A multicenter retrospective cohort study of practice patterns and clinical outcomes of the use of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa for chemotherapy-induced anemia

Background: Darbepoetin alfa is the second erythropoietic protein to be approved for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA). In the clinical setting, darbepoetin alfa can be administered less frequently than epoetin alfa with similar efficacy. Practice patterns and outcomes associated wi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical therapeutics 2003-11, Vol.25 (11), p.2781-2796
Hauptverfasser: Schwartzberg, Lee, Shiffman, Roger, Tomita, Dianne, Stolshek, Bradley, Rossi, Greg, Adamson, Robert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2796
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2781
container_title Clinical therapeutics
container_volume 25
creator Schwartzberg, Lee
Shiffman, Roger
Tomita, Dianne
Stolshek, Bradley
Rossi, Greg
Adamson, Robert
description Background: Darbepoetin alfa is the second erythropoietic protein to be approved for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA). In the clinical setting, darbepoetin alfa can be administered less frequently than epoetin alfa with similar efficacy. Practice patterns and outcomes associated with the use of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa in the clinical setting have not been reported. Objective: This study compared practice patterns and clinical outcomes of the use of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa for CIA at oncology practices in the United States. Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Data were abstracted from the medical charts of consecutive patients who began darbepoetin alfa treatment between August 1 and October 4, 2002, or epoetin alfa treatment between April 1 and July 31, 2002, and were receiving concurrent chemotherapy. These data were used to determine the initial dose and dosing schedule, dose changes, and changes in hemoglobin concentrations after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment, adjusted for red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, and the incidence of RBC transfusions over time. To minimize potential bias, the study protocol defined specific end points and prespecified analytic techniques for assessing clinical outcomes with the 2 agents. Results: The records of 1391 patients from 16 community and hospital outpatient oncology clinics were abstracted. Of these, 1293 patients (93.0%) received only 1 erythropoietic agent (darbepoetin alfa, 735 [56.8%]; epoetin alfa, 558 [43.2%]); the remainder received both agents. In the patients who received darbepoetin alfa, most (553 [75.2%]) received an initial dosage of 200 μg q2wk. A similar proportion (414 [74.2%]) received epoetin alfa at an initial dosage of 40,000 U qwk. As these were the regimens for the majority of patients whose records were abstracted, the results reported here are for these patients. The dose was increased in 63 darbepoetin alfa recipients (11.4%) and 58 epoetin alfa recipients (14.0%) at a median of 7 weeks. After 12 weeks, the 2 groups had an identical mean imputed change from baseline in hemoglobin concentration (1.0 g/dL), and the incidence of RBC transfusions during treatment was also similar between groups (darbepoetin alfa, 44 553 [8.0%]; epoetin alfa, 39 414 [9.4%]). Conclusions: Darbepoetin alfa 200 μg q2wk was used as a standard regimen for CIA at the 16 US oncology practices participating in this study. It appeared to be as effective as epo
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0149-2918(03)80333-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1032773057</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0149291803803338</els_id><sourcerecordid>2731885671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-da87dce4f13e87c753f05883338a0cef7d929a152259f29dd3edacc8189849803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc2KFDEURoMoTs_oIygBEcZFaVKpdCUrGQb_YMCFCu5C5uaGzlBVKZPUQD-PL2qqu3Fw5SohnO_mcj5CXnD2ljO-ffeN8U43rebqkok3igkhGvWIbLjqdcN59_Mx2fxFzsh5zneMMaFl-5Sc8W6rhWDdhvy-ouMylAA4FUw0YUkxzwgl3COFuIup0FwWt6fR0zlZWFE621LpKVM7OQpDmALYgcalQBwxr2jZIV0yrldn0y3OEUuYqB28PYT-efAxUdjhGGsq2XnfhMktgK6SOAb7jDzxdsj4_HRekB8fP3y__tzcfP305frqpoGO69I4q3oH2HkuUPXQS-GZVKqKUZYB-t7pVlsu21Zq32rnBDoLoLjSqtPV4AV5dZw7p_hrwVzMXVzSVL80nIm27wWTfaXkkYJqKif0Zk5htGlfIbNWYw7VmNW7YcIcqjGq5l6epi-3I7qH1KmLCrw-ATZXnT7ZCUJ-4KSUXLBt5d4fOawu7gMmkyHgVH2FVIszLob_rPIH4VGuNA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1032773057</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A multicenter retrospective cohort study of practice patterns and clinical outcomes of the use of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa for chemotherapy-induced anemia</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Schwartzberg, Lee ; Shiffman, Roger ; Tomita, Dianne ; Stolshek, Bradley ; Rossi, Greg ; Adamson, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Schwartzberg, Lee ; Shiffman, Roger ; Tomita, Dianne ; Stolshek, Bradley ; Rossi, Greg ; Adamson, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Darbepoetin alfa is the second erythropoietic protein to be approved for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA). In the clinical setting, darbepoetin alfa can be administered less frequently than epoetin alfa with similar efficacy. Practice patterns and outcomes associated with the use of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa in the clinical setting have not been reported. Objective: This study compared practice patterns and clinical outcomes of the use of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa for CIA at oncology practices in the United States. Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Data were abstracted from the medical charts of consecutive patients who began darbepoetin alfa treatment between August 1 and October 4, 2002, or epoetin alfa treatment between April 1 and July 31, 2002, and were receiving concurrent chemotherapy. These data were used to determine the initial dose and dosing schedule, dose changes, and changes in hemoglobin concentrations after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment, adjusted for red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, and the incidence of RBC transfusions over time. To minimize potential bias, the study protocol defined specific end points and prespecified analytic techniques for assessing clinical outcomes with the 2 agents. Results: The records of 1391 patients from 16 community and hospital outpatient oncology clinics were abstracted. Of these, 1293 patients (93.0%) received only 1 erythropoietic agent (darbepoetin alfa, 735 [56.8%]; epoetin alfa, 558 [43.2%]); the remainder received both agents. In the patients who received darbepoetin alfa, most (553 [75.2%]) received an initial dosage of 200 μg q2wk. A similar proportion (414 [74.2%]) received epoetin alfa at an initial dosage of 40,000 U qwk. As these were the regimens for the majority of patients whose records were abstracted, the results reported here are for these patients. The dose was increased in 63 darbepoetin alfa recipients (11.4%) and 58 epoetin alfa recipients (14.0%) at a median of 7 weeks. After 12 weeks, the 2 groups had an identical mean imputed change from baseline in hemoglobin concentration (1.0 g/dL), and the incidence of RBC transfusions during treatment was also similar between groups (darbepoetin alfa, 44 553 [8.0%]; epoetin alfa, 39 414 [9.4%]). Conclusions: Darbepoetin alfa 200 μg q2wk was used as a standard regimen for CIA at the 16 US oncology practices participating in this study. It appeared to be as effective as epoetin alfa 40,000 U qwk, with a reduced frequency of dosing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-2918</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-114X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0149-2918(03)80333-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14693304</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Belle Mead, NJ: EM Inc USA</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anemia ; Anemia - chemically induced ; Anemia - drug therapy ; Antineoplastic Agents - adverse effects ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood. Blood coagulation. Reticuloendothelial system ; Cancer ; Chemotherapy ; Clinical trials ; Darbepoetin alfa ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Drug dosages ; Drug Utilization Review ; Epoetin Alfa ; erythropoiesis ; Erythropoietin - administration &amp; dosage ; Erythropoietin - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Erythropoietin - therapeutic use ; Female ; Hematinics - administration &amp; dosage ; Hematinics - therapeutic use ; hemoglobin ; Humans ; Lymphoma ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Multiple myeloma ; Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Observational studies ; Oncology ; Pharmacoeconomics ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Practice Patterns, Physicians ; Proteins ; Quality of life ; Recombinant Proteins ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Clinical therapeutics, 2003-11, Vol.25 (11), p.2781-2796</ispartof><rights>2003</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Nov 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-da87dce4f13e87c753f05883338a0cef7d929a152259f29dd3edacc8189849803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-da87dce4f13e87c753f05883338a0cef7d929a152259f29dd3edacc8189849803</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1032773057?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15551306$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14693304$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schwartzberg, Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shiffman, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomita, Dianne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stolshek, Bradley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Greg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adamson, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>A multicenter retrospective cohort study of practice patterns and clinical outcomes of the use of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa for chemotherapy-induced anemia</title><title>Clinical therapeutics</title><addtitle>Clin Ther</addtitle><description>Background: Darbepoetin alfa is the second erythropoietic protein to be approved for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA). In the clinical setting, darbepoetin alfa can be administered less frequently than epoetin alfa with similar efficacy. Practice patterns and outcomes associated with the use of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa in the clinical setting have not been reported. Objective: This study compared practice patterns and clinical outcomes of the use of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa for CIA at oncology practices in the United States. Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Data were abstracted from the medical charts of consecutive patients who began darbepoetin alfa treatment between August 1 and October 4, 2002, or epoetin alfa treatment between April 1 and July 31, 2002, and were receiving concurrent chemotherapy. These data were used to determine the initial dose and dosing schedule, dose changes, and changes in hemoglobin concentrations after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment, adjusted for red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, and the incidence of RBC transfusions over time. To minimize potential bias, the study protocol defined specific end points and prespecified analytic techniques for assessing clinical outcomes with the 2 agents. Results: The records of 1391 patients from 16 community and hospital outpatient oncology clinics were abstracted. Of these, 1293 patients (93.0%) received only 1 erythropoietic agent (darbepoetin alfa, 735 [56.8%]; epoetin alfa, 558 [43.2%]); the remainder received both agents. In the patients who received darbepoetin alfa, most (553 [75.2%]) received an initial dosage of 200 μg q2wk. A similar proportion (414 [74.2%]) received epoetin alfa at an initial dosage of 40,000 U qwk. As these were the regimens for the majority of patients whose records were abstracted, the results reported here are for these patients. The dose was increased in 63 darbepoetin alfa recipients (11.4%) and 58 epoetin alfa recipients (14.0%) at a median of 7 weeks. After 12 weeks, the 2 groups had an identical mean imputed change from baseline in hemoglobin concentration (1.0 g/dL), and the incidence of RBC transfusions during treatment was also similar between groups (darbepoetin alfa, 44 553 [8.0%]; epoetin alfa, 39 414 [9.4%]). Conclusions: Darbepoetin alfa 200 μg q2wk was used as a standard regimen for CIA at the 16 US oncology practices participating in this study. It appeared to be as effective as epoetin alfa 40,000 U qwk, with a reduced frequency of dosing.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anemia</subject><subject>Anemia - chemically induced</subject><subject>Anemia - drug therapy</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood. Blood coagulation. Reticuloendothelial system</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Darbepoetin alfa</subject><subject>Drug Administration Schedule</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Drug Utilization Review</subject><subject>Epoetin Alfa</subject><subject>erythropoiesis</subject><subject>Erythropoietin - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Erythropoietin - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Erythropoietin - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hematinics - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Hematinics - therapeutic use</subject><subject>hemoglobin</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymphoma</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multiple myeloma</subject><subject>Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Observational studies</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Pharmacoeconomics</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Recombinant Proteins</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>0149-2918</issn><issn>1879-114X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc2KFDEURoMoTs_oIygBEcZFaVKpdCUrGQb_YMCFCu5C5uaGzlBVKZPUQD-PL2qqu3Fw5SohnO_mcj5CXnD2ljO-ffeN8U43rebqkok3igkhGvWIbLjqdcN59_Mx2fxFzsh5zneMMaFl-5Sc8W6rhWDdhvy-ouMylAA4FUw0YUkxzwgl3COFuIup0FwWt6fR0zlZWFE621LpKVM7OQpDmALYgcalQBwxr2jZIV0yrldn0y3OEUuYqB28PYT-efAxUdjhGGsq2XnfhMktgK6SOAb7jDzxdsj4_HRekB8fP3y__tzcfP305frqpoGO69I4q3oH2HkuUPXQS-GZVKqKUZYB-t7pVlsu21Zq32rnBDoLoLjSqtPV4AV5dZw7p_hrwVzMXVzSVL80nIm27wWTfaXkkYJqKif0Zk5htGlfIbNWYw7VmNW7YcIcqjGq5l6epi-3I7qH1KmLCrw-ATZXnT7ZCUJ-4KSUXLBt5d4fOawu7gMmkyHgVH2FVIszLob_rPIH4VGuNA</recordid><startdate>20031101</startdate><enddate>20031101</enddate><creator>Schwartzberg, Lee</creator><creator>Shiffman, Roger</creator><creator>Tomita, Dianne</creator><creator>Stolshek, Bradley</creator><creator>Rossi, Greg</creator><creator>Adamson, Robert</creator><general>EM Inc USA</general><general>Excerpta Medica</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031101</creationdate><title>A multicenter retrospective cohort study of practice patterns and clinical outcomes of the use of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa for chemotherapy-induced anemia</title><author>Schwartzberg, Lee ; Shiffman, Roger ; Tomita, Dianne ; Stolshek, Bradley ; Rossi, Greg ; Adamson, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-da87dce4f13e87c753f05883338a0cef7d929a152259f29dd3edacc8189849803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anemia</topic><topic>Anemia - chemically induced</topic><topic>Anemia - drug therapy</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood. Blood coagulation. Reticuloendothelial system</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Darbepoetin alfa</topic><topic>Drug Administration Schedule</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Drug Utilization Review</topic><topic>Epoetin Alfa</topic><topic>erythropoiesis</topic><topic>Erythropoietin - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Erythropoietin - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Erythropoietin - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hematinics - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Hematinics - therapeutic use</topic><topic>hemoglobin</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymphoma</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multiple myeloma</topic><topic>Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Observational studies</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Pharmacoeconomics</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Recombinant Proteins</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schwartzberg, Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shiffman, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomita, Dianne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stolshek, Bradley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Greg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adamson, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Clinical therapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schwartzberg, Lee</au><au>Shiffman, Roger</au><au>Tomita, Dianne</au><au>Stolshek, Bradley</au><au>Rossi, Greg</au><au>Adamson, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A multicenter retrospective cohort study of practice patterns and clinical outcomes of the use of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa for chemotherapy-induced anemia</atitle><jtitle>Clinical therapeutics</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Ther</addtitle><date>2003-11-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2781</spage><epage>2796</epage><pages>2781-2796</pages><issn>0149-2918</issn><eissn>1879-114X</eissn><abstract>Background: Darbepoetin alfa is the second erythropoietic protein to be approved for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA). In the clinical setting, darbepoetin alfa can be administered less frequently than epoetin alfa with similar efficacy. Practice patterns and outcomes associated with the use of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa in the clinical setting have not been reported. Objective: This study compared practice patterns and clinical outcomes of the use of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa for CIA at oncology practices in the United States. Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Data were abstracted from the medical charts of consecutive patients who began darbepoetin alfa treatment between August 1 and October 4, 2002, or epoetin alfa treatment between April 1 and July 31, 2002, and were receiving concurrent chemotherapy. These data were used to determine the initial dose and dosing schedule, dose changes, and changes in hemoglobin concentrations after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment, adjusted for red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, and the incidence of RBC transfusions over time. To minimize potential bias, the study protocol defined specific end points and prespecified analytic techniques for assessing clinical outcomes with the 2 agents. Results: The records of 1391 patients from 16 community and hospital outpatient oncology clinics were abstracted. Of these, 1293 patients (93.0%) received only 1 erythropoietic agent (darbepoetin alfa, 735 [56.8%]; epoetin alfa, 558 [43.2%]); the remainder received both agents. In the patients who received darbepoetin alfa, most (553 [75.2%]) received an initial dosage of 200 μg q2wk. A similar proportion (414 [74.2%]) received epoetin alfa at an initial dosage of 40,000 U qwk. As these were the regimens for the majority of patients whose records were abstracted, the results reported here are for these patients. The dose was increased in 63 darbepoetin alfa recipients (11.4%) and 58 epoetin alfa recipients (14.0%) at a median of 7 weeks. After 12 weeks, the 2 groups had an identical mean imputed change from baseline in hemoglobin concentration (1.0 g/dL), and the incidence of RBC transfusions during treatment was also similar between groups (darbepoetin alfa, 44 553 [8.0%]; epoetin alfa, 39 414 [9.4%]). Conclusions: Darbepoetin alfa 200 μg q2wk was used as a standard regimen for CIA at the 16 US oncology practices participating in this study. It appeared to be as effective as epoetin alfa 40,000 U qwk, with a reduced frequency of dosing.</abstract><cop>Belle Mead, NJ</cop><pub>EM Inc USA</pub><pmid>14693304</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0149-2918(03)80333-8</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0149-2918
ispartof Clinical therapeutics, 2003-11, Vol.25 (11), p.2781-2796
issn 0149-2918
1879-114X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1032773057
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anemia
Anemia - chemically induced
Anemia - drug therapy
Antineoplastic Agents - adverse effects
Biological and medical sciences
Blood. Blood coagulation. Reticuloendothelial system
Cancer
Chemotherapy
Clinical trials
Darbepoetin alfa
Drug Administration Schedule
Drug dosages
Drug Utilization Review
Epoetin Alfa
erythropoiesis
Erythropoietin - administration & dosage
Erythropoietin - analogs & derivatives
Erythropoietin - therapeutic use
Female
Hematinics - administration & dosage
Hematinics - therapeutic use
hemoglobin
Humans
Lymphoma
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Multiple myeloma
Neoplasms - drug therapy
Observational studies
Oncology
Pharmacoeconomics
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Practice Patterns, Physicians
Proteins
Quality of life
Recombinant Proteins
Retrospective Studies
title A multicenter retrospective cohort study of practice patterns and clinical outcomes of the use of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa for chemotherapy-induced anemia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T12%3A26%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20multicenter%20retrospective%20cohort%20study%20of%20practice%20patterns%20and%20clinical%20outcomes%20of%20the%20use%20of%20darbepoetin%20alfa%20and%20epoetin%20alfa%20for%20chemotherapy-induced%20anemia&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20therapeutics&rft.au=Schwartzberg,%20Lee&rft.date=2003-11-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2781&rft.epage=2796&rft.pages=2781-2796&rft.issn=0149-2918&rft.eissn=1879-114X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0149-2918(03)80333-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2731885671%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1032773057&rft_id=info:pmid/14693304&rft_els_id=S0149291803803338&rfr_iscdi=true