Risk of adhesions formation following microsurgical monopolar laparoscopic ovarian drilling: a comparative study

The objective of the study was to determine the prevalence, extent, and location of adhesion formation following microsurgical monopolar laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD) among fertile and infertile women with clomiphene-resistant polycystic ovaries (PCO). The design was a longitudinal cohort foll...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gynecological surgery 2009-05, Vol.6 (2), p.135-141
Hauptverfasser: Darwish, A. M., AbdelAleem, M. A., Ismail, A. M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 141
container_issue 2
container_start_page 135
container_title Gynecological surgery
container_volume 6
creator Darwish, A. M.
AbdelAleem, M. A.
Ismail, A. M.
description The objective of the study was to determine the prevalence, extent, and location of adhesion formation following microsurgical monopolar laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD) among fertile and infertile women with clomiphene-resistant polycystic ovaries (PCO). The design was a longitudinal cohort follow-up study. The study was performed at the endoscopic unit of a tertiary university center. Three hundred and forty-seven patients with PCO were scheduled for LOD as a treatment option for clomiphene-resistant anovulation. Microsurgical monopolar LOD was performed in all cases. Two hundred and forty-six patients without possible additional predisposing factor for postoperative adhesion formation were followed up. To assess the sole effect of LOD on adhesion formation, only 51 eligible patients were classified into two groups; Group A comprised 22 women who conceived within 6 months following LOD and subjected to cesarean section, while group B included 29 women who failed to conceive over the same period of time and subjected to second-look laparoscopy. The main outcome measure was an evaluation of the prevalence, side, site, and severity of pelvic adhesions following microsurgical monopolar LOD. In total, adhesions were diagnosed in 40 cases (78.4%). Adhesions were diagnosed in 15 cases (68.1%) and 25 cases (86.2%) in groups A and B, respectively, without a statistically significant difference ( p  = 0.21). Periovarian adhesions were diagnosed in 47/51 (92%) of cases in both groups. In 29 (56.8%) cases in both groups, adhesions were diagnosed on both sides (right and left adnexae) divided as eight (36.3%) and 21 (72.4%) in groups A and B, respectively, with a statistically significant difference ( p  = 0.01). The documented high prevalence of adhesions among infertile as well as women who conceived following LOD is an added evidence to the established risk of post-LOD adhesion formation. Following microsurgical principles would minimize the risk of these adhesions except periovarian adhesions. There is a bad need for studies on more refinement of LOD to make it as less adhesiogenic procedure as possible.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10397-008-0437-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_C6C</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1112411477</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2790761441</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-755556763cd6dfcea57cc1ba4503b8f99e3663d70b5f4f5b353487af723e87a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMFKxDAUDKLguvoB3gKeq0lfm3S9yaKrsCCInkOaJmvWtKlJu7J_b5aKePFdZuDNzOMNQpeUXFNC-E2kBBY8I6TKSAE8gyM0o4xClpOqOP7lnJ2isxi3hEBFynyG-hcbP7A3WDbvOlrfRWx8aOWQaGLO-S_bbXBrVfBxDBurpMOt73zvnQzYyV6mhfK9VdjvZLCyw02wziXXLZZY-TYpUtxO4ziMzf4cnRjpor74wTl6e7h_XT5m6-fV0_JunSmgbMh4mYZxBqphjVFallwpWsuiJFBXZrHQwBg0nNSlKUxZQwlFxaXhOeiEBOboasrtg_8cdRzE1o-hSycFpTQvKC04Tyo6qQ7vxaCN6INtZdgLSsShWDEVK1Kx4lCsgOTJJ09M2m6jw5_kf03fD9V9kA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1112411477</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk of adhesions formation following microsurgical monopolar laparoscopic ovarian drilling: a comparative study</title><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><creator>Darwish, A. M. ; AbdelAleem, M. A. ; Ismail, A. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Darwish, A. M. ; AbdelAleem, M. A. ; Ismail, A. M.</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of the study was to determine the prevalence, extent, and location of adhesion formation following microsurgical monopolar laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD) among fertile and infertile women with clomiphene-resistant polycystic ovaries (PCO). The design was a longitudinal cohort follow-up study. The study was performed at the endoscopic unit of a tertiary university center. Three hundred and forty-seven patients with PCO were scheduled for LOD as a treatment option for clomiphene-resistant anovulation. Microsurgical monopolar LOD was performed in all cases. Two hundred and forty-six patients without possible additional predisposing factor for postoperative adhesion formation were followed up. To assess the sole effect of LOD on adhesion formation, only 51 eligible patients were classified into two groups; Group A comprised 22 women who conceived within 6 months following LOD and subjected to cesarean section, while group B included 29 women who failed to conceive over the same period of time and subjected to second-look laparoscopy. The main outcome measure was an evaluation of the prevalence, side, site, and severity of pelvic adhesions following microsurgical monopolar LOD. In total, adhesions were diagnosed in 40 cases (78.4%). Adhesions were diagnosed in 15 cases (68.1%) and 25 cases (86.2%) in groups A and B, respectively, without a statistically significant difference ( p  = 0.21). Periovarian adhesions were diagnosed in 47/51 (92%) of cases in both groups. In 29 (56.8%) cases in both groups, adhesions were diagnosed on both sides (right and left adnexae) divided as eight (36.3%) and 21 (72.4%) in groups A and B, respectively, with a statistically significant difference ( p  = 0.01). The documented high prevalence of adhesions among infertile as well as women who conceived following LOD is an added evidence to the established risk of post-LOD adhesion formation. Following microsurgical principles would minimize the risk of these adhesions except periovarian adhesions. There is a bad need for studies on more refinement of LOD to make it as less adhesiogenic procedure as possible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1613-2076</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1613-2084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10397-008-0437-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Adhesion ; Gynecology ; Interventional Radiology ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Minimally Invasive Surgery ; Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery ; Original Article ; Reproductive Medicine ; Surgical Oncology ; Women</subject><ispartof>Gynecological surgery, 2009-05, Vol.6 (2), p.135-141</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2008</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-755556763cd6dfcea57cc1ba4503b8f99e3663d70b5f4f5b353487af723e87a03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-755556763cd6dfcea57cc1ba4503b8f99e3663d70b5f4f5b353487af723e87a03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10397-008-0437-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-008-0437-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41120,42189,51576</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-008-0437-3$$EView_record_in_Springer_Nature$$FView_record_in_$$GSpringer_Nature</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Darwish, A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AbdelAleem, M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ismail, A. M.</creatorcontrib><title>Risk of adhesions formation following microsurgical monopolar laparoscopic ovarian drilling: a comparative study</title><title>Gynecological surgery</title><addtitle>Gynecol Surg</addtitle><description>The objective of the study was to determine the prevalence, extent, and location of adhesion formation following microsurgical monopolar laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD) among fertile and infertile women with clomiphene-resistant polycystic ovaries (PCO). The design was a longitudinal cohort follow-up study. The study was performed at the endoscopic unit of a tertiary university center. Three hundred and forty-seven patients with PCO were scheduled for LOD as a treatment option for clomiphene-resistant anovulation. Microsurgical monopolar LOD was performed in all cases. Two hundred and forty-six patients without possible additional predisposing factor for postoperative adhesion formation were followed up. To assess the sole effect of LOD on adhesion formation, only 51 eligible patients were classified into two groups; Group A comprised 22 women who conceived within 6 months following LOD and subjected to cesarean section, while group B included 29 women who failed to conceive over the same period of time and subjected to second-look laparoscopy. The main outcome measure was an evaluation of the prevalence, side, site, and severity of pelvic adhesions following microsurgical monopolar LOD. In total, adhesions were diagnosed in 40 cases (78.4%). Adhesions were diagnosed in 15 cases (68.1%) and 25 cases (86.2%) in groups A and B, respectively, without a statistically significant difference ( p  = 0.21). Periovarian adhesions were diagnosed in 47/51 (92%) of cases in both groups. In 29 (56.8%) cases in both groups, adhesions were diagnosed on both sides (right and left adnexae) divided as eight (36.3%) and 21 (72.4%) in groups A and B, respectively, with a statistically significant difference ( p  = 0.01). The documented high prevalence of adhesions among infertile as well as women who conceived following LOD is an added evidence to the established risk of post-LOD adhesion formation. Following microsurgical principles would minimize the risk of these adhesions except periovarian adhesions. There is a bad need for studies on more refinement of LOD to make it as less adhesiogenic procedure as possible.</description><subject>Adhesion</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Interventional Radiology</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgery</subject><subject>Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Reproductive Medicine</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>1613-2076</issn><issn>1613-2084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UMFKxDAUDKLguvoB3gKeq0lfm3S9yaKrsCCInkOaJmvWtKlJu7J_b5aKePFdZuDNzOMNQpeUXFNC-E2kBBY8I6TKSAE8gyM0o4xClpOqOP7lnJ2isxi3hEBFynyG-hcbP7A3WDbvOlrfRWx8aOWQaGLO-S_bbXBrVfBxDBurpMOt73zvnQzYyV6mhfK9VdjvZLCyw02wziXXLZZY-TYpUtxO4ziMzf4cnRjpor74wTl6e7h_XT5m6-fV0_JunSmgbMh4mYZxBqphjVFallwpWsuiJFBXZrHQwBg0nNSlKUxZQwlFxaXhOeiEBOboasrtg_8cdRzE1o-hSycFpTQvKC04Tyo6qQ7vxaCN6INtZdgLSsShWDEVK1Kx4lCsgOTJJ09M2m6jw5_kf03fD9V9kA</recordid><startdate>20090501</startdate><enddate>20090501</enddate><creator>Darwish, A. M.</creator><creator>AbdelAleem, M. A.</creator><creator>Ismail, A. M.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090501</creationdate><title>Risk of adhesions formation following microsurgical monopolar laparoscopic ovarian drilling: a comparative study</title><author>Darwish, A. M. ; AbdelAleem, M. A. ; Ismail, A. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-755556763cd6dfcea57cc1ba4503b8f99e3663d70b5f4f5b353487af723e87a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adhesion</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Interventional Radiology</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgery</topic><topic>Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Reproductive Medicine</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Darwish, A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AbdelAleem, M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ismail, A. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Gynecological surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Darwish, A. M.</au><au>AbdelAleem, M. A.</au><au>Ismail, A. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risk of adhesions formation following microsurgical monopolar laparoscopic ovarian drilling: a comparative study</atitle><jtitle>Gynecological surgery</jtitle><stitle>Gynecol Surg</stitle><date>2009-05-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>135</spage><epage>141</epage><pages>135-141</pages><issn>1613-2076</issn><eissn>1613-2084</eissn><abstract>The objective of the study was to determine the prevalence, extent, and location of adhesion formation following microsurgical monopolar laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD) among fertile and infertile women with clomiphene-resistant polycystic ovaries (PCO). The design was a longitudinal cohort follow-up study. The study was performed at the endoscopic unit of a tertiary university center. Three hundred and forty-seven patients with PCO were scheduled for LOD as a treatment option for clomiphene-resistant anovulation. Microsurgical monopolar LOD was performed in all cases. Two hundred and forty-six patients without possible additional predisposing factor for postoperative adhesion formation were followed up. To assess the sole effect of LOD on adhesion formation, only 51 eligible patients were classified into two groups; Group A comprised 22 women who conceived within 6 months following LOD and subjected to cesarean section, while group B included 29 women who failed to conceive over the same period of time and subjected to second-look laparoscopy. The main outcome measure was an evaluation of the prevalence, side, site, and severity of pelvic adhesions following microsurgical monopolar LOD. In total, adhesions were diagnosed in 40 cases (78.4%). Adhesions were diagnosed in 15 cases (68.1%) and 25 cases (86.2%) in groups A and B, respectively, without a statistically significant difference ( p  = 0.21). Periovarian adhesions were diagnosed in 47/51 (92%) of cases in both groups. In 29 (56.8%) cases in both groups, adhesions were diagnosed on both sides (right and left adnexae) divided as eight (36.3%) and 21 (72.4%) in groups A and B, respectively, with a statistically significant difference ( p  = 0.01). The documented high prevalence of adhesions among infertile as well as women who conceived following LOD is an added evidence to the established risk of post-LOD adhesion formation. Following microsurgical principles would minimize the risk of these adhesions except periovarian adhesions. There is a bad need for studies on more refinement of LOD to make it as less adhesiogenic procedure as possible.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s10397-008-0437-3</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1613-2076
ispartof Gynecological surgery, 2009-05, Vol.6 (2), p.135-141
issn 1613-2076
1613-2084
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1112411477
source Springer Nature OA Free Journals
subjects Adhesion
Gynecology
Interventional Radiology
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Minimally Invasive Surgery
Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery
Original Article
Reproductive Medicine
Surgical Oncology
Women
title Risk of adhesions formation following microsurgical monopolar laparoscopic ovarian drilling: a comparative study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T13%3A26%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_C6C&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk%20of%20adhesions%20formation%20following%20microsurgical%20monopolar%20laparoscopic%20ovarian%20drilling:%20a%20comparative%20study&rft.jtitle=Gynecological%20surgery&rft.au=Darwish,%20A.%20M.&rft.date=2009-05-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=135&rft.epage=141&rft.pages=135-141&rft.issn=1613-2076&rft.eissn=1613-2084&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10397-008-0437-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_C6C%3E2790761441%3C/proquest_C6C%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1112411477&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true