Thinking and behaving like scientists: Perceptions of undergraduate science interns and their faculty mentors

We examined undergraduate research experiences (UREs) participants' and their faculty mentors' beliefs about the professional practices and dispositions of research scientists. In Study 1, 63 science interns and their mentors rated Merton's (J Legal Political Sociol, 1: 115-126, 1942)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Instructional science 2012-11, Vol.40 (6), p.875-899
Hauptverfasser: Kardash, CarolAnne M., Edwards, Ordene V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 899
container_issue 6
container_start_page 875
container_title Instructional science
container_volume 40
creator Kardash, CarolAnne M.
Edwards, Ordene V.
description We examined undergraduate research experiences (UREs) participants' and their faculty mentors' beliefs about the professional practices and dispositions of research scientists. In Study 1, 63 science interns and their mentors rated Merton's (J Legal Political Sociol, 1: 115-126, 1942) norms and Mitroffs (Am Sociol Rev, 39(August): 579-595, 1974) counter-norms of scientific practice. Specifically, we investigated what practices they believed research scientists should subscribe to (or not), and what practices they believed actually characterized research scientists' behavior in the real world. Regarding idealized practice, mentors rated the norms significantly higher than did interns; mentors and interns generally did not differ in subscription to the counter-norms. Regarding actual practice, mentors believed scientists' behaviors reflected counter-norms more than norms. Mentors further noted discrepancies between practices that should represent and actually did represent scientists' work. In Study 2, interns and mentors listed characteristics associated with "thinking" and "behaving" like scientists. Personal and professional dispositions were mentioned more than intellectual and research skills. Although there was considerable consensus between faculty and intern perceptions, findings also revealed discrepancies that could be addressed in UREs, thereby aiding undergraduates' socialization into the culture of scientific practice. Suggestions are provided for broadening interns' conceptions of both scientists and science.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11251-011-9195-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1113704783</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ983168</ericid><jstor_id>43575389</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43575389</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-faa035f26325a2cb64cdffa4d04a8a1176cf6227f1ee78635386cc7090fb2daf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AEEh4Lk6k7RN603ETwQ96Dlk02Q36266JqngvzdLRTx5Gob3Y5iHkGOEcwQQFxGRVVgAYtFiWxWwQyZYCV7khe2SCQCDomRC7JODGJcAgGUDE7J-XTj_7vycKt_RmVmoz-2ycu-GRu2MTy6meElfTNBmk1zvI-0tHXxnwjyoblDpx6gNdT6ZkA3bqrQwLlCr9LBKX3Sdi_oQD8meVatojn7mlLzd3rxe3xdPz3cP11dPheZVmwqrFPDKspqzSjE9q0vdWavKDkrVKERRa1szJiwaI5qaV7yptRbQgp2xTlk-JWdj7yb0H4OJSS77Ifh8UiIiF1CKhmcXji4d-hiDsXIT3FqFL4kgt1TlSFVmqnJLVULOnIwZE5z-9d88tg3HuskyG-WYJT834c_hfzpPx9AyZki_pSWvRP6s5d-v4478</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1113704783</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Thinking and behaving like scientists: Perceptions of undergraduate science interns and their faculty mentors</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Kardash, CarolAnne M. ; Edwards, Ordene V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kardash, CarolAnne M. ; Edwards, Ordene V.</creatorcontrib><description>We examined undergraduate research experiences (UREs) participants' and their faculty mentors' beliefs about the professional practices and dispositions of research scientists. In Study 1, 63 science interns and their mentors rated Merton's (J Legal Political Sociol, 1: 115-126, 1942) norms and Mitroffs (Am Sociol Rev, 39(August): 579-595, 1974) counter-norms of scientific practice. Specifically, we investigated what practices they believed research scientists should subscribe to (or not), and what practices they believed actually characterized research scientists' behavior in the real world. Regarding idealized practice, mentors rated the norms significantly higher than did interns; mentors and interns generally did not differ in subscription to the counter-norms. Regarding actual practice, mentors believed scientists' behaviors reflected counter-norms more than norms. Mentors further noted discrepancies between practices that should represent and actually did represent scientists' work. In Study 2, interns and mentors listed characteristics associated with "thinking" and "behaving" like scientists. Personal and professional dispositions were mentioned more than intellectual and research skills. Although there was considerable consensus between faculty and intern perceptions, findings also revealed discrepancies that could be addressed in UREs, thereby aiding undergraduates' socialization into the culture of scientific practice. Suggestions are provided for broadening interns' conceptions of both scientists and science.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-4277</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1952</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11251-011-9195-0</identifier><identifier>CODEN: INLSBJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Apprenticeships ; Behavior Standards ; Behavioral sciences ; Beliefs ; College Faculty ; College Science ; College students ; Education ; Educational Experience ; Educational Psychology ; Educational Research ; Ethical behavior ; Graduate Students ; Individual Characteristics ; Internship Programs ; Internships ; Learning and Instruction ; Mentors ; Normativity ; Pedagogic Psychology ; Perceptions ; Professional Identity ; Professional standards ; Research Methodology ; Research Skills ; Science Careers ; Science education ; Science Instruction ; Scientific belief ; Scientific Research ; Scientists ; Socialization ; Student Attitudes ; Student Research ; Teacher Attitudes ; Undergraduate Students</subject><ispartof>Instructional science, 2012-11, Vol.40 (6), p.875-899</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-faa035f26325a2cb64cdffa4d04a8a1176cf6227f1ee78635386cc7090fb2daf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-faa035f26325a2cb64cdffa4d04a8a1176cf6227f1ee78635386cc7090fb2daf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43575389$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43575389$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27915,27916,41479,42548,51310,58008,58241</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ983168$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kardash, CarolAnne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Ordene V.</creatorcontrib><title>Thinking and behaving like scientists: Perceptions of undergraduate science interns and their faculty mentors</title><title>Instructional science</title><addtitle>Instr Sci</addtitle><description>We examined undergraduate research experiences (UREs) participants' and their faculty mentors' beliefs about the professional practices and dispositions of research scientists. In Study 1, 63 science interns and their mentors rated Merton's (J Legal Political Sociol, 1: 115-126, 1942) norms and Mitroffs (Am Sociol Rev, 39(August): 579-595, 1974) counter-norms of scientific practice. Specifically, we investigated what practices they believed research scientists should subscribe to (or not), and what practices they believed actually characterized research scientists' behavior in the real world. Regarding idealized practice, mentors rated the norms significantly higher than did interns; mentors and interns generally did not differ in subscription to the counter-norms. Regarding actual practice, mentors believed scientists' behaviors reflected counter-norms more than norms. Mentors further noted discrepancies between practices that should represent and actually did represent scientists' work. In Study 2, interns and mentors listed characteristics associated with "thinking" and "behaving" like scientists. Personal and professional dispositions were mentioned more than intellectual and research skills. Although there was considerable consensus between faculty and intern perceptions, findings also revealed discrepancies that could be addressed in UREs, thereby aiding undergraduates' socialization into the culture of scientific practice. Suggestions are provided for broadening interns' conceptions of both scientists and science.</description><subject>Apprenticeships</subject><subject>Behavior Standards</subject><subject>Behavioral sciences</subject><subject>Beliefs</subject><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>College Science</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Experience</subject><subject>Educational Psychology</subject><subject>Educational Research</subject><subject>Ethical behavior</subject><subject>Graduate Students</subject><subject>Individual Characteristics</subject><subject>Internship Programs</subject><subject>Internships</subject><subject>Learning and Instruction</subject><subject>Mentors</subject><subject>Normativity</subject><subject>Pedagogic Psychology</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Professional Identity</subject><subject>Professional standards</subject><subject>Research Methodology</subject><subject>Research Skills</subject><subject>Science Careers</subject><subject>Science education</subject><subject>Science Instruction</subject><subject>Scientific belief</subject><subject>Scientific Research</subject><subject>Scientists</subject><subject>Socialization</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Student Research</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><issn>0020-4277</issn><issn>1573-1952</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AEEh4Lk6k7RN603ETwQ96Dlk02Q36266JqngvzdLRTx5Gob3Y5iHkGOEcwQQFxGRVVgAYtFiWxWwQyZYCV7khe2SCQCDomRC7JODGJcAgGUDE7J-XTj_7vycKt_RmVmoz-2ycu-GRu2MTy6meElfTNBmk1zvI-0tHXxnwjyoblDpx6gNdT6ZkA3bqrQwLlCr9LBKX3Sdi_oQD8meVatojn7mlLzd3rxe3xdPz3cP11dPheZVmwqrFPDKspqzSjE9q0vdWavKDkrVKERRa1szJiwaI5qaV7yptRbQgp2xTlk-JWdj7yb0H4OJSS77Ifh8UiIiF1CKhmcXji4d-hiDsXIT3FqFL4kgt1TlSFVmqnJLVULOnIwZE5z-9d88tg3HuskyG-WYJT834c_hfzpPx9AyZki_pSWvRP6s5d-v4478</recordid><startdate>20121101</startdate><enddate>20121101</enddate><creator>Kardash, CarolAnne M.</creator><creator>Edwards, Ordene V.</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121101</creationdate><title>Thinking and behaving like scientists: Perceptions of undergraduate science interns and their faculty mentors</title><author>Kardash, CarolAnne M. ; Edwards, Ordene V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-faa035f26325a2cb64cdffa4d04a8a1176cf6227f1ee78635386cc7090fb2daf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Apprenticeships</topic><topic>Behavior Standards</topic><topic>Behavioral sciences</topic><topic>Beliefs</topic><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>College Science</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Experience</topic><topic>Educational Psychology</topic><topic>Educational Research</topic><topic>Ethical behavior</topic><topic>Graduate Students</topic><topic>Individual Characteristics</topic><topic>Internship Programs</topic><topic>Internships</topic><topic>Learning and Instruction</topic><topic>Mentors</topic><topic>Normativity</topic><topic>Pedagogic Psychology</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Professional Identity</topic><topic>Professional standards</topic><topic>Research Methodology</topic><topic>Research Skills</topic><topic>Science Careers</topic><topic>Science education</topic><topic>Science Instruction</topic><topic>Scientific belief</topic><topic>Scientific Research</topic><topic>Scientists</topic><topic>Socialization</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Student Research</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kardash, CarolAnne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Ordene V.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Instructional science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kardash, CarolAnne M.</au><au>Edwards, Ordene V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ983168</ericid><atitle>Thinking and behaving like scientists: Perceptions of undergraduate science interns and their faculty mentors</atitle><jtitle>Instructional science</jtitle><stitle>Instr Sci</stitle><date>2012-11-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>875</spage><epage>899</epage><pages>875-899</pages><issn>0020-4277</issn><eissn>1573-1952</eissn><coden>INLSBJ</coden><abstract>We examined undergraduate research experiences (UREs) participants' and their faculty mentors' beliefs about the professional practices and dispositions of research scientists. In Study 1, 63 science interns and their mentors rated Merton's (J Legal Political Sociol, 1: 115-126, 1942) norms and Mitroffs (Am Sociol Rev, 39(August): 579-595, 1974) counter-norms of scientific practice. Specifically, we investigated what practices they believed research scientists should subscribe to (or not), and what practices they believed actually characterized research scientists' behavior in the real world. Regarding idealized practice, mentors rated the norms significantly higher than did interns; mentors and interns generally did not differ in subscription to the counter-norms. Regarding actual practice, mentors believed scientists' behaviors reflected counter-norms more than norms. Mentors further noted discrepancies between practices that should represent and actually did represent scientists' work. In Study 2, interns and mentors listed characteristics associated with "thinking" and "behaving" like scientists. Personal and professional dispositions were mentioned more than intellectual and research skills. Although there was considerable consensus between faculty and intern perceptions, findings also revealed discrepancies that could be addressed in UREs, thereby aiding undergraduates' socialization into the culture of scientific practice. Suggestions are provided for broadening interns' conceptions of both scientists and science.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s11251-011-9195-0</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-4277
ispartof Instructional science, 2012-11, Vol.40 (6), p.875-899
issn 0020-4277
1573-1952
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1113704783
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Education Source; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Apprenticeships
Behavior Standards
Behavioral sciences
Beliefs
College Faculty
College Science
College students
Education
Educational Experience
Educational Psychology
Educational Research
Ethical behavior
Graduate Students
Individual Characteristics
Internship Programs
Internships
Learning and Instruction
Mentors
Normativity
Pedagogic Psychology
Perceptions
Professional Identity
Professional standards
Research Methodology
Research Skills
Science Careers
Science education
Science Instruction
Scientific belief
Scientific Research
Scientists
Socialization
Student Attitudes
Student Research
Teacher Attitudes
Undergraduate Students
title Thinking and behaving like scientists: Perceptions of undergraduate science interns and their faculty mentors
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T20%3A38%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Thinking%20and%20behaving%20like%20scientists:%20Perceptions%20of%20undergraduate%20science%20interns%20and%20their%20faculty%20mentors&rft.jtitle=Instructional%20science&rft.au=Kardash,%20CarolAnne%20M.&rft.date=2012-11-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=875&rft.epage=899&rft.pages=875-899&rft.issn=0020-4277&rft.eissn=1573-1952&rft.coden=INLSBJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11251-011-9195-0&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43575389%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1113704783&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ983168&rft_jstor_id=43575389&rfr_iscdi=true