Vertical disintegration and training: evidence from a matched employer—employee survey

The mechanism through which outsourcing favourably impacts on workplace performance, particularly productivity, is still unclear. I explore the hypothesis that it does so by impacting workers' training. I use AWIRS-1995, a matched employer-employee survey that reports ample information on the e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of productivity analysis 2012-10, Vol.38 (2), p.199-217
1. Verfasser: Magnani, Elisabetta
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 217
container_issue 2
container_start_page 199
container_title Journal of productivity analysis
container_volume 38
creator Magnani, Elisabetta
description The mechanism through which outsourcing favourably impacts on workplace performance, particularly productivity, is still unclear. I explore the hypothesis that it does so by impacting workers' training. I use AWIRS-1995, a matched employer-employee survey that reports ample information on the extent of technology and organizational change in Australian workplaces. I find that there is a positive and significant impact of outsourcing on training when I do not control for the correlation between ununobservable factors in these two binary outcomes. However, once I control for this correlation using a bivariate probit estimator, the training impact of outsourcing becomes negative. I then assess the sensitivity of the outsourcing effect to endogeneity by using the method advocated by Altonji et al. (J Polit Econ 113(1): 151-184, 2005) to find that this latter result persists even in the presence of a low correlation between unobservables.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11123-011-0256-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1039255511</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43549904</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43549904</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-4d47fc03f58e7af0f3d79b2849f64a3ce6363493d258e313cba1e32fea91bbed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKw0AUhgdRsFYfwIUw4Do6Zy5Jxp0Ub1Bwo9JdmMycqSlNUmfSQnc-hE_ok5iSIm5cncPh-_8DHyHnwK6Asew6AgAXCQNIGFdpog_ICFTWX6SEQzJiuVaJSvnsmJzEuGCM6TzTIzJ7w9BV1iypq2LVdDgPpqvahprG0S6Yqqma-Q3FTeWwsUh9aGtqaG06-46OYr1atlsM359f-xVpXIcNbk_JkTfLiGf7OSav93cvk8dk-vzwNLmdJlYy3iXSycxbJrzKMTOeeeEyXfJcap9KIyymIhVSC8d7QICwpQEU3KPRUJboxJhcDr2r0H6sMXbFol2Hpn9ZABOaK6UAegoGyoY2xoC-WIWqNmHbQ8VOYDEILHqBxU5gofsMHzKxZ5s5hr_N_4cuhtAidm34_SKFklozKX4Ax1Z_KA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1039255511</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vertical disintegration and training: evidence from a matched employer—employee survey</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Magnani, Elisabetta</creator><creatorcontrib>Magnani, Elisabetta</creatorcontrib><description>The mechanism through which outsourcing favourably impacts on workplace performance, particularly productivity, is still unclear. I explore the hypothesis that it does so by impacting workers' training. I use AWIRS-1995, a matched employer-employee survey that reports ample information on the extent of technology and organizational change in Australian workplaces. I find that there is a positive and significant impact of outsourcing on training when I do not control for the correlation between ununobservable factors in these two binary outcomes. However, once I control for this correlation using a bivariate probit estimator, the training impact of outsourcing becomes negative. I then assess the sensitivity of the outsourcing effect to endogeneity by using the method advocated by Altonji et al. (J Polit Econ 113(1): 151-184, 2005) to find that this latter result persists even in the presence of a low correlation between unobservables.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0895-562X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0441</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11123-011-0256-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Spring Science+Business Media</publisher><subject>Accounting/Auditing ; Analytical estimating ; Competition ; Econometrics ; Economic models ; Economic statistics ; Economic theory ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Labor economics ; Labor force ; Labor market ; Manufacturing ; Microeconomics ; Modeling ; Older workers ; Operations Research/Decision Theory ; Organizational change ; Outsourcing ; Productivity ; Standard error ; Studies ; Training ; Unobservables ; Variable coefficients ; Workplaces</subject><ispartof>Journal of productivity analysis, 2012-10, Vol.38 (2), p.199-217</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-4d47fc03f58e7af0f3d79b2849f64a3ce6363493d258e313cba1e32fea91bbed3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-4d47fc03f58e7af0f3d79b2849f64a3ce6363493d258e313cba1e32fea91bbed3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43549904$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43549904$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Magnani, Elisabetta</creatorcontrib><title>Vertical disintegration and training: evidence from a matched employer—employee survey</title><title>Journal of productivity analysis</title><addtitle>J Prod Anal</addtitle><description>The mechanism through which outsourcing favourably impacts on workplace performance, particularly productivity, is still unclear. I explore the hypothesis that it does so by impacting workers' training. I use AWIRS-1995, a matched employer-employee survey that reports ample information on the extent of technology and organizational change in Australian workplaces. I find that there is a positive and significant impact of outsourcing on training when I do not control for the correlation between ununobservable factors in these two binary outcomes. However, once I control for this correlation using a bivariate probit estimator, the training impact of outsourcing becomes negative. I then assess the sensitivity of the outsourcing effect to endogeneity by using the method advocated by Altonji et al. (J Polit Econ 113(1): 151-184, 2005) to find that this latter result persists even in the presence of a low correlation between unobservables.</description><subject>Accounting/Auditing</subject><subject>Analytical estimating</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Econometrics</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economic statistics</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Labor economics</subject><subject>Labor force</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Microeconomics</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Older workers</subject><subject>Operations Research/Decision Theory</subject><subject>Organizational change</subject><subject>Outsourcing</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Standard error</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Unobservables</subject><subject>Variable coefficients</subject><subject>Workplaces</subject><issn>0895-562X</issn><issn>1573-0441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKw0AUhgdRsFYfwIUw4Do6Zy5Jxp0Ub1Bwo9JdmMycqSlNUmfSQnc-hE_ok5iSIm5cncPh-_8DHyHnwK6Asew6AgAXCQNIGFdpog_ICFTWX6SEQzJiuVaJSvnsmJzEuGCM6TzTIzJ7w9BV1iypq2LVdDgPpqvahprG0S6Yqqma-Q3FTeWwsUh9aGtqaG06-46OYr1atlsM359f-xVpXIcNbk_JkTfLiGf7OSav93cvk8dk-vzwNLmdJlYy3iXSycxbJrzKMTOeeeEyXfJcap9KIyymIhVSC8d7QICwpQEU3KPRUJboxJhcDr2r0H6sMXbFol2Hpn9ZABOaK6UAegoGyoY2xoC-WIWqNmHbQ8VOYDEILHqBxU5gofsMHzKxZ5s5hr_N_4cuhtAidm34_SKFklozKX4Ax1Z_KA</recordid><startdate>20121001</startdate><enddate>20121001</enddate><creator>Magnani, Elisabetta</creator><general>Spring Science+Business Media</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121001</creationdate><title>Vertical disintegration and training: evidence from a matched employer—employee survey</title><author>Magnani, Elisabetta</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-4d47fc03f58e7af0f3d79b2849f64a3ce6363493d258e313cba1e32fea91bbed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Accounting/Auditing</topic><topic>Analytical estimating</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Econometrics</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economic statistics</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Labor economics</topic><topic>Labor force</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Microeconomics</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Older workers</topic><topic>Operations Research/Decision Theory</topic><topic>Organizational change</topic><topic>Outsourcing</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Standard error</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Unobservables</topic><topic>Variable coefficients</topic><topic>Workplaces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Magnani, Elisabetta</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of productivity analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Magnani, Elisabetta</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vertical disintegration and training: evidence from a matched employer—employee survey</atitle><jtitle>Journal of productivity analysis</jtitle><stitle>J Prod Anal</stitle><date>2012-10-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>199</spage><epage>217</epage><pages>199-217</pages><issn>0895-562X</issn><eissn>1573-0441</eissn><abstract>The mechanism through which outsourcing favourably impacts on workplace performance, particularly productivity, is still unclear. I explore the hypothesis that it does so by impacting workers' training. I use AWIRS-1995, a matched employer-employee survey that reports ample information on the extent of technology and organizational change in Australian workplaces. I find that there is a positive and significant impact of outsourcing on training when I do not control for the correlation between ununobservable factors in these two binary outcomes. However, once I control for this correlation using a bivariate probit estimator, the training impact of outsourcing becomes negative. I then assess the sensitivity of the outsourcing effect to endogeneity by using the method advocated by Altonji et al. (J Polit Econ 113(1): 151-184, 2005) to find that this latter result persists even in the presence of a low correlation between unobservables.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Spring Science+Business Media</pub><doi>10.1007/s11123-011-0256-9</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0895-562X
ispartof Journal of productivity analysis, 2012-10, Vol.38 (2), p.199-217
issn 0895-562X
1573-0441
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1039255511
source EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Accounting/Auditing
Analytical estimating
Competition
Econometrics
Economic models
Economic statistics
Economic theory
Economics
Economics and Finance
Labor economics
Labor force
Labor market
Manufacturing
Microeconomics
Modeling
Older workers
Operations Research/Decision Theory
Organizational change
Outsourcing
Productivity
Standard error
Studies
Training
Unobservables
Variable coefficients
Workplaces
title Vertical disintegration and training: evidence from a matched employer—employee survey
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T21%3A36%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vertical%20disintegration%20and%20training:%20evidence%20from%20a%20matched%20employer%E2%80%94employee%20survey&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20productivity%20analysis&rft.au=Magnani,%20Elisabetta&rft.date=2012-10-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=199&rft.epage=217&rft.pages=199-217&rft.issn=0895-562X&rft.eissn=1573-0441&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11123-011-0256-9&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43549904%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1039255511&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43549904&rfr_iscdi=true