P-310: Comparison of brachial artery diameter measured by oscillometry and ultrasound

Introduction: Volume oscillometry is a non-invasive method to measure isobaric arterial compliance. An ordinary blood pressure cuff applied on the upper arm performs the measurement. Oscillations in the cuff around the upper arm are transformed into changes of volume during concomitant pressures reg...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of hypertension 2003-05, Vol.16 (S1), p.148A-149A
Hauptverfasser: Wiinberg, Niels, Jespersen, Lillian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 149A
container_issue S1
container_start_page 148A
container_title American journal of hypertension
container_volume 16
creator Wiinberg, Niels
Jespersen, Lillian
description Introduction: Volume oscillometry is a non-invasive method to measure isobaric arterial compliance. An ordinary blood pressure cuff applied on the upper arm performs the measurement. Oscillations in the cuff around the upper arm are transformed into changes of volume during concomitant pressures registration allowing for calculation of arterial compliance as a function of transmural pressure. The volume of the large arteries under the cuff is determined by summation of the compliance over the transmural pressure range from approximate −50 mmHg to subjects actual mean arterial pressure. Methods: Twelve healthy postmenopausal women of age 69 (55–73) years were examined by 4 occasions with 2 weeks between. Measurements were made at baseline, and after sublingual glyceryl trinitrate (GTN). Each ultrasonic diameter was measured 4 times followed by 4 oscillometric measurements on the other arm. Brachial arterial compliance was measured using a volume-oscillometric method (Artcomp®, Critikon®). Results: There was no significant change in BT before and after GTN. The oscillometry seems to systematic overestimate the artery volume under the cuff by 21% (before )and 15% (after GTN), but without any significant difference. We would expect a higher volume because there is more than one large artery under the cuff. A second problem is that the ultrasonic arterial volume was measured on the right arm, where the oscillometry was measured on the left. Conclusions: It is possible to determine brachial artery volume using oscillometric compliance measurement with a satisfying result. Indirectly verifying that the oscillometric isobaric measurement of arterial compliance is iving realistic values. (See Figure) (See Table) Baseline After GNT P-Value Systolic/diastolic BP (mmHg) 129 ± 20/65 ± 12 126 ± 17/68 ± 11 ns/ns Ultrasonic diameter (mm) 3.16 ± 0.29*** 3.74 ± 0.39*** *** Oscillometric diameter (mm) 3.82 ± 0.60 4.29 ± 0.69 * *P
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0895-7061(03)00475-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_natur</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1026682480</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2712956651</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i910-28ef6bd20d83baaf01b222ad735b107f724b1d7f643b0757ef16e58d875d22c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpF0E1LAzEQBuAgCtbqTxACXvSwOkk2H_UmRa1YsWpF8RKyTZZu3d3UZBfsvzdQ0dMMzMPM8CJ0TOCcABEXL6BGPJMgyCmwM4Bc8kztoAEZ5SSTlPJdNPgj--ggxhUkJQQZoNdZxghc4rFv1iZU0bfYl7gIZrGsTI1N6FzYYFuZxqUON87EPjiLiw32cVHVtU-DJExrcV93wUTft_YQ7ZWmju7otw7R_OZ6Pp5k08fbu_HVNKtGBDKqXCkKS8EqVhhTAikopcZKxgsCspQ0L4iVpchZAZJLVxLhuLJKckvpgrIhOtmuXQf_1bvY6ZXvQ5suagJUCEVzBUnhrWpNl37X61A1Jmy0WS0pAOMjlki2JVXs3Pe_CJ9aSCa5nrx_6PvZw9NzSk2_sR_nUG0S</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1026682480</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>P-310: Comparison of brachial artery diameter measured by oscillometry and ultrasound</title><source>AUTh Library subscriptions: Oxford University Press</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Wiinberg, Niels ; Jespersen, Lillian</creator><creatorcontrib>Wiinberg, Niels ; Jespersen, Lillian</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Volume oscillometry is a non-invasive method to measure isobaric arterial compliance. An ordinary blood pressure cuff applied on the upper arm performs the measurement. Oscillations in the cuff around the upper arm are transformed into changes of volume during concomitant pressures registration allowing for calculation of arterial compliance as a function of transmural pressure. The volume of the large arteries under the cuff is determined by summation of the compliance over the transmural pressure range from approximate −50 mmHg to subjects actual mean arterial pressure. Methods: Twelve healthy postmenopausal women of age 69 (55–73) years were examined by 4 occasions with 2 weeks between. Measurements were made at baseline, and after sublingual glyceryl trinitrate (GTN). Each ultrasonic diameter was measured 4 times followed by 4 oscillometric measurements on the other arm. Brachial arterial compliance was measured using a volume-oscillometric method (Artcomp®, Critikon®). Results: There was no significant change in BT before and after GTN. The oscillometry seems to systematic overestimate the artery volume under the cuff by 21% (before )and 15% (after GTN), but without any significant difference. We would expect a higher volume because there is more than one large artery under the cuff. A second problem is that the ultrasonic arterial volume was measured on the right arm, where the oscillometry was measured on the left. Conclusions: It is possible to determine brachial artery volume using oscillometric compliance measurement with a satisfying result. Indirectly verifying that the oscillometric isobaric measurement of arterial compliance is iving realistic values. (See Figure) (See Table) Baseline After GNT P-Value Systolic/diastolic BP (mmHg) 129 ± 20/65 ± 12 126 ± 17/68 ± 11 ns/ns Ultrasonic diameter (mm) 3.16 ± 0.29*** 3.74 ± 0.39*** *** Oscillometric diameter (mm) 3.82 ± 0.60 4.29 ± 0.69 * *P&lt;0.05, **p&lt;0.01, ***p&lt;0.001</description><identifier>ISSN: 0895-7061</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-7225</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1905</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0895-7061(03)00475-8</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJHYE6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Arterial volume ; Compliance ; Oscillometry</subject><ispartof>American journal of hypertension, 2003-05, Vol.16 (S1), p.148A-149A</ispartof><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group May 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wiinberg, Niels</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jespersen, Lillian</creatorcontrib><title>P-310: Comparison of brachial artery diameter measured by oscillometry and ultrasound</title><title>American journal of hypertension</title><addtitle>AJH</addtitle><description>Introduction: Volume oscillometry is a non-invasive method to measure isobaric arterial compliance. An ordinary blood pressure cuff applied on the upper arm performs the measurement. Oscillations in the cuff around the upper arm are transformed into changes of volume during concomitant pressures registration allowing for calculation of arterial compliance as a function of transmural pressure. The volume of the large arteries under the cuff is determined by summation of the compliance over the transmural pressure range from approximate −50 mmHg to subjects actual mean arterial pressure. Methods: Twelve healthy postmenopausal women of age 69 (55–73) years were examined by 4 occasions with 2 weeks between. Measurements were made at baseline, and after sublingual glyceryl trinitrate (GTN). Each ultrasonic diameter was measured 4 times followed by 4 oscillometric measurements on the other arm. Brachial arterial compliance was measured using a volume-oscillometric method (Artcomp®, Critikon®). Results: There was no significant change in BT before and after GTN. The oscillometry seems to systematic overestimate the artery volume under the cuff by 21% (before )and 15% (after GTN), but without any significant difference. We would expect a higher volume because there is more than one large artery under the cuff. A second problem is that the ultrasonic arterial volume was measured on the right arm, where the oscillometry was measured on the left. Conclusions: It is possible to determine brachial artery volume using oscillometric compliance measurement with a satisfying result. Indirectly verifying that the oscillometric isobaric measurement of arterial compliance is iving realistic values. (See Figure) (See Table) Baseline After GNT P-Value Systolic/diastolic BP (mmHg) 129 ± 20/65 ± 12 126 ± 17/68 ± 11 ns/ns Ultrasonic diameter (mm) 3.16 ± 0.29*** 3.74 ± 0.39*** *** Oscillometric diameter (mm) 3.82 ± 0.60 4.29 ± 0.69 * *P&lt;0.05, **p&lt;0.01, ***p&lt;0.001</description><subject>Arterial volume</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Oscillometry</subject><issn>0895-7061</issn><issn>1941-7225</issn><issn>1879-1905</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNpF0E1LAzEQBuAgCtbqTxACXvSwOkk2H_UmRa1YsWpF8RKyTZZu3d3UZBfsvzdQ0dMMzMPM8CJ0TOCcABEXL6BGPJMgyCmwM4Bc8kztoAEZ5SSTlPJdNPgj--ggxhUkJQQZoNdZxghc4rFv1iZU0bfYl7gIZrGsTI1N6FzYYFuZxqUON87EPjiLiw32cVHVtU-DJExrcV93wUTft_YQ7ZWmju7otw7R_OZ6Pp5k08fbu_HVNKtGBDKqXCkKS8EqVhhTAikopcZKxgsCspQ0L4iVpchZAZJLVxLhuLJKckvpgrIhOtmuXQf_1bvY6ZXvQ5suagJUCEVzBUnhrWpNl37X61A1Jmy0WS0pAOMjlki2JVXs3Pe_CJ9aSCa5nrx_6PvZw9NzSk2_sR_nUG0S</recordid><startdate>200305</startdate><enddate>200305</enddate><creator>Wiinberg, Niels</creator><creator>Jespersen, Lillian</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200305</creationdate><title>P-310: Comparison of brachial artery diameter measured by oscillometry and ultrasound</title><author>Wiinberg, Niels ; Jespersen, Lillian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i910-28ef6bd20d83baaf01b222ad735b107f724b1d7f643b0757ef16e58d875d22c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Arterial volume</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Oscillometry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wiinberg, Niels</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jespersen, Lillian</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>American journal of hypertension</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wiinberg, Niels</au><au>Jespersen, Lillian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>P-310: Comparison of brachial artery diameter measured by oscillometry and ultrasound</atitle><jtitle>American journal of hypertension</jtitle><addtitle>AJH</addtitle><date>2003-05</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>148A</spage><epage>149A</epage><pages>148A-149A</pages><issn>0895-7061</issn><eissn>1941-7225</eissn><eissn>1879-1905</eissn><coden>AJHYE6</coden><abstract>Introduction: Volume oscillometry is a non-invasive method to measure isobaric arterial compliance. An ordinary blood pressure cuff applied on the upper arm performs the measurement. Oscillations in the cuff around the upper arm are transformed into changes of volume during concomitant pressures registration allowing for calculation of arterial compliance as a function of transmural pressure. The volume of the large arteries under the cuff is determined by summation of the compliance over the transmural pressure range from approximate −50 mmHg to subjects actual mean arterial pressure. Methods: Twelve healthy postmenopausal women of age 69 (55–73) years were examined by 4 occasions with 2 weeks between. Measurements were made at baseline, and after sublingual glyceryl trinitrate (GTN). Each ultrasonic diameter was measured 4 times followed by 4 oscillometric measurements on the other arm. Brachial arterial compliance was measured using a volume-oscillometric method (Artcomp®, Critikon®). Results: There was no significant change in BT before and after GTN. The oscillometry seems to systematic overestimate the artery volume under the cuff by 21% (before )and 15% (after GTN), but without any significant difference. We would expect a higher volume because there is more than one large artery under the cuff. A second problem is that the ultrasonic arterial volume was measured on the right arm, where the oscillometry was measured on the left. Conclusions: It is possible to determine brachial artery volume using oscillometric compliance measurement with a satisfying result. Indirectly verifying that the oscillometric isobaric measurement of arterial compliance is iving realistic values. (See Figure) (See Table) Baseline After GNT P-Value Systolic/diastolic BP (mmHg) 129 ± 20/65 ± 12 126 ± 17/68 ± 11 ns/ns Ultrasonic diameter (mm) 3.16 ± 0.29*** 3.74 ± 0.39*** *** Oscillometric diameter (mm) 3.82 ± 0.60 4.29 ± 0.69 * *P&lt;0.05, **p&lt;0.01, ***p&lt;0.001</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1016/S0895-7061(03)00475-8</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0895-7061
ispartof American journal of hypertension, 2003-05, Vol.16 (S1), p.148A-149A
issn 0895-7061
1941-7225
1879-1905
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1026682480
source AUTh Library subscriptions: Oxford University Press; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Arterial volume
Compliance
Oscillometry
title P-310: Comparison of brachial artery diameter measured by oscillometry and ultrasound
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T05%3A52%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_natur&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=P-310:%20Comparison%20of%20brachial%20artery%20diameter%20measured%20by%20oscillometry%20and%20ultrasound&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20hypertension&rft.au=Wiinberg,%20Niels&rft.date=2003-05&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=148A&rft.epage=149A&rft.pages=148A-149A&rft.issn=0895-7061&rft.eissn=1941-7225&rft.coden=AJHYE6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0895-7061(03)00475-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_natur%3E2712956651%3C/proquest_natur%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1026682480&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true