Systematic Thinking on Dialogical Education
Dialogic or dialogical education is an umbrella term that encompasses a myriad of different and at times conflicting approaches. As there is no agreed-upon definition of 'dialogue' (not that there is or should be one unified definition), and even fewer clear and systematic guidelines for a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Educational philosophy and theory 2012-11, Vol.44 (9), p.926-941 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 941 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 926 |
| container_title | Educational philosophy and theory |
| container_volume | 44 |
| creator | SARID, ARIEL |
| description | Dialogic or dialogical education is an umbrella term that encompasses a myriad of different and at times conflicting approaches. As there is no agreed-upon definition of 'dialogue' (not that there is or should be one unified definition), and even fewer clear and systematic guidelines for application, researchers and practitioners in the DE field are faced with countless questions and dilemmas. My aim in this paper is therefore to offer some ideas for a general outline of how to employ systematic thinking on DE. This outline can serve as a basis for the development of a methodological tool that can enable researchers and practitioners to think about and apply dialogical practices with greater clarity, coherency and consistency. Following a normatively oriented (rather than instrumental) systematic line of reasoning, this paper will begin by discussing the basic values of three central dialogical approaches and then move on to discuss more practical parameters that surpass strictly pedagogical and didactic concerns. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2011.00757.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1114677760</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ983593</ericid><informt_id>10.3316/aeipt.194483</informt_id><sourcerecordid>2796560921</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5977-fe9c297035c3740ce8b870dbc0a28ebee70e5d4773c95366e010944c1f71e17b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE-P0zAQxSMEEmXhG3CIxAUJJeuJk4x9AGkpZQGtBBLlbLmO07qkdtd2tS2fHmezWiQ4sL74z_vNm_HLshxICWmdb0uoW140DKqyIgAlIdhgeXyUze6Fx9mMEKAFsAafZs9C2KZrUyPOsjffTyHqnYxG5cuNsT-NXefO5h-MHNzaKDnki-6gku7s8-xJL4egX9ztZ9mPj4vl_FNx9fXy8_ziqlANRyx6zVXFkdBGUayJ0mzFkHQrRWTF9EprJLrpUneqeEPbVhMgvK4V9AgacEXPsteT796764MOUexMUHoYpNXuEAQAAqtZXUNCX_2Fbt3B2zRdotL_EbEliWITpbwLwete7L3ZSX8SQEYOxFaMYYkxLDGmKG5TFMc_DexgfwljO31MO-fIKWNIW1Ixiol6OVHaG3VvvvjCGW04TfLbSb4xgz49uLlYfLtYplOqfzfV-52JQmqzjyJo6dUmTdS721fn16JzZjSlFNo7ClKwbBzg_T8Gmxj3QXQyygebzCeTCZc3zg-diPI0ON97aZUJgv430N8yuc1V</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1114677760</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Systematic Thinking on Dialogical Education</title><source>Education Source</source><creator>SARID, ARIEL</creator><creatorcontrib>SARID, ARIEL</creatorcontrib><description>Dialogic or dialogical education is an umbrella term that encompasses a myriad of different and at times conflicting approaches. As there is no agreed-upon definition of 'dialogue' (not that there is or should be one unified definition), and even fewer clear and systematic guidelines for application, researchers and practitioners in the DE field are faced with countless questions and dilemmas. My aim in this paper is therefore to offer some ideas for a general outline of how to employ systematic thinking on DE. This outline can serve as a basis for the development of a methodological tool that can enable researchers and practitioners to think about and apply dialogical practices with greater clarity, coherency and consistency. Following a normatively oriented (rather than instrumental) systematic line of reasoning, this paper will begin by discussing the basic values of three central dialogical approaches and then move on to discuss more practical parameters that surpass strictly pedagogical and didactic concerns.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-1857</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1469-5812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-5812</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2011.00757.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Cognitive processes ; Deconstruction ; Development ; Dialogic Education ; Dialogic teaching ; dialogical values ; Dialogs (Language) ; Dialogue ; Dialogue (Educational theory) ; Dialogues (Language) ; Discourse ; Discourse analysis ; Discussion (Teaching technique) ; Education ; Educational Philosophy ; Guidelines ; Habermas ; Habermas (J) ; Ideology ; Instructional Design ; Methodology ; Moral values ; Organisations (Groups) ; Pedagogy ; Personality ; Philosophy ; Political issues ; Questioning ; Research Methodology ; Researchers ; Socratic Dialogue ; Socratic thinking ; Study and teaching ; Systematic thinking ; Teaching Methods</subject><ispartof>Educational philosophy and theory, 2012-11, Vol.44 (9), p.926-941</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2012</rights><rights>2011 The Author. Educational Philosophy and Theory © 2011 Philosophy of Education Society of Australasia</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5977-fe9c297035c3740ce8b870dbc0a28ebee70e5d4773c95366e010944c1f71e17b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5977-fe9c297035c3740ce8b870dbc0a28ebee70e5d4773c95366e010944c1f71e17b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ983593$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://natlib-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/search?query=any,contains,997938873602837&tab=innz&search_scope=INNZ&vid=NLNZ&offset=0$$DView this record in NLNZ$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SARID, ARIEL</creatorcontrib><title>Systematic Thinking on Dialogical Education</title><title>Educational philosophy and theory</title><description>Dialogic or dialogical education is an umbrella term that encompasses a myriad of different and at times conflicting approaches. As there is no agreed-upon definition of 'dialogue' (not that there is or should be one unified definition), and even fewer clear and systematic guidelines for application, researchers and practitioners in the DE field are faced with countless questions and dilemmas. My aim in this paper is therefore to offer some ideas for a general outline of how to employ systematic thinking on DE. This outline can serve as a basis for the development of a methodological tool that can enable researchers and practitioners to think about and apply dialogical practices with greater clarity, coherency and consistency. Following a normatively oriented (rather than instrumental) systematic line of reasoning, this paper will begin by discussing the basic values of three central dialogical approaches and then move on to discuss more practical parameters that surpass strictly pedagogical and didactic concerns.</description><subject>Cognitive processes</subject><subject>Deconstruction</subject><subject>Development</subject><subject>Dialogic Education</subject><subject>Dialogic teaching</subject><subject>dialogical values</subject><subject>Dialogs (Language)</subject><subject>Dialogue</subject><subject>Dialogue (Educational theory)</subject><subject>Dialogues (Language)</subject><subject>Discourse</subject><subject>Discourse analysis</subject><subject>Discussion (Teaching technique)</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Philosophy</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Habermas</subject><subject>Habermas (J)</subject><subject>Ideology</subject><subject>Instructional Design</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Moral values</subject><subject>Organisations (Groups)</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Political issues</subject><subject>Questioning</subject><subject>Research Methodology</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Socratic Dialogue</subject><subject>Socratic thinking</subject><subject>Study and teaching</subject><subject>Systematic thinking</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><issn>0013-1857</issn><issn>1469-5812</issn><issn>1469-5812</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE-P0zAQxSMEEmXhG3CIxAUJJeuJk4x9AGkpZQGtBBLlbLmO07qkdtd2tS2fHmezWiQ4sL74z_vNm_HLshxICWmdb0uoW140DKqyIgAlIdhgeXyUze6Fx9mMEKAFsAafZs9C2KZrUyPOsjffTyHqnYxG5cuNsT-NXefO5h-MHNzaKDnki-6gku7s8-xJL4egX9ztZ9mPj4vl_FNx9fXy8_ziqlANRyx6zVXFkdBGUayJ0mzFkHQrRWTF9EprJLrpUneqeEPbVhMgvK4V9AgacEXPsteT796764MOUexMUHoYpNXuEAQAAqtZXUNCX_2Fbt3B2zRdotL_EbEliWITpbwLwete7L3ZSX8SQEYOxFaMYYkxLDGmKG5TFMc_DexgfwljO31MO-fIKWNIW1Ixiol6OVHaG3VvvvjCGW04TfLbSb4xgz49uLlYfLtYplOqfzfV-52JQmqzjyJo6dUmTdS721fn16JzZjSlFNo7ClKwbBzg_T8Gmxj3QXQyygebzCeTCZc3zg-diPI0ON97aZUJgv430N8yuc1V</recordid><startdate>201211</startdate><enddate>201211</enddate><creator>SARID, ARIEL</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>DUNLO</scope><scope>GOM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201211</creationdate><title>Systematic Thinking on Dialogical Education</title><author>SARID, ARIEL</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5977-fe9c297035c3740ce8b870dbc0a28ebee70e5d4773c95366e010944c1f71e17b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Cognitive processes</topic><topic>Deconstruction</topic><topic>Development</topic><topic>Dialogic Education</topic><topic>Dialogic teaching</topic><topic>dialogical values</topic><topic>Dialogs (Language)</topic><topic>Dialogue</topic><topic>Dialogue (Educational theory)</topic><topic>Dialogues (Language)</topic><topic>Discourse</topic><topic>Discourse analysis</topic><topic>Discussion (Teaching technique)</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Philosophy</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Habermas</topic><topic>Habermas (J)</topic><topic>Ideology</topic><topic>Instructional Design</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Moral values</topic><topic>Organisations (Groups)</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Political issues</topic><topic>Questioning</topic><topic>Research Methodology</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Socratic Dialogue</topic><topic>Socratic thinking</topic><topic>Study and teaching</topic><topic>Systematic thinking</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SARID, ARIEL</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Index New Zealand (A&I)</collection><collection>Index New Zealand</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Educational philosophy and theory</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SARID, ARIEL</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ983593</ericid><atitle>Systematic Thinking on Dialogical Education</atitle><jtitle>Educational philosophy and theory</jtitle><date>2012-11</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>926</spage><epage>941</epage><pages>926-941</pages><issn>0013-1857</issn><issn>1469-5812</issn><eissn>1469-5812</eissn><abstract>Dialogic or dialogical education is an umbrella term that encompasses a myriad of different and at times conflicting approaches. As there is no agreed-upon definition of 'dialogue' (not that there is or should be one unified definition), and even fewer clear and systematic guidelines for application, researchers and practitioners in the DE field are faced with countless questions and dilemmas. My aim in this paper is therefore to offer some ideas for a general outline of how to employ systematic thinking on DE. This outline can serve as a basis for the development of a methodological tool that can enable researchers and practitioners to think about and apply dialogical practices with greater clarity, coherency and consistency. Following a normatively oriented (rather than instrumental) systematic line of reasoning, this paper will begin by discussing the basic values of three central dialogical approaches and then move on to discuss more practical parameters that surpass strictly pedagogical and didactic concerns.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1469-5812.2011.00757.x</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0013-1857 |
| ispartof | Educational philosophy and theory, 2012-11, Vol.44 (9), p.926-941 |
| issn | 0013-1857 1469-5812 1469-5812 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1114677760 |
| source | Education Source |
| subjects | Cognitive processes Deconstruction Development Dialogic Education Dialogic teaching dialogical values Dialogs (Language) Dialogue Dialogue (Educational theory) Dialogues (Language) Discourse Discourse analysis Discussion (Teaching technique) Education Educational Philosophy Guidelines Habermas Habermas (J) Ideology Instructional Design Methodology Moral values Organisations (Groups) Pedagogy Personality Philosophy Political issues Questioning Research Methodology Researchers Socratic Dialogue Socratic thinking Study and teaching Systematic thinking Teaching Methods |
| title | Systematic Thinking on Dialogical Education |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T05%3A08%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Systematic%20Thinking%20on%20Dialogical%20Education&rft.jtitle=Educational%20philosophy%20and%20theory&rft.au=SARID,%20ARIEL&rft.date=2012-11&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=926&rft.epage=941&rft.pages=926-941&rft.issn=0013-1857&rft.eissn=1469-5812&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2011.00757.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2796560921%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1114677760&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ983593&rft_informt_id=10.3316/aeipt.194483&rfr_iscdi=true |