Behavioral and neural correlates of delay of gratification 40 years later

Delayed gratification refers to the ability to wait over a period of time to receive a desired outcome. Given a choice between $10 today and $11 tomorrow, many people would opt for the immediately available reward.1 In an experiment with preschool children four decades ago, Mischel and colleagues2 o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of Neurosciences 2012-01, Vol.19 (1)
Hauptverfasser: Casey, B. J., Somerville, Leah H., Gotlib, Ian H., Ayduk, Ozlem, Franklin, Nicholas T., Askrend, Mary K., Jonides, John, Berman, Marc G., Wilson, Nicole L., Teslovich, Theresa, Glover, Gary, Zayas, Vivian, Mischel, Walter, Shodae, Yuichi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title Annals of Neurosciences
container_volume 19
creator Casey, B. J.
Somerville, Leah H.
Gotlib, Ian H.
Ayduk, Ozlem
Franklin, Nicholas T.
Askrend, Mary K.
Jonides, John
Berman, Marc G.
Wilson, Nicole L.
Teslovich, Theresa
Glover, Gary
Zayas, Vivian
Mischel, Walter
Shodae, Yuichi
description Delayed gratification refers to the ability to wait over a period of time to receive a desired outcome. Given a choice between $10 today and $11 tomorrow, many people would opt for the immediately available reward.1 In an experiment with preschool children four decades ago, Mischel and colleagues2 offered one piece of the preferred confectionary (e.g. a cookie) whenever the child wanted to eat it. However, the participants in that study were informed that if they could wait until the experimenter would return back (which could be up to 15 minutes), then they could have two pieces of the confectionary. Inter- individual differences were measured by the time for which the child could actually wait before giving in for the immediate, alluring reward.
doi_str_mv 10.5214/ans.0972.7531.180407
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1020568067</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2688360351</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-3dea6370416fa8a2a3ada754d09428e08ac47ce65455999d6761d3a90c54d6bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE1LAzEQhoMoWGr_gYeA510nH5tsjlrUFgpe9Bym2axuqZuabIX-exNrDpOXmYcZeAi5ZVA3nMl7HFMNRvNaN4LVrAUJ-oLMcktVgiu4_Mu8KuNrskhpB_kJwyWIGVk_-k_8GULEPcWxo6M_luhCjH6Pk0809LTL8VTCR8Rp6AeXaxipBHryGBMtYLwhVz3uk1_8_3Py_vz0tlxVm9eX9fJhUzlh2FSJzqMSGiRTPbbIUWCHupEdGMlbDy06qZ1XjWwaY0yntGKdQAMuM2q7FXNyd957iOH76NNkd-EYx3zSMuDQqBaUzpQ8Uy6GlKLv7SEOXxhPGbLFm83ebBFjixh79iZ-AeaxYBQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1020568067</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Behavioral and neural correlates of delay of gratification 40 years later</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Casey, B. J. ; Somerville, Leah H. ; Gotlib, Ian H. ; Ayduk, Ozlem ; Franklin, Nicholas T. ; Askrend, Mary K. ; Jonides, John ; Berman, Marc G. ; Wilson, Nicole L. ; Teslovich, Theresa ; Glover, Gary ; Zayas, Vivian ; Mischel, Walter ; Shodae, Yuichi</creator><creatorcontrib>Casey, B. J. ; Somerville, Leah H. ; Gotlib, Ian H. ; Ayduk, Ozlem ; Franklin, Nicholas T. ; Askrend, Mary K. ; Jonides, John ; Berman, Marc G. ; Wilson, Nicole L. ; Teslovich, Theresa ; Glover, Gary ; Zayas, Vivian ; Mischel, Walter ; Shodae, Yuichi</creatorcontrib><description>Delayed gratification refers to the ability to wait over a period of time to receive a desired outcome. Given a choice between $10 today and $11 tomorrow, many people would opt for the immediately available reward.1 In an experiment with preschool children four decades ago, Mischel and colleagues2 offered one piece of the preferred confectionary (e.g. a cookie) whenever the child wanted to eat it. However, the participants in that study were informed that if they could wait until the experimenter would return back (which could be up to 15 minutes), then they could have two pieces of the confectionary. Inter- individual differences were measured by the time for which the child could actually wait before giving in for the immediate, alluring reward.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0972-7531</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0976-3260</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5214/ans.0972.7531.180407</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chandigarh: Annals of Neurosciences</publisher><ispartof>Annals of Neurosciences, 2012-01, Vol.19 (1)</ispartof><rights>Copyright Annals of Neurosciences 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-3dea6370416fa8a2a3ada754d09428e08ac47ce65455999d6761d3a90c54d6bb3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Casey, B. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Somerville, Leah H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gotlib, Ian H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayduk, Ozlem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franklin, Nicholas T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Askrend, Mary K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jonides, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berman, Marc G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Nicole L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teslovich, Theresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glover, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zayas, Vivian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mischel, Walter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shodae, Yuichi</creatorcontrib><title>Behavioral and neural correlates of delay of gratification 40 years later</title><title>Annals of Neurosciences</title><description>Delayed gratification refers to the ability to wait over a period of time to receive a desired outcome. Given a choice between $10 today and $11 tomorrow, many people would opt for the immediately available reward.1 In an experiment with preschool children four decades ago, Mischel and colleagues2 offered one piece of the preferred confectionary (e.g. a cookie) whenever the child wanted to eat it. However, the participants in that study were informed that if they could wait until the experimenter would return back (which could be up to 15 minutes), then they could have two pieces of the confectionary. Inter- individual differences were measured by the time for which the child could actually wait before giving in for the immediate, alluring reward.</description><issn>0972-7531</issn><issn>0976-3260</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNotkE1LAzEQhoMoWGr_gYeA510nH5tsjlrUFgpe9Bym2axuqZuabIX-exNrDpOXmYcZeAi5ZVA3nMl7HFMNRvNaN4LVrAUJ-oLMcktVgiu4_Mu8KuNrskhpB_kJwyWIGVk_-k_8GULEPcWxo6M_luhCjH6Pk0809LTL8VTCR8Rp6AeXaxipBHryGBMtYLwhVz3uk1_8_3Py_vz0tlxVm9eX9fJhUzlh2FSJzqMSGiRTPbbIUWCHupEdGMlbDy06qZ1XjWwaY0yntGKdQAMuM2q7FXNyd957iOH76NNkd-EYx3zSMuDQqBaUzpQ8Uy6GlKLv7SEOXxhPGbLFm83ebBFjixh79iZ-AeaxYBQ</recordid><startdate>20120101</startdate><enddate>20120101</enddate><creator>Casey, B. J.</creator><creator>Somerville, Leah H.</creator><creator>Gotlib, Ian H.</creator><creator>Ayduk, Ozlem</creator><creator>Franklin, Nicholas T.</creator><creator>Askrend, Mary K.</creator><creator>Jonides, John</creator><creator>Berman, Marc G.</creator><creator>Wilson, Nicole L.</creator><creator>Teslovich, Theresa</creator><creator>Glover, Gary</creator><creator>Zayas, Vivian</creator><creator>Mischel, Walter</creator><creator>Shodae, Yuichi</creator><general>Annals of Neurosciences</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120101</creationdate><title>Behavioral and neural correlates of delay of gratification 40 years later</title><author>Casey, B. J. ; Somerville, Leah H. ; Gotlib, Ian H. ; Ayduk, Ozlem ; Franklin, Nicholas T. ; Askrend, Mary K. ; Jonides, John ; Berman, Marc G. ; Wilson, Nicole L. ; Teslovich, Theresa ; Glover, Gary ; Zayas, Vivian ; Mischel, Walter ; Shodae, Yuichi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-3dea6370416fa8a2a3ada754d09428e08ac47ce65455999d6761d3a90c54d6bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Casey, B. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Somerville, Leah H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gotlib, Ian H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayduk, Ozlem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franklin, Nicholas T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Askrend, Mary K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jonides, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berman, Marc G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Nicole L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teslovich, Theresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glover, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zayas, Vivian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mischel, Walter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shodae, Yuichi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Annals of Neurosciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Casey, B. J.</au><au>Somerville, Leah H.</au><au>Gotlib, Ian H.</au><au>Ayduk, Ozlem</au><au>Franklin, Nicholas T.</au><au>Askrend, Mary K.</au><au>Jonides, John</au><au>Berman, Marc G.</au><au>Wilson, Nicole L.</au><au>Teslovich, Theresa</au><au>Glover, Gary</au><au>Zayas, Vivian</au><au>Mischel, Walter</au><au>Shodae, Yuichi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Behavioral and neural correlates of delay of gratification 40 years later</atitle><jtitle>Annals of Neurosciences</jtitle><date>2012-01-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>0972-7531</issn><eissn>0976-3260</eissn><abstract>Delayed gratification refers to the ability to wait over a period of time to receive a desired outcome. Given a choice between $10 today and $11 tomorrow, many people would opt for the immediately available reward.1 In an experiment with preschool children four decades ago, Mischel and colleagues2 offered one piece of the preferred confectionary (e.g. a cookie) whenever the child wanted to eat it. However, the participants in that study were informed that if they could wait until the experimenter would return back (which could be up to 15 minutes), then they could have two pieces of the confectionary. Inter- individual differences were measured by the time for which the child could actually wait before giving in for the immediate, alluring reward.</abstract><cop>Chandigarh</cop><pub>Annals of Neurosciences</pub><doi>10.5214/ans.0972.7531.180407</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0972-7531
ispartof Annals of Neurosciences, 2012-01, Vol.19 (1)
issn 0972-7531
0976-3260
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1020568067
source PubMed Central; EZB Electronic Journals Library
title Behavioral and neural correlates of delay of gratification 40 years later
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T17%3A01%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Behavioral%20and%20neural%20correlates%20of%20delay%20of%20gratification%2040%20years%20later&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20Neurosciences&rft.au=Casey,%20B.%20J.&rft.date=2012-01-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=0972-7531&rft.eissn=0976-3260&rft_id=info:doi/10.5214/ans.0972.7531.180407&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2688360351%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1020568067&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true