Comparative compositional analysis of walls with two different morphologies: archetypical versus transfer-cell-like
Abnormally thick cell walls of a clonal maize cell line with the labyrinth wall morphology found in transfer cells were analyzed and compared to the relatively thin and even archetypical walls of a sister cell line. Despite a drastic difference in wall morphology between the transfer and archetypica...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Protoplasma 1999-01, Vol.209 (3/4), p.238-245 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 245 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3/4 |
container_start_page | 238 |
container_title | Protoplasma |
container_volume | 209 |
creator | DeWitt, G Richards, J Mohnen, D Jones, A.M |
description | Abnormally thick cell walls of a clonal maize cell line with the labyrinth wall morphology found in transfer cells were analyzed and compared to the relatively thin and even archetypical walls of a sister cell line. Despite a drastic difference in wall morphology between the transfer and archetypical cell walls, the chemical composition of the walls was essentially the same. There were no major differences in the glycosyl residue composition, in the amount of total lipid, and in the amount of total protein. The amounts of wall material released by chemical extraction of cellulosic, hemicellulosic, and pectic fractions were the same for the two types of walls. There were some differences in the protein profile and in the inorganic ion content between the transfer and archetypical walls. These results indicate that profound changes in wall morphology can be brought about in the absence of gross changes in wall composition and suggest that major changes in time- or place-dependent deposition and/or subtle changes in arrangement of rare wall constituents may be responsible.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/bf01453452 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1095681399</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2785611521</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-b3e46d1bfb01939808f1031629857a8677cb49c9baf3bb98b11088ab92954ce23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo10MFqGzEQBmBRUqjj9NIXqKC3wqYzq9Wu1Ftq4qYQyKEx5LZIshQrXVsbjRzjt88WJ5eZOXwzMD9jXxAuEaD7YQNgI0Uj6w9shi3KqkWoz9gMQIgKlXj4xM6JngBA1iBnjBZpO5psSnzx3E1zolhi2pmBm6kcKRJPgR_MMBA_xLLh5ZD4Oobgs98Vvk153KQhPUZPP7nJbuPLcYxu2n_xmfbESzY7mnTl_DBUQ_znL9jHYAbyn9_6nK2W1_eLm-r27vefxdVt5QRCqazwTbtGGyygFlqBCggC21or2RnVdp2zjXbamiCs1coiglLG6lrLxvlazNm3090xp-e9p9I_pX2evqIeQctWodB6Ut9PyuVElH3oxxy3Jh8n1P8Ptf-1fA91wl9POJjUm8ccqV_9rQEF1FrIruvEKzUrdJQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1095681399</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative compositional analysis of walls with two different morphologies: archetypical versus transfer-cell-like</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>DeWitt, G ; Richards, J ; Mohnen, D ; Jones, A.M</creator><creatorcontrib>DeWitt, G ; Richards, J ; Mohnen, D ; Jones, A.M</creatorcontrib><description>Abnormally thick cell walls of a clonal maize cell line with the labyrinth wall morphology found in transfer cells were analyzed and compared to the relatively thin and even archetypical walls of a sister cell line. Despite a drastic difference in wall morphology between the transfer and archetypical cell walls, the chemical composition of the walls was essentially the same. There were no major differences in the glycosyl residue composition, in the amount of total lipid, and in the amount of total protein. The amounts of wall material released by chemical extraction of cellulosic, hemicellulosic, and pectic fractions were the same for the two types of walls. There were some differences in the protein profile and in the inorganic ion content between the transfer and archetypical walls. These results indicate that profound changes in wall morphology can be brought about in the absence of gross changes in wall composition and suggest that major changes in time- or place-dependent deposition and/or subtle changes in arrangement of rare wall constituents may be responsible.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-183X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1615-6102</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/bf01453452</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Vienna: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>cell wall components ; cell walls ; cellulose ; endosperm ; hemicellulose ; lipids ; pectins ; plant proteins ; Zea mays</subject><ispartof>Protoplasma, 1999-01, Vol.209 (3/4), p.238-245</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-b3e46d1bfb01939808f1031629857a8677cb49c9baf3bb98b11088ab92954ce23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-b3e46d1bfb01939808f1031629857a8677cb49c9baf3bb98b11088ab92954ce23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>DeWitt, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohnen, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, A.M</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative compositional analysis of walls with two different morphologies: archetypical versus transfer-cell-like</title><title>Protoplasma</title><description>Abnormally thick cell walls of a clonal maize cell line with the labyrinth wall morphology found in transfer cells were analyzed and compared to the relatively thin and even archetypical walls of a sister cell line. Despite a drastic difference in wall morphology between the transfer and archetypical cell walls, the chemical composition of the walls was essentially the same. There were no major differences in the glycosyl residue composition, in the amount of total lipid, and in the amount of total protein. The amounts of wall material released by chemical extraction of cellulosic, hemicellulosic, and pectic fractions were the same for the two types of walls. There were some differences in the protein profile and in the inorganic ion content between the transfer and archetypical walls. These results indicate that profound changes in wall morphology can be brought about in the absence of gross changes in wall composition and suggest that major changes in time- or place-dependent deposition and/or subtle changes in arrangement of rare wall constituents may be responsible.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>cell wall components</subject><subject>cell walls</subject><subject>cellulose</subject><subject>endosperm</subject><subject>hemicellulose</subject><subject>lipids</subject><subject>pectins</subject><subject>plant proteins</subject><subject>Zea mays</subject><issn>0033-183X</issn><issn>1615-6102</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNo10MFqGzEQBmBRUqjj9NIXqKC3wqYzq9Wu1Ftq4qYQyKEx5LZIshQrXVsbjRzjt88WJ5eZOXwzMD9jXxAuEaD7YQNgI0Uj6w9shi3KqkWoz9gMQIgKlXj4xM6JngBA1iBnjBZpO5psSnzx3E1zolhi2pmBm6kcKRJPgR_MMBA_xLLh5ZD4Oobgs98Vvk153KQhPUZPP7nJbuPLcYxu2n_xmfbESzY7mnTl_DBUQ_znL9jHYAbyn9_6nK2W1_eLm-r27vefxdVt5QRCqazwTbtGGyygFlqBCggC21or2RnVdp2zjXbamiCs1coiglLG6lrLxvlazNm3090xp-e9p9I_pX2evqIeQctWodB6Ut9PyuVElH3oxxy3Jh8n1P8Ptf-1fA91wl9POJjUm8ccqV_9rQEF1FrIruvEKzUrdJQ</recordid><startdate>19990101</startdate><enddate>19990101</enddate><creator>DeWitt, G</creator><creator>Richards, J</creator><creator>Mohnen, D</creator><creator>Jones, A.M</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990101</creationdate><title>Comparative compositional analysis of walls with two different morphologies: archetypical versus transfer-cell-like</title><author>DeWitt, G ; Richards, J ; Mohnen, D ; Jones, A.M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-b3e46d1bfb01939808f1031629857a8677cb49c9baf3bb98b11088ab92954ce23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>cell wall components</topic><topic>cell walls</topic><topic>cellulose</topic><topic>endosperm</topic><topic>hemicellulose</topic><topic>lipids</topic><topic>pectins</topic><topic>plant proteins</topic><topic>Zea mays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DeWitt, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohnen, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, A.M</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Protoplasma</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DeWitt, G</au><au>Richards, J</au><au>Mohnen, D</au><au>Jones, A.M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative compositional analysis of walls with two different morphologies: archetypical versus transfer-cell-like</atitle><jtitle>Protoplasma</jtitle><date>1999-01-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>209</volume><issue>3/4</issue><spage>238</spage><epage>245</epage><pages>238-245</pages><issn>0033-183X</issn><eissn>1615-6102</eissn><abstract>Abnormally thick cell walls of a clonal maize cell line with the labyrinth wall morphology found in transfer cells were analyzed and compared to the relatively thin and even archetypical walls of a sister cell line. Despite a drastic difference in wall morphology between the transfer and archetypical cell walls, the chemical composition of the walls was essentially the same. There were no major differences in the glycosyl residue composition, in the amount of total lipid, and in the amount of total protein. The amounts of wall material released by chemical extraction of cellulosic, hemicellulosic, and pectic fractions were the same for the two types of walls. There were some differences in the protein profile and in the inorganic ion content between the transfer and archetypical walls. These results indicate that profound changes in wall morphology can be brought about in the absence of gross changes in wall composition and suggest that major changes in time- or place-dependent deposition and/or subtle changes in arrangement of rare wall constituents may be responsible.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Vienna</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/bf01453452</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-183X |
ispartof | Protoplasma, 1999-01, Vol.209 (3/4), p.238-245 |
issn | 0033-183X 1615-6102 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1095681399 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | cell wall components cell walls cellulose endosperm hemicellulose lipids pectins plant proteins Zea mays |
title | Comparative compositional analysis of walls with two different morphologies: archetypical versus transfer-cell-like |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T08%3A17%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20compositional%20analysis%20of%20walls%20with%20two%20different%20morphologies:%20archetypical%20versus%20transfer-cell-like&rft.jtitle=Protoplasma&rft.au=DeWitt,%20G&rft.date=1999-01-01&rft.volume=209&rft.issue=3/4&rft.spage=238&rft.epage=245&rft.pages=238-245&rft.issn=0033-183X&rft.eissn=1615-6102&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/bf01453452&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2785611521%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1095681399&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |