A027: Left ventricular function parameters and arterial load in a healthy versus hypertensive population
The heart and the arterial system are functionally coupled. Hemodynamics are determined by preload, cardiac contractility and afterload. In hypertension, these factors may be changed. The aim is to assess non-invasively the hemodynamic profile by evaluating left ventricular filling and contractility...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of hypertension 2000-04, Vol.13 (S2), p.49A-50A |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 50A |
---|---|
container_issue | S2 |
container_start_page | 49A |
container_title | American journal of hypertension |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | De Backer, T.L. De Mey, S. Segers, P. De Buyzere, M.L. Duprez, D.A. Verdonck, P.R. Clement, D.L. |
description | The heart and the arterial system are functionally coupled. Hemodynamics are determined by preload, cardiac contractility and afterload. In hypertension, these factors may be changed. The aim is to assess non-invasively the hemodynamic profile by evaluating left ventricular filling and contractility and afterload parameters in normotensives and hypertensives. Seventy-seven healthy volunteers (mean blood pressure 79 mmHg) and 25 hypertensives (mean blood pressure 102 mm Hg) were enrolled. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured at baseline and every 10 minutes thereafter in supine position. All had an echocardiography (HP Sonos 2500) with assessment of left ventricular geometry, diastolic and systolic function. At the same time a radial tonometer (Colin) continuously registered the arterial pressure wave. Aortic pressure was estimated from the radial artery pressure using a validated radial-aorta pressure transfer function. Arterial compliance was calculated by the pulse pressure method. Total peripheral resistance was calculated as the ratio of mean blood pressure and cardiac output. Outcome measures were 1) cardiac filling: pulmonary venous and transmitral flow 2) cardiac contractility 3) afterload: aortic pressure, total peripheral resistance and total arterial compliance. Filling of the heart was impaired in hypertensives: diastolic (36 ± 13 vs 46 ± 13 cm/s), systolic (39 ± 11 vs 50 ± 14 cm/s) pulmonary venous flow parameters decreased, transmitral E-wave decreased (68 ± 23 vs 79 ± 18 cm/s) while transmitral A-wave increased (74 ± 16 vs 48 ± 14 cm/s) (p < 0.01). Systolic function did not differ between both groups. Total peripheral resistance and central mean aortic pressure were significantly increased (1.6 ± 0.50 vs 1.3 ± 0.30 mmHg.s/ml and 105 ± 17 vs 80 ± 10 mmHg), while arterial compliance was significantly lowered in the hypertensives (0.7 ± 0.3 vs 1.1 ± 0.4 ml/mmHg) (p < 0.01). We conclude that preload, contractile state and afterload can be well assessed in a non-invasive way by echocardiography and tonometry. In hypertension diastolic filling and arterial load are impaired while contractile function is preserved. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0895-7061(00)00419-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_natur</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1038141591</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2753697991</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i911-738efe56f50cffe13e3893f4c82a21e545d57c53c5b266fdd82c98bcc85eadde3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpF0N9LwzAQB_AgCs7pnyAEfNGHan40berbGLqpAx8cKL6ELL3Qzq6tSTrcf29kok93D5_73nEInVNyTQnNbl6ILESSk4xeEnJFSEqLhB2gES1SmuSMiUM0-iPH6MT7NYkqy-gIVRPC8lu8ABvwFtrgajM02mE7tCbUXYt77fQGAjiPdVti7WJb6wY3nS5x3WKNK9BNqHZx3PnB42rXQ0Str7eA-66PcT9Bp-jI6sbD2W8do-X93XI6TxbPs4fpZJHUBY3XcgkWRGYFMdYC5cBlwW1qJNOMgkhFKXIjuBErlmW2LCUzhVwZIwXosgQ-Rhf72N51nwP4oNbd4Nq4UVHCJU2pKGhUeK9aHQYHqnf1Rrud0uuKxddwLiNJ9qT2Ab7-hftQWc5zoeZv7-o1f5o9CjFXlH8DqiZ1eQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1038141591</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A027: Left ventricular function parameters and arterial load in a healthy versus hypertensive population</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>De Backer, T.L. ; De Mey, S. ; Segers, P. ; De Buyzere, M.L. ; Duprez, D.A. ; Verdonck, P.R. ; Clement, D.L.</creator><creatorcontrib>De Backer, T.L. ; De Mey, S. ; Segers, P. ; De Buyzere, M.L. ; Duprez, D.A. ; Verdonck, P.R. ; Clement, D.L.</creatorcontrib><description>The heart and the arterial system are functionally coupled. Hemodynamics are determined by preload, cardiac contractility and afterload. In hypertension, these factors may be changed. The aim is to assess non-invasively the hemodynamic profile by evaluating left ventricular filling and contractility and afterload parameters in normotensives and hypertensives. Seventy-seven healthy volunteers (mean blood pressure 79 mmHg) and 25 hypertensives (mean blood pressure 102 mm Hg) were enrolled. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured at baseline and every 10 minutes thereafter in supine position. All had an echocardiography (HP Sonos 2500) with assessment of left ventricular geometry, diastolic and systolic function. At the same time a radial tonometer (Colin) continuously registered the arterial pressure wave. Aortic pressure was estimated from the radial artery pressure using a validated radial-aorta pressure transfer function. Arterial compliance was calculated by the pulse pressure method. Total peripheral resistance was calculated as the ratio of mean blood pressure and cardiac output. Outcome measures were 1) cardiac filling: pulmonary venous and transmitral flow 2) cardiac contractility 3) afterload: aortic pressure, total peripheral resistance and total arterial compliance. Filling of the heart was impaired in hypertensives: diastolic (36 ± 13 vs 46 ± 13 cm/s), systolic (39 ± 11 vs 50 ± 14 cm/s) pulmonary venous flow parameters decreased, transmitral E-wave decreased (68 ± 23 vs 79 ± 18 cm/s) while transmitral A-wave increased (74 ± 16 vs 48 ± 14 cm/s) (p < 0.01). Systolic function did not differ between both groups. Total peripheral resistance and central mean aortic pressure were significantly increased (1.6 ± 0.50 vs 1.3 ± 0.30 mmHg.s/ml and 105 ± 17 vs 80 ± 10 mmHg), while arterial compliance was significantly lowered in the hypertensives (0.7 ± 0.3 vs 1.1 ± 0.4 ml/mmHg) (p < 0.01). We conclude that preload, contractile state and afterload can be well assessed in a non-invasive way by echocardiography and tonometry. In hypertension diastolic filling and arterial load are impaired while contractile function is preserved.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0895-7061</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-7225</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1905</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0895-7061(00)00419-2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJHYE6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>arterial load ; contractility ; echocardiography ; Preload ; tonometry</subject><ispartof>American journal of hypertension, 2000-04, Vol.13 (S2), p.49A-50A</ispartof><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Apr 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>De Backer, T.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Mey, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segers, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Buyzere, M.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duprez, D.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verdonck, P.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clement, D.L.</creatorcontrib><title>A027: Left ventricular function parameters and arterial load in a healthy versus hypertensive population</title><title>American journal of hypertension</title><addtitle>AJH</addtitle><description>The heart and the arterial system are functionally coupled. Hemodynamics are determined by preload, cardiac contractility and afterload. In hypertension, these factors may be changed. The aim is to assess non-invasively the hemodynamic profile by evaluating left ventricular filling and contractility and afterload parameters in normotensives and hypertensives. Seventy-seven healthy volunteers (mean blood pressure 79 mmHg) and 25 hypertensives (mean blood pressure 102 mm Hg) were enrolled. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured at baseline and every 10 minutes thereafter in supine position. All had an echocardiography (HP Sonos 2500) with assessment of left ventricular geometry, diastolic and systolic function. At the same time a radial tonometer (Colin) continuously registered the arterial pressure wave. Aortic pressure was estimated from the radial artery pressure using a validated radial-aorta pressure transfer function. Arterial compliance was calculated by the pulse pressure method. Total peripheral resistance was calculated as the ratio of mean blood pressure and cardiac output. Outcome measures were 1) cardiac filling: pulmonary venous and transmitral flow 2) cardiac contractility 3) afterload: aortic pressure, total peripheral resistance and total arterial compliance. Filling of the heart was impaired in hypertensives: diastolic (36 ± 13 vs 46 ± 13 cm/s), systolic (39 ± 11 vs 50 ± 14 cm/s) pulmonary venous flow parameters decreased, transmitral E-wave decreased (68 ± 23 vs 79 ± 18 cm/s) while transmitral A-wave increased (74 ± 16 vs 48 ± 14 cm/s) (p < 0.01). Systolic function did not differ between both groups. Total peripheral resistance and central mean aortic pressure were significantly increased (1.6 ± 0.50 vs 1.3 ± 0.30 mmHg.s/ml and 105 ± 17 vs 80 ± 10 mmHg), while arterial compliance was significantly lowered in the hypertensives (0.7 ± 0.3 vs 1.1 ± 0.4 ml/mmHg) (p < 0.01). We conclude that preload, contractile state and afterload can be well assessed in a non-invasive way by echocardiography and tonometry. In hypertension diastolic filling and arterial load are impaired while contractile function is preserved.</description><subject>arterial load</subject><subject>contractility</subject><subject>echocardiography</subject><subject>Preload</subject><subject>tonometry</subject><issn>0895-7061</issn><issn>1941-7225</issn><issn>1879-1905</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNpF0N9LwzAQB_AgCs7pnyAEfNGHan40berbGLqpAx8cKL6ELL3Qzq6tSTrcf29kok93D5_73nEInVNyTQnNbl6ILESSk4xeEnJFSEqLhB2gES1SmuSMiUM0-iPH6MT7NYkqy-gIVRPC8lu8ABvwFtrgajM02mE7tCbUXYt77fQGAjiPdVti7WJb6wY3nS5x3WKNK9BNqHZx3PnB42rXQ0Str7eA-66PcT9Bp-jI6sbD2W8do-X93XI6TxbPs4fpZJHUBY3XcgkWRGYFMdYC5cBlwW1qJNOMgkhFKXIjuBErlmW2LCUzhVwZIwXosgQ-Rhf72N51nwP4oNbd4Nq4UVHCJU2pKGhUeK9aHQYHqnf1Rrud0uuKxddwLiNJ9qT2Ab7-hftQWc5zoeZv7-o1f5o9CjFXlH8DqiZ1eQ</recordid><startdate>200004</startdate><enddate>200004</enddate><creator>De Backer, T.L.</creator><creator>De Mey, S.</creator><creator>Segers, P.</creator><creator>De Buyzere, M.L.</creator><creator>Duprez, D.A.</creator><creator>Verdonck, P.R.</creator><creator>Clement, D.L.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200004</creationdate><title>A027: Left ventricular function parameters and arterial load in a healthy versus hypertensive population</title><author>De Backer, T.L. ; De Mey, S. ; Segers, P. ; De Buyzere, M.L. ; Duprez, D.A. ; Verdonck, P.R. ; Clement, D.L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i911-738efe56f50cffe13e3893f4c82a21e545d57c53c5b266fdd82c98bcc85eadde3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>arterial load</topic><topic>contractility</topic><topic>echocardiography</topic><topic>Preload</topic><topic>tonometry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Backer, T.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Mey, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segers, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Buyzere, M.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duprez, D.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verdonck, P.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clement, D.L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>American journal of hypertension</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Backer, T.L.</au><au>De Mey, S.</au><au>Segers, P.</au><au>De Buyzere, M.L.</au><au>Duprez, D.A.</au><au>Verdonck, P.R.</au><au>Clement, D.L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A027: Left ventricular function parameters and arterial load in a healthy versus hypertensive population</atitle><jtitle>American journal of hypertension</jtitle><addtitle>AJH</addtitle><date>2000-04</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>S2</issue><spage>49A</spage><epage>50A</epage><pages>49A-50A</pages><issn>0895-7061</issn><eissn>1941-7225</eissn><eissn>1879-1905</eissn><coden>AJHYE6</coden><abstract>The heart and the arterial system are functionally coupled. Hemodynamics are determined by preload, cardiac contractility and afterload. In hypertension, these factors may be changed. The aim is to assess non-invasively the hemodynamic profile by evaluating left ventricular filling and contractility and afterload parameters in normotensives and hypertensives. Seventy-seven healthy volunteers (mean blood pressure 79 mmHg) and 25 hypertensives (mean blood pressure 102 mm Hg) were enrolled. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured at baseline and every 10 minutes thereafter in supine position. All had an echocardiography (HP Sonos 2500) with assessment of left ventricular geometry, diastolic and systolic function. At the same time a radial tonometer (Colin) continuously registered the arterial pressure wave. Aortic pressure was estimated from the radial artery pressure using a validated radial-aorta pressure transfer function. Arterial compliance was calculated by the pulse pressure method. Total peripheral resistance was calculated as the ratio of mean blood pressure and cardiac output. Outcome measures were 1) cardiac filling: pulmonary venous and transmitral flow 2) cardiac contractility 3) afterload: aortic pressure, total peripheral resistance and total arterial compliance. Filling of the heart was impaired in hypertensives: diastolic (36 ± 13 vs 46 ± 13 cm/s), systolic (39 ± 11 vs 50 ± 14 cm/s) pulmonary venous flow parameters decreased, transmitral E-wave decreased (68 ± 23 vs 79 ± 18 cm/s) while transmitral A-wave increased (74 ± 16 vs 48 ± 14 cm/s) (p < 0.01). Systolic function did not differ between both groups. Total peripheral resistance and central mean aortic pressure were significantly increased (1.6 ± 0.50 vs 1.3 ± 0.30 mmHg.s/ml and 105 ± 17 vs 80 ± 10 mmHg), while arterial compliance was significantly lowered in the hypertensives (0.7 ± 0.3 vs 1.1 ± 0.4 ml/mmHg) (p < 0.01). We conclude that preload, contractile state and afterload can be well assessed in a non-invasive way by echocardiography and tonometry. In hypertension diastolic filling and arterial load are impaired while contractile function is preserved.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1016/S0895-7061(00)00419-2</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0895-7061 |
ispartof | American journal of hypertension, 2000-04, Vol.13 (S2), p.49A-50A |
issn | 0895-7061 1941-7225 1879-1905 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1038141591 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | arterial load contractility echocardiography Preload tonometry |
title | A027: Left ventricular function parameters and arterial load in a healthy versus hypertensive population |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T04%3A13%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_natur&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A027:%20Left%20ventricular%20function%20parameters%20and%20arterial%20load%20in%20a%20healthy%20versus%20hypertensive%20population&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20hypertension&rft.au=De%20Backer,%20T.L.&rft.date=2000-04&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=S2&rft.spage=49A&rft.epage=50A&rft.pages=49A-50A&rft.issn=0895-7061&rft.eissn=1941-7225&rft.coden=AJHYE6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0895-7061(00)00419-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_natur%3E2753697991%3C/proquest_natur%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1038141591&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |