"Open" multiple employer plans after Advisory Opinion 2012-04A: an assessment

In Advisory Opinion 2012-04A, the Department of Labor (DOL) for the first time issued an explicit ruling that an "open" multiple employer plan (an Open MEP) is not a single employee benefit pension plan under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), but a group of singl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of pension benefits 2012-09, Vol.20 (1), p.17
Hauptverfasser: Reish, Fred, Ashton, Bruce, Waldbeser, Joshua
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 17
container_title Journal of pension benefits
container_volume 20
creator Reish, Fred
Ashton, Bruce
Waldbeser, Joshua
description In Advisory Opinion 2012-04A, the Department of Labor (DOL) for the first time issued an explicit ruling that an "open" multiple employer plan (an Open MEP) is not a single employee benefit pension plan under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), but a group of single employer plans. The DOL previously issued a significant number of Advisory Opinions addressing single ERISA plan status for multiple employer pension plans sponsored by employer associations and multiple employer welfare arrangements, and a number of commentators had taken the position that the standards set forth in these prior rulings indicated that Open MEPs were not multiple employer plans. In this article, the authors assess the legal underpinnings of the Opinion and the impact it will have on Open MEP providers and the small employers that participate in them. The analysis takes into account both the legal issues and the policy considerations that it appears are being applied to Open MEPs.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1055173449</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A303451158</galeid><sourcerecordid>A303451158</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1429-2ac282b6d6da90d30da97d608116df49ac18ad1c3f06cc54a4789c7f0eb870a23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM1Lw0AQxXNQsFb_h6VejcxmN5vEWyh-QaUXPZfpfsQtySZmEqH_vQv14KHM4Q3D770Hc5EsOKgqlaDkVXJNdADgIpewSN5X28GGFevmdvJDa5nthrY_2pENLQZi6Ka41-bHUz8e2XbwwfeBZcCzFGT9yDAwJLJEnQ3TTXLpsCV7-6fL5PP56WP9mm62L2_repM2XGZVmqHOymyvjDJYgREQpTAKSs6VcbJCzUs0XAsHSutcoizKShcO7L4sADOxTO5OucPYf8-Wpt2hn8cQK3cc8pwXQsoqUumJarC1Ox9cP42oGxvsiG0frPPxXAsQMuc8LyP_cIaPY2zn9VnD_T_DfiYf4iN8IN98TdTgTPQf_wWuFHYb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1055173449</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>"Open" multiple employer plans after Advisory Opinion 2012-04A: an assessment</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Reish, Fred ; Ashton, Bruce ; Waldbeser, Joshua</creator><creatorcontrib>Reish, Fred ; Ashton, Bruce ; Waldbeser, Joshua</creatorcontrib><description>In Advisory Opinion 2012-04A, the Department of Labor (DOL) for the first time issued an explicit ruling that an "open" multiple employer plan (an Open MEP) is not a single employee benefit pension plan under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), but a group of single employer plans. The DOL previously issued a significant number of Advisory Opinions addressing single ERISA plan status for multiple employer pension plans sponsored by employer associations and multiple employer welfare arrangements, and a number of commentators had taken the position that the standards set forth in these prior rulings indicated that Open MEPs were not multiple employer plans. In this article, the authors assess the legal underpinnings of the Opinion and the impact it will have on Open MEP providers and the small employers that participate in them. The analysis takes into account both the legal issues and the policy considerations that it appears are being applied to Open MEPs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1069-4064</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Aspen Publishers, Inc</publisher><subject>Associations ; Employee benefits ; Employees ; Employers ; ERISA ; Multiemployer pension plans ; Opinions ; Pension plans ; Political activity ; Political aspects ; Retirement plans ; Small business</subject><ispartof>Journal of pension benefits, 2012-09, Vol.20 (1), p.17</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Aspen Publishers, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Aspen Publishers, Inc. Autumn 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reish, Fred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashton, Bruce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waldbeser, Joshua</creatorcontrib><title>"Open" multiple employer plans after Advisory Opinion 2012-04A: an assessment</title><title>Journal of pension benefits</title><description>In Advisory Opinion 2012-04A, the Department of Labor (DOL) for the first time issued an explicit ruling that an "open" multiple employer plan (an Open MEP) is not a single employee benefit pension plan under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), but a group of single employer plans. The DOL previously issued a significant number of Advisory Opinions addressing single ERISA plan status for multiple employer pension plans sponsored by employer associations and multiple employer welfare arrangements, and a number of commentators had taken the position that the standards set forth in these prior rulings indicated that Open MEPs were not multiple employer plans. In this article, the authors assess the legal underpinnings of the Opinion and the impact it will have on Open MEP providers and the small employers that participate in them. The analysis takes into account both the legal issues and the policy considerations that it appears are being applied to Open MEPs.</description><subject>Associations</subject><subject>Employee benefits</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Employers</subject><subject>ERISA</subject><subject>Multiemployer pension plans</subject><subject>Opinions</subject><subject>Pension plans</subject><subject>Political activity</subject><subject>Political aspects</subject><subject>Retirement plans</subject><subject>Small business</subject><issn>1069-4064</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkM1Lw0AQxXNQsFb_h6VejcxmN5vEWyh-QaUXPZfpfsQtySZmEqH_vQv14KHM4Q3D770Hc5EsOKgqlaDkVXJNdADgIpewSN5X28GGFevmdvJDa5nthrY_2pENLQZi6Ka41-bHUz8e2XbwwfeBZcCzFGT9yDAwJLJEnQ3TTXLpsCV7-6fL5PP56WP9mm62L2_repM2XGZVmqHOymyvjDJYgREQpTAKSs6VcbJCzUs0XAsHSutcoizKShcO7L4sADOxTO5OucPYf8-Wpt2hn8cQK3cc8pwXQsoqUumJarC1Ox9cP42oGxvsiG0frPPxXAsQMuc8LyP_cIaPY2zn9VnD_T_DfiYf4iN8IN98TdTgTPQf_wWuFHYb</recordid><startdate>20120922</startdate><enddate>20120922</enddate><creator>Reish, Fred</creator><creator>Ashton, Bruce</creator><creator>Waldbeser, Joshua</creator><general>Aspen Publishers, Inc</general><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120922</creationdate><title>"Open" multiple employer plans after Advisory Opinion 2012-04A: an assessment</title><author>Reish, Fred ; Ashton, Bruce ; Waldbeser, Joshua</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1429-2ac282b6d6da90d30da97d608116df49ac18ad1c3f06cc54a4789c7f0eb870a23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Associations</topic><topic>Employee benefits</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Employers</topic><topic>ERISA</topic><topic>Multiemployer pension plans</topic><topic>Opinions</topic><topic>Pension plans</topic><topic>Political activity</topic><topic>Political aspects</topic><topic>Retirement plans</topic><topic>Small business</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reish, Fred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashton, Bruce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waldbeser, Joshua</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of pension benefits</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reish, Fred</au><au>Ashton, Bruce</au><au>Waldbeser, Joshua</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>"Open" multiple employer plans after Advisory Opinion 2012-04A: an assessment</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pension benefits</jtitle><date>2012-09-22</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>17</spage><pages>17-</pages><issn>1069-4064</issn><abstract>In Advisory Opinion 2012-04A, the Department of Labor (DOL) for the first time issued an explicit ruling that an "open" multiple employer plan (an Open MEP) is not a single employee benefit pension plan under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), but a group of single employer plans. The DOL previously issued a significant number of Advisory Opinions addressing single ERISA plan status for multiple employer pension plans sponsored by employer associations and multiple employer welfare arrangements, and a number of commentators had taken the position that the standards set forth in these prior rulings indicated that Open MEPs were not multiple employer plans. In this article, the authors assess the legal underpinnings of the Opinion and the impact it will have on Open MEP providers and the small employers that participate in them. The analysis takes into account both the legal issues and the policy considerations that it appears are being applied to Open MEPs.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Aspen Publishers, Inc</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1069-4064
ispartof Journal of pension benefits, 2012-09, Vol.20 (1), p.17
issn 1069-4064
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1055173449
source EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Associations
Employee benefits
Employees
Employers
ERISA
Multiemployer pension plans
Opinions
Pension plans
Political activity
Political aspects
Retirement plans
Small business
title "Open" multiple employer plans after Advisory Opinion 2012-04A: an assessment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T13%3A57%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%22Open%22%20multiple%20employer%20plans%20after%20Advisory%20Opinion%202012-04A:%20an%20assessment&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pension%20benefits&rft.au=Reish,%20Fred&rft.date=2012-09-22&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=17&rft.pages=17-&rft.issn=1069-4064&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA303451158%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1055173449&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A303451158&rfr_iscdi=true