Hysteroscopic sterilization with Essure® device in situ: a challenge?
Hysteroscopic sterilization through the Essure® method is preferably performed in the outpatient department without any form of anesthesia. This approach requires the hysteroscopic skills of the gynecologist to use the vaginoscopic route. Initially, the manufacturer advised to remove any type of int...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gynecological surgery 2011-02, Vol.8 (1), p.51-55 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 55 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 51 |
container_title | Gynecological surgery |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Vleugels, Michel P. H. Heckel, Sergine Veersema, Sebastian Engrand, Jean Bernard Villefranque, Vincent Fernandez, Hervé Panel, Pierre |
description | Hysteroscopic sterilization through the Essure® method is preferably performed in the outpatient department without any form of anesthesia. This approach requires the hysteroscopic skills of the gynecologist to use the vaginoscopic route. Initially, the manufacturer advised to remove any type of intrauterine device (IUD), 1 month before the procedure, to prevent difficult procedures and also to increase the success rate of placement. This observational prospective study analyzed the outcome in women in where the IUD was left in the uterus during the sterilization. During a period of 2 years, all women have been included consecutively in seven public hospitals located in France and the Netherlands. During this procedure, 32 out of 239 IUDs had to be removed to finish the sterilization successfully. The placement success rate was 97%. Placement failures were not related to the IUD being present at the time of the procedure. At confirmation tests 3 months after insertion of the Essure®, only five tubes were still patent. No complications were registered. Pain was recorded, and women responded well on oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug medication. The IUD did not need to be removed before the start of the hysteroscopic sterilization; only in case the procedure could not be completed, the IUD had to be removed during the sterilization itself. Placement rate was 97.1%. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10397-010-0615-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_C6C</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1095599046</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2784917881</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-8e2ffb236b2a76bea7b819a95ee40531418cc5f694c8ca2d20ccb8a19ecfd8e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFOwzAQRC0EEqXwAdwscQ6snTixuSBUtRSpEhc4W467oa5CUuwEFD6Kj-DLcBWEuHDaOczMah4h5wwuGUBxFRikqkiAQQI5E8lwQCYsZ2nCQWaHv7rIj8lJCFuAVILgE7JYDqFD3wbb7pyle-1q92E61zb03XUbOg-h9_j1Sdf45ixS19Dguv6aGmo3pq6xecabU3JUmTrg2c-dkqfF_HG2TFYPd_ez21ViU6G6RCKvqpKneclNkZdoilIyZZRAzECkLGPSWlHlKrPSGr7mYG0pDVNoq7VESKfkYuzd-fa1x9Dpbdv7Jr7UDJQQSkGWRxcbXTYOCx4rvfPuxfghmvQelx5x6YhL73HpIWb4mAnRGyf5v83_hb4Bw7lvIg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1095599046</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hysteroscopic sterilization with Essure® device in situ: a challenge?</title><source>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</source><creator>Vleugels, Michel P. H. ; Heckel, Sergine ; Veersema, Sebastian ; Engrand, Jean Bernard ; Villefranque, Vincent ; Fernandez, Hervé ; Panel, Pierre</creator><creatorcontrib>Vleugels, Michel P. H. ; Heckel, Sergine ; Veersema, Sebastian ; Engrand, Jean Bernard ; Villefranque, Vincent ; Fernandez, Hervé ; Panel, Pierre</creatorcontrib><description>Hysteroscopic sterilization through the Essure® method is preferably performed in the outpatient department without any form of anesthesia. This approach requires the hysteroscopic skills of the gynecologist to use the vaginoscopic route. Initially, the manufacturer advised to remove any type of intrauterine device (IUD), 1 month before the procedure, to prevent difficult procedures and also to increase the success rate of placement. This observational prospective study analyzed the outcome in women in where the IUD was left in the uterus during the sterilization. During a period of 2 years, all women have been included consecutively in seven public hospitals located in France and the Netherlands. During this procedure, 32 out of 239 IUDs had to be removed to finish the sterilization successfully. The placement success rate was 97%. Placement failures were not related to the IUD being present at the time of the procedure. At confirmation tests 3 months after insertion of the Essure®, only five tubes were still patent. No complications were registered. Pain was recorded, and women responded well on oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug medication. The IUD did not need to be removed before the start of the hysteroscopic sterilization; only in case the procedure could not be completed, the IUD had to be removed during the sterilization itself. Placement rate was 97.1%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1613-2076</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1613-2084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10397-010-0615-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Gynecology ; Interventional Radiology ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Minimally Invasive Surgery ; Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery ; Original Article ; Reproductive Medicine ; Surgical Oncology</subject><ispartof>Gynecological surgery, 2011-02, Vol.8 (1), p.51-55</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2010</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-8e2ffb236b2a76bea7b819a95ee40531418cc5f694c8ca2d20ccb8a19ecfd8e03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-8e2ffb236b2a76bea7b819a95ee40531418cc5f694c8ca2d20ccb8a19ecfd8e03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10397-010-0615-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-010-0615-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41120,42189,51576</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-010-0615-y$$EView_record_in_Springer_Nature$$FView_record_in_$$GSpringer_Nature</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vleugels, Michel P. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heckel, Sergine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veersema, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engrand, Jean Bernard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villefranque, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandez, Hervé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panel, Pierre</creatorcontrib><title>Hysteroscopic sterilization with Essure® device in situ: a challenge?</title><title>Gynecological surgery</title><addtitle>Gynecol Surg</addtitle><description>Hysteroscopic sterilization through the Essure® method is preferably performed in the outpatient department without any form of anesthesia. This approach requires the hysteroscopic skills of the gynecologist to use the vaginoscopic route. Initially, the manufacturer advised to remove any type of intrauterine device (IUD), 1 month before the procedure, to prevent difficult procedures and also to increase the success rate of placement. This observational prospective study analyzed the outcome in women in where the IUD was left in the uterus during the sterilization. During a period of 2 years, all women have been included consecutively in seven public hospitals located in France and the Netherlands. During this procedure, 32 out of 239 IUDs had to be removed to finish the sterilization successfully. The placement success rate was 97%. Placement failures were not related to the IUD being present at the time of the procedure. At confirmation tests 3 months after insertion of the Essure®, only five tubes were still patent. No complications were registered. Pain was recorded, and women responded well on oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug medication. The IUD did not need to be removed before the start of the hysteroscopic sterilization; only in case the procedure could not be completed, the IUD had to be removed during the sterilization itself. Placement rate was 97.1%.</description><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Interventional Radiology</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgery</subject><subject>Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Reproductive Medicine</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><issn>1613-2076</issn><issn>1613-2084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMFOwzAQRC0EEqXwAdwscQ6snTixuSBUtRSpEhc4W467oa5CUuwEFD6Kj-DLcBWEuHDaOczMah4h5wwuGUBxFRikqkiAQQI5E8lwQCYsZ2nCQWaHv7rIj8lJCFuAVILgE7JYDqFD3wbb7pyle-1q92E61zb03XUbOg-h9_j1Sdf45ixS19Dguv6aGmo3pq6xecabU3JUmTrg2c-dkqfF_HG2TFYPd_ez21ViU6G6RCKvqpKneclNkZdoilIyZZRAzECkLGPSWlHlKrPSGr7mYG0pDVNoq7VESKfkYuzd-fa1x9Dpbdv7Jr7UDJQQSkGWRxcbXTYOCx4rvfPuxfghmvQelx5x6YhL73HpIWb4mAnRGyf5v83_hb4Bw7lvIg</recordid><startdate>20110201</startdate><enddate>20110201</enddate><creator>Vleugels, Michel P. H.</creator><creator>Heckel, Sergine</creator><creator>Veersema, Sebastian</creator><creator>Engrand, Jean Bernard</creator><creator>Villefranque, Vincent</creator><creator>Fernandez, Hervé</creator><creator>Panel, Pierre</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110201</creationdate><title>Hysteroscopic sterilization with Essure® device in situ: a challenge?</title><author>Vleugels, Michel P. H. ; Heckel, Sergine ; Veersema, Sebastian ; Engrand, Jean Bernard ; Villefranque, Vincent ; Fernandez, Hervé ; Panel, Pierre</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-8e2ffb236b2a76bea7b819a95ee40531418cc5f694c8ca2d20ccb8a19ecfd8e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Interventional Radiology</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgery</topic><topic>Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Reproductive Medicine</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vleugels, Michel P. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heckel, Sergine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veersema, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engrand, Jean Bernard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villefranque, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandez, Hervé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panel, Pierre</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Gynecological surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vleugels, Michel P. H.</au><au>Heckel, Sergine</au><au>Veersema, Sebastian</au><au>Engrand, Jean Bernard</au><au>Villefranque, Vincent</au><au>Fernandez, Hervé</au><au>Panel, Pierre</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hysteroscopic sterilization with Essure® device in situ: a challenge?</atitle><jtitle>Gynecological surgery</jtitle><stitle>Gynecol Surg</stitle><date>2011-02-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>51</spage><epage>55</epage><pages>51-55</pages><issn>1613-2076</issn><eissn>1613-2084</eissn><abstract>Hysteroscopic sterilization through the Essure® method is preferably performed in the outpatient department without any form of anesthesia. This approach requires the hysteroscopic skills of the gynecologist to use the vaginoscopic route. Initially, the manufacturer advised to remove any type of intrauterine device (IUD), 1 month before the procedure, to prevent difficult procedures and also to increase the success rate of placement. This observational prospective study analyzed the outcome in women in where the IUD was left in the uterus during the sterilization. During a period of 2 years, all women have been included consecutively in seven public hospitals located in France and the Netherlands. During this procedure, 32 out of 239 IUDs had to be removed to finish the sterilization successfully. The placement success rate was 97%. Placement failures were not related to the IUD being present at the time of the procedure. At confirmation tests 3 months after insertion of the Essure®, only five tubes were still patent. No complications were registered. Pain was recorded, and women responded well on oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug medication. The IUD did not need to be removed before the start of the hysteroscopic sterilization; only in case the procedure could not be completed, the IUD had to be removed during the sterilization itself. Placement rate was 97.1%.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s10397-010-0615-y</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1613-2076 |
ispartof | Gynecological surgery, 2011-02, Vol.8 (1), p.51-55 |
issn | 1613-2076 1613-2084 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1095599046 |
source | Springer Nature OA/Free Journals |
subjects | Gynecology Interventional Radiology Medicine Medicine & Public Health Minimally Invasive Surgery Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery Original Article Reproductive Medicine Surgical Oncology |
title | Hysteroscopic sterilization with Essure® device in situ: a challenge? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T05%3A59%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_C6C&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hysteroscopic%20sterilization%20with%20Essure%C2%AE%20device%20in%20situ:%20a%20challenge?&rft.jtitle=Gynecological%20surgery&rft.au=Vleugels,%20Michel%20P.%20H.&rft.date=2011-02-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=51&rft.epage=55&rft.pages=51-55&rft.issn=1613-2076&rft.eissn=1613-2084&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10397-010-0615-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_C6C%3E2784917881%3C/proquest_C6C%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1095599046&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |