Further Investigation of the Validity and Reliability of the Photographic Figure Rating Scale for Body Image Assessment
Previous studies have not fully investigated the psychometric properties of the Photographic Figure Rating Scale (PFRS). In 2 studies, we report on the test-retest reliability and convergent validity of ratings derived from the PFRS. In Study 1, 322 female university students in Britain provided sel...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of personality assessment 2012-07, Vol.94 (4), p.404-409 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 409 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 404 |
| container_title | Journal of personality assessment |
| container_volume | 94 |
| creator | Swami, Viren Stieger, Stefan Harris, Amy Sunshine Nader, Ingo W. Pietschnig, Jakob Voracek, Martin Tovée, Martin J. |
| description | Previous studies have not fully investigated the psychometric properties of the Photographic Figure Rating Scale (PFRS). In 2 studies, we report on the test-retest reliability and convergent validity of ratings derived from the PFRS. In Study 1, 322 female university students in Britain provided self-ratings on the PFRS and objectively measured body mass index (BMI); a subsample of 132 women also completed the task after 5 weeks. In Study 2, 243 women from the community in Austria completed the PFRS along with a battery of other body image scales. Results of Study 1 showed that ratings on the PFRS had good test-retest reliability (all rs > .87) and good convergent validity in relation to BMI. Results of Study 2 showed that PFRS-derived body dissatisfaction scores were significantly correlated with a range of body image variables. These results provide evidence for the convergent validity and good test-retest reliability of the PFRS. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00223891.2012.660293 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1021026610</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2691101981</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-70e888ef0a22cee087aefed2939bf0d01f8bc44f091b8aa4fd6b096a22a54b3b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U1v1DAQBmALUdFt4R8gZAkh9ZJl7DhfJ1QqFlaqBCot12iSjLOuknhrJ1T773HY3SJxAPlgOX5m5MnL2GsBSwE5vAeQMs4LsZQg5DJNQRbxM7YQSSyjLEvkc7aYSTSbU3bm_T0ACKHkC3YaKrMkhXjBHleTGzfk-Hr4SX40LY7GDtxqHr7yH9iZxow7jkPDb6gzWJluPh_uv23saFuH242p-cq0kyN-EzoMLf9eY0dcW8c_2mbH1z22xC-9J-97GsaX7ERj5-nVYT9nd6tPt1dfouuvn9dXl9dRrRI1RhlQnuekAaWsiSDPkDQ1YdSi0tCA0HlVK6WhEFWOqHSTVlCkQWOiqriKz9nFvu_W2YcpTFj2xtfUdTiQnXwpZB5nSigQ_6cghZAqrEDf_kXv7eSGMMhvBTJNBQSl9qp21ntHutw606PbBVTOGZbHDMs5w3KfYSh7c2g-VT01T0XH0AJ4dwDow1_WDofa-D8uFVksiiy4D3tnhpBDj4_WdU054q6z7lgU__MpvwAwqLdX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1021026610</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Further Investigation of the Validity and Reliability of the Photographic Figure Rating Scale for Body Image Assessment</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Swami, Viren ; Stieger, Stefan ; Harris, Amy Sunshine ; Nader, Ingo W. ; Pietschnig, Jakob ; Voracek, Martin ; Tovée, Martin J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Swami, Viren ; Stieger, Stefan ; Harris, Amy Sunshine ; Nader, Ingo W. ; Pietschnig, Jakob ; Voracek, Martin ; Tovée, Martin J.</creatorcontrib><description>Previous studies have not fully investigated the psychometric properties of the Photographic Figure Rating Scale (PFRS). In 2 studies, we report on the test-retest reliability and convergent validity of ratings derived from the PFRS. In Study 1, 322 female university students in Britain provided self-ratings on the PFRS and objectively measured body mass index (BMI); a subsample of 132 women also completed the task after 5 weeks. In Study 2, 243 women from the community in Austria completed the PFRS along with a battery of other body image scales. Results of Study 1 showed that ratings on the PFRS had good test-retest reliability (all rs > .87) and good convergent validity in relation to BMI. Results of Study 2 showed that PFRS-derived body dissatisfaction scores were significantly correlated with a range of body image variables. These results provide evidence for the convergent validity and good test-retest reliability of the PFRS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3891</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7752</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2012.660293</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22375603</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JNPABU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Adult ; Austria ; Biological and medical sciences ; Body Image ; Body Mass Index ; Convergent validity ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; London ; Personality. Affectivity ; Photography ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychometric properties ; Psychometrics ; Quantitative psychology ; Reliability ; Reproducibility of Results ; Self Concept ; Self evaluation ; Surveys and Questionnaires - standards ; University students ; Validation studies ; Women ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of personality assessment, 2012-07, Vol.94 (4), p.404-409</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2012</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Routledge 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-70e888ef0a22cee087aefed2939bf0d01f8bc44f091b8aa4fd6b096a22a54b3b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-70e888ef0a22cee087aefed2939bf0d01f8bc44f091b8aa4fd6b096a22a54b3b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,30980,30981</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26173197$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22375603$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Swami, Viren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stieger, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Amy Sunshine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nader, Ingo W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pietschnig, Jakob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voracek, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tovée, Martin J.</creatorcontrib><title>Further Investigation of the Validity and Reliability of the Photographic Figure Rating Scale for Body Image Assessment</title><title>Journal of personality assessment</title><addtitle>J Pers Assess</addtitle><description>Previous studies have not fully investigated the psychometric properties of the Photographic Figure Rating Scale (PFRS). In 2 studies, we report on the test-retest reliability and convergent validity of ratings derived from the PFRS. In Study 1, 322 female university students in Britain provided self-ratings on the PFRS and objectively measured body mass index (BMI); a subsample of 132 women also completed the task after 5 weeks. In Study 2, 243 women from the community in Austria completed the PFRS along with a battery of other body image scales. Results of Study 1 showed that ratings on the PFRS had good test-retest reliability (all rs > .87) and good convergent validity in relation to BMI. Results of Study 2 showed that PFRS-derived body dissatisfaction scores were significantly correlated with a range of body image variables. These results provide evidence for the convergent validity and good test-retest reliability of the PFRS.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Austria</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Body Image</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Convergent validity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>London</subject><subject>Personality. Affectivity</subject><subject>Photography</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychometric properties</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Self Concept</subject><subject>Self evaluation</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</subject><subject>University students</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0022-3891</issn><issn>1532-7752</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0U1v1DAQBmALUdFt4R8gZAkh9ZJl7DhfJ1QqFlaqBCot12iSjLOuknhrJ1T773HY3SJxAPlgOX5m5MnL2GsBSwE5vAeQMs4LsZQg5DJNQRbxM7YQSSyjLEvkc7aYSTSbU3bm_T0ACKHkC3YaKrMkhXjBHleTGzfk-Hr4SX40LY7GDtxqHr7yH9iZxow7jkPDb6gzWJluPh_uv23saFuH242p-cq0kyN-EzoMLf9eY0dcW8c_2mbH1z22xC-9J-97GsaX7ERj5-nVYT9nd6tPt1dfouuvn9dXl9dRrRI1RhlQnuekAaWsiSDPkDQ1YdSi0tCA0HlVK6WhEFWOqHSTVlCkQWOiqriKz9nFvu_W2YcpTFj2xtfUdTiQnXwpZB5nSigQ_6cghZAqrEDf_kXv7eSGMMhvBTJNBQSl9qp21ntHutw606PbBVTOGZbHDMs5w3KfYSh7c2g-VT01T0XH0AJ4dwDow1_WDofa-D8uFVksiiy4D3tnhpBDj4_WdU054q6z7lgU__MpvwAwqLdX</recordid><startdate>20120701</startdate><enddate>20120701</enddate><creator>Swami, Viren</creator><creator>Stieger, Stefan</creator><creator>Harris, Amy Sunshine</creator><creator>Nader, Ingo W.</creator><creator>Pietschnig, Jakob</creator><creator>Voracek, Martin</creator><creator>Tovée, Martin J.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120701</creationdate><title>Further Investigation of the Validity and Reliability of the Photographic Figure Rating Scale for Body Image Assessment</title><author>Swami, Viren ; Stieger, Stefan ; Harris, Amy Sunshine ; Nader, Ingo W. ; Pietschnig, Jakob ; Voracek, Martin ; Tovée, Martin J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-70e888ef0a22cee087aefed2939bf0d01f8bc44f091b8aa4fd6b096a22a54b3b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Austria</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Body Image</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Convergent validity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>London</topic><topic>Personality. Affectivity</topic><topic>Photography</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychometric properties</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Self Concept</topic><topic>Self evaluation</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</topic><topic>University students</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Swami, Viren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stieger, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Amy Sunshine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nader, Ingo W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pietschnig, Jakob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voracek, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tovée, Martin J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of personality assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Swami, Viren</au><au>Stieger, Stefan</au><au>Harris, Amy Sunshine</au><au>Nader, Ingo W.</au><au>Pietschnig, Jakob</au><au>Voracek, Martin</au><au>Tovée, Martin J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Further Investigation of the Validity and Reliability of the Photographic Figure Rating Scale for Body Image Assessment</atitle><jtitle>Journal of personality assessment</jtitle><addtitle>J Pers Assess</addtitle><date>2012-07-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>404</spage><epage>409</epage><pages>404-409</pages><issn>0022-3891</issn><eissn>1532-7752</eissn><coden>JNPABU</coden><abstract>Previous studies have not fully investigated the psychometric properties of the Photographic Figure Rating Scale (PFRS). In 2 studies, we report on the test-retest reliability and convergent validity of ratings derived from the PFRS. In Study 1, 322 female university students in Britain provided self-ratings on the PFRS and objectively measured body mass index (BMI); a subsample of 132 women also completed the task after 5 weeks. In Study 2, 243 women from the community in Austria completed the PFRS along with a battery of other body image scales. Results of Study 1 showed that ratings on the PFRS had good test-retest reliability (all rs > .87) and good convergent validity in relation to BMI. Results of Study 2 showed that PFRS-derived body dissatisfaction scores were significantly correlated with a range of body image variables. These results provide evidence for the convergent validity and good test-retest reliability of the PFRS.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><pmid>22375603</pmid><doi>10.1080/00223891.2012.660293</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-3891 |
| ispartof | Journal of personality assessment, 2012-07, Vol.94 (4), p.404-409 |
| issn | 0022-3891 1532-7752 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1021026610 |
| source | MEDLINE; Business Source Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
| subjects | Adult Austria Biological and medical sciences Body Image Body Mass Index Convergent validity Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans London Personality. Affectivity Photography Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Psychometric properties Psychometrics Quantitative psychology Reliability Reproducibility of Results Self Concept Self evaluation Surveys and Questionnaires - standards University students Validation studies Women Young Adult |
| title | Further Investigation of the Validity and Reliability of the Photographic Figure Rating Scale for Body Image Assessment |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T11%3A35%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Further%20Investigation%20of%20the%20Validity%20and%20Reliability%20of%20the%20Photographic%20Figure%20Rating%20Scale%20for%20Body%20Image%20Assessment&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20personality%20assessment&rft.au=Swami,%20Viren&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=404&rft.epage=409&rft.pages=404-409&rft.issn=0022-3891&rft.eissn=1532-7752&rft.coden=JNPABU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00223891.2012.660293&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2691101981%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1021026610&rft_id=info:pmid/22375603&rfr_iscdi=true |