Assessment of comparative pain relief and tolerability of SKI306X compared with celecoxib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A 6-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, phase III, noninferiority clinical trial
Abstract Background: SKI306X, which consists of biologically active ingredients from Clematis mandsburica, Tricbosantbes kirilowii , and Prunella vulgaris , was developed and tested in preclinical trials in Korea. Those studies found that SKI306X was associated with an anti-inflammatory and analgesi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical therapeutics 2007-05, Vol.29 (5), p.862-873 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 873 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 862 |
container_title | Clinical therapeutics |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Song, Yeong Wook, MD, PhD Lee, Eun Young, MD, PhD Koh, Eun-Mi, MD, PhD Cha, Hoon-Suk, MD, PhD Yoo, Bin, MD, PhD Lee, Chang-Keun, MD, PhD Baek, Han Joo, MD, PhD Kim, Hyun Ah, MD, PhD Suh, Young, MD, PhD Kang, Seong-Wook, MD, PhD Lee, Yun Jong, MD, PhD Jung, Hyung-gi, PhD |
description | Abstract Background: SKI306X, which consists of biologically active ingredients from Clematis mandsburica, Tricbosantbes kirilowii , and Prunella vulgaris , was developed and tested in preclinical trials in Korea. Those studies found that SKI306X was associated with an anti-inflammatory and analgesic effect, and that it can delay the destruction of cartilage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the pain relief and tolerability of SKI306X and celecoxib in patients with RA. Methods: This study was a 6-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, Phase III, noninferiority clinical trial. Eligible patients were aged 18 to 80 years, had a history of RA with a disease duration of ≥3 months, and were functional American College of Rheumatology (ACR) class I, II, or III before entry. After a washout period of 2 weeks, patients were randomized to SKI306X 200 mg TID or celecoxib 200 mg BID for 6 weeks. The primary end point was a change in patient assessment of pain intensity using a visual analog scale (VAS). The secondary end points were a 20% improvement in response rate as defined by the ACR (ACR20) and the frequency of rescue medication use. Results after 3 and 6 weeks of treatment were compared with baseline and between treatment groups, and all patients were assessed for adverse events (AEs), clinical laboratory data, and vital signs. AEs were identified based on spontaneous reports by patients during interviews conducted by the investigators and the study coordinator. Results: Two hundred twenty-two Korean patients from 7 medical centers were assessed and 183 were enrolled and randomized to 1 of 2 treatment groups. Ninety-one patients (10 male, 81 female; mean [SD] age, 52.13 [12.64] years; mean [SD] duration of RA, 9.08 [10.23] years; no. [%] of ACR class I, II, and III, 13 [14.29], 44 [48.35] and 34 [37.36] patients, respectively) received SKI306X 200 mg TID and 92 patients (10 male, 82 female; mean [SD] age, 51.78 [10.94] years; mean [SD] duration of RA, 8.78 [7.78] years; no. [%] of ACR class I, II, and III, 14 [15.22], 44 [47.83], and 34 [36.96] patients, respectively) received celecoxib 200 mg BID. An analysis of the change in reported pain intensity as determined by VAS (mm) score between baseline and week 3 (mean [SD], 13.64 [16.62] vs 14.45 [15.89]), and between baseline and week 6 (18.4 [20.8] vs 17.9 [19.1], respectively) suggested that SKI306X was not inferior to celecoxib. The number of pati |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.05.006 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1032927644</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S014929180700135X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2732795881</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-9d34cd6709d67ed462aeff0b2e671fa1d8caa6dbade0cbae7d17c641de0a52683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNksuO0zAUhiMEYsrAK4AlxK4px7nYNYuRqhGXipFYDEjdWY59orqTxMV2ZihPzGPgqIVKrNjYsvyd_1z-k2WvKCwoUPZ2t9CdHeIWvVoUAHwB9QKAPcpmdMlFTmm1eZzNgFYiLwRdXmTPQtgBQCnq4ml2QTkTXEA9y36tQsAQehwicS3Rrt8rr6K9R7JXdiAeO4stUYMh0XUpXWM7Gw8Te_t5XQLbnGLQkAcbt0Rjh9r9sA1J0fuklJTD8ctvcexVdNYQ5ePW22jDO7IiLH9AvJuTfuyi1YlHPyc-pXS9_YlmTowbmw7zJrV8fpmx7w9zst-qgGS9Xs_J4AY7tOit81OJ04SsVh2J3qruefakVV3AF6f7Mvv24f3X60_5zZeP6-vVTa5LwWMuTFlpwziIdKCpWKGwbaEpkHHaKmqWWilmGmUQdKOQG8o1q2h6qrpgy_Iye33U3Xv3fcQQ5c6NfkgpJYWyEAVnVZUofqS0dyF4bOXe2175Q4Lk5LDcyb8Oy8lhCbVMDqfIlyf9senRnONOlibgzQlQIXXfpkFqG86coKKGYuJWRw7TNO4tehl0MkujsR51lMbZ_yjm6h-NP0O_wwOGc-cyFBLk7bSQ0z4CB6BlvSl_AyGy47Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1032927644</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of comparative pain relief and tolerability of SKI306X compared with celecoxib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A 6-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, phase III, noninferiority clinical trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Song, Yeong Wook, MD, PhD ; Lee, Eun Young, MD, PhD ; Koh, Eun-Mi, MD, PhD ; Cha, Hoon-Suk, MD, PhD ; Yoo, Bin, MD, PhD ; Lee, Chang-Keun, MD, PhD ; Baek, Han Joo, MD, PhD ; Kim, Hyun Ah, MD, PhD ; Suh, Young, MD, PhD ; Kang, Seong-Wook, MD, PhD ; Lee, Yun Jong, MD, PhD ; Jung, Hyung-gi, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Song, Yeong Wook, MD, PhD ; Lee, Eun Young, MD, PhD ; Koh, Eun-Mi, MD, PhD ; Cha, Hoon-Suk, MD, PhD ; Yoo, Bin, MD, PhD ; Lee, Chang-Keun, MD, PhD ; Baek, Han Joo, MD, PhD ; Kim, Hyun Ah, MD, PhD ; Suh, Young, MD, PhD ; Kang, Seong-Wook, MD, PhD ; Lee, Yun Jong, MD, PhD ; Jung, Hyung-gi, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background: SKI306X, which consists of biologically active ingredients from Clematis mandsburica, Tricbosantbes kirilowii , and Prunella vulgaris , was developed and tested in preclinical trials in Korea. Those studies found that SKI306X was associated with an anti-inflammatory and analgesic effect, and that it can delay the destruction of cartilage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the pain relief and tolerability of SKI306X and celecoxib in patients with RA. Methods: This study was a 6-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, Phase III, noninferiority clinical trial. Eligible patients were aged 18 to 80 years, had a history of RA with a disease duration of ≥3 months, and were functional American College of Rheumatology (ACR) class I, II, or III before entry. After a washout period of 2 weeks, patients were randomized to SKI306X 200 mg TID or celecoxib 200 mg BID for 6 weeks. The primary end point was a change in patient assessment of pain intensity using a visual analog scale (VAS). The secondary end points were a 20% improvement in response rate as defined by the ACR (ACR20) and the frequency of rescue medication use. Results after 3 and 6 weeks of treatment were compared with baseline and between treatment groups, and all patients were assessed for adverse events (AEs), clinical laboratory data, and vital signs. AEs were identified based on spontaneous reports by patients during interviews conducted by the investigators and the study coordinator. Results: Two hundred twenty-two Korean patients from 7 medical centers were assessed and 183 were enrolled and randomized to 1 of 2 treatment groups. Ninety-one patients (10 male, 81 female; mean [SD] age, 52.13 [12.64] years; mean [SD] duration of RA, 9.08 [10.23] years; no. [%] of ACR class I, II, and III, 13 [14.29], 44 [48.35] and 34 [37.36] patients, respectively) received SKI306X 200 mg TID and 92 patients (10 male, 82 female; mean [SD] age, 51.78 [10.94] years; mean [SD] duration of RA, 8.78 [7.78] years; no. [%] of ACR class I, II, and III, 14 [15.22], 44 [47.83], and 34 [36.96] patients, respectively) received celecoxib 200 mg BID. An analysis of the change in reported pain intensity as determined by VAS (mm) score between baseline and week 3 (mean [SD], 13.64 [16.62] vs 14.45 [15.89]), and between baseline and week 6 (18.4 [20.8] vs 17.9 [19.1], respectively) suggested that SKI306X was not inferior to celecoxib. The number of patients who achieved ACR20 response rate was not significantly different between the SKI306X group and the celecoxib group at week 3 (16/87 [18.4%] vs 24/87 [27.6%], respectively) and at week 6 (29/87 [33.3%] vs 29/87 [33.3%]). The frequency of rescue medication use was not significantly different between the SKI306X group and celecoxib group at week 3 (54/87 [62.1%] vs 47/87 [54.0%], respectively) or week 6 (57/87 [65.5%] vs 49/87 [56.3%]). Drug-related AEs were reported by 27 (29.7%) patients in the SKI306X group and 22 (23.9%) patients in the celecoxib group. The most frequent drug-related AEs were epigastric pain (9/91 [9.9%]) in the SKI306X group and glutamyltranferase elevation (4/92 [4.3%]) in the celecoxib group. No significant between-group differences were observed in the prevalence of drug-related clinical- or laboratory-determined AEs. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that SKI306X was generally well tolerated and not inferior to celecoxib in regard to pain relief in these Korean patients with RA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-2918</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-114X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.05.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17697905</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Belle Mead, NJ: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>ACR20 ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents ; Antirheumatic Agents - adverse effects ; Antirheumatic Agents - therapeutic use ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid - complications ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid - drug therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cartilage ; Celecoxib ; Clematis ; Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors - adverse effects ; Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors - therapeutic use ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; Double-Blind Method ; Drugs, Chinese Herbal - adverse effects ; Drugs, Chinese Herbal - therapeutic use ; Female ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Inflammatory joint diseases ; Internal Medicine ; Korea ; Male ; Medical Education ; Medical sciences ; Medicine ; Middle Aged ; Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs ; Osteoarthritis ; pain ; Pain - drug therapy ; Pain - etiology ; Pain Measurement ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Phytotherapy ; Prednisolone - administration & dosage ; Prednisolone - therapeutic use ; Prunella ; Pyrazoles - adverse effects ; Pyrazoles - therapeutic use ; Questionnaires ; Rheumatoid arthritis ; Rheumatology ; SKI306X ; Sulfonamides - adverse effects ; Sulfonamides - therapeutic use ; Ulcers</subject><ispartof>Clinical therapeutics, 2007-05, Vol.29 (5), p.862-873</ispartof><rights>Excerpta Medica, Inc.</rights><rights>2007 Excerpta Medica, Inc.</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-9d34cd6709d67ed462aeff0b2e671fa1d8caa6dbade0cbae7d17c641de0a52683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-9d34cd6709d67ed462aeff0b2e671fa1d8caa6dbade0cbae7d17c641de0a52683</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014929180700135X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19195025$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17697905$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Song, Yeong Wook, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Eun Young, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koh, Eun-Mi, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cha, Hoon-Suk, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoo, Bin, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Chang-Keun, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baek, Han Joo, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyun Ah, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suh, Young, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Seong-Wook, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Yun Jong, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Hyung-gi, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of comparative pain relief and tolerability of SKI306X compared with celecoxib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A 6-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, phase III, noninferiority clinical trial</title><title>Clinical therapeutics</title><addtitle>Clin Ther</addtitle><description>Abstract Background: SKI306X, which consists of biologically active ingredients from Clematis mandsburica, Tricbosantbes kirilowii , and Prunella vulgaris , was developed and tested in preclinical trials in Korea. Those studies found that SKI306X was associated with an anti-inflammatory and analgesic effect, and that it can delay the destruction of cartilage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the pain relief and tolerability of SKI306X and celecoxib in patients with RA. Methods: This study was a 6-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, Phase III, noninferiority clinical trial. Eligible patients were aged 18 to 80 years, had a history of RA with a disease duration of ≥3 months, and were functional American College of Rheumatology (ACR) class I, II, or III before entry. After a washout period of 2 weeks, patients were randomized to SKI306X 200 mg TID or celecoxib 200 mg BID for 6 weeks. The primary end point was a change in patient assessment of pain intensity using a visual analog scale (VAS). The secondary end points were a 20% improvement in response rate as defined by the ACR (ACR20) and the frequency of rescue medication use. Results after 3 and 6 weeks of treatment were compared with baseline and between treatment groups, and all patients were assessed for adverse events (AEs), clinical laboratory data, and vital signs. AEs were identified based on spontaneous reports by patients during interviews conducted by the investigators and the study coordinator. Results: Two hundred twenty-two Korean patients from 7 medical centers were assessed and 183 were enrolled and randomized to 1 of 2 treatment groups. Ninety-one patients (10 male, 81 female; mean [SD] age, 52.13 [12.64] years; mean [SD] duration of RA, 9.08 [10.23] years; no. [%] of ACR class I, II, and III, 13 [14.29], 44 [48.35] and 34 [37.36] patients, respectively) received SKI306X 200 mg TID and 92 patients (10 male, 82 female; mean [SD] age, 51.78 [10.94] years; mean [SD] duration of RA, 8.78 [7.78] years; no. [%] of ACR class I, II, and III, 14 [15.22], 44 [47.83], and 34 [36.96] patients, respectively) received celecoxib 200 mg BID. An analysis of the change in reported pain intensity as determined by VAS (mm) score between baseline and week 3 (mean [SD], 13.64 [16.62] vs 14.45 [15.89]), and between baseline and week 6 (18.4 [20.8] vs 17.9 [19.1], respectively) suggested that SKI306X was not inferior to celecoxib. The number of patients who achieved ACR20 response rate was not significantly different between the SKI306X group and the celecoxib group at week 3 (16/87 [18.4%] vs 24/87 [27.6%], respectively) and at week 6 (29/87 [33.3%] vs 29/87 [33.3%]). The frequency of rescue medication use was not significantly different between the SKI306X group and celecoxib group at week 3 (54/87 [62.1%] vs 47/87 [54.0%], respectively) or week 6 (57/87 [65.5%] vs 49/87 [56.3%]). Drug-related AEs were reported by 27 (29.7%) patients in the SKI306X group and 22 (23.9%) patients in the celecoxib group. The most frequent drug-related AEs were epigastric pain (9/91 [9.9%]) in the SKI306X group and glutamyltranferase elevation (4/92 [4.3%]) in the celecoxib group. No significant between-group differences were observed in the prevalence of drug-related clinical- or laboratory-determined AEs. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that SKI306X was generally well tolerated and not inferior to celecoxib in regard to pain relief in these Korean patients with RA.</description><subject>ACR20</subject><subject>Anti-Inflammatory Agents</subject><subject>Antirheumatic Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Antirheumatic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - complications</subject><subject>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - drug therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cartilage</subject><subject>Celecoxib</subject><subject>Clematis</subject><subject>Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Drugs, Chinese Herbal - adverse effects</subject><subject>Drugs, Chinese Herbal - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inflammatory joint diseases</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Korea</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical Education</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis</subject><subject>pain</subject><subject>Pain - drug therapy</subject><subject>Pain - etiology</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Phytotherapy</subject><subject>Prednisolone - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Prednisolone - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Prunella</subject><subject>Pyrazoles - adverse effects</subject><subject>Pyrazoles - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Rheumatoid arthritis</subject><subject>Rheumatology</subject><subject>SKI306X</subject><subject>Sulfonamides - adverse effects</subject><subject>Sulfonamides - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Ulcers</subject><issn>0149-2918</issn><issn>1879-114X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNksuO0zAUhiMEYsrAK4AlxK4px7nYNYuRqhGXipFYDEjdWY59orqTxMV2ZihPzGPgqIVKrNjYsvyd_1z-k2WvKCwoUPZ2t9CdHeIWvVoUAHwB9QKAPcpmdMlFTmm1eZzNgFYiLwRdXmTPQtgBQCnq4ml2QTkTXEA9y36tQsAQehwicS3Rrt8rr6K9R7JXdiAeO4stUYMh0XUpXWM7Gw8Te_t5XQLbnGLQkAcbt0Rjh9r9sA1J0fuklJTD8ctvcexVdNYQ5ePW22jDO7IiLH9AvJuTfuyi1YlHPyc-pXS9_YlmTowbmw7zJrV8fpmx7w9zst-qgGS9Xs_J4AY7tOit81OJ04SsVh2J3qruefakVV3AF6f7Mvv24f3X60_5zZeP6-vVTa5LwWMuTFlpwziIdKCpWKGwbaEpkHHaKmqWWilmGmUQdKOQG8o1q2h6qrpgy_Iye33U3Xv3fcQQ5c6NfkgpJYWyEAVnVZUofqS0dyF4bOXe2175Q4Lk5LDcyb8Oy8lhCbVMDqfIlyf9senRnONOlibgzQlQIXXfpkFqG86coKKGYuJWRw7TNO4tehl0MkujsR51lMbZ_yjm6h-NP0O_wwOGc-cyFBLk7bSQ0z4CB6BlvSl_AyGy47Y</recordid><startdate>200705</startdate><enddate>200705</enddate><creator>Song, Yeong Wook, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Lee, Eun Young, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Koh, Eun-Mi, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Cha, Hoon-Suk, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Yoo, Bin, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Lee, Chang-Keun, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Baek, Han Joo, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Kim, Hyun Ah, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Suh, Young, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Kang, Seong-Wook, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Lee, Yun Jong, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Jung, Hyung-gi, PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Excerpta Medica</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200705</creationdate><title>Assessment of comparative pain relief and tolerability of SKI306X compared with celecoxib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A 6-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, phase III, noninferiority clinical trial</title><author>Song, Yeong Wook, MD, PhD ; Lee, Eun Young, MD, PhD ; Koh, Eun-Mi, MD, PhD ; Cha, Hoon-Suk, MD, PhD ; Yoo, Bin, MD, PhD ; Lee, Chang-Keun, MD, PhD ; Baek, Han Joo, MD, PhD ; Kim, Hyun Ah, MD, PhD ; Suh, Young, MD, PhD ; Kang, Seong-Wook, MD, PhD ; Lee, Yun Jong, MD, PhD ; Jung, Hyung-gi, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-9d34cd6709d67ed462aeff0b2e671fa1d8caa6dbade0cbae7d17c641de0a52683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>ACR20</topic><topic>Anti-Inflammatory Agents</topic><topic>Antirheumatic Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Antirheumatic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - complications</topic><topic>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - drug therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cartilage</topic><topic>Celecoxib</topic><topic>Clematis</topic><topic>Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Drugs, Chinese Herbal - adverse effects</topic><topic>Drugs, Chinese Herbal - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inflammatory joint diseases</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Korea</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical Education</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis</topic><topic>pain</topic><topic>Pain - drug therapy</topic><topic>Pain - etiology</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Phytotherapy</topic><topic>Prednisolone - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Prednisolone - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Prunella</topic><topic>Pyrazoles - adverse effects</topic><topic>Pyrazoles - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Rheumatoid arthritis</topic><topic>Rheumatology</topic><topic>SKI306X</topic><topic>Sulfonamides - adverse effects</topic><topic>Sulfonamides - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Ulcers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Song, Yeong Wook, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Eun Young, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koh, Eun-Mi, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cha, Hoon-Suk, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoo, Bin, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Chang-Keun, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baek, Han Joo, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyun Ah, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suh, Young, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Seong-Wook, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Yun Jong, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Hyung-gi, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Clinical therapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Song, Yeong Wook, MD, PhD</au><au>Lee, Eun Young, MD, PhD</au><au>Koh, Eun-Mi, MD, PhD</au><au>Cha, Hoon-Suk, MD, PhD</au><au>Yoo, Bin, MD, PhD</au><au>Lee, Chang-Keun, MD, PhD</au><au>Baek, Han Joo, MD, PhD</au><au>Kim, Hyun Ah, MD, PhD</au><au>Suh, Young, MD, PhD</au><au>Kang, Seong-Wook, MD, PhD</au><au>Lee, Yun Jong, MD, PhD</au><au>Jung, Hyung-gi, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of comparative pain relief and tolerability of SKI306X compared with celecoxib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A 6-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, phase III, noninferiority clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>Clinical therapeutics</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Ther</addtitle><date>2007-05</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>862</spage><epage>873</epage><pages>862-873</pages><issn>0149-2918</issn><eissn>1879-114X</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background: SKI306X, which consists of biologically active ingredients from Clematis mandsburica, Tricbosantbes kirilowii , and Prunella vulgaris , was developed and tested in preclinical trials in Korea. Those studies found that SKI306X was associated with an anti-inflammatory and analgesic effect, and that it can delay the destruction of cartilage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the pain relief and tolerability of SKI306X and celecoxib in patients with RA. Methods: This study was a 6-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, Phase III, noninferiority clinical trial. Eligible patients were aged 18 to 80 years, had a history of RA with a disease duration of ≥3 months, and were functional American College of Rheumatology (ACR) class I, II, or III before entry. After a washout period of 2 weeks, patients were randomized to SKI306X 200 mg TID or celecoxib 200 mg BID for 6 weeks. The primary end point was a change in patient assessment of pain intensity using a visual analog scale (VAS). The secondary end points were a 20% improvement in response rate as defined by the ACR (ACR20) and the frequency of rescue medication use. Results after 3 and 6 weeks of treatment were compared with baseline and between treatment groups, and all patients were assessed for adverse events (AEs), clinical laboratory data, and vital signs. AEs were identified based on spontaneous reports by patients during interviews conducted by the investigators and the study coordinator. Results: Two hundred twenty-two Korean patients from 7 medical centers were assessed and 183 were enrolled and randomized to 1 of 2 treatment groups. Ninety-one patients (10 male, 81 female; mean [SD] age, 52.13 [12.64] years; mean [SD] duration of RA, 9.08 [10.23] years; no. [%] of ACR class I, II, and III, 13 [14.29], 44 [48.35] and 34 [37.36] patients, respectively) received SKI306X 200 mg TID and 92 patients (10 male, 82 female; mean [SD] age, 51.78 [10.94] years; mean [SD] duration of RA, 8.78 [7.78] years; no. [%] of ACR class I, II, and III, 14 [15.22], 44 [47.83], and 34 [36.96] patients, respectively) received celecoxib 200 mg BID. An analysis of the change in reported pain intensity as determined by VAS (mm) score between baseline and week 3 (mean [SD], 13.64 [16.62] vs 14.45 [15.89]), and between baseline and week 6 (18.4 [20.8] vs 17.9 [19.1], respectively) suggested that SKI306X was not inferior to celecoxib. The number of patients who achieved ACR20 response rate was not significantly different between the SKI306X group and the celecoxib group at week 3 (16/87 [18.4%] vs 24/87 [27.6%], respectively) and at week 6 (29/87 [33.3%] vs 29/87 [33.3%]). The frequency of rescue medication use was not significantly different between the SKI306X group and celecoxib group at week 3 (54/87 [62.1%] vs 47/87 [54.0%], respectively) or week 6 (57/87 [65.5%] vs 49/87 [56.3%]). Drug-related AEs were reported by 27 (29.7%) patients in the SKI306X group and 22 (23.9%) patients in the celecoxib group. The most frequent drug-related AEs were epigastric pain (9/91 [9.9%]) in the SKI306X group and glutamyltranferase elevation (4/92 [4.3%]) in the celecoxib group. No significant between-group differences were observed in the prevalence of drug-related clinical- or laboratory-determined AEs. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that SKI306X was generally well tolerated and not inferior to celecoxib in regard to pain relief in these Korean patients with RA.</abstract><cop>Belle Mead, NJ</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>17697905</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.05.006</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0149-2918 |
ispartof | Clinical therapeutics, 2007-05, Vol.29 (5), p.862-873 |
issn | 0149-2918 1879-114X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1032927644 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | ACR20 Anti-Inflammatory Agents Antirheumatic Agents - adverse effects Antirheumatic Agents - therapeutic use Arthritis, Rheumatoid - complications Arthritis, Rheumatoid - drug therapy Biological and medical sciences Cartilage Celecoxib Clematis Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors - adverse effects Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors - therapeutic use Diseases of the osteoarticular system Double-Blind Method Drugs, Chinese Herbal - adverse effects Drugs, Chinese Herbal - therapeutic use Female Hospitals Humans Inflammatory joint diseases Internal Medicine Korea Male Medical Education Medical sciences Medicine Middle Aged Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs Osteoarthritis pain Pain - drug therapy Pain - etiology Pain Measurement Pharmacology. Drug treatments Phytotherapy Prednisolone - administration & dosage Prednisolone - therapeutic use Prunella Pyrazoles - adverse effects Pyrazoles - therapeutic use Questionnaires Rheumatoid arthritis Rheumatology SKI306X Sulfonamides - adverse effects Sulfonamides - therapeutic use Ulcers |
title | Assessment of comparative pain relief and tolerability of SKI306X compared with celecoxib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A 6-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, phase III, noninferiority clinical trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T16%3A58%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20comparative%20pain%20relief%20and%20tolerability%20of%20SKI306X%20compared%20with%20celecoxib%20in%20patients%20with%20rheumatoid%20arthritis:%20A%206-week,%20multicenter,%20randomized,%20double-blind,%20double-dummy,%20phase%20III,%20noninferiority%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20therapeutics&rft.au=Song,%20Yeong%20Wook,%20MD,%20PhD&rft.date=2007-05&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=862&rft.epage=873&rft.pages=862-873&rft.issn=0149-2918&rft.eissn=1879-114X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.05.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2732795881%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1032927644&rft_id=info:pmid/17697905&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S014929180700135X&rfr_iscdi=true |