Density and Distribution of Amphipods in Oneida Lake, New York, after the Introduction of the Exotic Amphipod Echinogammarus ischnus

The exotic amphipod Echinogammarus ischnus, first reported in North America from western Lake Erie in 1995, was recorded in Oneida Lake, NY in 2001. Some North American studies have suggested that E. ischnus was replacing native amphipods, but other studies found no evidence for this. We sampled amp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Northeastern naturalist 2012-06, Vol.19 (2), p.249-266
Hauptverfasser: Cooper, John E, Wallquist, Elin, Holeck, Kristen T, Hoffman, Catharine E, Mills, Edward L, Mayer, Christine M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 266
container_issue 2
container_start_page 249
container_title Northeastern naturalist
container_volume 19
creator Cooper, John E
Wallquist, Elin
Holeck, Kristen T
Hoffman, Catharine E
Mills, Edward L
Mayer, Christine M
description The exotic amphipod Echinogammarus ischnus, first reported in North America from western Lake Erie in 1995, was recorded in Oneida Lake, NY in 2001. Some North American studies have suggested that E. ischnus was replacing native amphipods, but other studies found no evidence for this. We sampled amphipods at six depths (3.8 m) along six transects in Oneida Lake to quantify variation in densities of amphipod species as a function of depth, substrate (cobble with Dreissena and with or without macroalgae, sand with or without Dreissena, and macroalgae or submersed vascular plants) and density of Dreissena, and compared the present amphipod density to the historical record. Four species of amphipods, Gammarus fasciatus, Hyalella azteca, E. ischnus, and Crangonyx sp., were collected from Oneida Lake. Gammarus fasciatus was 9 to 90 times more abundant (mean = 0.09 individuals/cm2) than other amphipod species and was collected on all substrates and at all depths, as was H. azteca. Statistical comparisons were made with non-parametric tests between mean ranks of density of amphipods and Dreissena and the other variables. Mean ranks of density of G. fasciatus were correlated with depth (Spearman rank = 0.28, P < 0.0001), but mean ranks of density of H. azteca were not, and neither species was correlated with mean ranks of density of Dreissena. Mean ranks of density of G. fasciatus were greater on sand with or without macroalgae or submersed vascular plants (SVP) or Dreissena than on cobble with macroalgae and Dreissena (H = 28.2, P < 0.0001). Mean ranks of density of H. azteca were greater on sand with SVP, with or without Dreissena, than on sand with Dreissena and without SVP (H = 21.8, P = 0.0013). Echinogammarus ischnus was collected only in water less than 1.8 m depth and always with Dreissena. Mean ranks of density of E. ischnus were correlated with depth (Spearman rank = -0.29, P < 0.0001) and with Dreissena mean ranks of density (Spearman rank = 0.14, P = 0.01). Mean ranks of density of E. ischnus was greater on cobble with Dreissena than on sand with Dreissena regardless of the presence or absence of macroalgae or SVP (H = 35.4, P < 0.0001). Although E. ischnus is established in the near-shore zone of Oneida Lake, we found no evidence that it will replace the native amphipods G. fasciatus and H. azteca.
doi_str_mv 10.1656/045.019.0208
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1030745687</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41684234</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41684234</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b320t-dc1daf952c7475fe73b0a3f2307918c472230039f6338f8daf94fd58a21297083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhiMEEqWwsSJZYkNN8VcSe6xogUoVXWBgitzEpm6pHWxH0J0fjqNARyaffI-fO79JcongGOVZfgtpNoaIjyGG7CgZIE5YmhFYHMcacpzmiNPT5Mz7DYQI55QPku-pNF6HPRCmBlPtg9OrNmhrgFVgsmvWurG1B9qApZG6FmAhtnIEnuQneLVuOwJCBelAWEswN8HZuq3-Xnd3sy8bdHUQgVm11sa-id1OuDZqfbU2rT9PTpR49_Li9xwmL_ez57vHdLF8mN9NFumKYBjSukK1UDzDVUGLTMmCrKAgCscfcsQqWuBYQsJVTghTrGOpqjMmMMK8gIwMk-ve2zj70Uofyo1tnYkjSwSjhWY5KyI16qnKWe-dVGXjdNx3H6Gyy7mMOZcx57LLOeJXPb7xwboDS1HOKCY09m_6_kpba-T_sh87f4ZE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1030745687</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Density and Distribution of Amphipods in Oneida Lake, New York, after the Introduction of the Exotic Amphipod Echinogammarus ischnus</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Cooper, John E ; Wallquist, Elin ; Holeck, Kristen T ; Hoffman, Catharine E ; Mills, Edward L ; Mayer, Christine M</creator><creatorcontrib>Cooper, John E ; Wallquist, Elin ; Holeck, Kristen T ; Hoffman, Catharine E ; Mills, Edward L ; Mayer, Christine M</creatorcontrib><description>The exotic amphipod Echinogammarus ischnus, first reported in North America from western Lake Erie in 1995, was recorded in Oneida Lake, NY in 2001. Some North American studies have suggested that E. ischnus was replacing native amphipods, but other studies found no evidence for this. We sampled amphipods at six depths (&lt;0.2, 0.6, 1.2, 1.8, 3.0, and &gt;3.8 m) along six transects in Oneida Lake to quantify variation in densities of amphipod species as a function of depth, substrate (cobble with Dreissena and with or without macroalgae, sand with or without Dreissena, and macroalgae or submersed vascular plants) and density of Dreissena, and compared the present amphipod density to the historical record. Four species of amphipods, Gammarus fasciatus, Hyalella azteca, E. ischnus, and Crangonyx sp., were collected from Oneida Lake. Gammarus fasciatus was 9 to 90 times more abundant (mean = 0.09 individuals/cm2) than other amphipod species and was collected on all substrates and at all depths, as was H. azteca. Statistical comparisons were made with non-parametric tests between mean ranks of density of amphipods and Dreissena and the other variables. Mean ranks of density of G. fasciatus were correlated with depth (Spearman rank = 0.28, P &lt; 0.0001), but mean ranks of density of H. azteca were not, and neither species was correlated with mean ranks of density of Dreissena. Mean ranks of density of G. fasciatus were greater on sand with or without macroalgae or submersed vascular plants (SVP) or Dreissena than on cobble with macroalgae and Dreissena (H = 28.2, P &lt; 0.0001). Mean ranks of density of H. azteca were greater on sand with SVP, with or without Dreissena, than on sand with Dreissena and without SVP (H = 21.8, P = 0.0013). Echinogammarus ischnus was collected only in water less than 1.8 m depth and always with Dreissena. Mean ranks of density of E. ischnus were correlated with depth (Spearman rank = -0.29, P &lt; 0.0001) and with Dreissena mean ranks of density (Spearman rank = 0.14, P = 0.01). Mean ranks of density of E. ischnus was greater on cobble with Dreissena than on sand with Dreissena regardless of the presence or absence of macroalgae or SVP (H = 35.4, P &lt; 0.0001). Although E. ischnus is established in the near-shore zone of Oneida Lake, we found no evidence that it will replace the native amphipods G. fasciatus and H. azteca.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1092-6194</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5307</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1656/045.019.0208</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Steuben: Humboldt Field Research Institute</publisher><subject>Cobbles ; Crustaceans ; Density ; Fresh water ; Jewelry ; Lakes ; Macroalgae ; Mollusks ; Oxygen ; Riverine habitats ; Rivers ; Sand &amp; gravel ; Studies ; Vegetation</subject><ispartof>Northeastern naturalist, 2012-06, Vol.19 (2), p.249-266</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012</rights><rights>Copyright Northeastern Naturalist Spring 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b320t-dc1daf952c7475fe73b0a3f2307918c472230039f6338f8daf94fd58a21297083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b320t-dc1daf952c7475fe73b0a3f2307918c472230039f6338f8daf94fd58a21297083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41684234$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41684234$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cooper, John E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallquist, Elin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holeck, Kristen T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffman, Catharine E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mills, Edward L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, Christine M</creatorcontrib><title>Density and Distribution of Amphipods in Oneida Lake, New York, after the Introduction of the Exotic Amphipod Echinogammarus ischnus</title><title>Northeastern naturalist</title><description>The exotic amphipod Echinogammarus ischnus, first reported in North America from western Lake Erie in 1995, was recorded in Oneida Lake, NY in 2001. Some North American studies have suggested that E. ischnus was replacing native amphipods, but other studies found no evidence for this. We sampled amphipods at six depths (&lt;0.2, 0.6, 1.2, 1.8, 3.0, and &gt;3.8 m) along six transects in Oneida Lake to quantify variation in densities of amphipod species as a function of depth, substrate (cobble with Dreissena and with or without macroalgae, sand with or without Dreissena, and macroalgae or submersed vascular plants) and density of Dreissena, and compared the present amphipod density to the historical record. Four species of amphipods, Gammarus fasciatus, Hyalella azteca, E. ischnus, and Crangonyx sp., were collected from Oneida Lake. Gammarus fasciatus was 9 to 90 times more abundant (mean = 0.09 individuals/cm2) than other amphipod species and was collected on all substrates and at all depths, as was H. azteca. Statistical comparisons were made with non-parametric tests between mean ranks of density of amphipods and Dreissena and the other variables. Mean ranks of density of G. fasciatus were correlated with depth (Spearman rank = 0.28, P &lt; 0.0001), but mean ranks of density of H. azteca were not, and neither species was correlated with mean ranks of density of Dreissena. Mean ranks of density of G. fasciatus were greater on sand with or without macroalgae or submersed vascular plants (SVP) or Dreissena than on cobble with macroalgae and Dreissena (H = 28.2, P &lt; 0.0001). Mean ranks of density of H. azteca were greater on sand with SVP, with or without Dreissena, than on sand with Dreissena and without SVP (H = 21.8, P = 0.0013). Echinogammarus ischnus was collected only in water less than 1.8 m depth and always with Dreissena. Mean ranks of density of E. ischnus were correlated with depth (Spearman rank = -0.29, P &lt; 0.0001) and with Dreissena mean ranks of density (Spearman rank = 0.14, P = 0.01). Mean ranks of density of E. ischnus was greater on cobble with Dreissena than on sand with Dreissena regardless of the presence or absence of macroalgae or SVP (H = 35.4, P &lt; 0.0001). Although E. ischnus is established in the near-shore zone of Oneida Lake, we found no evidence that it will replace the native amphipods G. fasciatus and H. azteca.</description><subject>Cobbles</subject><subject>Crustaceans</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Fresh water</subject><subject>Jewelry</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Macroalgae</subject><subject>Mollusks</subject><subject>Oxygen</subject><subject>Riverine habitats</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Sand &amp; gravel</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><issn>1092-6194</issn><issn>1938-5307</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhiMEEqWwsSJZYkNN8VcSe6xogUoVXWBgitzEpm6pHWxH0J0fjqNARyaffI-fO79JcongGOVZfgtpNoaIjyGG7CgZIE5YmhFYHMcacpzmiNPT5Mz7DYQI55QPku-pNF6HPRCmBlPtg9OrNmhrgFVgsmvWurG1B9qApZG6FmAhtnIEnuQneLVuOwJCBelAWEswN8HZuq3-Xnd3sy8bdHUQgVm11sa-id1OuDZqfbU2rT9PTpR49_Li9xwmL_ez57vHdLF8mN9NFumKYBjSukK1UDzDVUGLTMmCrKAgCscfcsQqWuBYQsJVTghTrGOpqjMmMMK8gIwMk-ve2zj70Uofyo1tnYkjSwSjhWY5KyI16qnKWe-dVGXjdNx3H6Gyy7mMOZcx57LLOeJXPb7xwboDS1HOKCY09m_6_kpba-T_sh87f4ZE</recordid><startdate>20120601</startdate><enddate>20120601</enddate><creator>Cooper, John E</creator><creator>Wallquist, Elin</creator><creator>Holeck, Kristen T</creator><creator>Hoffman, Catharine E</creator><creator>Mills, Edward L</creator><creator>Mayer, Christine M</creator><general>Humboldt Field Research Institute</general><general>Eagle Hill Institute</general><general>Northeastern Naturalist</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120601</creationdate><title>Density and Distribution of Amphipods in Oneida Lake, New York, after the Introduction of the Exotic Amphipod Echinogammarus ischnus</title><author>Cooper, John E ; Wallquist, Elin ; Holeck, Kristen T ; Hoffman, Catharine E ; Mills, Edward L ; Mayer, Christine M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b320t-dc1daf952c7475fe73b0a3f2307918c472230039f6338f8daf94fd58a21297083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Cobbles</topic><topic>Crustaceans</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Fresh water</topic><topic>Jewelry</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Macroalgae</topic><topic>Mollusks</topic><topic>Oxygen</topic><topic>Riverine habitats</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Sand &amp; gravel</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cooper, John E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallquist, Elin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holeck, Kristen T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffman, Catharine E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mills, Edward L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, Christine M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Northeastern naturalist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cooper, John E</au><au>Wallquist, Elin</au><au>Holeck, Kristen T</au><au>Hoffman, Catharine E</au><au>Mills, Edward L</au><au>Mayer, Christine M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Density and Distribution of Amphipods in Oneida Lake, New York, after the Introduction of the Exotic Amphipod Echinogammarus ischnus</atitle><jtitle>Northeastern naturalist</jtitle><date>2012-06-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>249</spage><epage>266</epage><pages>249-266</pages><issn>1092-6194</issn><eissn>1938-5307</eissn><abstract>The exotic amphipod Echinogammarus ischnus, first reported in North America from western Lake Erie in 1995, was recorded in Oneida Lake, NY in 2001. Some North American studies have suggested that E. ischnus was replacing native amphipods, but other studies found no evidence for this. We sampled amphipods at six depths (&lt;0.2, 0.6, 1.2, 1.8, 3.0, and &gt;3.8 m) along six transects in Oneida Lake to quantify variation in densities of amphipod species as a function of depth, substrate (cobble with Dreissena and with or without macroalgae, sand with or without Dreissena, and macroalgae or submersed vascular plants) and density of Dreissena, and compared the present amphipod density to the historical record. Four species of amphipods, Gammarus fasciatus, Hyalella azteca, E. ischnus, and Crangonyx sp., were collected from Oneida Lake. Gammarus fasciatus was 9 to 90 times more abundant (mean = 0.09 individuals/cm2) than other amphipod species and was collected on all substrates and at all depths, as was H. azteca. Statistical comparisons were made with non-parametric tests between mean ranks of density of amphipods and Dreissena and the other variables. Mean ranks of density of G. fasciatus were correlated with depth (Spearman rank = 0.28, P &lt; 0.0001), but mean ranks of density of H. azteca were not, and neither species was correlated with mean ranks of density of Dreissena. Mean ranks of density of G. fasciatus were greater on sand with or without macroalgae or submersed vascular plants (SVP) or Dreissena than on cobble with macroalgae and Dreissena (H = 28.2, P &lt; 0.0001). Mean ranks of density of H. azteca were greater on sand with SVP, with or without Dreissena, than on sand with Dreissena and without SVP (H = 21.8, P = 0.0013). Echinogammarus ischnus was collected only in water less than 1.8 m depth and always with Dreissena. Mean ranks of density of E. ischnus were correlated with depth (Spearman rank = -0.29, P &lt; 0.0001) and with Dreissena mean ranks of density (Spearman rank = 0.14, P = 0.01). Mean ranks of density of E. ischnus was greater on cobble with Dreissena than on sand with Dreissena regardless of the presence or absence of macroalgae or SVP (H = 35.4, P &lt; 0.0001). Although E. ischnus is established in the near-shore zone of Oneida Lake, we found no evidence that it will replace the native amphipods G. fasciatus and H. azteca.</abstract><cop>Steuben</cop><pub>Humboldt Field Research Institute</pub><doi>10.1656/045.019.0208</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1092-6194
ispartof Northeastern naturalist, 2012-06, Vol.19 (2), p.249-266
issn 1092-6194
1938-5307
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1030745687
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Cobbles
Crustaceans
Density
Fresh water
Jewelry
Lakes
Macroalgae
Mollusks
Oxygen
Riverine habitats
Rivers
Sand & gravel
Studies
Vegetation
title Density and Distribution of Amphipods in Oneida Lake, New York, after the Introduction of the Exotic Amphipod Echinogammarus ischnus
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T01%3A18%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Density%20and%20Distribution%20of%20Amphipods%20in%20Oneida%20Lake,%20New%20York,%20after%20the%20Introduction%20of%20the%20Exotic%20Amphipod%20Echinogammarus%20ischnus&rft.jtitle=Northeastern%20naturalist&rft.au=Cooper,%20John%20E&rft.date=2012-06-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=249&rft.epage=266&rft.pages=249-266&rft.issn=1092-6194&rft.eissn=1938-5307&rft_id=info:doi/10.1656/045.019.0208&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41684234%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1030745687&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=41684234&rfr_iscdi=true