Some Limitations to the Psychological Orientation in Semantic Theory
The psychological orientation treats semantics as a matter of idealized computation over symbolic structures, and semantic relations like denotation as relations between linguistic expressions and these structures. I argue that results similar to Gödel's incompleteness theorems and Tarski'...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of philosophical logic 2011-02, Vol.40 (1), p.1-14 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 14 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 1 |
| container_title | Journal of philosophical logic |
| container_volume | 40 |
| creator | Thomason, Richmond H. |
| description | The psychological orientation treats semantics as a matter of idealized computation over symbolic structures, and semantic relations like denotation as relations between linguistic expressions and these structures. I argue that results similar to Gödel's incompleteness theorems and Tarski's theorem on truth create foundational difficulties for this view of semantics. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10992-010-9151-5 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1112257966</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41487500</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41487500</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-fe54f47ef4085196b31b5e2f31fd21a5252b7a2dc802f6a3f3227cc6ed82f2923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEURoMoWB8_wIUw4Dp6781kMrOU-oRChdZ1SNOkndKZ1GS66L93yoi4cnU353wXDmM3CPcIoB4SQlURBwReoUQuT9gIpRIcciFO2QiAiIsC8ZxdpLQBgBKFGrGnWWhcNqmbujNdHdqUdSHr1i77SAe7Dtuwqq3ZZtNYu3YgsrrNZq4xbVfbbL52IR6u2Jk32-Suf-4l-3x5no_f-GT6-j5-nHArRNlx72Tuc-V8DqXEqlgIXEhHXqBfEhpJkhbK0NKWQL4wwgsiZW3hliV5qkhcsrthdxfD196lTm_CPrb9S42IRFJVRdFTOFA2hpSi83oX68bEg0bQx1h6iKX7WPoYS8veocFJPduuXPyz_I90O0ib1IX4-yXHvFQSQHwDwnR1Vw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1112257966</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Some Limitations to the Psychological Orientation in Semantic Theory</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Thomason, Richmond H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Thomason, Richmond H.</creatorcontrib><description>The psychological orientation treats semantics as a matter of idealized computation over symbolic structures, and semantic relations like denotation as relations between linguistic expressions and these structures. I argue that results similar to Gödel's incompleteness theorems and Tarski's theorem on truth create foundational difficulties for this view of semantics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3611</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0433</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10992-010-9151-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Artificial intelligence ; Cognitive psychology ; Denotational semantics ; Education ; Language ; Linguistics ; Logic ; Mathematical psychologism ; Mathematics ; Meaning ; Philosophy ; Phosphorus content ; Predicates ; Psychology ; Semantic relations ; Semantics ; Theory ; Truth</subject><ispartof>Journal of philosophical logic, 2011-02, Vol.40 (1), p.1-14</ispartof><rights>Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2011</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-fe54f47ef4085196b31b5e2f31fd21a5252b7a2dc802f6a3f3227cc6ed82f2923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-fe54f47ef4085196b31b5e2f31fd21a5252b7a2dc802f6a3f3227cc6ed82f2923</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41487500$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41487500$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thomason, Richmond H.</creatorcontrib><title>Some Limitations to the Psychological Orientation in Semantic Theory</title><title>Journal of philosophical logic</title><addtitle>J Philos Logic</addtitle><description>The psychological orientation treats semantics as a matter of idealized computation over symbolic structures, and semantic relations like denotation as relations between linguistic expressions and these structures. I argue that results similar to Gödel's incompleteness theorems and Tarski's theorem on truth create foundational difficulties for this view of semantics.</description><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Cognitive psychology</subject><subject>Denotational semantics</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Mathematical psychologism</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Meaning</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Phosphorus content</subject><subject>Predicates</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Semantic relations</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>Truth</subject><issn>0022-3611</issn><issn>1573-0433</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEURoMoWB8_wIUw4Dp6781kMrOU-oRChdZ1SNOkndKZ1GS66L93yoi4cnU353wXDmM3CPcIoB4SQlURBwReoUQuT9gIpRIcciFO2QiAiIsC8ZxdpLQBgBKFGrGnWWhcNqmbujNdHdqUdSHr1i77SAe7Dtuwqq3ZZtNYu3YgsrrNZq4xbVfbbL52IR6u2Jk32-Suf-4l-3x5no_f-GT6-j5-nHArRNlx72Tuc-V8DqXEqlgIXEhHXqBfEhpJkhbK0NKWQL4wwgsiZW3hliV5qkhcsrthdxfD196lTm_CPrb9S42IRFJVRdFTOFA2hpSi83oX68bEg0bQx1h6iKX7WPoYS8veocFJPduuXPyz_I90O0ib1IX4-yXHvFQSQHwDwnR1Vw</recordid><startdate>20110201</startdate><enddate>20110201</enddate><creator>Thomason, Richmond H.</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110201</creationdate><title>Some Limitations to the Psychological Orientation in Semantic Theory</title><author>Thomason, Richmond H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-fe54f47ef4085196b31b5e2f31fd21a5252b7a2dc802f6a3f3227cc6ed82f2923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Cognitive psychology</topic><topic>Denotational semantics</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Mathematical psychologism</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Meaning</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Phosphorus content</topic><topic>Predicates</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Semantic relations</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>Truth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thomason, Richmond H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences & Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of philosophical logic</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thomason, Richmond H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Some Limitations to the Psychological Orientation in Semantic Theory</atitle><jtitle>Journal of philosophical logic</jtitle><stitle>J Philos Logic</stitle><date>2011-02-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>1-14</pages><issn>0022-3611</issn><eissn>1573-0433</eissn><abstract>The psychological orientation treats semantics as a matter of idealized computation over symbolic structures, and semantic relations like denotation as relations between linguistic expressions and these structures. I argue that results similar to Gödel's incompleteness theorems and Tarski's theorem on truth create foundational difficulties for this view of semantics.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10992-010-9151-5</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-3611 |
| ispartof | Journal of philosophical logic, 2011-02, Vol.40 (1), p.1-14 |
| issn | 0022-3611 1573-0433 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1112257966 |
| source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Artificial intelligence Cognitive psychology Denotational semantics Education Language Linguistics Logic Mathematical psychologism Mathematics Meaning Philosophy Phosphorus content Predicates Psychology Semantic relations Semantics Theory Truth |
| title | Some Limitations to the Psychological Orientation in Semantic Theory |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T19%3A21%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Some%20Limitations%20to%20the%20Psychological%20Orientation%20in%20Semantic%20Theory&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20philosophical%20logic&rft.au=Thomason,%20Richmond%20H.&rft.date=2011-02-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=1-14&rft.issn=0022-3611&rft.eissn=1573-0433&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10992-010-9151-5&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41487500%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1112257966&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=41487500&rfr_iscdi=true |