Ethical Considerations of Using Narrative to Communicate Science

This article discusses three ethical considerations science communicators face when considering narrative as a communication technique for science policy contexts: (a) What is the underlying purpose of using narrative: comprehension or persuasion? (b) What are the appropriate levels of accuracy to m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Science communication 2012-10, Vol.34 (5), p.592-617
Hauptverfasser: Dahlstrom, Michael F., Ho, Shirley S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 617
container_issue 5
container_start_page 592
container_title Science communication
container_volume 34
creator Dahlstrom, Michael F.
Ho, Shirley S.
description This article discusses three ethical considerations science communicators face when considering narrative as a communication technique for science policy contexts: (a) What is the underlying purpose of using narrative: comprehension or persuasion? (b) What are the appropriate levels of accuracy to maintain? (c) Should narrative be used at all? These considerations intersect with perceptions of the appropriate roles of communication and of scientists within democracy. By providing a clearer articulation of these ethical considerations, the authors hope that narrative can become a more useful communication technique toward informed science policy decisions.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1075547012454597
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1115694192</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1075547012454597</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2801676121</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-5c952a4b3ee86f11264c1ea0d3e1a92467b32f5079251744a24a7b057c4fb9fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LxDAQxYMouK7ePQY8VzNp0jQ3ZVk_YNGD7jmk2cnaZduuSSv435tSDyJ4mjczv3kDj5BLYNcASt0AU1IKxYALKaRWR2QGUvKsTN1x0mmdjftTchbjjiWuKPWM3C7799rZPV10baw3GGxfJ0U7T9exbrf02YZx9om07xLUNEOb-B7pq6uxdXhOTrzdR7z4qXOyvl--LR6z1cvD0-JulTkBqs-k05JbUeWIZeEhfRcO0LJNjmA1F4Wqcu4lU5pLUEJYLqyqmFRO-Ep7m8_J1eR7CN3HgLE3u24IbXppAEAWWoDmiWIT5UIXY0BvDqFubPgywMyYk_mbUzrJppNot_jL9D_-GyMcZfY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1115694192</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ethical Considerations of Using Narrative to Communicate Science</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Dahlstrom, Michael F. ; Ho, Shirley S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dahlstrom, Michael F. ; Ho, Shirley S.</creatorcontrib><description>This article discusses three ethical considerations science communicators face when considering narrative as a communication technique for science policy contexts: (a) What is the underlying purpose of using narrative: comprehension or persuasion? (b) What are the appropriate levels of accuracy to maintain? (c) Should narrative be used at all? These considerations intersect with perceptions of the appropriate roles of communication and of scientists within democracy. By providing a clearer articulation of these ethical considerations, the authors hope that narrative can become a more useful communication technique toward informed science policy decisions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1075-5470</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-8545</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1075547012454597</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Communication ; Ethics ; Narratives ; Perceptions ; Science ; Scientists</subject><ispartof>Science communication, 2012-10, Vol.34 (5), p.592-617</ispartof><rights>2012 SAGE Publications</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Oct 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-5c952a4b3ee86f11264c1ea0d3e1a92467b32f5079251744a24a7b057c4fb9fa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-5c952a4b3ee86f11264c1ea0d3e1a92467b32f5079251744a24a7b057c4fb9fa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1075547012454597$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1075547012454597$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,21828,27933,27934,43630,43631</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dahlstrom, Michael F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Shirley S.</creatorcontrib><title>Ethical Considerations of Using Narrative to Communicate Science</title><title>Science communication</title><description>This article discusses three ethical considerations science communicators face when considering narrative as a communication technique for science policy contexts: (a) What is the underlying purpose of using narrative: comprehension or persuasion? (b) What are the appropriate levels of accuracy to maintain? (c) Should narrative be used at all? These considerations intersect with perceptions of the appropriate roles of communication and of scientists within democracy. By providing a clearer articulation of these ethical considerations, the authors hope that narrative can become a more useful communication technique toward informed science policy decisions.</description><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Narratives</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Scientists</subject><issn>1075-5470</issn><issn>1552-8545</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1LxDAQxYMouK7ePQY8VzNp0jQ3ZVk_YNGD7jmk2cnaZduuSSv435tSDyJ4mjczv3kDj5BLYNcASt0AU1IKxYALKaRWR2QGUvKsTN1x0mmdjftTchbjjiWuKPWM3C7799rZPV10baw3GGxfJ0U7T9exbrf02YZx9om07xLUNEOb-B7pq6uxdXhOTrzdR7z4qXOyvl--LR6z1cvD0-JulTkBqs-k05JbUeWIZeEhfRcO0LJNjmA1F4Wqcu4lU5pLUEJYLqyqmFRO-Ep7m8_J1eR7CN3HgLE3u24IbXppAEAWWoDmiWIT5UIXY0BvDqFubPgywMyYk_mbUzrJppNot_jL9D_-GyMcZfY</recordid><startdate>20121001</startdate><enddate>20121001</enddate><creator>Dahlstrom, Michael F.</creator><creator>Ho, Shirley S.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121001</creationdate><title>Ethical Considerations of Using Narrative to Communicate Science</title><author>Dahlstrom, Michael F. ; Ho, Shirley S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-5c952a4b3ee86f11264c1ea0d3e1a92467b32f5079251744a24a7b057c4fb9fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Narratives</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Scientists</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dahlstrom, Michael F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Shirley S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Science communication</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dahlstrom, Michael F.</au><au>Ho, Shirley S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ethical Considerations of Using Narrative to Communicate Science</atitle><jtitle>Science communication</jtitle><date>2012-10-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>592</spage><epage>617</epage><pages>592-617</pages><issn>1075-5470</issn><eissn>1552-8545</eissn><abstract>This article discusses three ethical considerations science communicators face when considering narrative as a communication technique for science policy contexts: (a) What is the underlying purpose of using narrative: comprehension or persuasion? (b) What are the appropriate levels of accuracy to maintain? (c) Should narrative be used at all? These considerations intersect with perceptions of the appropriate roles of communication and of scientists within democracy. By providing a clearer articulation of these ethical considerations, the authors hope that narrative can become a more useful communication technique toward informed science policy decisions.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1075547012454597</doi><tpages>26</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1075-5470
ispartof Science communication, 2012-10, Vol.34 (5), p.592-617
issn 1075-5470
1552-8545
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1115694192
source Access via SAGE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Communication
Ethics
Narratives
Perceptions
Science
Scientists
title Ethical Considerations of Using Narrative to Communicate Science
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T03%3A17%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ethical%20Considerations%20of%20Using%20Narrative%20to%20Communicate%20Science&rft.jtitle=Science%20communication&rft.au=Dahlstrom,%20Michael%20F.&rft.date=2012-10-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=592&rft.epage=617&rft.pages=592-617&rft.issn=1075-5470&rft.eissn=1552-8545&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1075547012454597&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2801676121%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1115694192&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1075547012454597&rfr_iscdi=true