Reply
In response to their first comment noting that it would be useful to know the number of absolute lenticle dislocations, our study was an observational study, so absolute numbers of detachments were not collected as a denominator for statistical analysis, although this would have been a useful factor...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of ophthalmology 2012-01, Vol.153 (1), p.184 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 184 |
container_title | American journal of ophthalmology |
container_volume | 153 |
creator | Hayes, Daniel D Shih, Carolyn Y Udell, Ira J Shamie, Neda Terry, Mark A Price, Francis W Price, Marianne O Ritterband, David C Ritch, Robert Liebmann, Jeffrey M Hannush, Sadeer B Gorovoy, Mark S Weisenthal, Robert W |
description | In response to their first comment noting that it would be useful to know the number of absolute lenticle dislocations, our study was an observational study, so absolute numbers of detachments were not collected as a denominator for statistical analysis, although this would have been a useful factor to examine. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.09.033;10.1016/j.ajo.2011.09.034 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1036586196</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2747436231</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_10365861963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNij0LwjAQQA-xYPz4Fc6Jd72Y5HAUxVncS4c4hGJqYwf_vR1cBafH4z0AJjSE5HbJtCmbGokMikHmw69iZ6AoeNEUhOagELHWwmIXsCwlTeq89Qqqa-y79xqqe9uVuPlyBdvz6Xa86H7IzzGWV5PyODym1BCy2wdH4vi_6wMm5C_4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1036586196</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reply</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hayes, Daniel D ; Shih, Carolyn Y ; Udell, Ira J ; Shamie, Neda ; Terry, Mark A ; Price, Francis W ; Price, Marianne O ; Ritterband, David C ; Ritch, Robert ; Liebmann, Jeffrey M ; Hannush, Sadeer B ; Gorovoy, Mark S ; Weisenthal, Robert W</creator><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Daniel D ; Shih, Carolyn Y ; Udell, Ira J ; Shamie, Neda ; Terry, Mark A ; Price, Francis W ; Price, Marianne O ; Ritterband, David C ; Ritch, Robert ; Liebmann, Jeffrey M ; Hannush, Sadeer B ; Gorovoy, Mark S ; Weisenthal, Robert W</creatorcontrib><description>In response to their first comment noting that it would be useful to know the number of absolute lenticle dislocations, our study was an observational study, so absolute numbers of detachments were not collected as a denominator for statistical analysis, although this would have been a useful factor to examine.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9394</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1891</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.09.033;10.1016/j.ajo.2011.09.034</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJOPAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: Elsevier Limited</publisher><subject>Automation</subject><ispartof>American journal of ophthalmology, 2012-01, Vol.153 (1), p.184</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Daniel D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shih, Carolyn Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Udell, Ira J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shamie, Neda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terry, Mark A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Francis W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Marianne O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ritterband, David C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ritch, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liebmann, Jeffrey M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hannush, Sadeer B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorovoy, Mark S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weisenthal, Robert W</creatorcontrib><title>Reply</title><title>American journal of ophthalmology</title><description>In response to their first comment noting that it would be useful to know the number of absolute lenticle dislocations, our study was an observational study, so absolute numbers of detachments were not collected as a denominator for statistical analysis, although this would have been a useful factor to examine.</description><subject>Automation</subject><issn>0002-9394</issn><issn>1879-1891</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNij0LwjAQQA-xYPz4Fc6Jd72Y5HAUxVncS4c4hGJqYwf_vR1cBafH4z0AJjSE5HbJtCmbGokMikHmw69iZ6AoeNEUhOagELHWwmIXsCwlTeq89Qqqa-y79xqqe9uVuPlyBdvz6Xa86H7IzzGWV5PyODym1BCy2wdH4vi_6wMm5C_4</recordid><startdate>20120101</startdate><enddate>20120101</enddate><creator>Hayes, Daniel D</creator><creator>Shih, Carolyn Y</creator><creator>Udell, Ira J</creator><creator>Shamie, Neda</creator><creator>Terry, Mark A</creator><creator>Price, Francis W</creator><creator>Price, Marianne O</creator><creator>Ritterband, David C</creator><creator>Ritch, Robert</creator><creator>Liebmann, Jeffrey M</creator><creator>Hannush, Sadeer B</creator><creator>Gorovoy, Mark S</creator><creator>Weisenthal, Robert W</creator><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120101</creationdate><title>Reply</title><author>Hayes, Daniel D ; Shih, Carolyn Y ; Udell, Ira J ; Shamie, Neda ; Terry, Mark A ; Price, Francis W ; Price, Marianne O ; Ritterband, David C ; Ritch, Robert ; Liebmann, Jeffrey M ; Hannush, Sadeer B ; Gorovoy, Mark S ; Weisenthal, Robert W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_10365861963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Automation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Daniel D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shih, Carolyn Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Udell, Ira J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shamie, Neda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terry, Mark A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Francis W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Marianne O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ritterband, David C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ritch, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liebmann, Jeffrey M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hannush, Sadeer B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorovoy, Mark S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weisenthal, Robert W</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>American journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hayes, Daniel D</au><au>Shih, Carolyn Y</au><au>Udell, Ira J</au><au>Shamie, Neda</au><au>Terry, Mark A</au><au>Price, Francis W</au><au>Price, Marianne O</au><au>Ritterband, David C</au><au>Ritch, Robert</au><au>Liebmann, Jeffrey M</au><au>Hannush, Sadeer B</au><au>Gorovoy, Mark S</au><au>Weisenthal, Robert W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reply</atitle><jtitle>American journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><date>2012-01-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>153</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>184</spage><pages>184-</pages><issn>0002-9394</issn><eissn>1879-1891</eissn><coden>AJOPAA</coden><abstract>In response to their first comment noting that it would be useful to know the number of absolute lenticle dislocations, our study was an observational study, so absolute numbers of detachments were not collected as a denominator for statistical analysis, although this would have been a useful factor to examine.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>Elsevier Limited</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ajo.2011.09.033;10.1016/j.ajo.2011.09.034</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9394 |
ispartof | American journal of ophthalmology, 2012-01, Vol.153 (1), p.184 |
issn | 0002-9394 1879-1891 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1036586196 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Automation |
title | Reply |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T16%3A03%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reply&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Hayes,%20Daniel%20D&rft.date=2012-01-01&rft.volume=153&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=184&rft.pages=184-&rft.issn=0002-9394&rft.eissn=1879-1891&rft.coden=AJOPAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajo.2011.09.033;10.1016/j.ajo.2011.09.034&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2747436231%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1036586196&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |