Improving the acquisition and retention of science material by fifth grade students through the use of imagery interventions
This study examined the effect of imagery interventions for the presentation of novel science vocabulary to fifth grade learners. Eighty-nine students from two schools in Long Island participated in this study and were randomly assigned to four different instructional interventions: a Picture Presen...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Instructional science 2012-11, Vol.40 (6), p.925-955 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 955 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 925 |
container_title | Instructional science |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Cohen, Marisa T. Johnson, Helen L. |
description | This study examined the effect of imagery interventions for the presentation of novel science vocabulary to fifth grade learners. Eighty-nine students from two schools in Long Island participated in this study and were randomly assigned to four different instructional interventions: a Picture Presentation method, in which a word was paired with a picture; an Image Creation—No Picture method, in which the participants were told to create an image of the word and draw it on paper; an Image Creation—Picture method, in which the students were presented with the picture and then told to draw it; and a Word Only method, which involved the simple verbal presentation of the word. Results demonstrated that students in the imagery intervention groups (Picture Presentation, Image Creation—No Picture, and Image Creation—Picture) scored higher on the outcome measures at both immediate and delayed recall. It was also shown that the deeper the students processed the "to be learned" vocabulary words, the higher they scored on the outcome measures. Based on the mean outcome measure scores at both time points, students in the Image Creation—Picture intervention scored the highest, followed by the students in the Image Creation—No Picture intervention, those in the Picture Presentation intervention, and finally the Word Only intervention students. Such a study has implications as to the most effective way to integrate science and literacy and successfully present novel concepts in the classroom. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11251-011-9197-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1113720449</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ983162</ericid><jstor_id>43575391</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43575391</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-99c749cef612ecd12c2c49787a68a643f21c514091a7cbde7ef50a147112b22c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLwzAYhoMoOKc_QFAIeK7mS9JlOcqYOhl40XPI0rTL2NotSQcFf7zZKsOTpxC-932-5EHoFsgjECKeAgDNISMAmQQpsu4MDSAXLAOZ03M0IISSjFMhLtFVCCtCCPAxGaDv2Wbrm72rKxyXFmuza11w0TU11nWBvY22Pt6aEgfjbG0s3uhovdNrvOhw6cq4xJXXhcUhtkVKh0TyTVstj8Q22EPXbXRlfYddnbr7nhmu0UWp18He_J5D9PUy_Zy8ZfOP19nkeZ4ZlsuYSWkEl8aWI6DWFEANNVyKsdCjsR5xVlIwOXAiQQuzKKywZU40cJGcLCg1bIgeem766q61IapV0_o6rVQAwAQlnMuUgj5lfBOCt6Xa-vRs3ykg6iBZ9ZJVkqwOklWXOnd9Jwkxp_z0XY4ZjGga034c0qhOAv4s_od535dWITb-BOUsFzmTwH4ACIqU0Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1113720449</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving the acquisition and retention of science material by fifth grade students through the use of imagery interventions</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Cohen, Marisa T. ; Johnson, Helen L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Marisa T. ; Johnson, Helen L.</creatorcontrib><description>This study examined the effect of imagery interventions for the presentation of novel science vocabulary to fifth grade learners. Eighty-nine students from two schools in Long Island participated in this study and were randomly assigned to four different instructional interventions: a Picture Presentation method, in which a word was paired with a picture; an Image Creation—No Picture method, in which the participants were told to create an image of the word and draw it on paper; an Image Creation—Picture method, in which the students were presented with the picture and then told to draw it; and a Word Only method, which involved the simple verbal presentation of the word. Results demonstrated that students in the imagery intervention groups (Picture Presentation, Image Creation—No Picture, and Image Creation—Picture) scored higher on the outcome measures at both immediate and delayed recall. It was also shown that the deeper the students processed the "to be learned" vocabulary words, the higher they scored on the outcome measures. Based on the mean outcome measure scores at both time points, students in the Image Creation—Picture intervention scored the highest, followed by the students in the Image Creation—No Picture intervention, those in the Picture Presentation intervention, and finally the Word Only intervention students. Such a study has implications as to the most effective way to integrate science and literacy and successfully present novel concepts in the classroom.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-4277</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1952</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11251-011-9197-y</identifier><identifier>CODEN: INLSBJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Age ; Education ; Educational Psychology ; Elementary School Science ; Elementary School Students ; Grade 5 ; Health care outcome assessment ; Instructional design ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Intervention ; Language comprehension ; Language Skills ; Learning ; Learning and Instruction ; Literacy ; Mental imagery ; New York ; Pedagogic Psychology ; Reading Comprehension ; Reading instruction ; Retention (Psychology) ; Science education ; Science Instruction ; Science learning ; Teaching methods ; Visual Aids ; Vocabulary ; Vocabulary Development ; Vocabulary skills</subject><ispartof>Instructional science, 2012-11, Vol.40 (6), p.925-955</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-99c749cef612ecd12c2c49787a68a643f21c514091a7cbde7ef50a147112b22c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-99c749cef612ecd12c2c49787a68a643f21c514091a7cbde7ef50a147112b22c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43575391$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43575391$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ983162$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Marisa T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Helen L.</creatorcontrib><title>Improving the acquisition and retention of science material by fifth grade students through the use of imagery interventions</title><title>Instructional science</title><addtitle>Instr Sci</addtitle><description>This study examined the effect of imagery interventions for the presentation of novel science vocabulary to fifth grade learners. Eighty-nine students from two schools in Long Island participated in this study and were randomly assigned to four different instructional interventions: a Picture Presentation method, in which a word was paired with a picture; an Image Creation—No Picture method, in which the participants were told to create an image of the word and draw it on paper; an Image Creation—Picture method, in which the students were presented with the picture and then told to draw it; and a Word Only method, which involved the simple verbal presentation of the word. Results demonstrated that students in the imagery intervention groups (Picture Presentation, Image Creation—No Picture, and Image Creation—Picture) scored higher on the outcome measures at both immediate and delayed recall. It was also shown that the deeper the students processed the "to be learned" vocabulary words, the higher they scored on the outcome measures. Based on the mean outcome measure scores at both time points, students in the Image Creation—Picture intervention scored the highest, followed by the students in the Image Creation—No Picture intervention, those in the Picture Presentation intervention, and finally the Word Only intervention students. Such a study has implications as to the most effective way to integrate science and literacy and successfully present novel concepts in the classroom.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Psychology</subject><subject>Elementary School Science</subject><subject>Elementary School Students</subject><subject>Grade 5</subject><subject>Health care outcome assessment</subject><subject>Instructional design</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Language comprehension</subject><subject>Language Skills</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning and Instruction</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Mental imagery</subject><subject>New York</subject><subject>Pedagogic Psychology</subject><subject>Reading Comprehension</subject><subject>Reading instruction</subject><subject>Retention (Psychology)</subject><subject>Science education</subject><subject>Science Instruction</subject><subject>Science learning</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><subject>Visual Aids</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><subject>Vocabulary Development</subject><subject>Vocabulary skills</subject><issn>0020-4277</issn><issn>1573-1952</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFLwzAYhoMoOKc_QFAIeK7mS9JlOcqYOhl40XPI0rTL2NotSQcFf7zZKsOTpxC-932-5EHoFsgjECKeAgDNISMAmQQpsu4MDSAXLAOZ03M0IISSjFMhLtFVCCtCCPAxGaDv2Wbrm72rKxyXFmuza11w0TU11nWBvY22Pt6aEgfjbG0s3uhovdNrvOhw6cq4xJXXhcUhtkVKh0TyTVstj8Q22EPXbXRlfYddnbr7nhmu0UWp18He_J5D9PUy_Zy8ZfOP19nkeZ4ZlsuYSWkEl8aWI6DWFEANNVyKsdCjsR5xVlIwOXAiQQuzKKywZU40cJGcLCg1bIgeem766q61IapV0_o6rVQAwAQlnMuUgj5lfBOCt6Xa-vRs3ykg6iBZ9ZJVkqwOklWXOnd9Jwkxp_z0XY4ZjGga034c0qhOAv4s_od535dWITb-BOUsFzmTwH4ACIqU0Q</recordid><startdate>20121101</startdate><enddate>20121101</enddate><creator>Cohen, Marisa T.</creator><creator>Johnson, Helen L.</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121101</creationdate><title>Improving the acquisition and retention of science material by fifth grade students through the use of imagery interventions</title><author>Cohen, Marisa T. ; Johnson, Helen L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-99c749cef612ecd12c2c49787a68a643f21c514091a7cbde7ef50a147112b22c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Psychology</topic><topic>Elementary School Science</topic><topic>Elementary School Students</topic><topic>Grade 5</topic><topic>Health care outcome assessment</topic><topic>Instructional design</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Language comprehension</topic><topic>Language Skills</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning and Instruction</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Mental imagery</topic><topic>New York</topic><topic>Pedagogic Psychology</topic><topic>Reading Comprehension</topic><topic>Reading instruction</topic><topic>Retention (Psychology)</topic><topic>Science education</topic><topic>Science Instruction</topic><topic>Science learning</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><topic>Visual Aids</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><topic>Vocabulary Development</topic><topic>Vocabulary skills</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Marisa T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Helen L.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Instructional science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cohen, Marisa T.</au><au>Johnson, Helen L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ983162</ericid><atitle>Improving the acquisition and retention of science material by fifth grade students through the use of imagery interventions</atitle><jtitle>Instructional science</jtitle><stitle>Instr Sci</stitle><date>2012-11-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>925</spage><epage>955</epage><pages>925-955</pages><issn>0020-4277</issn><eissn>1573-1952</eissn><coden>INLSBJ</coden><abstract>This study examined the effect of imagery interventions for the presentation of novel science vocabulary to fifth grade learners. Eighty-nine students from two schools in Long Island participated in this study and were randomly assigned to four different instructional interventions: a Picture Presentation method, in which a word was paired with a picture; an Image Creation—No Picture method, in which the participants were told to create an image of the word and draw it on paper; an Image Creation—Picture method, in which the students were presented with the picture and then told to draw it; and a Word Only method, which involved the simple verbal presentation of the word. Results demonstrated that students in the imagery intervention groups (Picture Presentation, Image Creation—No Picture, and Image Creation—Picture) scored higher on the outcome measures at both immediate and delayed recall. It was also shown that the deeper the students processed the "to be learned" vocabulary words, the higher they scored on the outcome measures. Based on the mean outcome measure scores at both time points, students in the Image Creation—Picture intervention scored the highest, followed by the students in the Image Creation—No Picture intervention, those in the Picture Presentation intervention, and finally the Word Only intervention students. Such a study has implications as to the most effective way to integrate science and literacy and successfully present novel concepts in the classroom.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s11251-011-9197-y</doi><tpages>31</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0020-4277 |
ispartof | Instructional science, 2012-11, Vol.40 (6), p.925-955 |
issn | 0020-4277 1573-1952 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1113720449 |
source | SpringerNature Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Education Source |
subjects | Age Education Educational Psychology Elementary School Science Elementary School Students Grade 5 Health care outcome assessment Instructional design Instructional Effectiveness Intervention Language comprehension Language Skills Learning Learning and Instruction Literacy Mental imagery New York Pedagogic Psychology Reading Comprehension Reading instruction Retention (Psychology) Science education Science Instruction Science learning Teaching methods Visual Aids Vocabulary Vocabulary Development Vocabulary skills |
title | Improving the acquisition and retention of science material by fifth grade students through the use of imagery interventions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T10%3A58%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving%20the%20acquisition%20and%20retention%20of%20science%20material%20by%20fifth%20grade%20students%20through%20the%20use%20of%20imagery%20interventions&rft.jtitle=Instructional%20science&rft.au=Cohen,%20Marisa%20T.&rft.date=2012-11-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=925&rft.epage=955&rft.pages=925-955&rft.issn=0020-4277&rft.eissn=1573-1952&rft.coden=INLSBJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11251-011-9197-y&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43575391%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1113720449&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ983162&rft_jstor_id=43575391&rfr_iscdi=true |