Phase I, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study of the effects on blood pressure of abrupt cessation versus taper down of guanfacine extended-release tablets in adults aged 19 to 24 years

Abstract Background: Guanfacine hydrochloride is an α2a -adrenoreceptor agonist found to be effective in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Because the available immediate-release formulation requires multiple daily dosing and has been associated with rebound hypertens...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical therapeutics 2007-09, Vol.29 (9), p.1967-1979
Hauptverfasser: Kisicki, James C., MD, Fiske, Kimberly, MPH, Lyne, Andrew, MSc, CStat
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1979
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1967
container_title Clinical therapeutics
container_volume 29
creator Kisicki, James C., MD
Fiske, Kimberly, MPH
Lyne, Andrew, MSc, CStat
description Abstract Background: Guanfacine hydrochloride is an α2a -adrenoreceptor agonist found to be effective in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Because the available immediate-release formulation requires multiple daily dosing and has been associated with rebound hypertension on abrupt cessation, an extended-release (ER) formulation has been developed for study of efficacy and tolerability parameters in patients with ADHD. Objective: This trial was primarily undertaken to determine the effect on blood pressure (BP) of abrupt cessation versus taper-down of guanfacine ER. Methods: This Phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation trial was conducted at MDS Pharma Services, Lincoln, Nebraska. Male and female healthy young-adult (aged 19-24 years) volunteers were included. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive guanfacine ER as follows. Abrupt-cessation and taper-down groups both received guanfacine ER at forced titration: 1 mg on days 1 to 4, 2 mg on days 5 to 8, 3 mg on days 9 to 12, and 4 mg on days 13 to 16. The abrupt-cessation group then received placebo daily on days 17 to 32. The taper-down group began the following taper-down schedule: 3 mg on days 17 to 20, 2 mg on days 21 to 24, 1 mg on days 25 to 30, and placebo on days 31 to 32. Placebo was administered daily to the subjects in the placebo group (days 1–32). All doses were given in the morning. Tolerability was assessed before (at the 8-hour baseline visit), during (approximately every 4 days and during 48-hour confinements at days 17/18 and 31/32), and 7 days after the study and included assessment of BP and pulse, 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG), and laboratory assays. Adverse events (AEs) were also tracked every 4 days beginning on day 5 and 7, 14, and 30 days poststudy by recording responses and follow-up to a nonleading question about how the patient was feeling that day. Results: Forty-five subjects were enrolled in the study (15 in each group), and 35 subjects completed it. The mean age of study participants was 22 years, 87% were white, and the ratio of women to men was 2:1. There were no marked differences between groups regarding age, sex, or race. Compared with the taperdown group, the abrupt-cessation group did not exhibit a clinically significant elevation of systolic BP (SBP) or diastolic BP (DBP) or other tolerability parameters, including AEs. Significant differences in BP were observed on days 17/18 (first day of abrupt ce
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.09.020
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1032927549</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0149291807003013</els_id><sourcerecordid>2732796051</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-99c95e775f30f98c79adaa84e5207aa3b5a85501b24adb84a20bb4b96cd588dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkt9qFDEUxgdR7Fp9BQ1I7zprkpnZSW6EUvxTKCio4F04Sc60WWcnY5Kprk_q45iwiwWvvMrh8DtfvuQ7VfWC0TWjbPNquzajm9ItBlhzSvs1lWvK6YNqxUQva8barw-rFWWtrLlk4qR6EuOWUtrIjj-uTpigTcfkZlX9_ngLEcnVObF-0SPWOuvacxJgsn7nfmGu5xEMal8bP6Xgx7H0rI9YYzQwQnJ-IjEtdk_8QLIngsOAJkWS-3r03pI5YIxLwAKADsuciMmdw-gdhrhEkmDGkHV_TIW6WWAawLgpq_1MOFm0dcARi9kE2WiWdxMBu4y5ghu0hEmSPOEt2SOE-LR6NMAY8dnxPK2-vH3z-fJ9ff3h3dXlxXVtWsFTLaWRHfZ9NzR0kML0EiyAaLHjtAdodAei6yjTvAWrRQucat1quTG2E8Ka5rR6edCdg_--YExq65cw5SsVow2XvO9aman-QJngYww4qDm4HYR9hlRJVG3V30RVSVRRqXKiefL5UX_RO7T3c8cIM3B2BKDEMeTkjIv3XI6_60WxcHHgMP_GncOgonE4GbQu5LSU9e4_zLz-R6NwLl_7DfcY71-uIldUfSoLWPaP9nn1KGuaP3Ru3Ec</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1032927549</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phase I, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study of the effects on blood pressure of abrupt cessation versus taper down of guanfacine extended-release tablets in adults aged 19 to 24 years</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kisicki, James C., MD ; Fiske, Kimberly, MPH ; Lyne, Andrew, MSc, CStat</creator><creatorcontrib>Kisicki, James C., MD ; Fiske, Kimberly, MPH ; Lyne, Andrew, MSc, CStat</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background: Guanfacine hydrochloride is an α2a -adrenoreceptor agonist found to be effective in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Because the available immediate-release formulation requires multiple daily dosing and has been associated with rebound hypertension on abrupt cessation, an extended-release (ER) formulation has been developed for study of efficacy and tolerability parameters in patients with ADHD. Objective: This trial was primarily undertaken to determine the effect on blood pressure (BP) of abrupt cessation versus taper-down of guanfacine ER. Methods: This Phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation trial was conducted at MDS Pharma Services, Lincoln, Nebraska. Male and female healthy young-adult (aged 19-24 years) volunteers were included. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive guanfacine ER as follows. Abrupt-cessation and taper-down groups both received guanfacine ER at forced titration: 1 mg on days 1 to 4, 2 mg on days 5 to 8, 3 mg on days 9 to 12, and 4 mg on days 13 to 16. The abrupt-cessation group then received placebo daily on days 17 to 32. The taper-down group began the following taper-down schedule: 3 mg on days 17 to 20, 2 mg on days 21 to 24, 1 mg on days 25 to 30, and placebo on days 31 to 32. Placebo was administered daily to the subjects in the placebo group (days 1–32). All doses were given in the morning. Tolerability was assessed before (at the 8-hour baseline visit), during (approximately every 4 days and during 48-hour confinements at days 17/18 and 31/32), and 7 days after the study and included assessment of BP and pulse, 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG), and laboratory assays. Adverse events (AEs) were also tracked every 4 days beginning on day 5 and 7, 14, and 30 days poststudy by recording responses and follow-up to a nonleading question about how the patient was feeling that day. Results: Forty-five subjects were enrolled in the study (15 in each group), and 35 subjects completed it. The mean age of study participants was 22 years, 87% were white, and the ratio of women to men was 2:1. There were no marked differences between groups regarding age, sex, or race. Compared with the taperdown group, the abrupt-cessation group did not exhibit a clinically significant elevation of systolic BP (SBP) or diastolic BP (DBP) or other tolerability parameters, including AEs. Significant differences in BP were observed on days 17/18 (first day of abrupt cessation) and 31/32, but the overall means were not statistically different. The SBP decreases were −7.55% (−8.84 mm Hg) in the abrupt-cessation group and −8.33% (−9.69 mm Hg) in the taper-down group. The DBP decreases were −9.14% (−6.17 mm Hg) in the abrupt-cessation group and −9.94% (−6.59 mm Hg) in the taper-down group. There were no statistically significant or clinically important differences in change or percentage change in pulse from baseline to day 31/32 between the taper-down and placebo groups (least squares mean difference, 2.26 bpm). None of the subjects experienced bradycardia. No clinically important treatment related trends were noted in the clinical laboratory, ECG, or physical examination findings, including vital signs. No serious treatment-emergent AEs were reported in this study. Overall, 124 treatment-emergent AEs were reported in 29 (64%) subjects. Treatment-emergent AEs were reported in 14 (93.3%) of 15 subjects in the abrupt-cessation group, 8 (53.3%) of 15 subjects in the taper-down group, and 7 (46.7%) of 15 subjects in the placebo group. Headache was the most common AE reported in the abrupt-cessation (46.7%) and placebo (13.3%) groups. For the taper down group, it was dry mouth (26.7%). All AEs were classified as mild or moderate. Conclusion: In this small study group of healthy, young-adult volunteers, guanfacine ER at doses up to 4 mg/d was abruptly discontinued without significant increases in SBP or DBP or other tolerability parameters, including AEs, compared with taper.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-2918</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-114X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.09.020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18035196</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Belle Mead, NJ: EM Inc USA</publisher><subject>Adrenergic alpha-Agonists - administration &amp; dosage ; Adrenergic alpha-Agonists - adverse effects ; Adrenergic alpha-Agonists - pharmacology ; Adult ; Adults ; alpha-2a adrenoreceptor ; Analysis of Variance ; Antihypertensive Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Antihypertensive Agents - adverse effects ; Antihypertensive Agents - pharmacology ; Attention deficit disorders. Hyperactivity ; Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder ; attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood pressure ; Blood Pressure - drug effects ; Child &amp; adolescent psychiatry ; Child clinical studies ; Delayed-Action Preparations ; Diastole - drug effects ; Double-Blind Method ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Electrocardiography ; guanfacine ; Guanfacine - administration &amp; dosage ; Guanfacine - adverse effects ; Guanfacine - pharmacology ; Heart Rate - drug effects ; Humans ; Hyperactivity ; Internal Medicine ; Medical Education ; Medical sciences ; Memory ; Mental disorders ; Mental health ; Monkeys &amp; apes ; nonstimutant ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; SPD503 ; Systole - drug effects ; Tablets ; Tourette syndrome ; United States</subject><ispartof>Clinical therapeutics, 2007-09, Vol.29 (9), p.1967-1979</ispartof><rights>Excerpta Medica, Inc.</rights><rights>2007 Excerpta Medica, Inc.</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-99c95e775f30f98c79adaa84e5207aa3b5a85501b24adb84a20bb4b96cd588dc3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149291807003013$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=19185789$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18035196$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kisicki, James C., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiske, Kimberly, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyne, Andrew, MSc, CStat</creatorcontrib><title>Phase I, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study of the effects on blood pressure of abrupt cessation versus taper down of guanfacine extended-release tablets in adults aged 19 to 24 years</title><title>Clinical therapeutics</title><addtitle>Clin Ther</addtitle><description>Abstract Background: Guanfacine hydrochloride is an α2a -adrenoreceptor agonist found to be effective in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Because the available immediate-release formulation requires multiple daily dosing and has been associated with rebound hypertension on abrupt cessation, an extended-release (ER) formulation has been developed for study of efficacy and tolerability parameters in patients with ADHD. Objective: This trial was primarily undertaken to determine the effect on blood pressure (BP) of abrupt cessation versus taper-down of guanfacine ER. Methods: This Phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation trial was conducted at MDS Pharma Services, Lincoln, Nebraska. Male and female healthy young-adult (aged 19-24 years) volunteers were included. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive guanfacine ER as follows. Abrupt-cessation and taper-down groups both received guanfacine ER at forced titration: 1 mg on days 1 to 4, 2 mg on days 5 to 8, 3 mg on days 9 to 12, and 4 mg on days 13 to 16. The abrupt-cessation group then received placebo daily on days 17 to 32. The taper-down group began the following taper-down schedule: 3 mg on days 17 to 20, 2 mg on days 21 to 24, 1 mg on days 25 to 30, and placebo on days 31 to 32. Placebo was administered daily to the subjects in the placebo group (days 1–32). All doses were given in the morning. Tolerability was assessed before (at the 8-hour baseline visit), during (approximately every 4 days and during 48-hour confinements at days 17/18 and 31/32), and 7 days after the study and included assessment of BP and pulse, 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG), and laboratory assays. Adverse events (AEs) were also tracked every 4 days beginning on day 5 and 7, 14, and 30 days poststudy by recording responses and follow-up to a nonleading question about how the patient was feeling that day. Results: Forty-five subjects were enrolled in the study (15 in each group), and 35 subjects completed it. The mean age of study participants was 22 years, 87% were white, and the ratio of women to men was 2:1. There were no marked differences between groups regarding age, sex, or race. Compared with the taperdown group, the abrupt-cessation group did not exhibit a clinically significant elevation of systolic BP (SBP) or diastolic BP (DBP) or other tolerability parameters, including AEs. Significant differences in BP were observed on days 17/18 (first day of abrupt cessation) and 31/32, but the overall means were not statistically different. The SBP decreases were −7.55% (−8.84 mm Hg) in the abrupt-cessation group and −8.33% (−9.69 mm Hg) in the taper-down group. The DBP decreases were −9.14% (−6.17 mm Hg) in the abrupt-cessation group and −9.94% (−6.59 mm Hg) in the taper-down group. There were no statistically significant or clinically important differences in change or percentage change in pulse from baseline to day 31/32 between the taper-down and placebo groups (least squares mean difference, 2.26 bpm). None of the subjects experienced bradycardia. No clinically important treatment related trends were noted in the clinical laboratory, ECG, or physical examination findings, including vital signs. No serious treatment-emergent AEs were reported in this study. Overall, 124 treatment-emergent AEs were reported in 29 (64%) subjects. Treatment-emergent AEs were reported in 14 (93.3%) of 15 subjects in the abrupt-cessation group, 8 (53.3%) of 15 subjects in the taper-down group, and 7 (46.7%) of 15 subjects in the placebo group. Headache was the most common AE reported in the abrupt-cessation (46.7%) and placebo (13.3%) groups. For the taper down group, it was dry mouth (26.7%). All AEs were classified as mild or moderate. Conclusion: In this small study group of healthy, young-adult volunteers, guanfacine ER at doses up to 4 mg/d was abruptly discontinued without significant increases in SBP or DBP or other tolerability parameters, including AEs, compared with taper.</description><subject>Adrenergic alpha-Agonists - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Adrenergic alpha-Agonists - adverse effects</subject><subject>Adrenergic alpha-Agonists - pharmacology</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>alpha-2a adrenoreceptor</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Antihypertensive Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Antihypertensive Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Antihypertensive Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Attention deficit disorders. Hyperactivity</subject><subject>Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder</subject><subject>attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood pressure</subject><subject>Blood Pressure - drug effects</subject><subject>Child &amp; adolescent psychiatry</subject><subject>Child clinical studies</subject><subject>Delayed-Action Preparations</subject><subject>Diastole - drug effects</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Drug Administration Schedule</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>guanfacine</subject><subject>Guanfacine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Guanfacine - adverse effects</subject><subject>Guanfacine - pharmacology</subject><subject>Heart Rate - drug effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyperactivity</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Medical Education</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Monkeys &amp; apes</subject><subject>nonstimutant</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>SPD503</subject><subject>Systole - drug effects</subject><subject>Tablets</subject><subject>Tourette syndrome</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0149-2918</issn><issn>1879-114X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkt9qFDEUxgdR7Fp9BQ1I7zprkpnZSW6EUvxTKCio4F04Sc60WWcnY5Kprk_q45iwiwWvvMrh8DtfvuQ7VfWC0TWjbPNquzajm9ItBlhzSvs1lWvK6YNqxUQva8barw-rFWWtrLlk4qR6EuOWUtrIjj-uTpigTcfkZlX9_ngLEcnVObF-0SPWOuvacxJgsn7nfmGu5xEMal8bP6Xgx7H0rI9YYzQwQnJ-IjEtdk_8QLIngsOAJkWS-3r03pI5YIxLwAKADsuciMmdw-gdhrhEkmDGkHV_TIW6WWAawLgpq_1MOFm0dcARi9kE2WiWdxMBu4y5ghu0hEmSPOEt2SOE-LR6NMAY8dnxPK2-vH3z-fJ9ff3h3dXlxXVtWsFTLaWRHfZ9NzR0kML0EiyAaLHjtAdodAei6yjTvAWrRQucat1quTG2E8Ka5rR6edCdg_--YExq65cw5SsVow2XvO9aman-QJngYww4qDm4HYR9hlRJVG3V30RVSVRRqXKiefL5UX_RO7T3c8cIM3B2BKDEMeTkjIv3XI6_60WxcHHgMP_GncOgonE4GbQu5LSU9e4_zLz-R6NwLl_7DfcY71-uIldUfSoLWPaP9nn1KGuaP3Ru3Ec</recordid><startdate>20070901</startdate><enddate>20070901</enddate><creator>Kisicki, James C., MD</creator><creator>Fiske, Kimberly, MPH</creator><creator>Lyne, Andrew, MSc, CStat</creator><general>EM Inc USA</general><general>Excerpta Medica</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070901</creationdate><title>Phase I, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study of the effects on blood pressure of abrupt cessation versus taper down of guanfacine extended-release tablets in adults aged 19 to 24 years</title><author>Kisicki, James C., MD ; Fiske, Kimberly, MPH ; Lyne, Andrew, MSc, CStat</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-99c95e775f30f98c79adaa84e5207aa3b5a85501b24adb84a20bb4b96cd588dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adrenergic alpha-Agonists - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Adrenergic alpha-Agonists - adverse effects</topic><topic>Adrenergic alpha-Agonists - pharmacology</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>alpha-2a adrenoreceptor</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Antihypertensive Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Antihypertensive Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Antihypertensive Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Attention deficit disorders. Hyperactivity</topic><topic>Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder</topic><topic>attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood pressure</topic><topic>Blood Pressure - drug effects</topic><topic>Child &amp; adolescent psychiatry</topic><topic>Child clinical studies</topic><topic>Delayed-Action Preparations</topic><topic>Diastole - drug effects</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Drug Administration Schedule</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>guanfacine</topic><topic>Guanfacine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Guanfacine - adverse effects</topic><topic>Guanfacine - pharmacology</topic><topic>Heart Rate - drug effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyperactivity</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Medical Education</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Monkeys &amp; apes</topic><topic>nonstimutant</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>SPD503</topic><topic>Systole - drug effects</topic><topic>Tablets</topic><topic>Tourette syndrome</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kisicki, James C., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiske, Kimberly, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyne, Andrew, MSc, CStat</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Clinical therapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kisicki, James C., MD</au><au>Fiske, Kimberly, MPH</au><au>Lyne, Andrew, MSc, CStat</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phase I, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study of the effects on blood pressure of abrupt cessation versus taper down of guanfacine extended-release tablets in adults aged 19 to 24 years</atitle><jtitle>Clinical therapeutics</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Ther</addtitle><date>2007-09-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1967</spage><epage>1979</epage><pages>1967-1979</pages><issn>0149-2918</issn><eissn>1879-114X</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background: Guanfacine hydrochloride is an α2a -adrenoreceptor agonist found to be effective in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Because the available immediate-release formulation requires multiple daily dosing and has been associated with rebound hypertension on abrupt cessation, an extended-release (ER) formulation has been developed for study of efficacy and tolerability parameters in patients with ADHD. Objective: This trial was primarily undertaken to determine the effect on blood pressure (BP) of abrupt cessation versus taper-down of guanfacine ER. Methods: This Phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation trial was conducted at MDS Pharma Services, Lincoln, Nebraska. Male and female healthy young-adult (aged 19-24 years) volunteers were included. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive guanfacine ER as follows. Abrupt-cessation and taper-down groups both received guanfacine ER at forced titration: 1 mg on days 1 to 4, 2 mg on days 5 to 8, 3 mg on days 9 to 12, and 4 mg on days 13 to 16. The abrupt-cessation group then received placebo daily on days 17 to 32. The taper-down group began the following taper-down schedule: 3 mg on days 17 to 20, 2 mg on days 21 to 24, 1 mg on days 25 to 30, and placebo on days 31 to 32. Placebo was administered daily to the subjects in the placebo group (days 1–32). All doses were given in the morning. Tolerability was assessed before (at the 8-hour baseline visit), during (approximately every 4 days and during 48-hour confinements at days 17/18 and 31/32), and 7 days after the study and included assessment of BP and pulse, 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG), and laboratory assays. Adverse events (AEs) were also tracked every 4 days beginning on day 5 and 7, 14, and 30 days poststudy by recording responses and follow-up to a nonleading question about how the patient was feeling that day. Results: Forty-five subjects were enrolled in the study (15 in each group), and 35 subjects completed it. The mean age of study participants was 22 years, 87% were white, and the ratio of women to men was 2:1. There were no marked differences between groups regarding age, sex, or race. Compared with the taperdown group, the abrupt-cessation group did not exhibit a clinically significant elevation of systolic BP (SBP) or diastolic BP (DBP) or other tolerability parameters, including AEs. Significant differences in BP were observed on days 17/18 (first day of abrupt cessation) and 31/32, but the overall means were not statistically different. The SBP decreases were −7.55% (−8.84 mm Hg) in the abrupt-cessation group and −8.33% (−9.69 mm Hg) in the taper-down group. The DBP decreases were −9.14% (−6.17 mm Hg) in the abrupt-cessation group and −9.94% (−6.59 mm Hg) in the taper-down group. There were no statistically significant or clinically important differences in change or percentage change in pulse from baseline to day 31/32 between the taper-down and placebo groups (least squares mean difference, 2.26 bpm). None of the subjects experienced bradycardia. No clinically important treatment related trends were noted in the clinical laboratory, ECG, or physical examination findings, including vital signs. No serious treatment-emergent AEs were reported in this study. Overall, 124 treatment-emergent AEs were reported in 29 (64%) subjects. Treatment-emergent AEs were reported in 14 (93.3%) of 15 subjects in the abrupt-cessation group, 8 (53.3%) of 15 subjects in the taper-down group, and 7 (46.7%) of 15 subjects in the placebo group. Headache was the most common AE reported in the abrupt-cessation (46.7%) and placebo (13.3%) groups. For the taper down group, it was dry mouth (26.7%). All AEs were classified as mild or moderate. Conclusion: In this small study group of healthy, young-adult volunteers, guanfacine ER at doses up to 4 mg/d was abruptly discontinued without significant increases in SBP or DBP or other tolerability parameters, including AEs, compared with taper.</abstract><cop>Belle Mead, NJ</cop><pub>EM Inc USA</pub><pmid>18035196</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.09.020</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0149-2918
ispartof Clinical therapeutics, 2007-09, Vol.29 (9), p.1967-1979
issn 0149-2918
1879-114X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1032927549
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adrenergic alpha-Agonists - administration & dosage
Adrenergic alpha-Agonists - adverse effects
Adrenergic alpha-Agonists - pharmacology
Adult
Adults
alpha-2a adrenoreceptor
Analysis of Variance
Antihypertensive Agents - administration & dosage
Antihypertensive Agents - adverse effects
Antihypertensive Agents - pharmacology
Attention deficit disorders. Hyperactivity
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)
Biological and medical sciences
Blood pressure
Blood Pressure - drug effects
Child & adolescent psychiatry
Child clinical studies
Delayed-Action Preparations
Diastole - drug effects
Double-Blind Method
Drug Administration Schedule
Electrocardiography
guanfacine
Guanfacine - administration & dosage
Guanfacine - adverse effects
Guanfacine - pharmacology
Heart Rate - drug effects
Humans
Hyperactivity
Internal Medicine
Medical Education
Medical sciences
Memory
Mental disorders
Mental health
Monkeys & apes
nonstimutant
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
SPD503
Systole - drug effects
Tablets
Tourette syndrome
United States
title Phase I, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study of the effects on blood pressure of abrupt cessation versus taper down of guanfacine extended-release tablets in adults aged 19 to 24 years
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T02%3A13%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phase%20I,%20double-blind,%20randomized,%20placebo-controlled,%20dose-escalation%20study%20of%20the%20effects%20on%20blood%20pressure%20of%20abrupt%20cessation%20versus%20taper%20down%20of%20guanfacine%20extended-release%20tablets%20in%20adults%20aged%2019%20to%2024%20years&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20therapeutics&rft.au=Kisicki,%20James%20C.,%20MD&rft.date=2007-09-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1967&rft.epage=1979&rft.pages=1967-1979&rft.issn=0149-2918&rft.eissn=1879-114X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.09.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2732796051%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1032927549&rft_id=info:pmid/18035196&rft_els_id=S0149291807003013&rfr_iscdi=true