation, as well as student perceptions of satisfaction, feedback, and ease of use. Because the review revealed that studies involving clickers within the management discipline were nonexistent, an empirical study was conducted to determine whether the perceptions/outcomes of clickers realized in other disciplines could be duplicated in the management discipline. The results of the empirical study indicate that the same perceptions/outcomes can be attained within the management discipline. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1052562912454808 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1170620306</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ984728</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_1052562912454808</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2818930101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-a4ed1f3a2a9c98850d947374512a0f2423d7d38a6b7b4ca2bba52309b73de6563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRsFb3Ci4Crkfv3HkvJbQ-KLjRdZhMJpqaNnUmXfjvTYiICK7uhfOdcx-EnDO4ZkzrGwYSpULLUEhhwByQGZMSqVLSHA79INNRPyYnKa0BkDFlZ-Qibxv_HmLKmm3Wv4Usb11Kses2p-Sodm0KZ991Tl6Wi-f8nq6e7h7y2xX1nImeOhEqVnOHznprjITKCs21kAwd1CiQV7rixqlSl8I7LEsnkYMtNa-CkorPydWUu4vdxz6kvlh3-7gdRhbDYaAQOIwUTJSP3bBfqItdbDYufhYMRk4Xfx8wWC4nS4iN_8EXj9YIjaNMJzm51_Br5n9xXzeWYHA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1170620306</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clickers in the Classroom: A Review and a Replication</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Keough, Shawn M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Keough, Shawn M.</creatorcontrib><description>This article reviews 66 clicker technology–based studies focusing on student perceptions/outcomes. Eight major perceptions/outcomes are noted, including high levels of performance (actual and perceived), student attention span, attendance, and participation, as well as student perceptions of satisfaction, feedback, and ease of use. Because the review revealed that studies involving clickers within the management discipline were nonexistent, an empirical study was conducted to determine whether the perceptions/outcomes of clickers realized in other disciplines could be duplicated in the management discipline. The results of the empirical study indicate that the same perceptions/outcomes can be attained within the management discipline.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1052-5629</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6658</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1052562912454808</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Administrator Education ; Attendance Patterns ; Attention Span ; Attitude Measures ; College Students ; Educational Technology ; Feedback ; Feedback (Response) ; Handheld Devices ; Information technology ; Online instruction ; Perceptions ; Responses ; Satisfaction ; Student Attitudes ; Student behavior ; Student Participation ; Students ; Studies ; Usability</subject><ispartof>Journal of management education, 2012-12, Vol.36 (6), p.822-847</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2012</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Dec 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-a4ed1f3a2a9c98850d947374512a0f2423d7d38a6b7b4ca2bba52309b73de6563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1052562912454808$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1052562912454808$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ984728$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Keough, Shawn M.</creatorcontrib><title>Clickers in the Classroom: A Review and a Replication</title><title>Journal of management education</title><description>This article reviews 66 clicker technology–based studies focusing on student perceptions/outcomes. Eight major perceptions/outcomes are noted, including high levels of performance (actual and perceived), student attention span, attendance, and participation, as well as student perceptions of satisfaction, feedback, and ease of use. Because the review revealed that studies involving clickers within the management discipline were nonexistent, an empirical study was conducted to determine whether the perceptions/outcomes of clickers realized in other disciplines could be duplicated in the management discipline. The results of the empirical study indicate that the same perceptions/outcomes can be attained within the management discipline.</description><subject>Administrator Education</subject><subject>Attendance Patterns</subject><subject>Attention Span</subject><subject>Attitude Measures</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Handheld Devices</subject><subject>Information technology</subject><subject>Online instruction</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Responses</subject><subject>Satisfaction</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Student behavior</subject><subject>Student Participation</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Usability</subject><issn>1052-5629</issn><issn>1552-6658</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRsFb3Ci4Crkfv3HkvJbQ-KLjRdZhMJpqaNnUmXfjvTYiICK7uhfOdcx-EnDO4ZkzrGwYSpULLUEhhwByQGZMSqVLSHA79INNRPyYnKa0BkDFlZ-Qibxv_HmLKmm3Wv4Usb11Kses2p-Sodm0KZ991Tl6Wi-f8nq6e7h7y2xX1nImeOhEqVnOHznprjITKCs21kAwd1CiQV7rixqlSl8I7LEsnkYMtNa-CkorPydWUu4vdxz6kvlh3-7gdRhbDYaAQOIwUTJSP3bBfqItdbDYufhYMRk4Xfx8wWC4nS4iN_8EXj9YIjaNMJzm51_Br5n9xXzeWYHA</recordid><startdate>20121201</startdate><enddate>20121201</enddate><creator>Keough, Shawn M.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121201</creationdate><title>Clickers in the Classroom</title><author>Keough, Shawn M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-a4ed1f3a2a9c98850d947374512a0f2423d7d38a6b7b4ca2bba52309b73de6563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Administrator Education</topic><topic>Attendance Patterns</topic><topic>Attention Span</topic><topic>Attitude Measures</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Handheld Devices</topic><topic>Information technology</topic><topic>Online instruction</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Responses</topic><topic>Satisfaction</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Student behavior</topic><topic>Student Participation</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Usability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Keough, Shawn M.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of management education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Keough, Shawn M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ984728</ericid><atitle>Clickers in the Classroom: A Review and a Replication</atitle><jtitle>Journal of management education</jtitle><date>2012-12-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>822</spage><epage>847</epage><pages>822-847</pages><issn>1052-5629</issn><eissn>1552-6658</eissn><abstract>This article reviews 66 clicker technology–based studies focusing on student perceptions/outcomes. Eight major perceptions/outcomes are noted, including high levels of performance (actual and perceived), student attention span, attendance, and participation, as well as student perceptions of satisfaction, feedback, and ease of use. Because the review revealed that studies involving clickers within the management discipline were nonexistent, an empirical study was conducted to determine whether the perceptions/outcomes of clickers realized in other disciplines could be duplicated in the management discipline. The results of the empirical study indicate that the same perceptions/outcomes can be attained within the management discipline.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1052562912454808</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1052-5629 |
| ispartof | Journal of management education, 2012-12, Vol.36 (6), p.822-847 |
| issn | 1052-5629 1552-6658 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1170620306 |
| source | SAGE Complete |
| subjects | Administrator Education Attendance Patterns Attention Span Attitude Measures College Students Educational Technology Feedback Feedback (Response) Handheld Devices Information technology Online instruction Perceptions Responses Satisfaction Student Attitudes Student behavior Student Participation Students Studies Usability |
| title | Clickers in the Classroom: A Review and a Replication |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T20%3A09%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clickers%20in%20the%20Classroom:%20A%20Review%20and%20a%20Replication&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20management%20education&rft.au=Keough,%20Shawn%20M.&rft.date=2012-12-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=822&rft.epage=847&rft.pages=822-847&rft.issn=1052-5629&rft.eissn=1552-6658&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1052562912454808&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2818930101%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1170620306&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ984728&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1052562912454808&rfr_iscdi=true |