Ethical Considerations of Using Narrative to Communicate Science
This article discusses three ethical considerations science communicators face when considering narrative as a communication technique for science policy contexts: (a) What is the underlying purpose of using narrative: comprehension or persuasion? (b) What are the appropriate levels of accuracy to m...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Science communication 2012-10, Vol.34 (5), p.592-617 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 617 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 592 |
container_title | Science communication |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Dahlstrom, Michael F. Ho, Shirley S. |
description | This article discusses three ethical considerations science communicators face when considering narrative as a communication technique for science policy contexts: (a) What is the underlying purpose of using narrative: comprehension or persuasion? (b) What are the appropriate levels of accuracy to maintain? (c) Should narrative be used at all? These considerations intersect with perceptions of the appropriate roles of communication and of scientists within democracy. By providing a clearer articulation of these ethical considerations, the authors hope that narrative can become a more useful communication technique toward informed science policy decisions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1075547012454597 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1115694192</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1075547012454597</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2801676121</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-5c952a4b3ee86f11264c1ea0d3e1a92467b32f5079251744a24a7b057c4fb9fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LxDAQxYMouK7ePQY8VzNp0jQ3ZVk_YNGD7jmk2cnaZduuSSv435tSDyJ4mjczv3kDj5BLYNcASt0AU1IKxYALKaRWR2QGUvKsTN1x0mmdjftTchbjjiWuKPWM3C7799rZPV10baw3GGxfJ0U7T9exbrf02YZx9om07xLUNEOb-B7pq6uxdXhOTrzdR7z4qXOyvl--LR6z1cvD0-JulTkBqs-k05JbUeWIZeEhfRcO0LJNjmA1F4Wqcu4lU5pLUEJYLqyqmFRO-Ep7m8_J1eR7CN3HgLE3u24IbXppAEAWWoDmiWIT5UIXY0BvDqFubPgywMyYk_mbUzrJppNot_jL9D_-GyMcZfY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1115694192</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ethical Considerations of Using Narrative to Communicate Science</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Dahlstrom, Michael F. ; Ho, Shirley S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dahlstrom, Michael F. ; Ho, Shirley S.</creatorcontrib><description>This article discusses three ethical considerations science communicators face when considering narrative as a communication technique for science policy contexts: (a) What is the underlying purpose of using narrative: comprehension or persuasion? (b) What are the appropriate levels of accuracy to maintain? (c) Should narrative be used at all? These considerations intersect with perceptions of the appropriate roles of communication and of scientists within democracy. By providing a clearer articulation of these ethical considerations, the authors hope that narrative can become a more useful communication technique toward informed science policy decisions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1075-5470</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-8545</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1075547012454597</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Communication ; Ethics ; Narratives ; Perceptions ; Science ; Scientists</subject><ispartof>Science communication, 2012-10, Vol.34 (5), p.592-617</ispartof><rights>2012 SAGE Publications</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Oct 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-5c952a4b3ee86f11264c1ea0d3e1a92467b32f5079251744a24a7b057c4fb9fa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-5c952a4b3ee86f11264c1ea0d3e1a92467b32f5079251744a24a7b057c4fb9fa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1075547012454597$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1075547012454597$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,21828,27933,27934,43630,43631</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dahlstrom, Michael F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Shirley S.</creatorcontrib><title>Ethical Considerations of Using Narrative to Communicate Science</title><title>Science communication</title><description>This article discusses three ethical considerations science communicators face when considering narrative as a communication technique for science policy contexts: (a) What is the underlying purpose of using narrative: comprehension or persuasion? (b) What are the appropriate levels of accuracy to maintain? (c) Should narrative be used at all? These considerations intersect with perceptions of the appropriate roles of communication and of scientists within democracy. By providing a clearer articulation of these ethical considerations, the authors hope that narrative can become a more useful communication technique toward informed science policy decisions.</description><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Narratives</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Scientists</subject><issn>1075-5470</issn><issn>1552-8545</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1LxDAQxYMouK7ePQY8VzNp0jQ3ZVk_YNGD7jmk2cnaZduuSSv435tSDyJ4mjczv3kDj5BLYNcASt0AU1IKxYALKaRWR2QGUvKsTN1x0mmdjftTchbjjiWuKPWM3C7799rZPV10baw3GGxfJ0U7T9exbrf02YZx9om07xLUNEOb-B7pq6uxdXhOTrzdR7z4qXOyvl--LR6z1cvD0-JulTkBqs-k05JbUeWIZeEhfRcO0LJNjmA1F4Wqcu4lU5pLUEJYLqyqmFRO-Ep7m8_J1eR7CN3HgLE3u24IbXppAEAWWoDmiWIT5UIXY0BvDqFubPgywMyYk_mbUzrJppNot_jL9D_-GyMcZfY</recordid><startdate>20121001</startdate><enddate>20121001</enddate><creator>Dahlstrom, Michael F.</creator><creator>Ho, Shirley S.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121001</creationdate><title>Ethical Considerations of Using Narrative to Communicate Science</title><author>Dahlstrom, Michael F. ; Ho, Shirley S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-5c952a4b3ee86f11264c1ea0d3e1a92467b32f5079251744a24a7b057c4fb9fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Narratives</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Scientists</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dahlstrom, Michael F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Shirley S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Science communication</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dahlstrom, Michael F.</au><au>Ho, Shirley S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ethical Considerations of Using Narrative to Communicate Science</atitle><jtitle>Science communication</jtitle><date>2012-10-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>592</spage><epage>617</epage><pages>592-617</pages><issn>1075-5470</issn><eissn>1552-8545</eissn><abstract>This article discusses three ethical considerations science communicators face when considering narrative as a communication technique for science policy contexts: (a) What is the underlying purpose of using narrative: comprehension or persuasion? (b) What are the appropriate levels of accuracy to maintain? (c) Should narrative be used at all? These considerations intersect with perceptions of the appropriate roles of communication and of scientists within democracy. By providing a clearer articulation of these ethical considerations, the authors hope that narrative can become a more useful communication technique toward informed science policy decisions.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1075547012454597</doi><tpages>26</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1075-5470 |
ispartof | Science communication, 2012-10, Vol.34 (5), p.592-617 |
issn | 1075-5470 1552-8545 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1115694192 |
source | Access via SAGE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Communication Ethics Narratives Perceptions Science Scientists |
title | Ethical Considerations of Using Narrative to Communicate Science |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T03%3A17%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ethical%20Considerations%20of%20Using%20Narrative%20to%20Communicate%20Science&rft.jtitle=Science%20communication&rft.au=Dahlstrom,%20Michael%20F.&rft.date=2012-10-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=592&rft.epage=617&rft.pages=592-617&rft.issn=1075-5470&rft.eissn=1552-8545&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1075547012454597&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2801676121%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1115694192&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1075547012454597&rfr_iscdi=true |