Can contrast-enhanced ultrasonography replace multidetector-computed tomography in the detection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer?
Purpose To compare the sensitivity and specificity of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) and four-slice multidetector-computed tomography (MDCT) in the detection of liver metastases in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical imaging 2009-07, Vol.33 (4), p.332-332 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 332 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 332 |
| container_title | Clinical imaging |
| container_volume | 33 |
| creator | Skovgaard Larsen, L.P Rosenkilde, M Christensen, H Bang, N Bolvig, L Christiansen Laurberg, S |
| description | Purpose To compare the sensitivity and specificity of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) and four-slice multidetector-computed tomography (MDCT) in the detection of liver metastases in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.clinimag.2009.04.019 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1032577544</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0899707109000795</els_id><sourcerecordid>2730510941</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1874-199e6dbc54b079c5a4679ffed4c2e99d018835513e24f791b704cb5e00afd6af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhi1UJLaFV0CWOCeMEydeX4BqBbRSpR6As-V1xl0viR1sb6V9Bx4ap0tVqZeeLNnfzO_5hpD3DGoGrP-4r83ovJv0Xd0AyBp4DUy-Iiu2Fm3FuZRnZAVrKSsBgr0h5yntoRRKLlbk70Z7aoLPUadcod9pb3Cgh3G5CD7cRT3vjjTiPGqDdCoPbsCMJodYmTDNh1zwHKZH0nmad0hPjAueBktHd4-RTphLhk6YqI1hKqljiAXSIzVLavz8lry2ekz47v95QX59-_pzc1Xd3H6_3lzeVKaMxCsmJfbD1nR8C0KaTvNeSGtx4KZBKQdg63XbdazFhlsh2VYAN9sOAbQdem3bC_Lh1HeO4c8BU1b7cIi-RCoGbdMJ0XFeqP5EmRhSimjVHIvleCyQWsyrvXo0rxbzCrgq5kvhl1MhlhnuHUaVjMPFq1vmVUNwL7f49KzFA2b0-BuPmJ6-q1KjQP1Y1rtsFyRAcdK1_wDSuakC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1032577544</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can contrast-enhanced ultrasonography replace multidetector-computed tomography in the detection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer?</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Skovgaard Larsen, L.P ; Rosenkilde, M ; Christensen, H ; Bang, N ; Bolvig, L ; Christiansen ; Laurberg, S</creator><creatorcontrib>Skovgaard Larsen, L.P ; Rosenkilde, M ; Christensen, H ; Bang, N ; Bolvig, L ; Christiansen ; Laurberg, S</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To compare the sensitivity and specificity of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) and four-slice multidetector-computed tomography (MDCT) in the detection of liver metastases in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-7071</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4499</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2009.04.019</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CLIMEB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Colorectal cancer ; Liver ; Medical diagnosis ; Radiology ; Tomography ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Clinical imaging, 2009-07, Vol.33 (4), p.332-332</ispartof><rights>2009</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2009.04.019$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Skovgaard Larsen, L.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenkilde, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bang, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolvig, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christiansen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laurberg, S</creatorcontrib><title>Can contrast-enhanced ultrasonography replace multidetector-computed tomography in the detection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer?</title><title>Clinical imaging</title><description>Purpose To compare the sensitivity and specificity of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) and four-slice multidetector-computed tomography (MDCT) in the detection of liver metastases in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).</description><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0899-7071</issn><issn>1873-4499</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhi1UJLaFV0CWOCeMEydeX4BqBbRSpR6As-V1xl0viR1sb6V9Bx4ap0tVqZeeLNnfzO_5hpD3DGoGrP-4r83ovJv0Xd0AyBp4DUy-Iiu2Fm3FuZRnZAVrKSsBgr0h5yntoRRKLlbk70Z7aoLPUadcod9pb3Cgh3G5CD7cRT3vjjTiPGqDdCoPbsCMJodYmTDNh1zwHKZH0nmad0hPjAueBktHd4-RTphLhk6YqI1hKqljiAXSIzVLavz8lry2ekz47v95QX59-_pzc1Xd3H6_3lzeVKaMxCsmJfbD1nR8C0KaTvNeSGtx4KZBKQdg63XbdazFhlsh2VYAN9sOAbQdem3bC_Lh1HeO4c8BU1b7cIi-RCoGbdMJ0XFeqP5EmRhSimjVHIvleCyQWsyrvXo0rxbzCrgq5kvhl1MhlhnuHUaVjMPFq1vmVUNwL7f49KzFA2b0-BuPmJ6-q1KjQP1Y1rtsFyRAcdK1_wDSuakC</recordid><startdate>20090701</startdate><enddate>20090701</enddate><creator>Skovgaard Larsen, L.P</creator><creator>Rosenkilde, M</creator><creator>Christensen, H</creator><creator>Bang, N</creator><creator>Bolvig, L</creator><creator>Christiansen</creator><creator>Laurberg, S</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090701</creationdate><title>Can contrast-enhanced ultrasonography replace multidetector-computed tomography in the detection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer?</title><author>Skovgaard Larsen, L.P ; Rosenkilde, M ; Christensen, H ; Bang, N ; Bolvig, L ; Christiansen ; Laurberg, S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1874-199e6dbc54b079c5a4679ffed4c2e99d018835513e24f791b704cb5e00afd6af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Skovgaard Larsen, L.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenkilde, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bang, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolvig, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christiansen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laurberg, S</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Clinical imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Skovgaard Larsen, L.P</au><au>Rosenkilde, M</au><au>Christensen, H</au><au>Bang, N</au><au>Bolvig, L</au><au>Christiansen</au><au>Laurberg, S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can contrast-enhanced ultrasonography replace multidetector-computed tomography in the detection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer?</atitle><jtitle>Clinical imaging</jtitle><date>2009-07-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>332</spage><epage>332</epage><pages>332-332</pages><issn>0899-7071</issn><eissn>1873-4499</eissn><coden>CLIMEB</coden><abstract>Purpose To compare the sensitivity and specificity of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) and four-slice multidetector-computed tomography (MDCT) in the detection of liver metastases in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.clinimag.2009.04.019</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0899-7071 |
| ispartof | Clinical imaging, 2009-07, Vol.33 (4), p.332-332 |
| issn | 0899-7071 1873-4499 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1032577544 |
| source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Colorectal cancer Liver Medical diagnosis Radiology Tomography Tumors |
| title | Can contrast-enhanced ultrasonography replace multidetector-computed tomography in the detection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T21%3A43%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20contrast-enhanced%20ultrasonography%20replace%20multidetector-computed%20tomography%20in%20the%20detection%20of%20liver%20metastases%20from%20colorectal%20cancer?&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20imaging&rft.au=Skovgaard%20Larsen,%20L.P&rft.date=2009-07-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=332&rft.epage=332&rft.pages=332-332&rft.issn=0899-7071&rft.eissn=1873-4499&rft.coden=CLIMEB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clinimag.2009.04.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2730510941%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1032577544&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0899707109000795&rfr_iscdi=true |