More bang for the land manager's buck: disturbance autocorrelation can be used to achieve management objectives at no additional cost
1. Ecologists have long studied the effects of disturbance on species diversity. More recently, researchers have become interested in understanding how the various aspects of disturbance interact to influence community diversity. While the effects of temporal autocorrelation have also received some...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of applied ecology 2012-10, Vol.49 (5), p.1020-1027 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1027 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1020 |
container_title | The Journal of applied ecology |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Garrison, Andrew Miller, Adam Roxburgh, Stephen H. Shea, Katriona |
description | 1. Ecologists have long studied the effects of disturbance on species diversity. More recently, researchers have become interested in understanding how the various aspects of disturbance interact to influence community diversity. While the effects of temporal autocorrelation have also received some attention, the potential for manipulating disturbance autocorrelation to achieve management goals has not been theoretically explored. 2. We consider the interactions between temporal autocorrelation of disturbance occurrence and disturbance intensity at varying disturbance frequencies. Using an annual plant model, we show that when intensity and frequency are kept constant, changing the temporal autocorrelation of disturbance occurrence can also affect competitive outcomes. Additionally, we show that when species coexist, the degree of autocorrelation can affect which species reaches higher densities. 3. We describe several examples (including prescribed burning, grazing and mowing) that outline how manipulation of temporal autocorrelation may be used to achieve conservation and eradication goals at no additional cost. 4. Synthesis and applications. Our results provide important insights into, and have potential application to, land management and conservation. While changing the intensity and frequency of human-induced disturbances can be costly, adjusting the temporal autocorrelation of disturbance occurrence may be considered a 'no-cost manipulation'. In instances where a land manager lacks the funds or resources to manipulate other aspects of disturbance, such as intensity and frequency, changing the temporal autocorrelation may provide an effective, economical alternative. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02187.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1073472819</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23353467</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23353467</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4437-332e54f17cff23f6e432d23ce1b2ff80179c6e3d2b89bf46692de1fdea8794fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE2P1SAUhonRxOvoTzAhMcZVK3AobU1cmMmMHxmjC10TCoeZ1t4yAh1nfoD_W-q9GbeygcDzvoc8hFDOal7W66nmoJpKKCVrwbiomeBdW98-ILv7h4dkx8p11fWMPyZPUpoYY30DsCO_P4eIdDDLJfUh0nyFdDaLo3uzmEuMrxIdVvvjDXVjymssnEVq1hxsiBFnk8ewUGsWOiBdEzqaAzX2asQbPFbscck0DBPaPN5goibTpTDOjVvWzNSGlJ-SR97MCZ8d9xPy_fzs2-mH6uLL-4-n7y4qKyW0FYDARnreWu8FeIUShBNgkQ_C-47xtrcKwYmh6wcvleqFQ-4dmq7tpUc4IS8Ovdcx_FwxZT2FNZZfJM1ZC7IVHe8L1R0oG0NKEb2-juPexLsC6U26nvTmVm9u9SZd_5Wub0v05XGASdbMPhZhY7rPCwVdI4AV7u2B-zXOePff_frT17PtVPLPD_kp5RD_9QM0IFULfwD_7aBL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1073472819</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>More bang for the land manager's buck: disturbance autocorrelation can be used to achieve management objectives at no additional cost</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Garrison, Andrew ; Miller, Adam ; Roxburgh, Stephen H. ; Shea, Katriona</creator><contributor>Cadotte, Marc</contributor><creatorcontrib>Garrison, Andrew ; Miller, Adam ; Roxburgh, Stephen H. ; Shea, Katriona ; Cadotte, Marc</creatorcontrib><description>1. Ecologists have long studied the effects of disturbance on species diversity. More recently, researchers have become interested in understanding how the various aspects of disturbance interact to influence community diversity. While the effects of temporal autocorrelation have also received some attention, the potential for manipulating disturbance autocorrelation to achieve management goals has not been theoretically explored. 2. We consider the interactions between temporal autocorrelation of disturbance occurrence and disturbance intensity at varying disturbance frequencies. Using an annual plant model, we show that when intensity and frequency are kept constant, changing the temporal autocorrelation of disturbance occurrence can also affect competitive outcomes. Additionally, we show that when species coexist, the degree of autocorrelation can affect which species reaches higher densities. 3. We describe several examples (including prescribed burning, grazing and mowing) that outline how manipulation of temporal autocorrelation may be used to achieve conservation and eradication goals at no additional cost. 4. Synthesis and applications. Our results provide important insights into, and have potential application to, land management and conservation. While changing the intensity and frequency of human-induced disturbances can be costly, adjusting the temporal autocorrelation of disturbance occurrence may be considered a 'no-cost manipulation'. In instances where a land manager lacks the funds or resources to manipulate other aspects of disturbance, such as intensity and frequency, changing the temporal autocorrelation may provide an effective, economical alternative.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8901</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2664</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02187.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAPEAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing</publisher><subject>adaptive management ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Autocorrelation ; Biodiversity ; Biological and medical sciences ; Communities ; competition ; Conservation ; Conservation planning ; Correlation analysis ; disturbance ; disturbance aspects ; Ecological competition ; Ecological disturbance ; Ecology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Invasive species ; Land management ; Plants ; Reciprocal‐Yield Law ; Species ; species coexistence ; Species diversity ; temporal autocorrelation</subject><ispartof>The Journal of applied ecology, 2012-10, Vol.49 (5), p.1020-1027</ispartof><rights>2012 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2012 The Authors. Journal of Applied Ecology © 2012 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Oct 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4437-332e54f17cff23f6e432d23ce1b2ff80179c6e3d2b89bf46692de1fdea8794fe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4437-332e54f17cff23f6e432d23ce1b2ff80179c6e3d2b89bf46692de1fdea8794fe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23353467$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23353467$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,805,1419,1435,27933,27934,45583,45584,46418,46842,58026,58259</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26385230$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Cadotte, Marc</contributor><creatorcontrib>Garrison, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roxburgh, Stephen H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shea, Katriona</creatorcontrib><title>More bang for the land manager's buck: disturbance autocorrelation can be used to achieve management objectives at no additional cost</title><title>The Journal of applied ecology</title><description>1. Ecologists have long studied the effects of disturbance on species diversity. More recently, researchers have become interested in understanding how the various aspects of disturbance interact to influence community diversity. While the effects of temporal autocorrelation have also received some attention, the potential for manipulating disturbance autocorrelation to achieve management goals has not been theoretically explored. 2. We consider the interactions between temporal autocorrelation of disturbance occurrence and disturbance intensity at varying disturbance frequencies. Using an annual plant model, we show that when intensity and frequency are kept constant, changing the temporal autocorrelation of disturbance occurrence can also affect competitive outcomes. Additionally, we show that when species coexist, the degree of autocorrelation can affect which species reaches higher densities. 3. We describe several examples (including prescribed burning, grazing and mowing) that outline how manipulation of temporal autocorrelation may be used to achieve conservation and eradication goals at no additional cost. 4. Synthesis and applications. Our results provide important insights into, and have potential application to, land management and conservation. While changing the intensity and frequency of human-induced disturbances can be costly, adjusting the temporal autocorrelation of disturbance occurrence may be considered a 'no-cost manipulation'. In instances where a land manager lacks the funds or resources to manipulate other aspects of disturbance, such as intensity and frequency, changing the temporal autocorrelation may provide an effective, economical alternative.</description><subject>adaptive management</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Autocorrelation</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>competition</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation planning</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>disturbance</subject><subject>disturbance aspects</subject><subject>Ecological competition</subject><subject>Ecological disturbance</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Land management</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Reciprocal‐Yield Law</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>species coexistence</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>temporal autocorrelation</subject><issn>0021-8901</issn><issn>1365-2664</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE2P1SAUhonRxOvoTzAhMcZVK3AobU1cmMmMHxmjC10TCoeZ1t4yAh1nfoD_W-q9GbeygcDzvoc8hFDOal7W66nmoJpKKCVrwbiomeBdW98-ILv7h4dkx8p11fWMPyZPUpoYY30DsCO_P4eIdDDLJfUh0nyFdDaLo3uzmEuMrxIdVvvjDXVjymssnEVq1hxsiBFnk8ewUGsWOiBdEzqaAzX2asQbPFbscck0DBPaPN5goibTpTDOjVvWzNSGlJ-SR97MCZ8d9xPy_fzs2-mH6uLL-4-n7y4qKyW0FYDARnreWu8FeIUShBNgkQ_C-47xtrcKwYmh6wcvleqFQ-4dmq7tpUc4IS8Ovdcx_FwxZT2FNZZfJM1ZC7IVHe8L1R0oG0NKEb2-juPexLsC6U26nvTmVm9u9SZd_5Wub0v05XGASdbMPhZhY7rPCwVdI4AV7u2B-zXOePff_frT17PtVPLPD_kp5RD_9QM0IFULfwD_7aBL</recordid><startdate>201210</startdate><enddate>201210</enddate><creator>Garrison, Andrew</creator><creator>Miller, Adam</creator><creator>Roxburgh, Stephen H.</creator><creator>Shea, Katriona</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201210</creationdate><title>More bang for the land manager's buck: disturbance autocorrelation can be used to achieve management objectives at no additional cost</title><author>Garrison, Andrew ; Miller, Adam ; Roxburgh, Stephen H. ; Shea, Katriona</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4437-332e54f17cff23f6e432d23ce1b2ff80179c6e3d2b89bf46692de1fdea8794fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>adaptive management</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Autocorrelation</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>competition</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation planning</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>disturbance</topic><topic>disturbance aspects</topic><topic>Ecological competition</topic><topic>Ecological disturbance</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Land management</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Reciprocal‐Yield Law</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>species coexistence</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>temporal autocorrelation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Garrison, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roxburgh, Stephen H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shea, Katriona</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Garrison, Andrew</au><au>Miller, Adam</au><au>Roxburgh, Stephen H.</au><au>Shea, Katriona</au><au>Cadotte, Marc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>More bang for the land manager's buck: disturbance autocorrelation can be used to achieve management objectives at no additional cost</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle><date>2012-10</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1020</spage><epage>1027</epage><pages>1020-1027</pages><issn>0021-8901</issn><eissn>1365-2664</eissn><coden>JAPEAI</coden><abstract>1. Ecologists have long studied the effects of disturbance on species diversity. More recently, researchers have become interested in understanding how the various aspects of disturbance interact to influence community diversity. While the effects of temporal autocorrelation have also received some attention, the potential for manipulating disturbance autocorrelation to achieve management goals has not been theoretically explored. 2. We consider the interactions between temporal autocorrelation of disturbance occurrence and disturbance intensity at varying disturbance frequencies. Using an annual plant model, we show that when intensity and frequency are kept constant, changing the temporal autocorrelation of disturbance occurrence can also affect competitive outcomes. Additionally, we show that when species coexist, the degree of autocorrelation can affect which species reaches higher densities. 3. We describe several examples (including prescribed burning, grazing and mowing) that outline how manipulation of temporal autocorrelation may be used to achieve conservation and eradication goals at no additional cost. 4. Synthesis and applications. Our results provide important insights into, and have potential application to, land management and conservation. While changing the intensity and frequency of human-induced disturbances can be costly, adjusting the temporal autocorrelation of disturbance occurrence may be considered a 'no-cost manipulation'. In instances where a land manager lacks the funds or resources to manipulate other aspects of disturbance, such as intensity and frequency, changing the temporal autocorrelation may provide an effective, economical alternative.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02187.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8901 |
ispartof | The Journal of applied ecology, 2012-10, Vol.49 (5), p.1020-1027 |
issn | 0021-8901 1365-2664 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1073472819 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection) |
subjects | adaptive management Animal, plant and microbial ecology Applied ecology Autocorrelation Biodiversity Biological and medical sciences Communities competition Conservation Conservation planning Correlation analysis disturbance disturbance aspects Ecological competition Ecological disturbance Ecology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects Invasive species Land management Plants Reciprocal‐Yield Law Species species coexistence Species diversity temporal autocorrelation |
title | More bang for the land manager's buck: disturbance autocorrelation can be used to achieve management objectives at no additional cost |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-01T08%3A36%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=More%20bang%20for%20the%20land%20manager's%20buck:%20disturbance%20autocorrelation%20can%20be%20used%20to%20achieve%20management%20objectives%20at%20no%20additional%20cost&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20applied%20ecology&rft.au=Garrison,%20Andrew&rft.date=2012-10&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1020&rft.epage=1027&rft.pages=1020-1027&rft.issn=0021-8901&rft.eissn=1365-2664&rft.coden=JAPEAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02187.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23353467%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1073472819&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23353467&rfr_iscdi=true |