Evaluation of micromilled metal mold masters for the replication of microchip electrophoresis devices
High-precision micromilling was assessed as a tool for the rapid fabrication of mold masters for replicating microchip devices in thermoplastics. As an example, microchip electrophoresis devices were hot embossed in poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA) from brass masters fabricated via micromilling. Spec...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Microfluidics and nanofluidics 2007-02, Vol.3 (1), p.1-11 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 11 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Microfluidics and nanofluidics |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | Hupert, Mateusz L. Guy, W. Jason Llopis, Shawn D. Shadpour, Hamed Rani, Sudheer Nikitopoulos, Dimitris E. Soper, Steven A. |
description | High-precision micromilling was assessed as a tool for the rapid fabrication of mold masters for replicating microchip devices in thermoplastics. As an example, microchip electrophoresis devices were hot embossed in poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA) from brass masters fabricated via micromilling. Specifically, sidewall roughness and milling topology limitations were investigated. Numerical simulations were performed to determine the effects of additional volumes present on injection plugs (i.e., shape, size, concentration profiles) due to curvature of the corners produced by micromilling. Elongation of the plug was not dramatic (< 20%) for injection crosses with radii of curvatures to channel width ratios less than 0.5. Use of stronger pinching potentials, as compared to sharp-corner injectors, were necessary in order to obtain short sample plugs. The sidewalls of the polymer microstructures were characterized by a maximum average roughness of 115 nm and mean peak height of 290 nm. Sidewall roughness had insignificant effects on the bulk EOF as it was statistically the same for PMMA microchannels with different aspect ratios compared to LiGA-prepared devices with a value of ca. 3.7 × 10^sup -4^ cm^sup 2^/(V s). PMMA microchip electrophoresis devices were used for the separation of pUC19 Sau3AI double-stranded DNA. The plate numbers achieved in the micromilled-based chips exceeded 1 million/m and were comparable to the plate numbers obtained for the LiGA-prepared devices of similar geometry.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10404-006-0091-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1112396272</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2790614111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-fae2b97bc49d02ac4a702947bc71f9b6d2372a3d2b34263afb5e3efa1056f9503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wFvA8-rko7vmKKV-QMGLnkM2O6Ep2WZNsqX-e7dUBA_DvAzvzDs8hNwyuGcAzUNmIEFWAPVUilWHMzJjNROVVArO__QjvyRXOW8BZMMZzAiu9iaMpvi4o9HR3tsUex8CdrTHYgLtY5ikyQVTpi4mWjZIEw7B2_9bduMHigFtSXHYxITZZ9rh3lvM1-TCmZDx5rfPyefz6mP5Wq3fX96WT-vKCqFK5QzyVjWtlaoDbqw0DXAlp0HDnGrrjouGG9HxVkheC-PaBQp0hsGidmoBYk7uTneHFL9GzEVv45h2U6RmjHGhat7wycVOrunrnBM6PSTfm_StGegjTX2iqSea-khTH8QPMJ1qHw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1112396272</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of micromilled metal mold masters for the replication of microchip electrophoresis devices</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Hupert, Mateusz L. ; Guy, W. Jason ; Llopis, Shawn D. ; Shadpour, Hamed ; Rani, Sudheer ; Nikitopoulos, Dimitris E. ; Soper, Steven A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hupert, Mateusz L. ; Guy, W. Jason ; Llopis, Shawn D. ; Shadpour, Hamed ; Rani, Sudheer ; Nikitopoulos, Dimitris E. ; Soper, Steven A.</creatorcontrib><description>High-precision micromilling was assessed as a tool for the rapid fabrication of mold masters for replicating microchip devices in thermoplastics. As an example, microchip electrophoresis devices were hot embossed in poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA) from brass masters fabricated via micromilling. Specifically, sidewall roughness and milling topology limitations were investigated. Numerical simulations were performed to determine the effects of additional volumes present on injection plugs (i.e., shape, size, concentration profiles) due to curvature of the corners produced by micromilling. Elongation of the plug was not dramatic (< 20%) for injection crosses with radii of curvatures to channel width ratios less than 0.5. Use of stronger pinching potentials, as compared to sharp-corner injectors, were necessary in order to obtain short sample plugs. The sidewalls of the polymer microstructures were characterized by a maximum average roughness of 115 nm and mean peak height of 290 nm. Sidewall roughness had insignificant effects on the bulk EOF as it was statistically the same for PMMA microchannels with different aspect ratios compared to LiGA-prepared devices with a value of ca. 3.7 × 10^sup -4^ cm^sup 2^/(V s). PMMA microchip electrophoresis devices were used for the separation of pUC19 Sau3AI double-stranded DNA. The plate numbers achieved in the micromilled-based chips exceeded 1 million/m and were comparable to the plate numbers obtained for the LiGA-prepared devices of similar geometry.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1613-4982</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1613-4990</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10404-006-0091-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Analytical chemistry ; Electrophoresis ; Fabrication ; Injection ; Polymers ; Semiconductors ; Studies ; Topology</subject><ispartof>Microfluidics and nanofluidics, 2007-02, Vol.3 (1), p.1-11</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-fae2b97bc49d02ac4a702947bc71f9b6d2372a3d2b34263afb5e3efa1056f9503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-fae2b97bc49d02ac4a702947bc71f9b6d2372a3d2b34263afb5e3efa1056f9503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hupert, Mateusz L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guy, W. Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Llopis, Shawn D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shadpour, Hamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rani, Sudheer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nikitopoulos, Dimitris E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soper, Steven A.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of micromilled metal mold masters for the replication of microchip electrophoresis devices</title><title>Microfluidics and nanofluidics</title><description>High-precision micromilling was assessed as a tool for the rapid fabrication of mold masters for replicating microchip devices in thermoplastics. As an example, microchip electrophoresis devices were hot embossed in poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA) from brass masters fabricated via micromilling. Specifically, sidewall roughness and milling topology limitations were investigated. Numerical simulations were performed to determine the effects of additional volumes present on injection plugs (i.e., shape, size, concentration profiles) due to curvature of the corners produced by micromilling. Elongation of the plug was not dramatic (< 20%) for injection crosses with radii of curvatures to channel width ratios less than 0.5. Use of stronger pinching potentials, as compared to sharp-corner injectors, were necessary in order to obtain short sample plugs. The sidewalls of the polymer microstructures were characterized by a maximum average roughness of 115 nm and mean peak height of 290 nm. Sidewall roughness had insignificant effects on the bulk EOF as it was statistically the same for PMMA microchannels with different aspect ratios compared to LiGA-prepared devices with a value of ca. 3.7 × 10^sup -4^ cm^sup 2^/(V s). PMMA microchip electrophoresis devices were used for the separation of pUC19 Sau3AI double-stranded DNA. The plate numbers achieved in the micromilled-based chips exceeded 1 million/m and were comparable to the plate numbers obtained for the LiGA-prepared devices of similar geometry.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Analytical chemistry</subject><subject>Electrophoresis</subject><subject>Fabrication</subject><subject>Injection</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Semiconductors</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Topology</subject><issn>1613-4982</issn><issn>1613-4990</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wFvA8-rko7vmKKV-QMGLnkM2O6Ep2WZNsqX-e7dUBA_DvAzvzDs8hNwyuGcAzUNmIEFWAPVUilWHMzJjNROVVArO__QjvyRXOW8BZMMZzAiu9iaMpvi4o9HR3tsUex8CdrTHYgLtY5ikyQVTpi4mWjZIEw7B2_9bduMHigFtSXHYxITZZ9rh3lvM1-TCmZDx5rfPyefz6mP5Wq3fX96WT-vKCqFK5QzyVjWtlaoDbqw0DXAlp0HDnGrrjouGG9HxVkheC-PaBQp0hsGidmoBYk7uTneHFL9GzEVv45h2U6RmjHGhat7wycVOrunrnBM6PSTfm_StGegjTX2iqSea-khTH8QPMJ1qHw</recordid><startdate>20070201</startdate><enddate>20070201</enddate><creator>Hupert, Mateusz L.</creator><creator>Guy, W. Jason</creator><creator>Llopis, Shawn D.</creator><creator>Shadpour, Hamed</creator><creator>Rani, Sudheer</creator><creator>Nikitopoulos, Dimitris E.</creator><creator>Soper, Steven A.</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>S0W</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070201</creationdate><title>Evaluation of micromilled metal mold masters for the replication of microchip electrophoresis devices</title><author>Hupert, Mateusz L. ; Guy, W. Jason ; Llopis, Shawn D. ; Shadpour, Hamed ; Rani, Sudheer ; Nikitopoulos, Dimitris E. ; Soper, Steven A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-fae2b97bc49d02ac4a702947bc71f9b6d2372a3d2b34263afb5e3efa1056f9503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Analytical chemistry</topic><topic>Electrophoresis</topic><topic>Fabrication</topic><topic>Injection</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Semiconductors</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Topology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hupert, Mateusz L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guy, W. Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Llopis, Shawn D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shadpour, Hamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rani, Sudheer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nikitopoulos, Dimitris E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soper, Steven A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Engineering & Technology Collection</collection><jtitle>Microfluidics and nanofluidics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hupert, Mateusz L.</au><au>Guy, W. Jason</au><au>Llopis, Shawn D.</au><au>Shadpour, Hamed</au><au>Rani, Sudheer</au><au>Nikitopoulos, Dimitris E.</au><au>Soper, Steven A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of micromilled metal mold masters for the replication of microchip electrophoresis devices</atitle><jtitle>Microfluidics and nanofluidics</jtitle><date>2007-02-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>11</epage><pages>1-11</pages><issn>1613-4982</issn><eissn>1613-4990</eissn><abstract>High-precision micromilling was assessed as a tool for the rapid fabrication of mold masters for replicating microchip devices in thermoplastics. As an example, microchip electrophoresis devices were hot embossed in poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA) from brass masters fabricated via micromilling. Specifically, sidewall roughness and milling topology limitations were investigated. Numerical simulations were performed to determine the effects of additional volumes present on injection plugs (i.e., shape, size, concentration profiles) due to curvature of the corners produced by micromilling. Elongation of the plug was not dramatic (< 20%) for injection crosses with radii of curvatures to channel width ratios less than 0.5. Use of stronger pinching potentials, as compared to sharp-corner injectors, were necessary in order to obtain short sample plugs. The sidewalls of the polymer microstructures were characterized by a maximum average roughness of 115 nm and mean peak height of 290 nm. Sidewall roughness had insignificant effects on the bulk EOF as it was statistically the same for PMMA microchannels with different aspect ratios compared to LiGA-prepared devices with a value of ca. 3.7 × 10^sup -4^ cm^sup 2^/(V s). PMMA microchip electrophoresis devices were used for the separation of pUC19 Sau3AI double-stranded DNA. The plate numbers achieved in the micromilled-based chips exceeded 1 million/m and were comparable to the plate numbers obtained for the LiGA-prepared devices of similar geometry.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/s10404-006-0091-x</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1613-4982 |
ispartof | Microfluidics and nanofluidics, 2007-02, Vol.3 (1), p.1-11 |
issn | 1613-4982 1613-4990 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1112396272 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Analytical chemistry Electrophoresis Fabrication Injection Polymers Semiconductors Studies Topology |
title | Evaluation of micromilled metal mold masters for the replication of microchip electrophoresis devices |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T20%3A09%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20micromilled%20metal%20mold%20masters%20for%20the%20replication%20of%20microchip%20electrophoresis%20devices&rft.jtitle=Microfluidics%20and%20nanofluidics&rft.au=Hupert,%20Mateusz%20L.&rft.date=2007-02-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=11&rft.pages=1-11&rft.issn=1613-4982&rft.eissn=1613-4990&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10404-006-0091-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2790614111%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1112396272&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |