The gender dimension of technical change and the role of task inputs
By 2011, the employment shares of UK graduate men and women had become equal for the first time. With no evidence of a significantly declining graduate female–male wage differential, this suggests that the relative demand for graduate women must have increased in order to accommodate the faster incr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Labour economics 2012-08, Vol.19 (4), p.516-526 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 526 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 516 |
container_title | Labour economics |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Lindley, Joanne |
description | By 2011, the employment shares of UK graduate men and women had become equal for the first time. With no evidence of a significantly declining graduate female–male wage differential, this suggests that the relative demand for graduate women must have increased in order to accommodate the faster increase in their relative supply. However, gender clustering in degree subjects suggests that male and female graduates may not be perfect substitutes in production and therefore that gender biases may exist in the relative demand and supply of graduate labour. Consequently, this paper investigates whether industry level skill demand shifts have differed for men and women, focussing specifically on the role of technical change and job task inputs. The paper shows that, despite the large growth in the percentage of women obtaining a degree, overall women lost out from technical change between 1997 and 2006. This was most likely as a consequence of their lower quality numeracy and literacy skills, as well as other skills required to undertake the tasks that are correlated with technical change, especially in highly computerised private sector industries like finance and machine manufacturing.
► Overall UK women lost out from technical change between 1997 and 2006. ► The fall in demand for mid-skilled women exceeded the increase for skilled women. ► Skill demand shifts had a male bias in finance and machine manufacturing sectors. ► Numeracy task inputs are found to be highly correlated with technical change. ► Men possess better numeracy skills than women, on average. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.labeco.2012.05.005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1032939941</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0927537112000486</els_id><sourcerecordid>2732890551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-b77f50c5529abe37084e6a081e9ba9c5ed1a36f892453b8b1da01d2f55b64c823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwBywssU7wI07iDRIqT6kSm7K2HHvSOqR2sVMk_h6XsmY1m3PvzByErikpKaH17VCOugMTSkYoK4koCREnaEbbRhaU8OoUzYhkTSF4Q8_RRUoDIYRxxmfoYbUBvAZvIWLrtuCTCx6HHk9gNt4ZPWKz0X4NWHuLpwzHMMIvoNMHdn63n9IlOuv1mODqb87R-9PjavFSLN-eXxf3y8Jw2U5F1zS9IEYIJvO5vCFtBbUmLQXZaWkEWKp53beSVYJ3bUetJtSyXoiurkzL-BzdHHt3MXzuIU1qCPvo80qV32SSS1nRTFVHysSQUoRe7aLb6vidIXXwpQZ19KUOvhQRKvvKsbtjDPIHXw6iSsaBN2BdBDMpG9z_BT-fM3Q3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1032939941</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The gender dimension of technical change and the role of task inputs</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Lindley, Joanne</creator><creatorcontrib>Lindley, Joanne</creatorcontrib><description>By 2011, the employment shares of UK graduate men and women had become equal for the first time. With no evidence of a significantly declining graduate female–male wage differential, this suggests that the relative demand for graduate women must have increased in order to accommodate the faster increase in their relative supply. However, gender clustering in degree subjects suggests that male and female graduates may not be perfect substitutes in production and therefore that gender biases may exist in the relative demand and supply of graduate labour. Consequently, this paper investigates whether industry level skill demand shifts have differed for men and women, focussing specifically on the role of technical change and job task inputs. The paper shows that, despite the large growth in the percentage of women obtaining a degree, overall women lost out from technical change between 1997 and 2006. This was most likely as a consequence of their lower quality numeracy and literacy skills, as well as other skills required to undertake the tasks that are correlated with technical change, especially in highly computerised private sector industries like finance and machine manufacturing.
► Overall UK women lost out from technical change between 1997 and 2006. ► The fall in demand for mid-skilled women exceeded the increase for skilled women. ► Skill demand shifts had a male bias in finance and machine manufacturing sectors. ► Numeracy task inputs are found to be highly correlated with technical change. ► Men possess better numeracy skills than women, on average.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0927-5371</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1034</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.labeco.2012.05.005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Demand ; Employment ; Gender ; Gender differences ; Gender pay ; Skills ; Studies ; Task-biassed technical change ; Women</subject><ispartof>Labour economics, 2012-08, Vol.19 (4), p.516-526</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Aug 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-b77f50c5529abe37084e6a081e9ba9c5ed1a36f892453b8b1da01d2f55b64c823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-b77f50c5529abe37084e6a081e9ba9c5ed1a36f892453b8b1da01d2f55b64c823</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2012.05.005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lindley, Joanne</creatorcontrib><title>The gender dimension of technical change and the role of task inputs</title><title>Labour economics</title><description>By 2011, the employment shares of UK graduate men and women had become equal for the first time. With no evidence of a significantly declining graduate female–male wage differential, this suggests that the relative demand for graduate women must have increased in order to accommodate the faster increase in their relative supply. However, gender clustering in degree subjects suggests that male and female graduates may not be perfect substitutes in production and therefore that gender biases may exist in the relative demand and supply of graduate labour. Consequently, this paper investigates whether industry level skill demand shifts have differed for men and women, focussing specifically on the role of technical change and job task inputs. The paper shows that, despite the large growth in the percentage of women obtaining a degree, overall women lost out from technical change between 1997 and 2006. This was most likely as a consequence of their lower quality numeracy and literacy skills, as well as other skills required to undertake the tasks that are correlated with technical change, especially in highly computerised private sector industries like finance and machine manufacturing.
► Overall UK women lost out from technical change between 1997 and 2006. ► The fall in demand for mid-skilled women exceeded the increase for skilled women. ► Skill demand shifts had a male bias in finance and machine manufacturing sectors. ► Numeracy task inputs are found to be highly correlated with technical change. ► Men possess better numeracy skills than women, on average.</description><subject>Demand</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Gender pay</subject><subject>Skills</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Task-biassed technical change</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0927-5371</issn><issn>1879-1034</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwBywssU7wI07iDRIqT6kSm7K2HHvSOqR2sVMk_h6XsmY1m3PvzByErikpKaH17VCOugMTSkYoK4koCREnaEbbRhaU8OoUzYhkTSF4Q8_RRUoDIYRxxmfoYbUBvAZvIWLrtuCTCx6HHk9gNt4ZPWKz0X4NWHuLpwzHMMIvoNMHdn63n9IlOuv1mODqb87R-9PjavFSLN-eXxf3y8Jw2U5F1zS9IEYIJvO5vCFtBbUmLQXZaWkEWKp53beSVYJ3bUetJtSyXoiurkzL-BzdHHt3MXzuIU1qCPvo80qV32SSS1nRTFVHysSQUoRe7aLb6vidIXXwpQZ19KUOvhQRKvvKsbtjDPIHXw6iSsaBN2BdBDMpG9z_BT-fM3Q3</recordid><startdate>20120801</startdate><enddate>20120801</enddate><creator>Lindley, Joanne</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120801</creationdate><title>The gender dimension of technical change and the role of task inputs</title><author>Lindley, Joanne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-b77f50c5529abe37084e6a081e9ba9c5ed1a36f892453b8b1da01d2f55b64c823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Demand</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Gender pay</topic><topic>Skills</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Task-biassed technical change</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lindley, Joanne</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Labour economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lindley, Joanne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The gender dimension of technical change and the role of task inputs</atitle><jtitle>Labour economics</jtitle><date>2012-08-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>516</spage><epage>526</epage><pages>516-526</pages><issn>0927-5371</issn><eissn>1879-1034</eissn><abstract>By 2011, the employment shares of UK graduate men and women had become equal for the first time. With no evidence of a significantly declining graduate female–male wage differential, this suggests that the relative demand for graduate women must have increased in order to accommodate the faster increase in their relative supply. However, gender clustering in degree subjects suggests that male and female graduates may not be perfect substitutes in production and therefore that gender biases may exist in the relative demand and supply of graduate labour. Consequently, this paper investigates whether industry level skill demand shifts have differed for men and women, focussing specifically on the role of technical change and job task inputs. The paper shows that, despite the large growth in the percentage of women obtaining a degree, overall women lost out from technical change between 1997 and 2006. This was most likely as a consequence of their lower quality numeracy and literacy skills, as well as other skills required to undertake the tasks that are correlated with technical change, especially in highly computerised private sector industries like finance and machine manufacturing.
► Overall UK women lost out from technical change between 1997 and 2006. ► The fall in demand for mid-skilled women exceeded the increase for skilled women. ► Skill demand shifts had a male bias in finance and machine manufacturing sectors. ► Numeracy task inputs are found to be highly correlated with technical change. ► Men possess better numeracy skills than women, on average.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.labeco.2012.05.005</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0927-5371 |
ispartof | Labour economics, 2012-08, Vol.19 (4), p.516-526 |
issn | 0927-5371 1879-1034 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1032939941 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Demand Employment Gender Gender differences Gender pay Skills Studies Task-biassed technical change Women |
title | The gender dimension of technical change and the role of task inputs |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T04%3A18%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20gender%20dimension%20of%20technical%20change%20and%20the%20role%20of%20task%20inputs&rft.jtitle=Labour%20economics&rft.au=Lindley,%20Joanne&rft.date=2012-08-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=516&rft.epage=526&rft.pages=516-526&rft.issn=0927-5371&rft.eissn=1879-1034&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.labeco.2012.05.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2732890551%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1032939941&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0927537112000486&rfr_iscdi=true |