Glyphosate-Resistant Alfalfa Response to Harvest Frequency and Weed Management
Glyphosate-resistant (GR) alfalfa offers growers new options for weed control in alfalfa. One potential benefit of using GR alfalfa is increased longevity of an alfalfa stand under frequent harvests. It was hypothesized that GR alfalfa would have a greater longevity because of removal of weed interf...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Weed technology 2012-07, Vol.26 (3), p.399-404 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 404 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 399 |
container_title | Weed technology |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Min, Doo-Hong Dietz, Timothy S Everman, Wesley J Chomas, Andrew J Kells, James J Leep, Richard H |
description | Glyphosate-resistant (GR) alfalfa offers growers new options for weed control in alfalfa. One potential benefit of using GR alfalfa is increased longevity of an alfalfa stand under frequent harvests. It was hypothesized that GR alfalfa would have a greater longevity because of removal of weed interference with minimal crop injury. To study GR alfalfa yield, weed invasion, alfalfa stand persistence, and relative forage quality (RFQ), a field experiment with three weed control methods (no herbicide, glyphosate, and hexazinone) under two harvest frequencies (high and moderate) was established in August 2003 at the Michigan State University Agronomy Farm in East Lansing, MI. Forage yield of established alfalfa was not adversely affected by herbicide treatments. There were no differences in weed biomass between alfalfa treated with glyphosate and that treated with hexazinone, except in 2007. Average GR alfalfa stand density decreased approximately 90% (from 236 to 27 plant m−2), and yield decreased approximately 30% (from 11.04 to 7.87 Mg ha−1) during the 7-yr period (2004 to 2010) of the experiment. Stand density of GR alfalfa showed natural thinning during the 7-yr period regardless of harvest intensity or herbicide treatment. In most production years (4 out of 5 yr), relative forage quality of GR alfalfa was higher under a high-intensity harvesting system (4 to 5 harvests yr−1) than it was with a moderate intensity harvesting system (3 to 4 harvests yr−1). Relative forage quality was not affected by weed removal with herbicides in most years. Weed removal and harvest intensity in established GR alfalfa had no effect on stand persistence. Nomenclature: Glyphosate; hexazinone; alfalfa, Medicago sativa L. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1614/WT-D-11-00103.1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1038133573</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23264318</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23264318</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b353t-b98faddc7e4469d913a924e6459b5658b3ea335d5d5e9613700e5c6e6f74b9983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1LAzEQxYMoWKtnT-KC59h87-ZYqlXBD9BKvYXs7qxu0c2apEL_e1NXvMoEBpLfy5t5CB1Tck4VFZPlAl9gSjEhlPBzuoNGVEqCWS7ILhqRQhNMeP6yjw5CWCVIMUZG6P7qfdO_uWAj4EcIbYi2i9n0vbHpZOmmd12ALLrs2vovCDGbe_hcQ1dtMtvV2RKgzu5sZ1_hA7p4iPaSMsDRbx-j5_nlYnaNbx-ubmbTW1xyySMuddHYuq5yEELpWlNuNROghNSlVLIoOVjOZZ0KtKI8JwRkpUA1uSi1LvgYnQ3_9t6laUI0K7f2XbI0afuCJnHOEzUZqMq7EDw0pvfth_WbBJltaGa5MBeGUvMTmqFJcTIoViE6_4czzpTgdOt7Orw31hn76ttgnp8YoZIQxsTWeIzwQJStcx386_gNqmN_pQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1038133573</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Glyphosate-Resistant Alfalfa Response to Harvest Frequency and Weed Management</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Cambridge Journals</source><creator>Min, Doo-Hong ; Dietz, Timothy S ; Everman, Wesley J ; Chomas, Andrew J ; Kells, James J ; Leep, Richard H</creator><creatorcontrib>Min, Doo-Hong ; Dietz, Timothy S ; Everman, Wesley J ; Chomas, Andrew J ; Kells, James J ; Leep, Richard H</creatorcontrib><description>Glyphosate-resistant (GR) alfalfa offers growers new options for weed control in alfalfa. One potential benefit of using GR alfalfa is increased longevity of an alfalfa stand under frequent harvests. It was hypothesized that GR alfalfa would have a greater longevity because of removal of weed interference with minimal crop injury. To study GR alfalfa yield, weed invasion, alfalfa stand persistence, and relative forage quality (RFQ), a field experiment with three weed control methods (no herbicide, glyphosate, and hexazinone) under two harvest frequencies (high and moderate) was established in August 2003 at the Michigan State University Agronomy Farm in East Lansing, MI. Forage yield of established alfalfa was not adversely affected by herbicide treatments. There were no differences in weed biomass between alfalfa treated with glyphosate and that treated with hexazinone, except in 2007. Average GR alfalfa stand density decreased approximately 90% (from 236 to 27 plant m−2), and yield decreased approximately 30% (from 11.04 to 7.87 Mg ha−1) during the 7-yr period (2004 to 2010) of the experiment. Stand density of GR alfalfa showed natural thinning during the 7-yr period regardless of harvest intensity or herbicide treatment. In most production years (4 out of 5 yr), relative forage quality of GR alfalfa was higher under a high-intensity harvesting system (4 to 5 harvests yr−1) than it was with a moderate intensity harvesting system (3 to 4 harvests yr−1). Relative forage quality was not affected by weed removal with herbicides in most years. Weed removal and harvest intensity in established GR alfalfa had no effect on stand persistence. Nomenclature: Glyphosate; hexazinone; alfalfa, Medicago sativa L.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-037X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1614/WT-D-11-00103.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>810 East 10th St., Lawrence, KS 66044-7050: Weed Science Society of America</publisher><subject>Agronomy ; Alfalfa ; alfalfa stand persistence ; biomass ; control methods ; Crop harvesting ; Established alfalfa ; Experiments ; farms ; field experimentation ; Forage ; Forage quality ; forage yield ; glyphosate ; growers ; harvesting ; herbicide resistance ; Herbicides ; hexazinone ; Loam soils ; Longevity ; Medicago sativa ; Pastures ; Plants ; Rain ; Seeding ; Stand density ; Weed control ; WEED MANAGEMENT — MAJOR CROPS ; Weeds</subject><ispartof>Weed technology, 2012-07, Vol.26 (3), p.399-404</ispartof><rights>Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright 2012 Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright Allen Press Publishing Services Jul-Sep 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b353t-b98faddc7e4469d913a924e6459b5658b3ea335d5d5e9613700e5c6e6f74b9983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b353t-b98faddc7e4469d913a924e6459b5658b3ea335d5d5e9613700e5c6e6f74b9983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23264318$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23264318$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Min, Doo-Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietz, Timothy S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Everman, Wesley J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chomas, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kells, James J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leep, Richard H</creatorcontrib><title>Glyphosate-Resistant Alfalfa Response to Harvest Frequency and Weed Management</title><title>Weed technology</title><description>Glyphosate-resistant (GR) alfalfa offers growers new options for weed control in alfalfa. One potential benefit of using GR alfalfa is increased longevity of an alfalfa stand under frequent harvests. It was hypothesized that GR alfalfa would have a greater longevity because of removal of weed interference with minimal crop injury. To study GR alfalfa yield, weed invasion, alfalfa stand persistence, and relative forage quality (RFQ), a field experiment with three weed control methods (no herbicide, glyphosate, and hexazinone) under two harvest frequencies (high and moderate) was established in August 2003 at the Michigan State University Agronomy Farm in East Lansing, MI. Forage yield of established alfalfa was not adversely affected by herbicide treatments. There were no differences in weed biomass between alfalfa treated with glyphosate and that treated with hexazinone, except in 2007. Average GR alfalfa stand density decreased approximately 90% (from 236 to 27 plant m−2), and yield decreased approximately 30% (from 11.04 to 7.87 Mg ha−1) during the 7-yr period (2004 to 2010) of the experiment. Stand density of GR alfalfa showed natural thinning during the 7-yr period regardless of harvest intensity or herbicide treatment. In most production years (4 out of 5 yr), relative forage quality of GR alfalfa was higher under a high-intensity harvesting system (4 to 5 harvests yr−1) than it was with a moderate intensity harvesting system (3 to 4 harvests yr−1). Relative forage quality was not affected by weed removal with herbicides in most years. Weed removal and harvest intensity in established GR alfalfa had no effect on stand persistence. Nomenclature: Glyphosate; hexazinone; alfalfa, Medicago sativa L.</description><subject>Agronomy</subject><subject>Alfalfa</subject><subject>alfalfa stand persistence</subject><subject>biomass</subject><subject>control methods</subject><subject>Crop harvesting</subject><subject>Established alfalfa</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>farms</subject><subject>field experimentation</subject><subject>Forage</subject><subject>Forage quality</subject><subject>forage yield</subject><subject>glyphosate</subject><subject>growers</subject><subject>harvesting</subject><subject>herbicide resistance</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>hexazinone</subject><subject>Loam soils</subject><subject>Longevity</subject><subject>Medicago sativa</subject><subject>Pastures</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Seeding</subject><subject>Stand density</subject><subject>Weed control</subject><subject>WEED MANAGEMENT — MAJOR CROPS</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><issn>0890-037X</issn><issn>1550-2740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1LAzEQxYMoWKtnT-KC59h87-ZYqlXBD9BKvYXs7qxu0c2apEL_e1NXvMoEBpLfy5t5CB1Tck4VFZPlAl9gSjEhlPBzuoNGVEqCWS7ILhqRQhNMeP6yjw5CWCVIMUZG6P7qfdO_uWAj4EcIbYi2i9n0vbHpZOmmd12ALLrs2vovCDGbe_hcQ1dtMtvV2RKgzu5sZ1_hA7p4iPaSMsDRbx-j5_nlYnaNbx-ubmbTW1xyySMuddHYuq5yEELpWlNuNROghNSlVLIoOVjOZZ0KtKI8JwRkpUA1uSi1LvgYnQ3_9t6laUI0K7f2XbI0afuCJnHOEzUZqMq7EDw0pvfth_WbBJltaGa5MBeGUvMTmqFJcTIoViE6_4czzpTgdOt7Orw31hn76ttgnp8YoZIQxsTWeIzwQJStcx386_gNqmN_pQ</recordid><startdate>20120701</startdate><enddate>20120701</enddate><creator>Min, Doo-Hong</creator><creator>Dietz, Timothy S</creator><creator>Everman, Wesley J</creator><creator>Chomas, Andrew J</creator><creator>Kells, James J</creator><creator>Leep, Richard H</creator><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120701</creationdate><title>Glyphosate-Resistant Alfalfa Response to Harvest Frequency and Weed Management</title><author>Min, Doo-Hong ; Dietz, Timothy S ; Everman, Wesley J ; Chomas, Andrew J ; Kells, James J ; Leep, Richard H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b353t-b98faddc7e4469d913a924e6459b5658b3ea335d5d5e9613700e5c6e6f74b9983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Agronomy</topic><topic>Alfalfa</topic><topic>alfalfa stand persistence</topic><topic>biomass</topic><topic>control methods</topic><topic>Crop harvesting</topic><topic>Established alfalfa</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>farms</topic><topic>field experimentation</topic><topic>Forage</topic><topic>Forage quality</topic><topic>forage yield</topic><topic>glyphosate</topic><topic>growers</topic><topic>harvesting</topic><topic>herbicide resistance</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>hexazinone</topic><topic>Loam soils</topic><topic>Longevity</topic><topic>Medicago sativa</topic><topic>Pastures</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Seeding</topic><topic>Stand density</topic><topic>Weed control</topic><topic>WEED MANAGEMENT — MAJOR CROPS</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Min, Doo-Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietz, Timothy S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Everman, Wesley J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chomas, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kells, James J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leep, Richard H</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Min, Doo-Hong</au><au>Dietz, Timothy S</au><au>Everman, Wesley J</au><au>Chomas, Andrew J</au><au>Kells, James J</au><au>Leep, Richard H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Glyphosate-Resistant Alfalfa Response to Harvest Frequency and Weed Management</atitle><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle><date>2012-07-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>399</spage><epage>404</epage><pages>399-404</pages><issn>0890-037X</issn><eissn>1550-2740</eissn><abstract>Glyphosate-resistant (GR) alfalfa offers growers new options for weed control in alfalfa. One potential benefit of using GR alfalfa is increased longevity of an alfalfa stand under frequent harvests. It was hypothesized that GR alfalfa would have a greater longevity because of removal of weed interference with minimal crop injury. To study GR alfalfa yield, weed invasion, alfalfa stand persistence, and relative forage quality (RFQ), a field experiment with three weed control methods (no herbicide, glyphosate, and hexazinone) under two harvest frequencies (high and moderate) was established in August 2003 at the Michigan State University Agronomy Farm in East Lansing, MI. Forage yield of established alfalfa was not adversely affected by herbicide treatments. There were no differences in weed biomass between alfalfa treated with glyphosate and that treated with hexazinone, except in 2007. Average GR alfalfa stand density decreased approximately 90% (from 236 to 27 plant m−2), and yield decreased approximately 30% (from 11.04 to 7.87 Mg ha−1) during the 7-yr period (2004 to 2010) of the experiment. Stand density of GR alfalfa showed natural thinning during the 7-yr period regardless of harvest intensity or herbicide treatment. In most production years (4 out of 5 yr), relative forage quality of GR alfalfa was higher under a high-intensity harvesting system (4 to 5 harvests yr−1) than it was with a moderate intensity harvesting system (3 to 4 harvests yr−1). Relative forage quality was not affected by weed removal with herbicides in most years. Weed removal and harvest intensity in established GR alfalfa had no effect on stand persistence. Nomenclature: Glyphosate; hexazinone; alfalfa, Medicago sativa L.</abstract><cop>810 East 10th St., Lawrence, KS 66044-7050</cop><pub>Weed Science Society of America</pub><doi>10.1614/WT-D-11-00103.1</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0890-037X |
ispartof | Weed technology, 2012-07, Vol.26 (3), p.399-404 |
issn | 0890-037X 1550-2740 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1038133573 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Cambridge Journals |
subjects | Agronomy Alfalfa alfalfa stand persistence biomass control methods Crop harvesting Established alfalfa Experiments farms field experimentation Forage Forage quality forage yield glyphosate growers harvesting herbicide resistance Herbicides hexazinone Loam soils Longevity Medicago sativa Pastures Plants Rain Seeding Stand density Weed control WEED MANAGEMENT — MAJOR CROPS Weeds |
title | Glyphosate-Resistant Alfalfa Response to Harvest Frequency and Weed Management |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-16T02%3A53%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Glyphosate-Resistant%20Alfalfa%20Response%20to%20Harvest%20Frequency%20and%20Weed%20Management&rft.jtitle=Weed%20technology&rft.au=Min,%20Doo-Hong&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=399&rft.epage=404&rft.pages=399-404&rft.issn=0890-037X&rft.eissn=1550-2740&rft_id=info:doi/10.1614/WT-D-11-00103.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23264318%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1038133573&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23264318&rfr_iscdi=true |