Shakespeare Studies Today: Romanticism Lost
Pechter gives a shrewd and generally sympathetic account of materialist criticism, ranging from a focus on the history of the book to the social practices of performance, and he shows how these efforts aim to move beyond mystification of a solitary sovereign genius by shifting attention to the elusi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Shakespeare quarterly 2012, Vol.63 (2), p.280-283 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Review |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 283 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 280 |
container_title | Shakespeare quarterly |
container_volume | 63 |
creator | McCoy, Richard C. |
description | Pechter gives a shrewd and generally sympathetic account of materialist criticism, ranging from a focus on the history of the book to the social practices of performance, and he shows how these efforts aim to move beyond mystification of a solitary sovereign genius by shifting attention to the elusive and chimerical quality of early modern texts and the collective and demotic nature of early modern theater. [...]he concludes his book with an ambivalent tribute to Harold Bloom's elegiac bardolatry inspired by Bloom's own deep regard for the Romantics. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1353/shq.2012.0015 |
format | Review |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1038954207</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41679762</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41679762</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c218t-4818318cd8a106087ae8605ac78c0eaa0e951a39246ee47202693e1294629c313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKtHj8KCR9k6mUmyWW8ifkFBsPUcQjqlu9pum-we-u_dpVLnMpfnfWd4hLiWMJGk6T6tdhMEiRMAqU_ESGqyOWmtT8UIgIqcEPFcXKRUQz-WzEjczVb-m9OWfeRs1naLilM2bxZ-_5B9Nmu_aatQpXU2bVJ7Kc6W_ifx1d8ei6-X5_nTWz79eH1_epzmAaVtc2WlJWnDwnoJBmzh2RrQPhQ2AHsPXGrpqURlmFWBgKYkllgqg2UgSWNxe-jdxmbXcWpd3XRx0590EsiWWiEUPZUfqBCblCIv3TZWax_3PeQGH6734QYfbvDR8-rYWnNo113i_2JlFZFxs8HZoEwi9ikzPHNziNWpbeLxhpKmKAuD9AvpTGnr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>review</recordtype><pqid>1038954207</pqid></control><display><type>review</type><title>Shakespeare Studies Today: Romanticism Lost</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>McCoy, Richard C.</creator><creatorcontrib>McCoy, Richard C.</creatorcontrib><description>Pechter gives a shrewd and generally sympathetic account of materialist criticism, ranging from a focus on the history of the book to the social practices of performance, and he shows how these efforts aim to move beyond mystification of a solitary sovereign genius by shifting attention to the elusive and chimerical quality of early modern texts and the collective and demotic nature of early modern theater. [...]he concludes his book with an ambivalent tribute to Harold Bloom's elegiac bardolatry inspired by Bloom's own deep regard for the Romantics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0037-3222</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1538-3555</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-3555</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1353/shq.2012.0015</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: The Johns Hopkins University Press</publisher><subject>Bloom, Harold (1930-2019) ; Early Modern English ; Postmodernism ; Romanticism ; Sidney, Philip (1554-1586) ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Shakespeare quarterly, 2012, Vol.63 (2), p.280-283</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 Folger Shakespeare Library</rights><rights>Copyright © The Folger Shakespeare Library.</rights><rights>Copyright Johns Hopkins University Press Summer 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41679762$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41679762$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,776,780,788,799,27899,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McCoy, Richard C.</creatorcontrib><title>Shakespeare Studies Today: Romanticism Lost</title><title>Shakespeare quarterly</title><description>Pechter gives a shrewd and generally sympathetic account of materialist criticism, ranging from a focus on the history of the book to the social practices of performance, and he shows how these efforts aim to move beyond mystification of a solitary sovereign genius by shifting attention to the elusive and chimerical quality of early modern texts and the collective and demotic nature of early modern theater. [...]he concludes his book with an ambivalent tribute to Harold Bloom's elegiac bardolatry inspired by Bloom's own deep regard for the Romantics.</description><subject>Bloom, Harold (1930-2019)</subject><subject>Early Modern English</subject><subject>Postmodernism</subject><subject>Romanticism</subject><subject>Sidney, Philip (1554-1586)</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0037-3222</issn><issn>1538-3555</issn><issn>1538-3555</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>review</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>review</recordtype><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DJMCT</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>PAF</sourceid><sourceid>PQLNA</sourceid><sourceid>PROLI</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKtHj8KCR9k6mUmyWW8ifkFBsPUcQjqlu9pum-we-u_dpVLnMpfnfWd4hLiWMJGk6T6tdhMEiRMAqU_ESGqyOWmtT8UIgIqcEPFcXKRUQz-WzEjczVb-m9OWfeRs1naLilM2bxZ-_5B9Nmu_aatQpXU2bVJ7Kc6W_ifx1d8ei6-X5_nTWz79eH1_epzmAaVtc2WlJWnDwnoJBmzh2RrQPhQ2AHsPXGrpqURlmFWBgKYkllgqg2UgSWNxe-jdxmbXcWpd3XRx0590EsiWWiEUPZUfqBCblCIv3TZWax_3PeQGH6734QYfbvDR8-rYWnNo113i_2JlFZFxs8HZoEwi9ikzPHNziNWpbeLxhpKmKAuD9AvpTGnr</recordid><startdate>20120701</startdate><enddate>20120701</enddate><creator>McCoy, Richard C.</creator><general>The Johns Hopkins University Press</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>A3F</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CLO</scope><scope>DJMCT</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PAF</scope><scope>PPXUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQLNA</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PROLI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120701</creationdate><title>Shakespeare Studies Today: Romanticism Lost</title><author>McCoy, Richard C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c218t-4818318cd8a106087ae8605ac78c0eaa0e951a39246ee47202693e1294629c313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reviews</rsrctype><prefilter>reviews</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Bloom, Harold (1930-2019)</topic><topic>Early Modern English</topic><topic>Postmodernism</topic><topic>Romanticism</topic><topic>Sidney, Philip (1554-1586)</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McCoy, Richard C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Performing Arts Periodicals Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Literature Online Core (LION Core) (legacy)</collection><collection>Music & Performing Arts Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Learning: Literature</collection><collection>Literature Online Premium (LION Premium) (legacy)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>Literature Online (LION) - US Customers Only</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Literature Online (LION)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McCoy, Richard C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Shakespeare Studies Today: Romanticism Lost</atitle><jtitle>Shakespeare quarterly</jtitle><date>2012-07-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>280</spage><epage>283</epage><pages>280-283</pages><issn>0037-3222</issn><issn>1538-3555</issn><eissn>1538-3555</eissn><abstract>Pechter gives a shrewd and generally sympathetic account of materialist criticism, ranging from a focus on the history of the book to the social practices of performance, and he shows how these efforts aim to move beyond mystification of a solitary sovereign genius by shifting attention to the elusive and chimerical quality of early modern texts and the collective and demotic nature of early modern theater. [...]he concludes his book with an ambivalent tribute to Harold Bloom's elegiac bardolatry inspired by Bloom's own deep regard for the Romantics.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>The Johns Hopkins University Press</pub><doi>10.1353/shq.2012.0015</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0037-3222 |
ispartof | Shakespeare quarterly, 2012, Vol.63 (2), p.280-283 |
issn | 0037-3222 1538-3555 1538-3555 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1038954207 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Bloom, Harold (1930-2019) Early Modern English Postmodernism Romanticism Sidney, Philip (1554-1586) Studies |
title | Shakespeare Studies Today: Romanticism Lost |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T15%3A30%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Shakespeare%20Studies%20Today:%20Romanticism%20Lost&rft.jtitle=Shakespeare%20quarterly&rft.au=McCoy,%20Richard%20C.&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=280&rft.epage=283&rft.pages=280-283&rft.issn=0037-3222&rft.eissn=1538-3555&rft_id=info:doi/10.1353/shq.2012.0015&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41679762%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1038954207&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=41679762&rfr_iscdi=true |