Multicenter Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Standard Esophagectomy With Chemoradiotherapy for Treatment of Squamous Esophageal Cancer: Early Results From the Chinese University Research Group for Esophageal Cancer (CURE)
We conducted a prospective randomized trial to compare the efficacy and survival outcome by chemoradiation with that by esophagectomy as a curative treatment. From July 2000 to December 2004, 80 patients with potentially resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the mid or lower thoracic esophagus were...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of gastrointestinal surgery 2005-07, Vol.9 (6), p.794-802 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 802 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 794 |
container_title | Journal of gastrointestinal surgery |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Chiu, Philip W.Y. Chan, Angus C.W. Leung, S.F. Leong, H.T. Kwong, K.H. Li, Micheal K.W. Au-Yeung, Alex C.M. Chung, Sydney C.S. Ng, Enders K.W. |
description | We conducted a prospective randomized trial to compare the efficacy and survival outcome by chemoradiation with that by esophagectomy as a curative treatment. From July 2000 to December 2004, 80 patients with potentially resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the mid or lower thoracic esophagus were randomized to esophagectomy or chemoradiotherapy. A two- or three-stage esophagectomy with two-field dissection was performed. Patients treated with chemoradiotherapy received continuous 5-fluorouracil infusion (200 mg/m
2/day) from day 1 to 42 and cisplatin (60 mg/m
2) on days 1 and 22. The tumor and regional lymphatics were concomitantly irradiated to a total of 50–60 Gy. Tumor response was assessed by endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasonography, and computed tomography scan. Salvage esophagectomy was performed for incomplete response or recurrence. Forty-four patients received standard esophagectomy, whereas 36 were treated with chemoradiotherapy. Median follow-up was 16.9 months. The operative mortality was 6.8%. The incidence of postoperative complications was 38.6%. No difference in the early cumulative survival was found between the two groups (RR
=
0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.37–2.17; log-rank test
P
=
0.45). There was no difference in the disease-free survival. Patients treated with surgery had a slightly higher proportion of recurrence in the mediastinum, whereas those treated with chemoradiation sustained a higher proportion of recurrence in the cervical or abdominal regions. Standard esophagectomy or chemoradiotherapy offered similar early clinical outcome and survival for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. The challenge lies in the detection of residue disease after chemoradiotherapy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.05.005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1112236583</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1091255X05004695</els_id><sourcerecordid>2789659361</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-9c7c35b1276246b1bd433b4b8ac7e44c24728e521e702835ff150d4a65c960c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kdGK1DAUhoso7rr6BiIBb_SiY5ImbccLQcrsKqwoszvoXUjT02mGadM9SRfG1_VFTHcGvRCEAwnkP99_cv4kecnoglGWv9stttr7CRecUrmYi8pHyTkriywVOc8fxztdspRL-eMseeb9jlJWUFY-Tc5YHmWipOfJry_TPlgDQwAk39D5EUyw90DWemhcb39CQ27R6j2pXD9qtMOW3IT4prEhK-_GTm9jh-sP5LsNHak66B3qxrrQAerxQFqHkQA69NGEuJbc3E26d5P_0z7D9WAA35OVxv2BrMHHqTy5RNeTyIlUO4AHshniaOhteNCARtORK3TT-ODyD4-8qTbr1dvnyZNW7z28OJ0XyeZydVt9Sq-_Xn2uPl6nJivLkC5NYTJZM17kXOQ1qxuRZbWoS20KEMJwUfASJGdQUF5msm2ZpI3QuTTLnJosu0heH7kjursJfFA7N-EQLRVjjPMsl-WsEkeVidv2CK0a0fYaD4pRNSerduqYrJqTVXNRGdteneBT3UPzt-kUZRR8OAogfvHeAipvLMQ1NBZjQqpx9v8OvwG3nLsw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1112236583</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multicenter Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Standard Esophagectomy With Chemoradiotherapy for Treatment of Squamous Esophageal Cancer: Early Results From the Chinese University Research Group for Esophageal Cancer (CURE)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Chiu, Philip W.Y. ; Chan, Angus C.W. ; Leung, S.F. ; Leong, H.T. ; Kwong, K.H. ; Li, Micheal K.W. ; Au-Yeung, Alex C.M. ; Chung, Sydney C.S. ; Ng, Enders K.W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Philip W.Y. ; Chan, Angus C.W. ; Leung, S.F. ; Leong, H.T. ; Kwong, K.H. ; Li, Micheal K.W. ; Au-Yeung, Alex C.M. ; Chung, Sydney C.S. ; Ng, Enders K.W.</creatorcontrib><description>We conducted a prospective randomized trial to compare the efficacy and survival outcome by chemoradiation with that by esophagectomy as a curative treatment. From July 2000 to December 2004, 80 patients with potentially resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the mid or lower thoracic esophagus were randomized to esophagectomy or chemoradiotherapy. A two- or three-stage esophagectomy with two-field dissection was performed. Patients treated with chemoradiotherapy received continuous 5-fluorouracil infusion (200 mg/m
2/day) from day 1 to 42 and cisplatin (60 mg/m
2) on days 1 and 22. The tumor and regional lymphatics were concomitantly irradiated to a total of 50–60 Gy. Tumor response was assessed by endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasonography, and computed tomography scan. Salvage esophagectomy was performed for incomplete response or recurrence. Forty-four patients received standard esophagectomy, whereas 36 were treated with chemoradiotherapy. Median follow-up was 16.9 months. The operative mortality was 6.8%. The incidence of postoperative complications was 38.6%. No difference in the early cumulative survival was found between the two groups (RR
=
0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.37–2.17; log-rank test
P
=
0.45). There was no difference in the disease-free survival. Patients treated with surgery had a slightly higher proportion of recurrence in the mediastinum, whereas those treated with chemoradiation sustained a higher proportion of recurrence in the cervical or abdominal regions. Standard esophagectomy or chemoradiotherapy offered similar early clinical outcome and survival for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. The challenge lies in the detection of residue disease after chemoradiotherapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1091-255X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4626</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.05.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16187480</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use ; Carcinoma of esophagus ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - drug therapy ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - mortality ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - radiotherapy ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery ; Cervical cancer ; chemoradiation ; chemoradiotherapy ; Chemotherapy ; Cisplatin - therapeutic use ; Confidence intervals ; Esophageal Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Esophageal Neoplasms - mortality ; Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology ; Esophageal Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery ; esophagectomy ; Esophagectomy - methods ; Female ; Fluorouracil - therapeutic use ; Hong Kong ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; Neoplasm Staging ; Probability ; Prognosis ; Prospective Studies ; Radiotherapy, Conformal - methods ; Risk Assessment ; Skin cancer ; squamous cell carcinoma ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Survival Analysis ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2005-07, Vol.9 (6), p.794-802</ispartof><rights>2005 The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract</rights><rights>The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Inc. 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-9c7c35b1276246b1bd433b4b8ac7e44c24728e521e702835ff150d4a65c960c33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-9c7c35b1276246b1bd433b4b8ac7e44c24728e521e702835ff150d4a65c960c33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16187480$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Philip W.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Angus C.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leung, S.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leong, H.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwong, K.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Micheal K.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Au-Yeung, Alex C.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Sydney C.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Enders K.W.</creatorcontrib><title>Multicenter Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Standard Esophagectomy With Chemoradiotherapy for Treatment of Squamous Esophageal Cancer: Early Results From the Chinese University Research Group for Esophageal Cancer (CURE)</title><title>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</title><addtitle>J Gastrointest Surg</addtitle><description>We conducted a prospective randomized trial to compare the efficacy and survival outcome by chemoradiation with that by esophagectomy as a curative treatment. From July 2000 to December 2004, 80 patients with potentially resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the mid or lower thoracic esophagus were randomized to esophagectomy or chemoradiotherapy. A two- or three-stage esophagectomy with two-field dissection was performed. Patients treated with chemoradiotherapy received continuous 5-fluorouracil infusion (200 mg/m
2/day) from day 1 to 42 and cisplatin (60 mg/m
2) on days 1 and 22. The tumor and regional lymphatics were concomitantly irradiated to a total of 50–60 Gy. Tumor response was assessed by endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasonography, and computed tomography scan. Salvage esophagectomy was performed for incomplete response or recurrence. Forty-four patients received standard esophagectomy, whereas 36 were treated with chemoradiotherapy. Median follow-up was 16.9 months. The operative mortality was 6.8%. The incidence of postoperative complications was 38.6%. No difference in the early cumulative survival was found between the two groups (RR
=
0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.37–2.17; log-rank test
P
=
0.45). There was no difference in the disease-free survival. Patients treated with surgery had a slightly higher proportion of recurrence in the mediastinum, whereas those treated with chemoradiation sustained a higher proportion of recurrence in the cervical or abdominal regions. Standard esophagectomy or chemoradiotherapy offered similar early clinical outcome and survival for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. The challenge lies in the detection of residue disease after chemoradiotherapy.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Carcinoma of esophagus</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - drug therapy</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - mortality</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery</subject><subject>Cervical cancer</subject><subject>chemoradiation</subject><subject>chemoradiotherapy</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Cisplatin - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>esophagectomy</subject><subject>Esophagectomy - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluorouracil - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Hong Kong</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Conformal - methods</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Skin cancer</subject><subject>squamous cell carcinoma</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1091-255X</issn><issn>1873-4626</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kdGK1DAUhoso7rr6BiIBb_SiY5ImbccLQcrsKqwoszvoXUjT02mGadM9SRfG1_VFTHcGvRCEAwnkP99_cv4kecnoglGWv9stttr7CRecUrmYi8pHyTkriywVOc8fxztdspRL-eMseeb9jlJWUFY-Tc5YHmWipOfJry_TPlgDQwAk39D5EUyw90DWemhcb39CQ27R6j2pXD9qtMOW3IT4prEhK-_GTm9jh-sP5LsNHak66B3qxrrQAerxQFqHkQA69NGEuJbc3E26d5P_0z7D9WAA35OVxv2BrMHHqTy5RNeTyIlUO4AHshniaOhteNCARtORK3TT-ODyD4-8qTbr1dvnyZNW7z28OJ0XyeZydVt9Sq-_Xn2uPl6nJivLkC5NYTJZM17kXOQ1qxuRZbWoS20KEMJwUfASJGdQUF5msm2ZpI3QuTTLnJosu0heH7kjursJfFA7N-EQLRVjjPMsl-WsEkeVidv2CK0a0fYaD4pRNSerduqYrJqTVXNRGdteneBT3UPzt-kUZRR8OAogfvHeAipvLMQ1NBZjQqpx9v8OvwG3nLsw</recordid><startdate>20050701</startdate><enddate>20050701</enddate><creator>Chiu, Philip W.Y.</creator><creator>Chan, Angus C.W.</creator><creator>Leung, S.F.</creator><creator>Leong, H.T.</creator><creator>Kwong, K.H.</creator><creator>Li, Micheal K.W.</creator><creator>Au-Yeung, Alex C.M.</creator><creator>Chung, Sydney C.S.</creator><creator>Ng, Enders K.W.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050701</creationdate><title>Multicenter Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Standard Esophagectomy With Chemoradiotherapy for Treatment of Squamous Esophageal Cancer: Early Results From the Chinese University Research Group for Esophageal Cancer (CURE)</title><author>Chiu, Philip W.Y. ; Chan, Angus C.W. ; Leung, S.F. ; Leong, H.T. ; Kwong, K.H. ; Li, Micheal K.W. ; Au-Yeung, Alex C.M. ; Chung, Sydney C.S. ; Ng, Enders K.W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-9c7c35b1276246b1bd433b4b8ac7e44c24728e521e702835ff150d4a65c960c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Carcinoma of esophagus</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - drug therapy</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - mortality</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery</topic><topic>Cervical cancer</topic><topic>chemoradiation</topic><topic>chemoradiotherapy</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Cisplatin - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>esophagectomy</topic><topic>Esophagectomy - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluorouracil - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Hong Kong</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Conformal - methods</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Skin cancer</topic><topic>squamous cell carcinoma</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Philip W.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Angus C.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leung, S.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leong, H.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwong, K.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Micheal K.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Au-Yeung, Alex C.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Sydney C.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Enders K.W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chiu, Philip W.Y.</au><au>Chan, Angus C.W.</au><au>Leung, S.F.</au><au>Leong, H.T.</au><au>Kwong, K.H.</au><au>Li, Micheal K.W.</au><au>Au-Yeung, Alex C.M.</au><au>Chung, Sydney C.S.</au><au>Ng, Enders K.W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multicenter Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Standard Esophagectomy With Chemoradiotherapy for Treatment of Squamous Esophageal Cancer: Early Results From the Chinese University Research Group for Esophageal Cancer (CURE)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Gastrointest Surg</addtitle><date>2005-07-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>794</spage><epage>802</epage><pages>794-802</pages><issn>1091-255X</issn><eissn>1873-4626</eissn><abstract>We conducted a prospective randomized trial to compare the efficacy and survival outcome by chemoradiation with that by esophagectomy as a curative treatment. From July 2000 to December 2004, 80 patients with potentially resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the mid or lower thoracic esophagus were randomized to esophagectomy or chemoradiotherapy. A two- or three-stage esophagectomy with two-field dissection was performed. Patients treated with chemoradiotherapy received continuous 5-fluorouracil infusion (200 mg/m
2/day) from day 1 to 42 and cisplatin (60 mg/m
2) on days 1 and 22. The tumor and regional lymphatics were concomitantly irradiated to a total of 50–60 Gy. Tumor response was assessed by endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasonography, and computed tomography scan. Salvage esophagectomy was performed for incomplete response or recurrence. Forty-four patients received standard esophagectomy, whereas 36 were treated with chemoradiotherapy. Median follow-up was 16.9 months. The operative mortality was 6.8%. The incidence of postoperative complications was 38.6%. No difference in the early cumulative survival was found between the two groups (RR
=
0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.37–2.17; log-rank test
P
=
0.45). There was no difference in the disease-free survival. Patients treated with surgery had a slightly higher proportion of recurrence in the mediastinum, whereas those treated with chemoradiation sustained a higher proportion of recurrence in the cervical or abdominal regions. Standard esophagectomy or chemoradiotherapy offered similar early clinical outcome and survival for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. The challenge lies in the detection of residue disease after chemoradiotherapy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>16187480</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gassur.2005.05.005</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1091-255X |
ispartof | Journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2005-07, Vol.9 (6), p.794-802 |
issn | 1091-255X 1873-4626 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1112236583 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adult Aged Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use Carcinoma of esophagus Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - drug therapy Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - mortality Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - radiotherapy Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery Cervical cancer chemoradiation chemoradiotherapy Chemotherapy Cisplatin - therapeutic use Confidence intervals Esophageal Neoplasms - drug therapy Esophageal Neoplasms - mortality Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology Esophageal Neoplasms - radiotherapy Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery esophagectomy Esophagectomy - methods Female Fluorouracil - therapeutic use Hong Kong Humans Male Middle Aged Mortality Neoplasm Staging Probability Prognosis Prospective Studies Radiotherapy, Conformal - methods Risk Assessment Skin cancer squamous cell carcinoma Statistics, Nonparametric Survival Analysis Treatment Outcome |
title | Multicenter Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Standard Esophagectomy With Chemoradiotherapy for Treatment of Squamous Esophageal Cancer: Early Results From the Chinese University Research Group for Esophageal Cancer (CURE) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T01%3A43%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multicenter%20Prospective%20Randomized%20Trial%20Comparing%20Standard%20Esophagectomy%20With%20Chemoradiotherapy%20for%20Treatment%20of%20Squamous%20Esophageal%20Cancer:%20Early%20Results%20From%20the%20Chinese%20University%20Research%20Group%20for%20Esophageal%20Cancer%20(CURE)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20gastrointestinal%20surgery&rft.au=Chiu,%20Philip%20W.Y.&rft.date=2005-07-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=794&rft.epage=802&rft.pages=794-802&rft.issn=1091-255X&rft.eissn=1873-4626&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.05.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2789659361%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1112236583&rft_id=info:pmid/16187480&rft_els_id=S1091255X05004695&rfr_iscdi=true |