Thinking and behaving like scientists: Perceptions of undergraduate science interns and their faculty mentors
We examined undergraduate research experiences (UREs) participants' and their faculty mentors' beliefs about the professional practices and dispositions of research scientists. In Study 1, 63 science interns and their mentors rated Merton's (J Legal Political Sociol, 1: 115-126, 1942)...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Instructional science 2012-11, Vol.40 (6), p.875-899 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 899 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 875 |
container_title | Instructional science |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Kardash, CarolAnne M. Edwards, Ordene V. |
description | We examined undergraduate research experiences (UREs) participants' and their faculty mentors' beliefs about the professional practices and dispositions of research scientists. In Study 1, 63 science interns and their mentors rated Merton's (J Legal Political Sociol, 1: 115-126, 1942) norms and Mitroffs (Am Sociol Rev, 39(August): 579-595, 1974) counter-norms of scientific practice. Specifically, we investigated what practices they believed research scientists should subscribe to (or not), and what practices they believed actually characterized research scientists' behavior in the real world. Regarding idealized practice, mentors rated the norms significantly higher than did interns; mentors and interns generally did not differ in subscription to the counter-norms. Regarding actual practice, mentors believed scientists' behaviors reflected counter-norms more than norms. Mentors further noted discrepancies between practices that should represent and actually did represent scientists' work. In Study 2, interns and mentors listed characteristics associated with "thinking" and "behaving" like scientists. Personal and professional dispositions were mentioned more than intellectual and research skills. Although there was considerable consensus between faculty and intern perceptions, findings also revealed discrepancies that could be addressed in UREs, thereby aiding undergraduates' socialization into the culture of scientific practice. Suggestions are provided for broadening interns' conceptions of both scientists and science. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11251-011-9195-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1113704783</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ983168</ericid><jstor_id>43575389</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43575389</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-faa035f26325a2cb64cdffa4d04a8a1176cf6227f1ee78635386cc7090fb2daf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AEEh4Lk6k7RN603ETwQ96Dlk02Q36266JqngvzdLRTx5Gob3Y5iHkGOEcwQQFxGRVVgAYtFiWxWwQyZYCV7khe2SCQCDomRC7JODGJcAgGUDE7J-XTj_7vycKt_RmVmoz-2ycu-GRu2MTy6meElfTNBmk1zvI-0tHXxnwjyoblDpx6gNdT6ZkA3bqrQwLlCr9LBKX3Sdi_oQD8meVatojn7mlLzd3rxe3xdPz3cP11dPheZVmwqrFPDKspqzSjE9q0vdWavKDkrVKERRa1szJiwaI5qaV7yptRbQgp2xTlk-JWdj7yb0H4OJSS77Ifh8UiIiF1CKhmcXji4d-hiDsXIT3FqFL4kgt1TlSFVmqnJLVULOnIwZE5z-9d88tg3HuskyG-WYJT834c_hfzpPx9AyZki_pSWvRP6s5d-v4478</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1113704783</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Thinking and behaving like scientists: Perceptions of undergraduate science interns and their faculty mentors</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Kardash, CarolAnne M. ; Edwards, Ordene V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kardash, CarolAnne M. ; Edwards, Ordene V.</creatorcontrib><description>We examined undergraduate research experiences (UREs) participants' and their faculty mentors' beliefs about the professional practices and dispositions of research scientists. In Study 1, 63 science interns and their mentors rated Merton's (J Legal Political Sociol, 1: 115-126, 1942) norms and Mitroffs (Am Sociol Rev, 39(August): 579-595, 1974) counter-norms of scientific practice. Specifically, we investigated what practices they believed research scientists should subscribe to (or not), and what practices they believed actually characterized research scientists' behavior in the real world. Regarding idealized practice, mentors rated the norms significantly higher than did interns; mentors and interns generally did not differ in subscription to the counter-norms. Regarding actual practice, mentors believed scientists' behaviors reflected counter-norms more than norms. Mentors further noted discrepancies between practices that should represent and actually did represent scientists' work. In Study 2, interns and mentors listed characteristics associated with "thinking" and "behaving" like scientists. Personal and professional dispositions were mentioned more than intellectual and research skills. Although there was considerable consensus between faculty and intern perceptions, findings also revealed discrepancies that could be addressed in UREs, thereby aiding undergraduates' socialization into the culture of scientific practice. Suggestions are provided for broadening interns' conceptions of both scientists and science.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-4277</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1952</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11251-011-9195-0</identifier><identifier>CODEN: INLSBJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Apprenticeships ; Behavior Standards ; Behavioral sciences ; Beliefs ; College Faculty ; College Science ; College students ; Education ; Educational Experience ; Educational Psychology ; Educational Research ; Ethical behavior ; Graduate Students ; Individual Characteristics ; Internship Programs ; Internships ; Learning and Instruction ; Mentors ; Normativity ; Pedagogic Psychology ; Perceptions ; Professional Identity ; Professional standards ; Research Methodology ; Research Skills ; Science Careers ; Science education ; Science Instruction ; Scientific belief ; Scientific Research ; Scientists ; Socialization ; Student Attitudes ; Student Research ; Teacher Attitudes ; Undergraduate Students</subject><ispartof>Instructional science, 2012-11, Vol.40 (6), p.875-899</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-faa035f26325a2cb64cdffa4d04a8a1176cf6227f1ee78635386cc7090fb2daf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-faa035f26325a2cb64cdffa4d04a8a1176cf6227f1ee78635386cc7090fb2daf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43575389$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43575389$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27915,27916,41479,42548,51310,58008,58241</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ983168$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kardash, CarolAnne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Ordene V.</creatorcontrib><title>Thinking and behaving like scientists: Perceptions of undergraduate science interns and their faculty mentors</title><title>Instructional science</title><addtitle>Instr Sci</addtitle><description>We examined undergraduate research experiences (UREs) participants' and their faculty mentors' beliefs about the professional practices and dispositions of research scientists. In Study 1, 63 science interns and their mentors rated Merton's (J Legal Political Sociol, 1: 115-126, 1942) norms and Mitroffs (Am Sociol Rev, 39(August): 579-595, 1974) counter-norms of scientific practice. Specifically, we investigated what practices they believed research scientists should subscribe to (or not), and what practices they believed actually characterized research scientists' behavior in the real world. Regarding idealized practice, mentors rated the norms significantly higher than did interns; mentors and interns generally did not differ in subscription to the counter-norms. Regarding actual practice, mentors believed scientists' behaviors reflected counter-norms more than norms. Mentors further noted discrepancies between practices that should represent and actually did represent scientists' work. In Study 2, interns and mentors listed characteristics associated with "thinking" and "behaving" like scientists. Personal and professional dispositions were mentioned more than intellectual and research skills. Although there was considerable consensus between faculty and intern perceptions, findings also revealed discrepancies that could be addressed in UREs, thereby aiding undergraduates' socialization into the culture of scientific practice. Suggestions are provided for broadening interns' conceptions of both scientists and science.</description><subject>Apprenticeships</subject><subject>Behavior Standards</subject><subject>Behavioral sciences</subject><subject>Beliefs</subject><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>College Science</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Experience</subject><subject>Educational Psychology</subject><subject>Educational Research</subject><subject>Ethical behavior</subject><subject>Graduate Students</subject><subject>Individual Characteristics</subject><subject>Internship Programs</subject><subject>Internships</subject><subject>Learning and Instruction</subject><subject>Mentors</subject><subject>Normativity</subject><subject>Pedagogic Psychology</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Professional Identity</subject><subject>Professional standards</subject><subject>Research Methodology</subject><subject>Research Skills</subject><subject>Science Careers</subject><subject>Science education</subject><subject>Science Instruction</subject><subject>Scientific belief</subject><subject>Scientific Research</subject><subject>Scientists</subject><subject>Socialization</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Student Research</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><issn>0020-4277</issn><issn>1573-1952</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AEEh4Lk6k7RN603ETwQ96Dlk02Q36266JqngvzdLRTx5Gob3Y5iHkGOEcwQQFxGRVVgAYtFiWxWwQyZYCV7khe2SCQCDomRC7JODGJcAgGUDE7J-XTj_7vycKt_RmVmoz-2ycu-GRu2MTy6meElfTNBmk1zvI-0tHXxnwjyoblDpx6gNdT6ZkA3bqrQwLlCr9LBKX3Sdi_oQD8meVatojn7mlLzd3rxe3xdPz3cP11dPheZVmwqrFPDKspqzSjE9q0vdWavKDkrVKERRa1szJiwaI5qaV7yptRbQgp2xTlk-JWdj7yb0H4OJSS77Ifh8UiIiF1CKhmcXji4d-hiDsXIT3FqFL4kgt1TlSFVmqnJLVULOnIwZE5z-9d88tg3HuskyG-WYJT834c_hfzpPx9AyZki_pSWvRP6s5d-v4478</recordid><startdate>20121101</startdate><enddate>20121101</enddate><creator>Kardash, CarolAnne M.</creator><creator>Edwards, Ordene V.</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121101</creationdate><title>Thinking and behaving like scientists: Perceptions of undergraduate science interns and their faculty mentors</title><author>Kardash, CarolAnne M. ; Edwards, Ordene V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-faa035f26325a2cb64cdffa4d04a8a1176cf6227f1ee78635386cc7090fb2daf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Apprenticeships</topic><topic>Behavior Standards</topic><topic>Behavioral sciences</topic><topic>Beliefs</topic><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>College Science</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Experience</topic><topic>Educational Psychology</topic><topic>Educational Research</topic><topic>Ethical behavior</topic><topic>Graduate Students</topic><topic>Individual Characteristics</topic><topic>Internship Programs</topic><topic>Internships</topic><topic>Learning and Instruction</topic><topic>Mentors</topic><topic>Normativity</topic><topic>Pedagogic Psychology</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Professional Identity</topic><topic>Professional standards</topic><topic>Research Methodology</topic><topic>Research Skills</topic><topic>Science Careers</topic><topic>Science education</topic><topic>Science Instruction</topic><topic>Scientific belief</topic><topic>Scientific Research</topic><topic>Scientists</topic><topic>Socialization</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Student Research</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kardash, CarolAnne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Ordene V.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Instructional science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kardash, CarolAnne M.</au><au>Edwards, Ordene V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ983168</ericid><atitle>Thinking and behaving like scientists: Perceptions of undergraduate science interns and their faculty mentors</atitle><jtitle>Instructional science</jtitle><stitle>Instr Sci</stitle><date>2012-11-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>875</spage><epage>899</epage><pages>875-899</pages><issn>0020-4277</issn><eissn>1573-1952</eissn><coden>INLSBJ</coden><abstract>We examined undergraduate research experiences (UREs) participants' and their faculty mentors' beliefs about the professional practices and dispositions of research scientists. In Study 1, 63 science interns and their mentors rated Merton's (J Legal Political Sociol, 1: 115-126, 1942) norms and Mitroffs (Am Sociol Rev, 39(August): 579-595, 1974) counter-norms of scientific practice. Specifically, we investigated what practices they believed research scientists should subscribe to (or not), and what practices they believed actually characterized research scientists' behavior in the real world. Regarding idealized practice, mentors rated the norms significantly higher than did interns; mentors and interns generally did not differ in subscription to the counter-norms. Regarding actual practice, mentors believed scientists' behaviors reflected counter-norms more than norms. Mentors further noted discrepancies between practices that should represent and actually did represent scientists' work. In Study 2, interns and mentors listed characteristics associated with "thinking" and "behaving" like scientists. Personal and professional dispositions were mentioned more than intellectual and research skills. Although there was considerable consensus between faculty and intern perceptions, findings also revealed discrepancies that could be addressed in UREs, thereby aiding undergraduates' socialization into the culture of scientific practice. Suggestions are provided for broadening interns' conceptions of both scientists and science.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s11251-011-9195-0</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0020-4277 |
ispartof | Instructional science, 2012-11, Vol.40 (6), p.875-899 |
issn | 0020-4277 1573-1952 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1113704783 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Education Source; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Apprenticeships Behavior Standards Behavioral sciences Beliefs College Faculty College Science College students Education Educational Experience Educational Psychology Educational Research Ethical behavior Graduate Students Individual Characteristics Internship Programs Internships Learning and Instruction Mentors Normativity Pedagogic Psychology Perceptions Professional Identity Professional standards Research Methodology Research Skills Science Careers Science education Science Instruction Scientific belief Scientific Research Scientists Socialization Student Attitudes Student Research Teacher Attitudes Undergraduate Students |
title | Thinking and behaving like scientists: Perceptions of undergraduate science interns and their faculty mentors |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T20%3A38%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Thinking%20and%20behaving%20like%20scientists:%20Perceptions%20of%20undergraduate%20science%20interns%20and%20their%20faculty%20mentors&rft.jtitle=Instructional%20science&rft.au=Kardash,%20CarolAnne%20M.&rft.date=2012-11-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=875&rft.epage=899&rft.pages=875-899&rft.issn=0020-4277&rft.eissn=1573-1952&rft.coden=INLSBJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11251-011-9195-0&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43575389%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1113704783&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ983168&rft_jstor_id=43575389&rfr_iscdi=true |