Rigorous gharial population estimation in the Chambal: implications for conservation and management of a globally threatened crocodilian
1. India's Chambal River hosts the largest population of the critically endangered gharial. Boat-based daylight surveys to date only provide indices of relative abundance, without measures of survey bias or error. No attempt to quantify detection probabilities in these surveys has yet been made...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of applied ecology 2012-10, Vol.49 (5), p.1046-1054 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1054 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1046 |
container_title | The Journal of applied ecology |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Nair, Tarun Thorbjarnarson, John B. Aust, Patrick Krishnaswamy, Jagdish |
description | 1. India's Chambal River hosts the largest population of the critically endangered gharial. Boat-based daylight surveys to date only provide indices of relative abundance, without measures of survey bias or error. No attempt to quantify detection probabilities in these surveys has yet been made, and thus, absolute density estimates of this population remain unknown. 2. We surveyed 75 km of the River Chambal and photographed individual gharials for capture—recapture analysis. The total sampling effort yielded 400 captures. Population closure was supported (z = -1·48, P = 0·069), and closed-population models were used to estimate abundances. 3. Models were selected using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) index of model fit. The best model estimated 231 ± 32 adult, 83 ± 23 subadult and 89 ± 19 juvenile gharials (Mean ± SE), respectively, while the model-averaged estimate was 220 ± 28 adult, 76 ± 16 subadults and 93 ± 16 juvenile gharials, respectively. 4. The best model estimated absolute densities of 3·08 ± 0·43, 1·11 ± 0·3 and 1·19 ± 0·25 adult, subadult and juvenile gharials km -1 , respectively, while the model-averaged estimate was 2·93 ± 0·37, 1·01 ± 0·21 and 1·24 ± 0·21 adult, subadult and juvenile gharials km -1 , respectively, compared with relative densities of 0·94, 0·45 and 0·30 adult, subadult and juvenile gharials km -1 , respectively, from boat-based daylight surveys. On the basis of our best model, we suggest a detection probability based correction factor of 3·27, 2·47 and 3·97 to boat-based daylight survey estimates of adult, subadult and juvenile gharials, respectively. 5. Synthesis and applications. Used within the framework of capture—recapture analysis, photoidentification provides a reliable and noninvasive method of estimating population size and structure in crocodilians. We also opine that without determining the current status of gharials, highly intensive strategies, such as the egg-collection and rear-and-release programmes being implemented currently, initiated on the basis of underestimates of population sizes, are unwarranted and divert valuable conservation resources away from field-based protection measures, which are essential in the face of threats like hydrologic diversions, sand mining, fishing and bankside cultivation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02189.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1073454123</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23353470</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23353470</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j3399-55d4578ff54a95cc34450ed221894ce93cdc1d22eb67de3210fab12f40d425183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFUctq3DAUFaWBTtN-QkEQsrSrp8cOZFGGJG0INIR2Le7I8oyMLLmSp838QT67chwSbXSk8xBXByFMSUnz-tqXlFeyYFUlSkYoKwmjdVM-vkOrV-I9WpF8XdQNoR_Qx5R6QkgjOV-hpwe7CzEcEt7tIVpweAzjwcFkg8cmTXZYoPV42hu82cOwBXeB7TA6q5-5hLsQsc7AxL-LGnyLB_CwM4PxEw4dBrxzITvdMedEA5PxpsU6Bh1a6yz4T-ikA5fM55f9FP2-vvq1-V7c_bz5sfl2V_ScN00hZSvkuu46KaCRWnMhJDEtm4cW2jRct5rmo9lW69ZwRkkHW8o6QVrBJK35KTpbcscY_hzyhKoPh-jzk4qSNRdSUMaz6vxFBUmD6yJ4bZMaY_6PeFSs4rXMsqy7XHT_rDPHV54SNZejejV3oOYO1FyOei5HParb-6sZZf-Xxd-nKcS3fM4lF2vC_wN6h5C3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1073454123</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rigorous gharial population estimation in the Chambal: implications for conservation and management of a globally threatened crocodilian</title><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals</source><source>JSTOR</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Nair, Tarun ; Thorbjarnarson, John B. ; Aust, Patrick ; Krishnaswamy, Jagdish</creator><creatorcontrib>Nair, Tarun ; Thorbjarnarson, John B. ; Aust, Patrick ; Krishnaswamy, Jagdish</creatorcontrib><description>1. India's Chambal River hosts the largest population of the critically endangered gharial. Boat-based daylight surveys to date only provide indices of relative abundance, without measures of survey bias or error. No attempt to quantify detection probabilities in these surveys has yet been made, and thus, absolute density estimates of this population remain unknown. 2. We surveyed 75 km of the River Chambal and photographed individual gharials for capture—recapture analysis. The total sampling effort yielded 400 captures. Population closure was supported (z = -1·48, P = 0·069), and closed-population models were used to estimate abundances. 3. Models were selected using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) index of model fit. The best model estimated 231 ± 32 adult, 83 ± 23 subadult and 89 ± 19 juvenile gharials (Mean ± SE), respectively, while the model-averaged estimate was 220 ± 28 adult, 76 ± 16 subadults and 93 ± 16 juvenile gharials, respectively. 4. The best model estimated absolute densities of 3·08 ± 0·43, 1·11 ± 0·3 and 1·19 ± 0·25 adult, subadult and juvenile gharials km -1 , respectively, while the model-averaged estimate was 2·93 ± 0·37, 1·01 ± 0·21 and 1·24 ± 0·21 adult, subadult and juvenile gharials km -1 , respectively, compared with relative densities of 0·94, 0·45 and 0·30 adult, subadult and juvenile gharials km -1 , respectively, from boat-based daylight surveys. On the basis of our best model, we suggest a detection probability based correction factor of 3·27, 2·47 and 3·97 to boat-based daylight survey estimates of adult, subadult and juvenile gharials, respectively. 5. Synthesis and applications. Used within the framework of capture—recapture analysis, photoidentification provides a reliable and noninvasive method of estimating population size and structure in crocodilians. We also opine that without determining the current status of gharials, highly intensive strategies, such as the egg-collection and rear-and-release programmes being implemented currently, initiated on the basis of underestimates of population sizes, are unwarranted and divert valuable conservation resources away from field-based protection measures, which are essential in the face of threats like hydrologic diversions, sand mining, fishing and bankside cultivation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8901</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2664</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02189.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAPEAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing</publisher><subject>abundance estimation ; Animal populations ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chambal River ; closed‐population models ; Conservation ; Conservation biology ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Crocodiles ; detection ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gavialis gangeticus ; General aspects ; Habitat conservation ; Human ecology ; Identification ; individual identification ; Monitoring and management ; noninvasive ; photographic capture–recapture ; Population ecology ; Population estimates ; Population size ; program mark ; River ecology ; Riverbanks ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>The Journal of applied ecology, 2012-10, Vol.49 (5), p.1046-1054</ispartof><rights>2012 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2012 The Authors. Journal of Applied Ecology © 2012 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Oct 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23353470$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23353470$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1416,1432,27922,27923,45572,45573,46407,46831,58015,58248</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26385233$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nair, Tarun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thorbjarnarson, John B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aust, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnaswamy, Jagdish</creatorcontrib><title>Rigorous gharial population estimation in the Chambal: implications for conservation and management of a globally threatened crocodilian</title><title>The Journal of applied ecology</title><description>1. India's Chambal River hosts the largest population of the critically endangered gharial. Boat-based daylight surveys to date only provide indices of relative abundance, without measures of survey bias or error. No attempt to quantify detection probabilities in these surveys has yet been made, and thus, absolute density estimates of this population remain unknown. 2. We surveyed 75 km of the River Chambal and photographed individual gharials for capture—recapture analysis. The total sampling effort yielded 400 captures. Population closure was supported (z = -1·48, P = 0·069), and closed-population models were used to estimate abundances. 3. Models were selected using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) index of model fit. The best model estimated 231 ± 32 adult, 83 ± 23 subadult and 89 ± 19 juvenile gharials (Mean ± SE), respectively, while the model-averaged estimate was 220 ± 28 adult, 76 ± 16 subadults and 93 ± 16 juvenile gharials, respectively. 4. The best model estimated absolute densities of 3·08 ± 0·43, 1·11 ± 0·3 and 1·19 ± 0·25 adult, subadult and juvenile gharials km -1 , respectively, while the model-averaged estimate was 2·93 ± 0·37, 1·01 ± 0·21 and 1·24 ± 0·21 adult, subadult and juvenile gharials km -1 , respectively, compared with relative densities of 0·94, 0·45 and 0·30 adult, subadult and juvenile gharials km -1 , respectively, from boat-based daylight surveys. On the basis of our best model, we suggest a detection probability based correction factor of 3·27, 2·47 and 3·97 to boat-based daylight survey estimates of adult, subadult and juvenile gharials, respectively. 5. Synthesis and applications. Used within the framework of capture—recapture analysis, photoidentification provides a reliable and noninvasive method of estimating population size and structure in crocodilians. We also opine that without determining the current status of gharials, highly intensive strategies, such as the egg-collection and rear-and-release programmes being implemented currently, initiated on the basis of underestimates of population sizes, are unwarranted and divert valuable conservation resources away from field-based protection measures, which are essential in the face of threats like hydrologic diversions, sand mining, fishing and bankside cultivation.</description><subject>abundance estimation</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chambal River</subject><subject>closed‐population models</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Crocodiles</subject><subject>detection</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gavialis gangeticus</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>Human ecology</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>individual identification</subject><subject>Monitoring and management</subject><subject>noninvasive</subject><subject>photographic capture–recapture</subject><subject>Population ecology</subject><subject>Population estimates</subject><subject>Population size</subject><subject>program mark</subject><subject>River ecology</subject><subject>Riverbanks</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>0021-8901</issn><issn>1365-2664</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFUctq3DAUFaWBTtN-QkEQsrSrp8cOZFGGJG0INIR2Le7I8oyMLLmSp838QT67chwSbXSk8xBXByFMSUnz-tqXlFeyYFUlSkYoKwmjdVM-vkOrV-I9WpF8XdQNoR_Qx5R6QkgjOV-hpwe7CzEcEt7tIVpweAzjwcFkg8cmTXZYoPV42hu82cOwBXeB7TA6q5-5hLsQsc7AxL-LGnyLB_CwM4PxEw4dBrxzITvdMedEA5PxpsU6Bh1a6yz4T-ikA5fM55f9FP2-vvq1-V7c_bz5sfl2V_ScN00hZSvkuu46KaCRWnMhJDEtm4cW2jRct5rmo9lW69ZwRkkHW8o6QVrBJK35KTpbcscY_hzyhKoPh-jzk4qSNRdSUMaz6vxFBUmD6yJ4bZMaY_6PeFSs4rXMsqy7XHT_rDPHV54SNZejejV3oOYO1FyOei5HParb-6sZZf-Xxd-nKcS3fM4lF2vC_wN6h5C3</recordid><startdate>201210</startdate><enddate>201210</enddate><creator>Nair, Tarun</creator><creator>Thorbjarnarson, John B.</creator><creator>Aust, Patrick</creator><creator>Krishnaswamy, Jagdish</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201210</creationdate><title>Rigorous gharial population estimation in the Chambal: implications for conservation and management of a globally threatened crocodilian</title><author>Nair, Tarun ; Thorbjarnarson, John B. ; Aust, Patrick ; Krishnaswamy, Jagdish</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j3399-55d4578ff54a95cc34450ed221894ce93cdc1d22eb67de3210fab12f40d425183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>abundance estimation</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chambal River</topic><topic>closed‐population models</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Crocodiles</topic><topic>detection</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gavialis gangeticus</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>Human ecology</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>individual identification</topic><topic>Monitoring and management</topic><topic>noninvasive</topic><topic>photographic capture–recapture</topic><topic>Population ecology</topic><topic>Population estimates</topic><topic>Population size</topic><topic>program mark</topic><topic>River ecology</topic><topic>Riverbanks</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nair, Tarun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thorbjarnarson, John B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aust, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnaswamy, Jagdish</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nair, Tarun</au><au>Thorbjarnarson, John B.</au><au>Aust, Patrick</au><au>Krishnaswamy, Jagdish</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rigorous gharial population estimation in the Chambal: implications for conservation and management of a globally threatened crocodilian</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle><date>2012-10</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1046</spage><epage>1054</epage><pages>1046-1054</pages><issn>0021-8901</issn><eissn>1365-2664</eissn><coden>JAPEAI</coden><abstract>1. India's Chambal River hosts the largest population of the critically endangered gharial. Boat-based daylight surveys to date only provide indices of relative abundance, without measures of survey bias or error. No attempt to quantify detection probabilities in these surveys has yet been made, and thus, absolute density estimates of this population remain unknown. 2. We surveyed 75 km of the River Chambal and photographed individual gharials for capture—recapture analysis. The total sampling effort yielded 400 captures. Population closure was supported (z = -1·48, P = 0·069), and closed-population models were used to estimate abundances. 3. Models were selected using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) index of model fit. The best model estimated 231 ± 32 adult, 83 ± 23 subadult and 89 ± 19 juvenile gharials (Mean ± SE), respectively, while the model-averaged estimate was 220 ± 28 adult, 76 ± 16 subadults and 93 ± 16 juvenile gharials, respectively. 4. The best model estimated absolute densities of 3·08 ± 0·43, 1·11 ± 0·3 and 1·19 ± 0·25 adult, subadult and juvenile gharials km -1 , respectively, while the model-averaged estimate was 2·93 ± 0·37, 1·01 ± 0·21 and 1·24 ± 0·21 adult, subadult and juvenile gharials km -1 , respectively, compared with relative densities of 0·94, 0·45 and 0·30 adult, subadult and juvenile gharials km -1 , respectively, from boat-based daylight surveys. On the basis of our best model, we suggest a detection probability based correction factor of 3·27, 2·47 and 3·97 to boat-based daylight survey estimates of adult, subadult and juvenile gharials, respectively. 5. Synthesis and applications. Used within the framework of capture—recapture analysis, photoidentification provides a reliable and noninvasive method of estimating population size and structure in crocodilians. We also opine that without determining the current status of gharials, highly intensive strategies, such as the egg-collection and rear-and-release programmes being implemented currently, initiated on the basis of underestimates of population sizes, are unwarranted and divert valuable conservation resources away from field-based protection measures, which are essential in the face of threats like hydrologic diversions, sand mining, fishing and bankside cultivation.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02189.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8901 |
ispartof | The Journal of applied ecology, 2012-10, Vol.49 (5), p.1046-1054 |
issn | 0021-8901 1365-2664 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1073454123 |
source | Wiley Online Library Free Content; Wiley Online Library Journals; JSTOR; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | abundance estimation Animal populations Animal, plant and microbial ecology Applied ecology Biological and medical sciences Chambal River closed‐population models Conservation Conservation biology Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife Crocodiles detection Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Gavialis gangeticus General aspects Habitat conservation Human ecology Identification individual identification Monitoring and management noninvasive photographic capture–recapture Population ecology Population estimates Population size program mark River ecology Riverbanks Wildlife conservation |
title | Rigorous gharial population estimation in the Chambal: implications for conservation and management of a globally threatened crocodilian |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T14%3A53%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rigorous%20gharial%20population%20estimation%20in%20the%20Chambal:%20implications%20for%20conservation%20and%20management%20of%20a%20globally%20threatened%20crocodilian&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20applied%20ecology&rft.au=Nair,%20Tarun&rft.date=2012-10&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1046&rft.epage=1054&rft.pages=1046-1054&rft.issn=0021-8901&rft.eissn=1365-2664&rft.coden=JAPEAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02189.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23353470%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1073454123&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23353470&rfr_iscdi=true |