Reply

In response to their first comment noting that it would be useful to know the number of absolute lenticle dislocations, our study was an observational study, so absolute numbers of detachments were not collected as a denominator for statistical analysis, although this would have been a useful factor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of ophthalmology 2012-01, Vol.153 (1), p.184
Hauptverfasser: Hayes, Daniel D, Shih, Carolyn Y, Udell, Ira J, Shamie, Neda, Terry, Mark A, Price, Francis W, Price, Marianne O, Ritterband, David C, Ritch, Robert, Liebmann, Jeffrey M, Hannush, Sadeer B, Gorovoy, Mark S, Weisenthal, Robert W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 184
container_title American journal of ophthalmology
container_volume 153
creator Hayes, Daniel D
Shih, Carolyn Y
Udell, Ira J
Shamie, Neda
Terry, Mark A
Price, Francis W
Price, Marianne O
Ritterband, David C
Ritch, Robert
Liebmann, Jeffrey M
Hannush, Sadeer B
Gorovoy, Mark S
Weisenthal, Robert W
description In response to their first comment noting that it would be useful to know the number of absolute lenticle dislocations, our study was an observational study, so absolute numbers of detachments were not collected as a denominator for statistical analysis, although this would have been a useful factor to examine.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.09.033;10.1016/j.ajo.2011.09.034
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1036586196</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2747436231</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_10365861963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNij0LwjAQQA-xYPz4Fc6Jd72Y5HAUxVncS4c4hGJqYwf_vR1cBafH4z0AJjSE5HbJtCmbGokMikHmw69iZ6AoeNEUhOagELHWwmIXsCwlTeq89Qqqa-y79xqqe9uVuPlyBdvz6Xa86H7IzzGWV5PyODym1BCy2wdH4vi_6wMm5C_4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1036586196</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reply</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hayes, Daniel D ; Shih, Carolyn Y ; Udell, Ira J ; Shamie, Neda ; Terry, Mark A ; Price, Francis W ; Price, Marianne O ; Ritterband, David C ; Ritch, Robert ; Liebmann, Jeffrey M ; Hannush, Sadeer B ; Gorovoy, Mark S ; Weisenthal, Robert W</creator><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Daniel D ; Shih, Carolyn Y ; Udell, Ira J ; Shamie, Neda ; Terry, Mark A ; Price, Francis W ; Price, Marianne O ; Ritterband, David C ; Ritch, Robert ; Liebmann, Jeffrey M ; Hannush, Sadeer B ; Gorovoy, Mark S ; Weisenthal, Robert W</creatorcontrib><description>In response to their first comment noting that it would be useful to know the number of absolute lenticle dislocations, our study was an observational study, so absolute numbers of detachments were not collected as a denominator for statistical analysis, although this would have been a useful factor to examine.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9394</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1891</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.09.033;10.1016/j.ajo.2011.09.034</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJOPAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: Elsevier Limited</publisher><subject>Automation</subject><ispartof>American journal of ophthalmology, 2012-01, Vol.153 (1), p.184</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Daniel D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shih, Carolyn Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Udell, Ira J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shamie, Neda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terry, Mark A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Francis W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Marianne O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ritterband, David C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ritch, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liebmann, Jeffrey M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hannush, Sadeer B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorovoy, Mark S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weisenthal, Robert W</creatorcontrib><title>Reply</title><title>American journal of ophthalmology</title><description>In response to their first comment noting that it would be useful to know the number of absolute lenticle dislocations, our study was an observational study, so absolute numbers of detachments were not collected as a denominator for statistical analysis, although this would have been a useful factor to examine.</description><subject>Automation</subject><issn>0002-9394</issn><issn>1879-1891</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNij0LwjAQQA-xYPz4Fc6Jd72Y5HAUxVncS4c4hGJqYwf_vR1cBafH4z0AJjSE5HbJtCmbGokMikHmw69iZ6AoeNEUhOagELHWwmIXsCwlTeq89Qqqa-y79xqqe9uVuPlyBdvz6Xa86H7IzzGWV5PyODym1BCy2wdH4vi_6wMm5C_4</recordid><startdate>20120101</startdate><enddate>20120101</enddate><creator>Hayes, Daniel D</creator><creator>Shih, Carolyn Y</creator><creator>Udell, Ira J</creator><creator>Shamie, Neda</creator><creator>Terry, Mark A</creator><creator>Price, Francis W</creator><creator>Price, Marianne O</creator><creator>Ritterband, David C</creator><creator>Ritch, Robert</creator><creator>Liebmann, Jeffrey M</creator><creator>Hannush, Sadeer B</creator><creator>Gorovoy, Mark S</creator><creator>Weisenthal, Robert W</creator><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120101</creationdate><title>Reply</title><author>Hayes, Daniel D ; Shih, Carolyn Y ; Udell, Ira J ; Shamie, Neda ; Terry, Mark A ; Price, Francis W ; Price, Marianne O ; Ritterband, David C ; Ritch, Robert ; Liebmann, Jeffrey M ; Hannush, Sadeer B ; Gorovoy, Mark S ; Weisenthal, Robert W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_10365861963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Automation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Daniel D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shih, Carolyn Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Udell, Ira J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shamie, Neda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terry, Mark A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Francis W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Marianne O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ritterband, David C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ritch, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liebmann, Jeffrey M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hannush, Sadeer B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorovoy, Mark S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weisenthal, Robert W</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>American journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hayes, Daniel D</au><au>Shih, Carolyn Y</au><au>Udell, Ira J</au><au>Shamie, Neda</au><au>Terry, Mark A</au><au>Price, Francis W</au><au>Price, Marianne O</au><au>Ritterband, David C</au><au>Ritch, Robert</au><au>Liebmann, Jeffrey M</au><au>Hannush, Sadeer B</au><au>Gorovoy, Mark S</au><au>Weisenthal, Robert W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reply</atitle><jtitle>American journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><date>2012-01-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>153</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>184</spage><pages>184-</pages><issn>0002-9394</issn><eissn>1879-1891</eissn><coden>AJOPAA</coden><abstract>In response to their first comment noting that it would be useful to know the number of absolute lenticle dislocations, our study was an observational study, so absolute numbers of detachments were not collected as a denominator for statistical analysis, although this would have been a useful factor to examine.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>Elsevier Limited</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ajo.2011.09.033;10.1016/j.ajo.2011.09.034</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9394
ispartof American journal of ophthalmology, 2012-01, Vol.153 (1), p.184
issn 0002-9394
1879-1891
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1036586196
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Automation
title Reply
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T16%3A03%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reply&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Hayes,%20Daniel%20D&rft.date=2012-01-01&rft.volume=153&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=184&rft.pages=184-&rft.issn=0002-9394&rft.eissn=1879-1891&rft.coden=AJOPAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajo.2011.09.033;10.1016/j.ajo.2011.09.034&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2747436231%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1036586196&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true