Glyphosate-Resistant Alfalfa Response to Harvest Frequency and Weed Management

Glyphosate-resistant (GR) alfalfa offers growers new options for weed control in alfalfa. One potential benefit of using GR alfalfa is increased longevity of an alfalfa stand under frequent harvests. It was hypothesized that GR alfalfa would have a greater longevity because of removal of weed interf...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Weed technology 2012-07, Vol.26 (3), p.399-404
Hauptverfasser: Min, Doo-Hong, Dietz, Timothy S, Everman, Wesley J, Chomas, Andrew J, Kells, James J, Leep, Richard H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 404
container_issue 3
container_start_page 399
container_title Weed technology
container_volume 26
creator Min, Doo-Hong
Dietz, Timothy S
Everman, Wesley J
Chomas, Andrew J
Kells, James J
Leep, Richard H
description Glyphosate-resistant (GR) alfalfa offers growers new options for weed control in alfalfa. One potential benefit of using GR alfalfa is increased longevity of an alfalfa stand under frequent harvests. It was hypothesized that GR alfalfa would have a greater longevity because of removal of weed interference with minimal crop injury. To study GR alfalfa yield, weed invasion, alfalfa stand persistence, and relative forage quality (RFQ), a field experiment with three weed control methods (no herbicide, glyphosate, and hexazinone) under two harvest frequencies (high and moderate) was established in August 2003 at the Michigan State University Agronomy Farm in East Lansing, MI. Forage yield of established alfalfa was not adversely affected by herbicide treatments. There were no differences in weed biomass between alfalfa treated with glyphosate and that treated with hexazinone, except in 2007. Average GR alfalfa stand density decreased approximately 90% (from 236 to 27 plant m−2), and yield decreased approximately 30% (from 11.04 to 7.87 Mg ha−1) during the 7-yr period (2004 to 2010) of the experiment. Stand density of GR alfalfa showed natural thinning during the 7-yr period regardless of harvest intensity or herbicide treatment. In most production years (4 out of 5 yr), relative forage quality of GR alfalfa was higher under a high-intensity harvesting system (4 to 5 harvests yr−1) than it was with a moderate intensity harvesting system (3 to 4 harvests yr−1). Relative forage quality was not affected by weed removal with herbicides in most years. Weed removal and harvest intensity in established GR alfalfa had no effect on stand persistence. Nomenclature: Glyphosate; hexazinone; alfalfa, Medicago sativa L.
doi_str_mv 10.1614/WT-D-11-00103.1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1038133573</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23264318</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23264318</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b353t-b98faddc7e4469d913a924e6459b5658b3ea335d5d5e9613700e5c6e6f74b9983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1LAzEQxYMoWKtnT-KC59h87-ZYqlXBD9BKvYXs7qxu0c2apEL_e1NXvMoEBpLfy5t5CB1Tck4VFZPlAl9gSjEhlPBzuoNGVEqCWS7ILhqRQhNMeP6yjw5CWCVIMUZG6P7qfdO_uWAj4EcIbYi2i9n0vbHpZOmmd12ALLrs2vovCDGbe_hcQ1dtMtvV2RKgzu5sZ1_hA7p4iPaSMsDRbx-j5_nlYnaNbx-ubmbTW1xyySMuddHYuq5yEELpWlNuNROghNSlVLIoOVjOZZ0KtKI8JwRkpUA1uSi1LvgYnQ3_9t6laUI0K7f2XbI0afuCJnHOEzUZqMq7EDw0pvfth_WbBJltaGa5MBeGUvMTmqFJcTIoViE6_4czzpTgdOt7Orw31hn76ttgnp8YoZIQxsTWeIzwQJStcx386_gNqmN_pQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1038133573</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Glyphosate-Resistant Alfalfa Response to Harvest Frequency and Weed Management</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Cambridge Journals</source><creator>Min, Doo-Hong ; Dietz, Timothy S ; Everman, Wesley J ; Chomas, Andrew J ; Kells, James J ; Leep, Richard H</creator><creatorcontrib>Min, Doo-Hong ; Dietz, Timothy S ; Everman, Wesley J ; Chomas, Andrew J ; Kells, James J ; Leep, Richard H</creatorcontrib><description>Glyphosate-resistant (GR) alfalfa offers growers new options for weed control in alfalfa. One potential benefit of using GR alfalfa is increased longevity of an alfalfa stand under frequent harvests. It was hypothesized that GR alfalfa would have a greater longevity because of removal of weed interference with minimal crop injury. To study GR alfalfa yield, weed invasion, alfalfa stand persistence, and relative forage quality (RFQ), a field experiment with three weed control methods (no herbicide, glyphosate, and hexazinone) under two harvest frequencies (high and moderate) was established in August 2003 at the Michigan State University Agronomy Farm in East Lansing, MI. Forage yield of established alfalfa was not adversely affected by herbicide treatments. There were no differences in weed biomass between alfalfa treated with glyphosate and that treated with hexazinone, except in 2007. Average GR alfalfa stand density decreased approximately 90% (from 236 to 27 plant m−2), and yield decreased approximately 30% (from 11.04 to 7.87 Mg ha−1) during the 7-yr period (2004 to 2010) of the experiment. Stand density of GR alfalfa showed natural thinning during the 7-yr period regardless of harvest intensity or herbicide treatment. In most production years (4 out of 5 yr), relative forage quality of GR alfalfa was higher under a high-intensity harvesting system (4 to 5 harvests yr−1) than it was with a moderate intensity harvesting system (3 to 4 harvests yr−1). Relative forage quality was not affected by weed removal with herbicides in most years. Weed removal and harvest intensity in established GR alfalfa had no effect on stand persistence. Nomenclature: Glyphosate; hexazinone; alfalfa, Medicago sativa L.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-037X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1614/WT-D-11-00103.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>810 East 10th St., Lawrence, KS 66044-7050: Weed Science Society of America</publisher><subject>Agronomy ; Alfalfa ; alfalfa stand persistence ; biomass ; control methods ; Crop harvesting ; Established alfalfa ; Experiments ; farms ; field experimentation ; Forage ; Forage quality ; forage yield ; glyphosate ; growers ; harvesting ; herbicide resistance ; Herbicides ; hexazinone ; Loam soils ; Longevity ; Medicago sativa ; Pastures ; Plants ; Rain ; Seeding ; Stand density ; Weed control ; WEED MANAGEMENT — MAJOR CROPS ; Weeds</subject><ispartof>Weed technology, 2012-07, Vol.26 (3), p.399-404</ispartof><rights>Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright 2012 Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright Allen Press Publishing Services Jul-Sep 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b353t-b98faddc7e4469d913a924e6459b5658b3ea335d5d5e9613700e5c6e6f74b9983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b353t-b98faddc7e4469d913a924e6459b5658b3ea335d5d5e9613700e5c6e6f74b9983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23264318$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23264318$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Min, Doo-Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietz, Timothy S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Everman, Wesley J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chomas, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kells, James J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leep, Richard H</creatorcontrib><title>Glyphosate-Resistant Alfalfa Response to Harvest Frequency and Weed Management</title><title>Weed technology</title><description>Glyphosate-resistant (GR) alfalfa offers growers new options for weed control in alfalfa. One potential benefit of using GR alfalfa is increased longevity of an alfalfa stand under frequent harvests. It was hypothesized that GR alfalfa would have a greater longevity because of removal of weed interference with minimal crop injury. To study GR alfalfa yield, weed invasion, alfalfa stand persistence, and relative forage quality (RFQ), a field experiment with three weed control methods (no herbicide, glyphosate, and hexazinone) under two harvest frequencies (high and moderate) was established in August 2003 at the Michigan State University Agronomy Farm in East Lansing, MI. Forage yield of established alfalfa was not adversely affected by herbicide treatments. There were no differences in weed biomass between alfalfa treated with glyphosate and that treated with hexazinone, except in 2007. Average GR alfalfa stand density decreased approximately 90% (from 236 to 27 plant m−2), and yield decreased approximately 30% (from 11.04 to 7.87 Mg ha−1) during the 7-yr period (2004 to 2010) of the experiment. Stand density of GR alfalfa showed natural thinning during the 7-yr period regardless of harvest intensity or herbicide treatment. In most production years (4 out of 5 yr), relative forage quality of GR alfalfa was higher under a high-intensity harvesting system (4 to 5 harvests yr−1) than it was with a moderate intensity harvesting system (3 to 4 harvests yr−1). Relative forage quality was not affected by weed removal with herbicides in most years. Weed removal and harvest intensity in established GR alfalfa had no effect on stand persistence. Nomenclature: Glyphosate; hexazinone; alfalfa, Medicago sativa L.</description><subject>Agronomy</subject><subject>Alfalfa</subject><subject>alfalfa stand persistence</subject><subject>biomass</subject><subject>control methods</subject><subject>Crop harvesting</subject><subject>Established alfalfa</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>farms</subject><subject>field experimentation</subject><subject>Forage</subject><subject>Forage quality</subject><subject>forage yield</subject><subject>glyphosate</subject><subject>growers</subject><subject>harvesting</subject><subject>herbicide resistance</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>hexazinone</subject><subject>Loam soils</subject><subject>Longevity</subject><subject>Medicago sativa</subject><subject>Pastures</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Seeding</subject><subject>Stand density</subject><subject>Weed control</subject><subject>WEED MANAGEMENT — MAJOR CROPS</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><issn>0890-037X</issn><issn>1550-2740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1LAzEQxYMoWKtnT-KC59h87-ZYqlXBD9BKvYXs7qxu0c2apEL_e1NXvMoEBpLfy5t5CB1Tck4VFZPlAl9gSjEhlPBzuoNGVEqCWS7ILhqRQhNMeP6yjw5CWCVIMUZG6P7qfdO_uWAj4EcIbYi2i9n0vbHpZOmmd12ALLrs2vovCDGbe_hcQ1dtMtvV2RKgzu5sZ1_hA7p4iPaSMsDRbx-j5_nlYnaNbx-ubmbTW1xyySMuddHYuq5yEELpWlNuNROghNSlVLIoOVjOZZ0KtKI8JwRkpUA1uSi1LvgYnQ3_9t6laUI0K7f2XbI0afuCJnHOEzUZqMq7EDw0pvfth_WbBJltaGa5MBeGUvMTmqFJcTIoViE6_4czzpTgdOt7Orw31hn76ttgnp8YoZIQxsTWeIzwQJStcx386_gNqmN_pQ</recordid><startdate>20120701</startdate><enddate>20120701</enddate><creator>Min, Doo-Hong</creator><creator>Dietz, Timothy S</creator><creator>Everman, Wesley J</creator><creator>Chomas, Andrew J</creator><creator>Kells, James J</creator><creator>Leep, Richard H</creator><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120701</creationdate><title>Glyphosate-Resistant Alfalfa Response to Harvest Frequency and Weed Management</title><author>Min, Doo-Hong ; Dietz, Timothy S ; Everman, Wesley J ; Chomas, Andrew J ; Kells, James J ; Leep, Richard H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b353t-b98faddc7e4469d913a924e6459b5658b3ea335d5d5e9613700e5c6e6f74b9983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Agronomy</topic><topic>Alfalfa</topic><topic>alfalfa stand persistence</topic><topic>biomass</topic><topic>control methods</topic><topic>Crop harvesting</topic><topic>Established alfalfa</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>farms</topic><topic>field experimentation</topic><topic>Forage</topic><topic>Forage quality</topic><topic>forage yield</topic><topic>glyphosate</topic><topic>growers</topic><topic>harvesting</topic><topic>herbicide resistance</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>hexazinone</topic><topic>Loam soils</topic><topic>Longevity</topic><topic>Medicago sativa</topic><topic>Pastures</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Seeding</topic><topic>Stand density</topic><topic>Weed control</topic><topic>WEED MANAGEMENT — MAJOR CROPS</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Min, Doo-Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietz, Timothy S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Everman, Wesley J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chomas, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kells, James J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leep, Richard H</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Min, Doo-Hong</au><au>Dietz, Timothy S</au><au>Everman, Wesley J</au><au>Chomas, Andrew J</au><au>Kells, James J</au><au>Leep, Richard H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Glyphosate-Resistant Alfalfa Response to Harvest Frequency and Weed Management</atitle><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle><date>2012-07-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>399</spage><epage>404</epage><pages>399-404</pages><issn>0890-037X</issn><eissn>1550-2740</eissn><abstract>Glyphosate-resistant (GR) alfalfa offers growers new options for weed control in alfalfa. One potential benefit of using GR alfalfa is increased longevity of an alfalfa stand under frequent harvests. It was hypothesized that GR alfalfa would have a greater longevity because of removal of weed interference with minimal crop injury. To study GR alfalfa yield, weed invasion, alfalfa stand persistence, and relative forage quality (RFQ), a field experiment with three weed control methods (no herbicide, glyphosate, and hexazinone) under two harvest frequencies (high and moderate) was established in August 2003 at the Michigan State University Agronomy Farm in East Lansing, MI. Forage yield of established alfalfa was not adversely affected by herbicide treatments. There were no differences in weed biomass between alfalfa treated with glyphosate and that treated with hexazinone, except in 2007. Average GR alfalfa stand density decreased approximately 90% (from 236 to 27 plant m−2), and yield decreased approximately 30% (from 11.04 to 7.87 Mg ha−1) during the 7-yr period (2004 to 2010) of the experiment. Stand density of GR alfalfa showed natural thinning during the 7-yr period regardless of harvest intensity or herbicide treatment. In most production years (4 out of 5 yr), relative forage quality of GR alfalfa was higher under a high-intensity harvesting system (4 to 5 harvests yr−1) than it was with a moderate intensity harvesting system (3 to 4 harvests yr−1). Relative forage quality was not affected by weed removal with herbicides in most years. Weed removal and harvest intensity in established GR alfalfa had no effect on stand persistence. Nomenclature: Glyphosate; hexazinone; alfalfa, Medicago sativa L.</abstract><cop>810 East 10th St., Lawrence, KS 66044-7050</cop><pub>Weed Science Society of America</pub><doi>10.1614/WT-D-11-00103.1</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0890-037X
ispartof Weed technology, 2012-07, Vol.26 (3), p.399-404
issn 0890-037X
1550-2740
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1038133573
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Cambridge Journals
subjects Agronomy
Alfalfa
alfalfa stand persistence
biomass
control methods
Crop harvesting
Established alfalfa
Experiments
farms
field experimentation
Forage
Forage quality
forage yield
glyphosate
growers
harvesting
herbicide resistance
Herbicides
hexazinone
Loam soils
Longevity
Medicago sativa
Pastures
Plants
Rain
Seeding
Stand density
Weed control
WEED MANAGEMENT — MAJOR CROPS
Weeds
title Glyphosate-Resistant Alfalfa Response to Harvest Frequency and Weed Management
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-16T02%3A53%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Glyphosate-Resistant%20Alfalfa%20Response%20to%20Harvest%20Frequency%20and%20Weed%20Management&rft.jtitle=Weed%20technology&rft.au=Min,%20Doo-Hong&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=399&rft.epage=404&rft.pages=399-404&rft.issn=0890-037X&rft.eissn=1550-2740&rft_id=info:doi/10.1614/WT-D-11-00103.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23264318%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1038133573&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23264318&rfr_iscdi=true