Building future coexistence or keeping people apart

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the importance of cross-communal cooperation and its contribution to peacebuilding and reconciliation in Northern Ireland through the opinions of 752 respondents.Design methodology approach - A multivariate analysis of the respondents' opinions...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The International journal of conflict management 2012-07, Vol.23 (3), p.248-265
Hauptverfasser: Fissuh, Eyob, Skarlato, Olga, Byrne, Sean, Karari, Peter, Kawser, Ahmad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 265
container_issue 3
container_start_page 248
container_title The International journal of conflict management
container_volume 23
creator Fissuh, Eyob
Skarlato, Olga
Byrne, Sean
Karari, Peter
Kawser, Ahmad
description Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the importance of cross-communal cooperation and its contribution to peacebuilding and reconciliation in Northern Ireland through the opinions of 752 respondents.Design methodology approach - A multivariate analysis of the respondents' opinions was gathered through a Public Opinion Survey (MBU 2006), which addresses the issue of physical separation of the Catholic and Protestant communities in the context of the Northern Ireland peace process.Findings - Findings indicate that religion is a key variable in any discussion of the sustainability of the Northern Ireland peace process in relation to cross-community initiatives, social and economic integration as well as existing divisions between both communities. Moreover, professional and skilled worker respondents disagreed that the impacts of physical separation between both communities supports the peace process. Catholic Nationalists and respondents from Belfast city and the Western region of Northern Ireland were less likely to perceive the physical separation of both communities as negatively impacting the peace process.Practical implications - The implication for practice necessitates that the liberal peacebuilding model includes hybrid approaches to harness external economic aid in post-accord societies that are inclusive of local people, ideas and concerns.Originality value - The value of the paper to practitioners and policymakers is that the research on the impact of external economic aid on cross community conflict must include the triangulation of both qualitative and quantitative methods to fully grasp its complexity.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/10444061211248958
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1022708633</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2699995411</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1543-ac0a73d9fb76e998938df7ebc35c9512e9fec34a94faefcd3be8ae31d49053ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AG8Fr1YznaRNjrr4Dxa86LmkyUS6dtuYtqDf3izrSfH0Bt7vzYPH2DnwKwCuroELIXgJBUAhlJbqgC2gkipXUsjDdCc_T4A6ZifjuOGcl8hhwfB2bjvX9m-Zn6c5UmYH-mzHiXpL2RCzd6KwcwMNoaPMBBOnU3bkTTfS2Y8u2ev93cvqMV8_Pzytbta5BSkwN5abCp32TVWS1kqjcr6ixqK0WkJB2pNFYbTwhrx12JAyhOCE5hK9xyW72P8NcfiYaZzqzTDHPlXWwIui4qpETBTfU7SlaDpXh9huTfxKTL2bpv4zTYpc_hf5hdbBefwG739jXw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1022708633</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Building future coexistence or keeping people apart</title><source>Emerald A-Z Current Journals</source><creator>Fissuh, Eyob ; Skarlato, Olga ; Byrne, Sean ; Karari, Peter ; Kawser, Ahmad</creator><creatorcontrib>Fissuh, Eyob ; Skarlato, Olga ; Byrne, Sean ; Karari, Peter ; Kawser, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the importance of cross-communal cooperation and its contribution to peacebuilding and reconciliation in Northern Ireland through the opinions of 752 respondents.Design methodology approach - A multivariate analysis of the respondents' opinions was gathered through a Public Opinion Survey (MBU 2006), which addresses the issue of physical separation of the Catholic and Protestant communities in the context of the Northern Ireland peace process.Findings - Findings indicate that religion is a key variable in any discussion of the sustainability of the Northern Ireland peace process in relation to cross-community initiatives, social and economic integration as well as existing divisions between both communities. Moreover, professional and skilled worker respondents disagreed that the impacts of physical separation between both communities supports the peace process. Catholic Nationalists and respondents from Belfast city and the Western region of Northern Ireland were less likely to perceive the physical separation of both communities as negatively impacting the peace process.Practical implications - The implication for practice necessitates that the liberal peacebuilding model includes hybrid approaches to harness external economic aid in post-accord societies that are inclusive of local people, ideas and concerns.Originality value - The value of the paper to practitioners and policymakers is that the research on the impact of external economic aid on cross community conflict must include the triangulation of both qualitative and quantitative methods to fully grasp its complexity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1044-4068</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-8545</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/10444061211248958</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bowling Green: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Community ; Conflict management ; Conflict resolution ; Cooperation ; Culture ; Debates ; Economic aid ; Human rights ; Minority &amp; ethnic violence ; Peace ; Peace negotiations ; Peace studies ; Political activism ; Public opinion surveys ; Reconciliation ; Religion</subject><ispartof>The International journal of conflict management, 2012-07, Vol.23 (3), p.248-265</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Copyright Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1543-ac0a73d9fb76e998938df7ebc35c9512e9fec34a94faefcd3be8ae31d49053ff3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/10444061211248958/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/10444061211248958/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,966,11626,27915,27916,52677,52680</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fissuh, Eyob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skarlato, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byrne, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karari, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawser, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><title>Building future coexistence or keeping people apart</title><title>The International journal of conflict management</title><description>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the importance of cross-communal cooperation and its contribution to peacebuilding and reconciliation in Northern Ireland through the opinions of 752 respondents.Design methodology approach - A multivariate analysis of the respondents' opinions was gathered through a Public Opinion Survey (MBU 2006), which addresses the issue of physical separation of the Catholic and Protestant communities in the context of the Northern Ireland peace process.Findings - Findings indicate that religion is a key variable in any discussion of the sustainability of the Northern Ireland peace process in relation to cross-community initiatives, social and economic integration as well as existing divisions between both communities. Moreover, professional and skilled worker respondents disagreed that the impacts of physical separation between both communities supports the peace process. Catholic Nationalists and respondents from Belfast city and the Western region of Northern Ireland were less likely to perceive the physical separation of both communities as negatively impacting the peace process.Practical implications - The implication for practice necessitates that the liberal peacebuilding model includes hybrid approaches to harness external economic aid in post-accord societies that are inclusive of local people, ideas and concerns.Originality value - The value of the paper to practitioners and policymakers is that the research on the impact of external economic aid on cross community conflict must include the triangulation of both qualitative and quantitative methods to fully grasp its complexity.</description><subject>Community</subject><subject>Conflict management</subject><subject>Conflict resolution</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Debates</subject><subject>Economic aid</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>Minority &amp; ethnic violence</subject><subject>Peace</subject><subject>Peace negotiations</subject><subject>Peace studies</subject><subject>Political activism</subject><subject>Public opinion surveys</subject><subject>Reconciliation</subject><subject>Religion</subject><issn>1044-4068</issn><issn>1758-8545</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AG8Fr1YznaRNjrr4Dxa86LmkyUS6dtuYtqDf3izrSfH0Bt7vzYPH2DnwKwCuroELIXgJBUAhlJbqgC2gkipXUsjDdCc_T4A6ZifjuOGcl8hhwfB2bjvX9m-Zn6c5UmYH-mzHiXpL2RCzd6KwcwMNoaPMBBOnU3bkTTfS2Y8u2ev93cvqMV8_Pzytbta5BSkwN5abCp32TVWS1kqjcr6ixqK0WkJB2pNFYbTwhrx12JAyhOCE5hK9xyW72P8NcfiYaZzqzTDHPlXWwIui4qpETBTfU7SlaDpXh9huTfxKTL2bpv4zTYpc_hf5hdbBefwG739jXw</recordid><startdate>20120701</startdate><enddate>20120701</enddate><creator>Fissuh, Eyob</creator><creator>Skarlato, Olga</creator><creator>Byrne, Sean</creator><creator>Karari, Peter</creator><creator>Kawser, Ahmad</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120701</creationdate><title>Building future coexistence or keeping people apart</title><author>Fissuh, Eyob ; Skarlato, Olga ; Byrne, Sean ; Karari, Peter ; Kawser, Ahmad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1543-ac0a73d9fb76e998938df7ebc35c9512e9fec34a94faefcd3be8ae31d49053ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Community</topic><topic>Conflict management</topic><topic>Conflict resolution</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Debates</topic><topic>Economic aid</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>Minority &amp; ethnic violence</topic><topic>Peace</topic><topic>Peace negotiations</topic><topic>Peace studies</topic><topic>Political activism</topic><topic>Public opinion surveys</topic><topic>Reconciliation</topic><topic>Religion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fissuh, Eyob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skarlato, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byrne, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karari, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawser, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The International journal of conflict management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fissuh, Eyob</au><au>Skarlato, Olga</au><au>Byrne, Sean</au><au>Karari, Peter</au><au>Kawser, Ahmad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Building future coexistence or keeping people apart</atitle><jtitle>The International journal of conflict management</jtitle><date>2012-07-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>248</spage><epage>265</epage><pages>248-265</pages><issn>1044-4068</issn><eissn>1758-8545</eissn><abstract>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the importance of cross-communal cooperation and its contribution to peacebuilding and reconciliation in Northern Ireland through the opinions of 752 respondents.Design methodology approach - A multivariate analysis of the respondents' opinions was gathered through a Public Opinion Survey (MBU 2006), which addresses the issue of physical separation of the Catholic and Protestant communities in the context of the Northern Ireland peace process.Findings - Findings indicate that religion is a key variable in any discussion of the sustainability of the Northern Ireland peace process in relation to cross-community initiatives, social and economic integration as well as existing divisions between both communities. Moreover, professional and skilled worker respondents disagreed that the impacts of physical separation between both communities supports the peace process. Catholic Nationalists and respondents from Belfast city and the Western region of Northern Ireland were less likely to perceive the physical separation of both communities as negatively impacting the peace process.Practical implications - The implication for practice necessitates that the liberal peacebuilding model includes hybrid approaches to harness external economic aid in post-accord societies that are inclusive of local people, ideas and concerns.Originality value - The value of the paper to practitioners and policymakers is that the research on the impact of external economic aid on cross community conflict must include the triangulation of both qualitative and quantitative methods to fully grasp its complexity.</abstract><cop>Bowling Green</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/10444061211248958</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1044-4068
ispartof The International journal of conflict management, 2012-07, Vol.23 (3), p.248-265
issn 1044-4068
1758-8545
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1022708633
source Emerald A-Z Current Journals
subjects Community
Conflict management
Conflict resolution
Cooperation
Culture
Debates
Economic aid
Human rights
Minority & ethnic violence
Peace
Peace negotiations
Peace studies
Political activism
Public opinion surveys
Reconciliation
Religion
title Building future coexistence or keeping people apart
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T02%3A03%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Building%20future%20coexistence%20or%20keeping%20people%20apart&rft.jtitle=The%20International%20journal%20of%20conflict%20management&rft.au=Fissuh,%20Eyob&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=248&rft.epage=265&rft.pages=248-265&rft.issn=1044-4068&rft.eissn=1758-8545&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/10444061211248958&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2699995411%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1022708633&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true