A027: Left ventricular function parameters and arterial load in a healthy versus hypertensive population

The heart and the arterial system are functionally coupled. Hemodynamics are determined by preload, cardiac contractility and afterload. In hypertension, these factors may be changed. The aim is to assess non-invasively the hemodynamic profile by evaluating left ventricular filling and contractility...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of hypertension 2000-04, Vol.13 (S2), p.49A-50A
Hauptverfasser: De Backer, T.L., De Mey, S., Segers, P., De Buyzere, M.L., Duprez, D.A., Verdonck, P.R., Clement, D.L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 50A
container_issue S2
container_start_page 49A
container_title American journal of hypertension
container_volume 13
creator De Backer, T.L.
De Mey, S.
Segers, P.
De Buyzere, M.L.
Duprez, D.A.
Verdonck, P.R.
Clement, D.L.
description The heart and the arterial system are functionally coupled. Hemodynamics are determined by preload, cardiac contractility and afterload. In hypertension, these factors may be changed. The aim is to assess non-invasively the hemodynamic profile by evaluating left ventricular filling and contractility and afterload parameters in normotensives and hypertensives. Seventy-seven healthy volunteers (mean blood pressure 79 mmHg) and 25 hypertensives (mean blood pressure 102 mm Hg) were enrolled. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured at baseline and every 10 minutes thereafter in supine position. All had an echocardiography (HP Sonos 2500) with assessment of left ventricular geometry, diastolic and systolic function. At the same time a radial tonometer (Colin) continuously registered the arterial pressure wave. Aortic pressure was estimated from the radial artery pressure using a validated radial-aorta pressure transfer function. Arterial compliance was calculated by the pulse pressure method. Total peripheral resistance was calculated as the ratio of mean blood pressure and cardiac output. Outcome measures were 1) cardiac filling: pulmonary venous and transmitral flow 2) cardiac contractility 3) afterload: aortic pressure, total peripheral resistance and total arterial compliance. Filling of the heart was impaired in hypertensives: diastolic (36 ± 13 vs 46 ± 13 cm/s), systolic (39 ± 11 vs 50 ± 14 cm/s) pulmonary venous flow parameters decreased, transmitral E-wave decreased (68 ± 23 vs 79 ± 18 cm/s) while transmitral A-wave increased (74 ± 16 vs 48 ± 14 cm/s) (p < 0.01). Systolic function did not differ between both groups. Total peripheral resistance and central mean aortic pressure were significantly increased (1.6 ± 0.50 vs 1.3 ± 0.30 mmHg.s/ml and 105 ± 17 vs 80 ± 10 mmHg), while arterial compliance was significantly lowered in the hypertensives (0.7 ± 0.3 vs 1.1 ± 0.4 ml/mmHg) (p < 0.01). We conclude that preload, contractile state and afterload can be well assessed in a non-invasive way by echocardiography and tonometry. In hypertension diastolic filling and arterial load are impaired while contractile function is preserved.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0895-7061(00)00419-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_natur</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1038141591</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2753697991</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i911-738efe56f50cffe13e3893f4c82a21e545d57c53c5b266fdd82c98bcc85eadde3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpF0N9LwzAQB_AgCs7pnyAEfNGHan40berbGLqpAx8cKL6ELL3Qzq6tSTrcf29kok93D5_73nEInVNyTQnNbl6ILESSk4xeEnJFSEqLhB2gES1SmuSMiUM0-iPH6MT7NYkqy-gIVRPC8lu8ABvwFtrgajM02mE7tCbUXYt77fQGAjiPdVti7WJb6wY3nS5x3WKNK9BNqHZx3PnB42rXQ0Str7eA-66PcT9Bp-jI6sbD2W8do-X93XI6TxbPs4fpZJHUBY3XcgkWRGYFMdYC5cBlwW1qJNOMgkhFKXIjuBErlmW2LCUzhVwZIwXosgQ-Rhf72N51nwP4oNbd4Nq4UVHCJU2pKGhUeK9aHQYHqnf1Rrud0uuKxddwLiNJ9qT2Ab7-hftQWc5zoeZv7-o1f5o9CjFXlH8DqiZ1eQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1038141591</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A027: Left ventricular function parameters and arterial load in a healthy versus hypertensive population</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>De Backer, T.L. ; De Mey, S. ; Segers, P. ; De Buyzere, M.L. ; Duprez, D.A. ; Verdonck, P.R. ; Clement, D.L.</creator><creatorcontrib>De Backer, T.L. ; De Mey, S. ; Segers, P. ; De Buyzere, M.L. ; Duprez, D.A. ; Verdonck, P.R. ; Clement, D.L.</creatorcontrib><description>The heart and the arterial system are functionally coupled. Hemodynamics are determined by preload, cardiac contractility and afterload. In hypertension, these factors may be changed. The aim is to assess non-invasively the hemodynamic profile by evaluating left ventricular filling and contractility and afterload parameters in normotensives and hypertensives. Seventy-seven healthy volunteers (mean blood pressure 79 mmHg) and 25 hypertensives (mean blood pressure 102 mm Hg) were enrolled. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured at baseline and every 10 minutes thereafter in supine position. All had an echocardiography (HP Sonos 2500) with assessment of left ventricular geometry, diastolic and systolic function. At the same time a radial tonometer (Colin) continuously registered the arterial pressure wave. Aortic pressure was estimated from the radial artery pressure using a validated radial-aorta pressure transfer function. Arterial compliance was calculated by the pulse pressure method. Total peripheral resistance was calculated as the ratio of mean blood pressure and cardiac output. Outcome measures were 1) cardiac filling: pulmonary venous and transmitral flow 2) cardiac contractility 3) afterload: aortic pressure, total peripheral resistance and total arterial compliance. Filling of the heart was impaired in hypertensives: diastolic (36 ± 13 vs 46 ± 13 cm/s), systolic (39 ± 11 vs 50 ± 14 cm/s) pulmonary venous flow parameters decreased, transmitral E-wave decreased (68 ± 23 vs 79 ± 18 cm/s) while transmitral A-wave increased (74 ± 16 vs 48 ± 14 cm/s) (p &lt; 0.01). Systolic function did not differ between both groups. Total peripheral resistance and central mean aortic pressure were significantly increased (1.6 ± 0.50 vs 1.3 ± 0.30 mmHg.s/ml and 105 ± 17 vs 80 ± 10 mmHg), while arterial compliance was significantly lowered in the hypertensives (0.7 ± 0.3 vs 1.1 ± 0.4 ml/mmHg) (p &lt; 0.01). We conclude that preload, contractile state and afterload can be well assessed in a non-invasive way by echocardiography and tonometry. In hypertension diastolic filling and arterial load are impaired while contractile function is preserved.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0895-7061</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-7225</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1905</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0895-7061(00)00419-2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJHYE6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>arterial load ; contractility ; echocardiography ; Preload ; tonometry</subject><ispartof>American journal of hypertension, 2000-04, Vol.13 (S2), p.49A-50A</ispartof><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Apr 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>De Backer, T.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Mey, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segers, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Buyzere, M.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duprez, D.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verdonck, P.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clement, D.L.</creatorcontrib><title>A027: Left ventricular function parameters and arterial load in a healthy versus hypertensive population</title><title>American journal of hypertension</title><addtitle>AJH</addtitle><description>The heart and the arterial system are functionally coupled. Hemodynamics are determined by preload, cardiac contractility and afterload. In hypertension, these factors may be changed. The aim is to assess non-invasively the hemodynamic profile by evaluating left ventricular filling and contractility and afterload parameters in normotensives and hypertensives. Seventy-seven healthy volunteers (mean blood pressure 79 mmHg) and 25 hypertensives (mean blood pressure 102 mm Hg) were enrolled. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured at baseline and every 10 minutes thereafter in supine position. All had an echocardiography (HP Sonos 2500) with assessment of left ventricular geometry, diastolic and systolic function. At the same time a radial tonometer (Colin) continuously registered the arterial pressure wave. Aortic pressure was estimated from the radial artery pressure using a validated radial-aorta pressure transfer function. Arterial compliance was calculated by the pulse pressure method. Total peripheral resistance was calculated as the ratio of mean blood pressure and cardiac output. Outcome measures were 1) cardiac filling: pulmonary venous and transmitral flow 2) cardiac contractility 3) afterload: aortic pressure, total peripheral resistance and total arterial compliance. Filling of the heart was impaired in hypertensives: diastolic (36 ± 13 vs 46 ± 13 cm/s), systolic (39 ± 11 vs 50 ± 14 cm/s) pulmonary venous flow parameters decreased, transmitral E-wave decreased (68 ± 23 vs 79 ± 18 cm/s) while transmitral A-wave increased (74 ± 16 vs 48 ± 14 cm/s) (p &lt; 0.01). Systolic function did not differ between both groups. Total peripheral resistance and central mean aortic pressure were significantly increased (1.6 ± 0.50 vs 1.3 ± 0.30 mmHg.s/ml and 105 ± 17 vs 80 ± 10 mmHg), while arterial compliance was significantly lowered in the hypertensives (0.7 ± 0.3 vs 1.1 ± 0.4 ml/mmHg) (p &lt; 0.01). We conclude that preload, contractile state and afterload can be well assessed in a non-invasive way by echocardiography and tonometry. In hypertension diastolic filling and arterial load are impaired while contractile function is preserved.</description><subject>arterial load</subject><subject>contractility</subject><subject>echocardiography</subject><subject>Preload</subject><subject>tonometry</subject><issn>0895-7061</issn><issn>1941-7225</issn><issn>1879-1905</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNpF0N9LwzAQB_AgCs7pnyAEfNGHan40berbGLqpAx8cKL6ELL3Qzq6tSTrcf29kok93D5_73nEInVNyTQnNbl6ILESSk4xeEnJFSEqLhB2gES1SmuSMiUM0-iPH6MT7NYkqy-gIVRPC8lu8ABvwFtrgajM02mE7tCbUXYt77fQGAjiPdVti7WJb6wY3nS5x3WKNK9BNqHZx3PnB42rXQ0Str7eA-66PcT9Bp-jI6sbD2W8do-X93XI6TxbPs4fpZJHUBY3XcgkWRGYFMdYC5cBlwW1qJNOMgkhFKXIjuBErlmW2LCUzhVwZIwXosgQ-Rhf72N51nwP4oNbd4Nq4UVHCJU2pKGhUeK9aHQYHqnf1Rrud0uuKxddwLiNJ9qT2Ab7-hftQWc5zoeZv7-o1f5o9CjFXlH8DqiZ1eQ</recordid><startdate>200004</startdate><enddate>200004</enddate><creator>De Backer, T.L.</creator><creator>De Mey, S.</creator><creator>Segers, P.</creator><creator>De Buyzere, M.L.</creator><creator>Duprez, D.A.</creator><creator>Verdonck, P.R.</creator><creator>Clement, D.L.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200004</creationdate><title>A027: Left ventricular function parameters and arterial load in a healthy versus hypertensive population</title><author>De Backer, T.L. ; De Mey, S. ; Segers, P. ; De Buyzere, M.L. ; Duprez, D.A. ; Verdonck, P.R. ; Clement, D.L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i911-738efe56f50cffe13e3893f4c82a21e545d57c53c5b266fdd82c98bcc85eadde3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>arterial load</topic><topic>contractility</topic><topic>echocardiography</topic><topic>Preload</topic><topic>tonometry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Backer, T.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Mey, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segers, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Buyzere, M.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duprez, D.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verdonck, P.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clement, D.L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>American journal of hypertension</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Backer, T.L.</au><au>De Mey, S.</au><au>Segers, P.</au><au>De Buyzere, M.L.</au><au>Duprez, D.A.</au><au>Verdonck, P.R.</au><au>Clement, D.L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A027: Left ventricular function parameters and arterial load in a healthy versus hypertensive population</atitle><jtitle>American journal of hypertension</jtitle><addtitle>AJH</addtitle><date>2000-04</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>S2</issue><spage>49A</spage><epage>50A</epage><pages>49A-50A</pages><issn>0895-7061</issn><eissn>1941-7225</eissn><eissn>1879-1905</eissn><coden>AJHYE6</coden><abstract>The heart and the arterial system are functionally coupled. Hemodynamics are determined by preload, cardiac contractility and afterload. In hypertension, these factors may be changed. The aim is to assess non-invasively the hemodynamic profile by evaluating left ventricular filling and contractility and afterload parameters in normotensives and hypertensives. Seventy-seven healthy volunteers (mean blood pressure 79 mmHg) and 25 hypertensives (mean blood pressure 102 mm Hg) were enrolled. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured at baseline and every 10 minutes thereafter in supine position. All had an echocardiography (HP Sonos 2500) with assessment of left ventricular geometry, diastolic and systolic function. At the same time a radial tonometer (Colin) continuously registered the arterial pressure wave. Aortic pressure was estimated from the radial artery pressure using a validated radial-aorta pressure transfer function. Arterial compliance was calculated by the pulse pressure method. Total peripheral resistance was calculated as the ratio of mean blood pressure and cardiac output. Outcome measures were 1) cardiac filling: pulmonary venous and transmitral flow 2) cardiac contractility 3) afterload: aortic pressure, total peripheral resistance and total arterial compliance. Filling of the heart was impaired in hypertensives: diastolic (36 ± 13 vs 46 ± 13 cm/s), systolic (39 ± 11 vs 50 ± 14 cm/s) pulmonary venous flow parameters decreased, transmitral E-wave decreased (68 ± 23 vs 79 ± 18 cm/s) while transmitral A-wave increased (74 ± 16 vs 48 ± 14 cm/s) (p &lt; 0.01). Systolic function did not differ between both groups. Total peripheral resistance and central mean aortic pressure were significantly increased (1.6 ± 0.50 vs 1.3 ± 0.30 mmHg.s/ml and 105 ± 17 vs 80 ± 10 mmHg), while arterial compliance was significantly lowered in the hypertensives (0.7 ± 0.3 vs 1.1 ± 0.4 ml/mmHg) (p &lt; 0.01). We conclude that preload, contractile state and afterload can be well assessed in a non-invasive way by echocardiography and tonometry. In hypertension diastolic filling and arterial load are impaired while contractile function is preserved.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1016/S0895-7061(00)00419-2</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0895-7061
ispartof American journal of hypertension, 2000-04, Vol.13 (S2), p.49A-50A
issn 0895-7061
1941-7225
1879-1905
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1038141591
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects arterial load
contractility
echocardiography
Preload
tonometry
title A027: Left ventricular function parameters and arterial load in a healthy versus hypertensive population
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T04%3A13%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_natur&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A027:%20Left%20ventricular%20function%20parameters%20and%20arterial%20load%20in%20a%20healthy%20versus%20hypertensive%20population&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20hypertension&rft.au=De%20Backer,%20T.L.&rft.date=2000-04&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=S2&rft.spage=49A&rft.epage=50A&rft.pages=49A-50A&rft.issn=0895-7061&rft.eissn=1941-7225&rft.coden=AJHYE6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0895-7061(00)00419-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_natur%3E2753697991%3C/proquest_natur%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1038141591&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true