Toxicity and Dose Response of Intra-Abdominally Administered Poly-L-[alpha]-Lysine and Poly-L-Glutamate for Postoperative Adhesion Protection
Background/Aims: Two differently charged polypeptides, poly-L-lysine (PL) and poly-L-glutamate (PG), have previously been shown to reduce postoperative intra-abdominal adhesions. This study aims to investigate the possible toxic effects and to establish a lowest effective antiadhesive dose. Methods:...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European surgical research 2010-01, Vol.44 (1), p.17 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 17 |
container_title | European surgical research |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Isaksson, K Åkerberg, D Andersson, R Tingstedt, B |
description | Background/Aims: Two differently charged polypeptides, poly-L-lysine (PL) and poly-L-glutamate (PG), have previously been shown to reduce postoperative intra-abdominal adhesions. This study aims to investigate the possible toxic effects and to establish a lowest effective antiadhesive dose. Methods: 152 mice were investigated with a well-known adhesion model and given different concentrations of the two differently charged polypeptides as well as only the cationic PL. Results: For the first time, a probable toxic level of PL given intraperitoneally (40 mg/kg) and the lowest significant concentration of PL and PG for antiadhesive purposes (1.6 mg/kg) could be established. Conclusion: The gap between the possible toxicity level of PL and the lowest efficient antiadhesive dose is probably too narrow, and the shape and charge of PL warrant continuous research for another polycation in the concept of differently charged polypeptides used as antiadhesive agents. Copyright © 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1159/000258654 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1081698833</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2776140431</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_10816988333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjttKAzEQhoMoWA8XvkHA62iyh7q5LJ6hF0V6IYiU2J2lKWlmzcyK-xC-s0H6AF7NN_8_fIwQF0ZfGVPba611UTfTujoQE1MVRllbmEMx0dpUqjTF67E4IdrmtbY3diJ-lvjt155H6WIr75BAvgD1GDNgJ58jJ6dmHy3ufHQhjHLWZvLEkKCVCwyjmqs3F_qNe1fzkXyEP9O-eQwDu51jkB2mHBJjD8mx_4Js2gB5jHKRkGHNGc_EUecCwfl-norLh_vl7ZPqE34OQLza4pDyI7QyujFT2zRlWf7v6hfJ4Fpj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1081698833</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Toxicity and Dose Response of Intra-Abdominally Administered Poly-L-[alpha]-Lysine and Poly-L-Glutamate for Postoperative Adhesion Protection</title><source>Karger Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Isaksson, K ; Åkerberg, D ; Andersson, R ; Tingstedt, B</creator><creatorcontrib>Isaksson, K ; Åkerberg, D ; Andersson, R ; Tingstedt, B</creatorcontrib><description>Background/Aims: Two differently charged polypeptides, poly-L-lysine (PL) and poly-L-glutamate (PG), have previously been shown to reduce postoperative intra-abdominal adhesions. This study aims to investigate the possible toxic effects and to establish a lowest effective antiadhesive dose. Methods: 152 mice were investigated with a well-known adhesion model and given different concentrations of the two differently charged polypeptides as well as only the cationic PL. Results: For the first time, a probable toxic level of PL given intraperitoneally (40 mg/kg) and the lowest significant concentration of PL and PG for antiadhesive purposes (1.6 mg/kg) could be established. Conclusion: The gap between the possible toxicity level of PL and the lowest efficient antiadhesive dose is probably too narrow, and the shape and charge of PL warrant continuous research for another polycation in the concept of differently charged polypeptides used as antiadhesive agents. Copyright © 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-312X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1421-9921</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000258654</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: S. Karger AG</publisher><ispartof>European surgical research, 2010-01, Vol.44 (1), p.17</ispartof><rights>Copyright (c) 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Isaksson, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Åkerberg, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersson, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tingstedt, B</creatorcontrib><title>Toxicity and Dose Response of Intra-Abdominally Administered Poly-L-[alpha]-Lysine and Poly-L-Glutamate for Postoperative Adhesion Protection</title><title>European surgical research</title><description>Background/Aims: Two differently charged polypeptides, poly-L-lysine (PL) and poly-L-glutamate (PG), have previously been shown to reduce postoperative intra-abdominal adhesions. This study aims to investigate the possible toxic effects and to establish a lowest effective antiadhesive dose. Methods: 152 mice were investigated with a well-known adhesion model and given different concentrations of the two differently charged polypeptides as well as only the cationic PL. Results: For the first time, a probable toxic level of PL given intraperitoneally (40 mg/kg) and the lowest significant concentration of PL and PG for antiadhesive purposes (1.6 mg/kg) could be established. Conclusion: The gap between the possible toxicity level of PL and the lowest efficient antiadhesive dose is probably too narrow, and the shape and charge of PL warrant continuous research for another polycation in the concept of differently charged polypeptides used as antiadhesive agents. Copyright © 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><issn>0014-312X</issn><issn>1421-9921</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjttKAzEQhoMoWA8XvkHA62iyh7q5LJ6hF0V6IYiU2J2lKWlmzcyK-xC-s0H6AF7NN_8_fIwQF0ZfGVPba611UTfTujoQE1MVRllbmEMx0dpUqjTF67E4IdrmtbY3diJ-lvjt155H6WIr75BAvgD1GDNgJ58jJ6dmHy3ufHQhjHLWZvLEkKCVCwyjmqs3F_qNe1fzkXyEP9O-eQwDu51jkB2mHBJjD8mx_4Js2gB5jHKRkGHNGc_EUecCwfl-norLh_vl7ZPqE34OQLza4pDyI7QyujFT2zRlWf7v6hfJ4Fpj</recordid><startdate>20100101</startdate><enddate>20100101</enddate><creator>Isaksson, K</creator><creator>Åkerberg, D</creator><creator>Andersson, R</creator><creator>Tingstedt, B</creator><general>S. Karger AG</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100101</creationdate><title>Toxicity and Dose Response of Intra-Abdominally Administered Poly-L-[alpha]-Lysine and Poly-L-Glutamate for Postoperative Adhesion Protection</title><author>Isaksson, K ; Åkerberg, D ; Andersson, R ; Tingstedt, B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_10816988333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Isaksson, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Åkerberg, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersson, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tingstedt, B</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>European surgical research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Isaksson, K</au><au>Åkerberg, D</au><au>Andersson, R</au><au>Tingstedt, B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Toxicity and Dose Response of Intra-Abdominally Administered Poly-L-[alpha]-Lysine and Poly-L-Glutamate for Postoperative Adhesion Protection</atitle><jtitle>European surgical research</jtitle><date>2010-01-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>17</spage><pages>17-</pages><issn>0014-312X</issn><eissn>1421-9921</eissn><abstract>Background/Aims: Two differently charged polypeptides, poly-L-lysine (PL) and poly-L-glutamate (PG), have previously been shown to reduce postoperative intra-abdominal adhesions. This study aims to investigate the possible toxic effects and to establish a lowest effective antiadhesive dose. Methods: 152 mice were investigated with a well-known adhesion model and given different concentrations of the two differently charged polypeptides as well as only the cationic PL. Results: For the first time, a probable toxic level of PL given intraperitoneally (40 mg/kg) and the lowest significant concentration of PL and PG for antiadhesive purposes (1.6 mg/kg) could be established. Conclusion: The gap between the possible toxicity level of PL and the lowest efficient antiadhesive dose is probably too narrow, and the shape and charge of PL warrant continuous research for another polycation in the concept of differently charged polypeptides used as antiadhesive agents. Copyright © 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>S. Karger AG</pub><doi>10.1159/000258654</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0014-312X |
ispartof | European surgical research, 2010-01, Vol.44 (1), p.17 |
issn | 0014-312X 1421-9921 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1081698833 |
source | Karger Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
title | Toxicity and Dose Response of Intra-Abdominally Administered Poly-L-[alpha]-Lysine and Poly-L-Glutamate for Postoperative Adhesion Protection |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T10%3A17%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Toxicity%20and%20Dose%20Response%20of%20Intra-Abdominally%20Administered%20Poly-L-%5Balpha%5D-Lysine%20and%20Poly-L-Glutamate%20for%20Postoperative%20Adhesion%20Protection&rft.jtitle=European%20surgical%20research&rft.au=Isaksson,%20K&rft.date=2010-01-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=17&rft.pages=17-&rft.issn=0014-312X&rft.eissn=1421-9921&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000258654&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2776140431%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1081698833&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |