A multicenter retrospective cohort study of practice patterns and clinical outcomes of the use of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa for chemotherapy-induced anemia
Background: Darbepoetin alfa is the second erythropoietic protein to be approved for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA). In the clinical setting, darbepoetin alfa can be administered less frequently than epoetin alfa with similar efficacy. Practice patterns and outcomes associated wi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical therapeutics 2003-11, Vol.25 (11), p.2781-2796 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2796 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 2781 |
container_title | Clinical therapeutics |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Schwartzberg, Lee Shiffman, Roger Tomita, Dianne Stolshek, Bradley Rossi, Greg Adamson, Robert |
description | Background: Darbepoetin alfa is the second erythropoietic protein to be approved for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA). In the clinical setting, darbepoetin alfa can be administered less frequently than epoetin alfa with similar efficacy. Practice patterns and outcomes associated with the use of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa in the clinical setting have not been reported.
Objective: This study compared practice patterns and clinical outcomes of the use of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa for CIA at oncology practices in the United States.
Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Data were abstracted from the medical charts of consecutive patients who began darbepoetin alfa treatment between August 1 and October 4, 2002, or epoetin alfa treatment between April 1 and July 31, 2002, and were receiving concurrent chemotherapy. These data were used to determine the initial dose and dosing schedule, dose changes, and changes in hemoglobin concentrations after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment, adjusted for red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, and the incidence of RBC transfusions over time. To minimize potential bias, the study protocol defined specific end points and prespecified analytic techniques for assessing clinical outcomes with the 2 agents.
Results: The records of 1391 patients from 16 community and hospital outpatient oncology clinics were abstracted. Of these, 1293 patients (93.0%) received only 1 erythropoietic agent (darbepoetin alfa, 735 [56.8%]; epoetin alfa, 558 [43.2%]); the remainder received both agents. In the patients who received darbepoetin alfa, most (553 [75.2%]) received an initial dosage of 200 μg q2wk. A similar proportion (414 [74.2%]) received epoetin alfa at an initial dosage of 40,000 U qwk. As these were the regimens for the majority of patients whose records were abstracted, the results reported here are for these patients. The dose was increased in 63 darbepoetin alfa recipients (11.4%) and 58 epoetin alfa recipients (14.0%) at a median of 7 weeks. After 12 weeks, the 2 groups had an identical mean imputed change from baseline in hemoglobin concentration (1.0 g/dL), and the incidence of RBC transfusions during treatment was also similar between groups (darbepoetin alfa,
44
553
[8.0%]; epoetin alfa,
39
414
[9.4%]).
Conclusions: Darbepoetin alfa 200 μg q2wk was used as a standard regimen for CIA at the 16 US oncology practices participating in this study. It appeared to be as effective as epo |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0149-2918(03)80333-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1032773057</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0149291803803338</els_id><sourcerecordid>2731885671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-da87dce4f13e87c753f05883338a0cef7d929a152259f29dd3edacc8189849803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc2KFDEURoMoTs_oIygBEcZFaVKpdCUrGQb_YMCFCu5C5uaGzlBVKZPUQD-PL2qqu3Fw5SohnO_mcj5CXnD2ljO-ffeN8U43rebqkok3igkhGvWIbLjqdcN59_Mx2fxFzsh5zneMMaFl-5Sc8W6rhWDdhvy-ouMylAA4FUw0YUkxzwgl3COFuIup0FwWt6fR0zlZWFE621LpKVM7OQpDmALYgcalQBwxr2jZIV0yrldn0y3OEUuYqB28PYT-efAxUdjhGGsq2XnfhMktgK6SOAb7jDzxdsj4_HRekB8fP3y__tzcfP305frqpoGO69I4q3oH2HkuUPXQS-GZVKqKUZYB-t7pVlsu21Zq32rnBDoLoLjSqtPV4AV5dZw7p_hrwVzMXVzSVL80nIm27wWTfaXkkYJqKif0Zk5htGlfIbNWYw7VmNW7YcIcqjGq5l6epi-3I7qH1KmLCrw-ATZXnT7ZCUJ-4KSUXLBt5d4fOawu7gMmkyHgVH2FVIszLob_rPIH4VGuNA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1032773057</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A multicenter retrospective cohort study of practice patterns and clinical outcomes of the use of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa for chemotherapy-induced anemia</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Schwartzberg, Lee ; Shiffman, Roger ; Tomita, Dianne ; Stolshek, Bradley ; Rossi, Greg ; Adamson, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Schwartzberg, Lee ; Shiffman, Roger ; Tomita, Dianne ; Stolshek, Bradley ; Rossi, Greg ; Adamson, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Darbepoetin alfa is the second erythropoietic protein to be approved for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA). In the clinical setting, darbepoetin alfa can be administered less frequently than epoetin alfa with similar efficacy. Practice patterns and outcomes associated with the use of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa in the clinical setting have not been reported.
Objective: This study compared practice patterns and clinical outcomes of the use of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa for CIA at oncology practices in the United States.
Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Data were abstracted from the medical charts of consecutive patients who began darbepoetin alfa treatment between August 1 and October 4, 2002, or epoetin alfa treatment between April 1 and July 31, 2002, and were receiving concurrent chemotherapy. These data were used to determine the initial dose and dosing schedule, dose changes, and changes in hemoglobin concentrations after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment, adjusted for red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, and the incidence of RBC transfusions over time. To minimize potential bias, the study protocol defined specific end points and prespecified analytic techniques for assessing clinical outcomes with the 2 agents.
Results: The records of 1391 patients from 16 community and hospital outpatient oncology clinics were abstracted. Of these, 1293 patients (93.0%) received only 1 erythropoietic agent (darbepoetin alfa, 735 [56.8%]; epoetin alfa, 558 [43.2%]); the remainder received both agents. In the patients who received darbepoetin alfa, most (553 [75.2%]) received an initial dosage of 200 μg q2wk. A similar proportion (414 [74.2%]) received epoetin alfa at an initial dosage of 40,000 U qwk. As these were the regimens for the majority of patients whose records were abstracted, the results reported here are for these patients. The dose was increased in 63 darbepoetin alfa recipients (11.4%) and 58 epoetin alfa recipients (14.0%) at a median of 7 weeks. After 12 weeks, the 2 groups had an identical mean imputed change from baseline in hemoglobin concentration (1.0 g/dL), and the incidence of RBC transfusions during treatment was also similar between groups (darbepoetin alfa,
44
553
[8.0%]; epoetin alfa,
39
414
[9.4%]).
Conclusions: Darbepoetin alfa 200 μg q2wk was used as a standard regimen for CIA at the 16 US oncology practices participating in this study. It appeared to be as effective as epoetin alfa 40,000 U qwk, with a reduced frequency of dosing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-2918</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-114X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0149-2918(03)80333-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14693304</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Belle Mead, NJ: EM Inc USA</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anemia ; Anemia - chemically induced ; Anemia - drug therapy ; Antineoplastic Agents - adverse effects ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood. Blood coagulation. Reticuloendothelial system ; Cancer ; Chemotherapy ; Clinical trials ; Darbepoetin alfa ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Drug dosages ; Drug Utilization Review ; Epoetin Alfa ; erythropoiesis ; Erythropoietin - administration & dosage ; Erythropoietin - analogs & derivatives ; Erythropoietin - therapeutic use ; Female ; Hematinics - administration & dosage ; Hematinics - therapeutic use ; hemoglobin ; Humans ; Lymphoma ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Multiple myeloma ; Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Observational studies ; Oncology ; Pharmacoeconomics ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Practice Patterns, Physicians ; Proteins ; Quality of life ; Recombinant Proteins ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Clinical therapeutics, 2003-11, Vol.25 (11), p.2781-2796</ispartof><rights>2003</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Nov 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-da87dce4f13e87c753f05883338a0cef7d929a152259f29dd3edacc8189849803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-da87dce4f13e87c753f05883338a0cef7d929a152259f29dd3edacc8189849803</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1032773057?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15551306$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14693304$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schwartzberg, Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shiffman, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomita, Dianne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stolshek, Bradley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Greg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adamson, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>A multicenter retrospective cohort study of practice patterns and clinical outcomes of the use of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa for chemotherapy-induced anemia</title><title>Clinical therapeutics</title><addtitle>Clin Ther</addtitle><description>Background: Darbepoetin alfa is the second erythropoietic protein to be approved for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA). In the clinical setting, darbepoetin alfa can be administered less frequently than epoetin alfa with similar efficacy. Practice patterns and outcomes associated with the use of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa in the clinical setting have not been reported.
Objective: This study compared practice patterns and clinical outcomes of the use of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa for CIA at oncology practices in the United States.
Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Data were abstracted from the medical charts of consecutive patients who began darbepoetin alfa treatment between August 1 and October 4, 2002, or epoetin alfa treatment between April 1 and July 31, 2002, and were receiving concurrent chemotherapy. These data were used to determine the initial dose and dosing schedule, dose changes, and changes in hemoglobin concentrations after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment, adjusted for red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, and the incidence of RBC transfusions over time. To minimize potential bias, the study protocol defined specific end points and prespecified analytic techniques for assessing clinical outcomes with the 2 agents.
Results: The records of 1391 patients from 16 community and hospital outpatient oncology clinics were abstracted. Of these, 1293 patients (93.0%) received only 1 erythropoietic agent (darbepoetin alfa, 735 [56.8%]; epoetin alfa, 558 [43.2%]); the remainder received both agents. In the patients who received darbepoetin alfa, most (553 [75.2%]) received an initial dosage of 200 μg q2wk. A similar proportion (414 [74.2%]) received epoetin alfa at an initial dosage of 40,000 U qwk. As these were the regimens for the majority of patients whose records were abstracted, the results reported here are for these patients. The dose was increased in 63 darbepoetin alfa recipients (11.4%) and 58 epoetin alfa recipients (14.0%) at a median of 7 weeks. After 12 weeks, the 2 groups had an identical mean imputed change from baseline in hemoglobin concentration (1.0 g/dL), and the incidence of RBC transfusions during treatment was also similar between groups (darbepoetin alfa,
44
553
[8.0%]; epoetin alfa,
39
414
[9.4%]).
Conclusions: Darbepoetin alfa 200 μg q2wk was used as a standard regimen for CIA at the 16 US oncology practices participating in this study. It appeared to be as effective as epoetin alfa 40,000 U qwk, with a reduced frequency of dosing.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anemia</subject><subject>Anemia - chemically induced</subject><subject>Anemia - drug therapy</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood. Blood coagulation. Reticuloendothelial system</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Darbepoetin alfa</subject><subject>Drug Administration Schedule</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Drug Utilization Review</subject><subject>Epoetin Alfa</subject><subject>erythropoiesis</subject><subject>Erythropoietin - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Erythropoietin - analogs & derivatives</subject><subject>Erythropoietin - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hematinics - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Hematinics - therapeutic use</subject><subject>hemoglobin</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymphoma</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multiple myeloma</subject><subject>Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Observational studies</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Pharmacoeconomics</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Recombinant Proteins</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>0149-2918</issn><issn>1879-114X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc2KFDEURoMoTs_oIygBEcZFaVKpdCUrGQb_YMCFCu5C5uaGzlBVKZPUQD-PL2qqu3Fw5SohnO_mcj5CXnD2ljO-ffeN8U43rebqkok3igkhGvWIbLjqdcN59_Mx2fxFzsh5zneMMaFl-5Sc8W6rhWDdhvy-ouMylAA4FUw0YUkxzwgl3COFuIup0FwWt6fR0zlZWFE621LpKVM7OQpDmALYgcalQBwxr2jZIV0yrldn0y3OEUuYqB28PYT-efAxUdjhGGsq2XnfhMktgK6SOAb7jDzxdsj4_HRekB8fP3y__tzcfP305frqpoGO69I4q3oH2HkuUPXQS-GZVKqKUZYB-t7pVlsu21Zq32rnBDoLoLjSqtPV4AV5dZw7p_hrwVzMXVzSVL80nIm27wWTfaXkkYJqKif0Zk5htGlfIbNWYw7VmNW7YcIcqjGq5l6epi-3I7qH1KmLCrw-ATZXnT7ZCUJ-4KSUXLBt5d4fOawu7gMmkyHgVH2FVIszLob_rPIH4VGuNA</recordid><startdate>20031101</startdate><enddate>20031101</enddate><creator>Schwartzberg, Lee</creator><creator>Shiffman, Roger</creator><creator>Tomita, Dianne</creator><creator>Stolshek, Bradley</creator><creator>Rossi, Greg</creator><creator>Adamson, Robert</creator><general>EM Inc USA</general><general>Excerpta Medica</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031101</creationdate><title>A multicenter retrospective cohort study of practice patterns and clinical outcomes of the use of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa for chemotherapy-induced anemia</title><author>Schwartzberg, Lee ; Shiffman, Roger ; Tomita, Dianne ; Stolshek, Bradley ; Rossi, Greg ; Adamson, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-da87dce4f13e87c753f05883338a0cef7d929a152259f29dd3edacc8189849803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anemia</topic><topic>Anemia - chemically induced</topic><topic>Anemia - drug therapy</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood. Blood coagulation. Reticuloendothelial system</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Darbepoetin alfa</topic><topic>Drug Administration Schedule</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Drug Utilization Review</topic><topic>Epoetin Alfa</topic><topic>erythropoiesis</topic><topic>Erythropoietin - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Erythropoietin - analogs & derivatives</topic><topic>Erythropoietin - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hematinics - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Hematinics - therapeutic use</topic><topic>hemoglobin</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymphoma</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multiple myeloma</topic><topic>Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Observational studies</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Pharmacoeconomics</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Recombinant Proteins</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schwartzberg, Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shiffman, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomita, Dianne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stolshek, Bradley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Greg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adamson, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Clinical therapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schwartzberg, Lee</au><au>Shiffman, Roger</au><au>Tomita, Dianne</au><au>Stolshek, Bradley</au><au>Rossi, Greg</au><au>Adamson, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A multicenter retrospective cohort study of practice patterns and clinical outcomes of the use of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa for chemotherapy-induced anemia</atitle><jtitle>Clinical therapeutics</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Ther</addtitle><date>2003-11-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2781</spage><epage>2796</epage><pages>2781-2796</pages><issn>0149-2918</issn><eissn>1879-114X</eissn><abstract>Background: Darbepoetin alfa is the second erythropoietic protein to be approved for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA). In the clinical setting, darbepoetin alfa can be administered less frequently than epoetin alfa with similar efficacy. Practice patterns and outcomes associated with the use of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa in the clinical setting have not been reported.
Objective: This study compared practice patterns and clinical outcomes of the use of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa for CIA at oncology practices in the United States.
Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Data were abstracted from the medical charts of consecutive patients who began darbepoetin alfa treatment between August 1 and October 4, 2002, or epoetin alfa treatment between April 1 and July 31, 2002, and were receiving concurrent chemotherapy. These data were used to determine the initial dose and dosing schedule, dose changes, and changes in hemoglobin concentrations after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment, adjusted for red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, and the incidence of RBC transfusions over time. To minimize potential bias, the study protocol defined specific end points and prespecified analytic techniques for assessing clinical outcomes with the 2 agents.
Results: The records of 1391 patients from 16 community and hospital outpatient oncology clinics were abstracted. Of these, 1293 patients (93.0%) received only 1 erythropoietic agent (darbepoetin alfa, 735 [56.8%]; epoetin alfa, 558 [43.2%]); the remainder received both agents. In the patients who received darbepoetin alfa, most (553 [75.2%]) received an initial dosage of 200 μg q2wk. A similar proportion (414 [74.2%]) received epoetin alfa at an initial dosage of 40,000 U qwk. As these were the regimens for the majority of patients whose records were abstracted, the results reported here are for these patients. The dose was increased in 63 darbepoetin alfa recipients (11.4%) and 58 epoetin alfa recipients (14.0%) at a median of 7 weeks. After 12 weeks, the 2 groups had an identical mean imputed change from baseline in hemoglobin concentration (1.0 g/dL), and the incidence of RBC transfusions during treatment was also similar between groups (darbepoetin alfa,
44
553
[8.0%]; epoetin alfa,
39
414
[9.4%]).
Conclusions: Darbepoetin alfa 200 μg q2wk was used as a standard regimen for CIA at the 16 US oncology practices participating in this study. It appeared to be as effective as epoetin alfa 40,000 U qwk, with a reduced frequency of dosing.</abstract><cop>Belle Mead, NJ</cop><pub>EM Inc USA</pub><pmid>14693304</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0149-2918(03)80333-8</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0149-2918 |
ispartof | Clinical therapeutics, 2003-11, Vol.25 (11), p.2781-2796 |
issn | 0149-2918 1879-114X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1032773057 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Anemia Anemia - chemically induced Anemia - drug therapy Antineoplastic Agents - adverse effects Biological and medical sciences Blood. Blood coagulation. Reticuloendothelial system Cancer Chemotherapy Clinical trials Darbepoetin alfa Drug Administration Schedule Drug dosages Drug Utilization Review Epoetin Alfa erythropoiesis Erythropoietin - administration & dosage Erythropoietin - analogs & derivatives Erythropoietin - therapeutic use Female Hematinics - administration & dosage Hematinics - therapeutic use hemoglobin Humans Lymphoma Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Multiple myeloma Neoplasms - drug therapy Observational studies Oncology Pharmacoeconomics Pharmacology. Drug treatments Practice Patterns, Physicians Proteins Quality of life Recombinant Proteins Retrospective Studies |
title | A multicenter retrospective cohort study of practice patterns and clinical outcomes of the use of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa for chemotherapy-induced anemia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T12%3A26%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20multicenter%20retrospective%20cohort%20study%20of%20practice%20patterns%20and%20clinical%20outcomes%20of%20the%20use%20of%20darbepoetin%20alfa%20and%20epoetin%20alfa%20for%20chemotherapy-induced%20anemia&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20therapeutics&rft.au=Schwartzberg,%20Lee&rft.date=2003-11-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2781&rft.epage=2796&rft.pages=2781-2796&rft.issn=0149-2918&rft.eissn=1879-114X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0149-2918(03)80333-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2731885671%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1032773057&rft_id=info:pmid/14693304&rft_els_id=S0149291803803338&rfr_iscdi=true |