Histological quantification of the tissue damage caused by PlasmaJet™ coagulator
The purpose of this study was to evaluate tissue damage caused by the PlasmaJet TM coagulator in the uterus, ovary, and fallopian tube at different power settings in vitro and then to examine the damage caused in vivo. In vitro evaluation included prospective recruitment of six subjects undergoing h...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gynecological surgery 2010-11, Vol.7 (4), p.441-446 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 446 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 441 |
container_title | Gynecological surgery |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Deb, Shilpa Deen, S. Ashford, K. S. Harwood, A. Newman, C. Powell, M. C. |
description | The purpose of this study was to evaluate tissue damage caused by the PlasmaJet
TM
coagulator in the uterus, ovary, and fallopian tube at different power settings in vitro and then to examine the damage caused in vivo. In vitro evaluation included prospective recruitment of six subjects undergoing hysterectomy with or without salpingo-oophorectomy. Tissue damage was evaluated histologically for power levels at 10%, 15%, and 20%, and for duration of 2 and 5 s at a clinically acceptable distance of 0.5 to 1 cm between the tip of probe and tissue. In vivo evaluation included 15 subjects undergoing hysterectomy with or without salpingo-oophorectomy. The most suitable power setting and duration of diathermy was decided from in vitro examination and applied on in vivo setting. Tissue damage was evaluated histologically. There was no significant difference seen in the depth and width of tissue damage in the in vitro specimens at different low power levels and duration of diathermy (
P
> 0.05). A setting of 20% power and duration of 5 s of diathermy was used therefore for in vivo setting. Mean ± SD depth (millimetres) of tissue damage in uterus, ovary, and fallopian tube were 0.63 ± 0.19, 0.61 ± 0.14, and 0.63 ± 0.18, respectively. Mean ± SD width (millimetres) of tissue damage in uterus, ovary, and fallopian tube were 4.66 ± 0.05, 4.05 ± 0.61, and 4.51 ± 0.77, respectively. Irrespective of tissue type, the average depth and width of tissue damage with application of Plasmajet
TM
coagulator for 5 s at low power is 0.62 and 4.24 mm, respectively. It therefore appears to be a safe method of coagulation in vitro and in vivo at 20% power on gynaecological tissues. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10397-010-0582-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_C6C</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1112411295</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2790762101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-1a8beb3ada8ae2e3d4d10020690a3b223fba83ef139d7edb34e13b36846fede33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhS0EEqVwAHaWWAdsT5qfJaqAgiqBEKytSTwJqdK4tZ1F95yEo_UkpApCbFiM5i3ee6P5GLuU4loKkd54KSBPIyFFJGaZiuCITWQiIVIii49_dZqcsjPvV0JAJmZqwl4XjQ-2tXVTYsu3PXahqQYdGttxW_HwQTw03vfEDa6xJl5i78nwYsdfWvRrfKKw__zipcW6bzFYd85OKmw9XfzsKXu_v3ubL6Ll88Pj_HYZlSCTEEnMCioADWZIisDEZvhEiSQXCIVSUBWYAVUScpOSKSAmCQUkWZxUZAhgyq7G3o2z25580Cvbu244qaWUKh4mnw0uObpKZ713VOmNa9bodloKfUCnR3R6QKcP6PShWY0ZP3i7mtyf5n9D38Kncvo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1112411295</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Histological quantification of the tissue damage caused by PlasmaJet™ coagulator</title><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><creator>Deb, Shilpa ; Deen, S. ; Ashford, K. S. ; Harwood, A. ; Newman, C. ; Powell, M. C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Deb, Shilpa ; Deen, S. ; Ashford, K. S. ; Harwood, A. ; Newman, C. ; Powell, M. C.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to evaluate tissue damage caused by the PlasmaJet
TM
coagulator in the uterus, ovary, and fallopian tube at different power settings in vitro and then to examine the damage caused in vivo. In vitro evaluation included prospective recruitment of six subjects undergoing hysterectomy with or without salpingo-oophorectomy. Tissue damage was evaluated histologically for power levels at 10%, 15%, and 20%, and for duration of 2 and 5 s at a clinically acceptable distance of 0.5 to 1 cm between the tip of probe and tissue. In vivo evaluation included 15 subjects undergoing hysterectomy with or without salpingo-oophorectomy. The most suitable power setting and duration of diathermy was decided from in vitro examination and applied on in vivo setting. Tissue damage was evaluated histologically. There was no significant difference seen in the depth and width of tissue damage in the in vitro specimens at different low power levels and duration of diathermy (
P
> 0.05). A setting of 20% power and duration of 5 s of diathermy was used therefore for in vivo setting. Mean ± SD depth (millimetres) of tissue damage in uterus, ovary, and fallopian tube were 0.63 ± 0.19, 0.61 ± 0.14, and 0.63 ± 0.18, respectively. Mean ± SD width (millimetres) of tissue damage in uterus, ovary, and fallopian tube were 4.66 ± 0.05, 4.05 ± 0.61, and 4.51 ± 0.77, respectively. Irrespective of tissue type, the average depth and width of tissue damage with application of Plasmajet
TM
coagulator for 5 s at low power is 0.62 and 4.24 mm, respectively. It therefore appears to be a safe method of coagulation in vitro and in vivo at 20% power on gynaecological tissues.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1613-2076</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1613-2084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10397-010-0582-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Gynecology ; Infections ; Interventional Radiology ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Minimally Invasive Surgery ; Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery ; Original Article ; Reproductive Medicine ; Surgical Oncology</subject><ispartof>Gynecological surgery, 2010-11, Vol.7 (4), p.441-446</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-1a8beb3ada8ae2e3d4d10020690a3b223fba83ef139d7edb34e13b36846fede33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-1a8beb3ada8ae2e3d4d10020690a3b223fba83ef139d7edb34e13b36846fede33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10397-010-0582-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-010-0582-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41119,42188,51575</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-010-0582-3$$EView_record_in_Springer_Nature$$FView_record_in_$$GSpringer_Nature</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Deb, Shilpa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deen, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashford, K. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harwood, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newman, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powell, M. C.</creatorcontrib><title>Histological quantification of the tissue damage caused by PlasmaJet™ coagulator</title><title>Gynecological surgery</title><addtitle>Gynecol Surg</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to evaluate tissue damage caused by the PlasmaJet
TM
coagulator in the uterus, ovary, and fallopian tube at different power settings in vitro and then to examine the damage caused in vivo. In vitro evaluation included prospective recruitment of six subjects undergoing hysterectomy with or without salpingo-oophorectomy. Tissue damage was evaluated histologically for power levels at 10%, 15%, and 20%, and for duration of 2 and 5 s at a clinically acceptable distance of 0.5 to 1 cm between the tip of probe and tissue. In vivo evaluation included 15 subjects undergoing hysterectomy with or without salpingo-oophorectomy. The most suitable power setting and duration of diathermy was decided from in vitro examination and applied on in vivo setting. Tissue damage was evaluated histologically. There was no significant difference seen in the depth and width of tissue damage in the in vitro specimens at different low power levels and duration of diathermy (
P
> 0.05). A setting of 20% power and duration of 5 s of diathermy was used therefore for in vivo setting. Mean ± SD depth (millimetres) of tissue damage in uterus, ovary, and fallopian tube were 0.63 ± 0.19, 0.61 ± 0.14, and 0.63 ± 0.18, respectively. Mean ± SD width (millimetres) of tissue damage in uterus, ovary, and fallopian tube were 4.66 ± 0.05, 4.05 ± 0.61, and 4.51 ± 0.77, respectively. Irrespective of tissue type, the average depth and width of tissue damage with application of Plasmajet
TM
coagulator for 5 s at low power is 0.62 and 4.24 mm, respectively. It therefore appears to be a safe method of coagulation in vitro and in vivo at 20% power on gynaecological tissues.</description><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Interventional Radiology</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgery</subject><subject>Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Reproductive Medicine</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><issn>1613-2076</issn><issn>1613-2084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhS0EEqVwAHaWWAdsT5qfJaqAgiqBEKytSTwJqdK4tZ1F95yEo_UkpApCbFiM5i3ee6P5GLuU4loKkd54KSBPIyFFJGaZiuCITWQiIVIii49_dZqcsjPvV0JAJmZqwl4XjQ-2tXVTYsu3PXahqQYdGttxW_HwQTw03vfEDa6xJl5i78nwYsdfWvRrfKKw__zipcW6bzFYd85OKmw9XfzsKXu_v3ubL6Ll88Pj_HYZlSCTEEnMCioADWZIisDEZvhEiSQXCIVSUBWYAVUScpOSKSAmCQUkWZxUZAhgyq7G3o2z25580Cvbu244qaWUKh4mnw0uObpKZ713VOmNa9bodloKfUCnR3R6QKcP6PShWY0ZP3i7mtyf5n9D38Kncvo</recordid><startdate>20101101</startdate><enddate>20101101</enddate><creator>Deb, Shilpa</creator><creator>Deen, S.</creator><creator>Ashford, K. S.</creator><creator>Harwood, A.</creator><creator>Newman, C.</creator><creator>Powell, M. C.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101101</creationdate><title>Histological quantification of the tissue damage caused by PlasmaJet™ coagulator</title><author>Deb, Shilpa ; Deen, S. ; Ashford, K. S. ; Harwood, A. ; Newman, C. ; Powell, M. C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-1a8beb3ada8ae2e3d4d10020690a3b223fba83ef139d7edb34e13b36846fede33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Interventional Radiology</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgery</topic><topic>Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Reproductive Medicine</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Deb, Shilpa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deen, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashford, K. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harwood, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newman, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powell, M. C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Gynecological surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Deb, Shilpa</au><au>Deen, S.</au><au>Ashford, K. S.</au><au>Harwood, A.</au><au>Newman, C.</au><au>Powell, M. C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Histological quantification of the tissue damage caused by PlasmaJet™ coagulator</atitle><jtitle>Gynecological surgery</jtitle><stitle>Gynecol Surg</stitle><date>2010-11-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>441</spage><epage>446</epage><pages>441-446</pages><issn>1613-2076</issn><eissn>1613-2084</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to evaluate tissue damage caused by the PlasmaJet
TM
coagulator in the uterus, ovary, and fallopian tube at different power settings in vitro and then to examine the damage caused in vivo. In vitro evaluation included prospective recruitment of six subjects undergoing hysterectomy with or without salpingo-oophorectomy. Tissue damage was evaluated histologically for power levels at 10%, 15%, and 20%, and for duration of 2 and 5 s at a clinically acceptable distance of 0.5 to 1 cm between the tip of probe and tissue. In vivo evaluation included 15 subjects undergoing hysterectomy with or without salpingo-oophorectomy. The most suitable power setting and duration of diathermy was decided from in vitro examination and applied on in vivo setting. Tissue damage was evaluated histologically. There was no significant difference seen in the depth and width of tissue damage in the in vitro specimens at different low power levels and duration of diathermy (
P
> 0.05). A setting of 20% power and duration of 5 s of diathermy was used therefore for in vivo setting. Mean ± SD depth (millimetres) of tissue damage in uterus, ovary, and fallopian tube were 0.63 ± 0.19, 0.61 ± 0.14, and 0.63 ± 0.18, respectively. Mean ± SD width (millimetres) of tissue damage in uterus, ovary, and fallopian tube were 4.66 ± 0.05, 4.05 ± 0.61, and 4.51 ± 0.77, respectively. Irrespective of tissue type, the average depth and width of tissue damage with application of Plasmajet
TM
coagulator for 5 s at low power is 0.62 and 4.24 mm, respectively. It therefore appears to be a safe method of coagulation in vitro and in vivo at 20% power on gynaecological tissues.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s10397-010-0582-3</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1613-2076 |
ispartof | Gynecological surgery, 2010-11, Vol.7 (4), p.441-446 |
issn | 1613-2076 1613-2084 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1112411295 |
source | Springer Nature OA Free Journals |
subjects | Gynecology Infections Interventional Radiology Medicine Medicine & Public Health Minimally Invasive Surgery Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery Original Article Reproductive Medicine Surgical Oncology |
title | Histological quantification of the tissue damage caused by PlasmaJet™ coagulator |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T22%3A27%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_C6C&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Histological%20quantification%20of%20the%20tissue%20damage%20caused%20by%20PlasmaJet%E2%84%A2%20coagulator&rft.jtitle=Gynecological%20surgery&rft.au=Deb,%20Shilpa&rft.date=2010-11-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=441&rft.epage=446&rft.pages=441-446&rft.issn=1613-2076&rft.eissn=1613-2084&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10397-010-0582-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_C6C%3E2790762101%3C/proquest_C6C%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1112411295&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |