Validation of a New Functional Design of Automatic Protection Systems at Level Crossings with Model-Checking Techniques
Level crossings (LCs) are considered to be a safety black spot for railway transportation since LC accidents/incidents dominate the railway accident landscape in Europe, thus considerably damaging the reputation of railway transportation. LC accidents cause more than 300 fatalities every year throug...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems 2012-06, Vol.13 (2), p.714-723 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 723 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 714 |
container_title | IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Mekki, A. Ghazel, M. Toguyeni, A. |
description | Level crossings (LCs) are considered to be a safety black spot for railway transportation since LC accidents/incidents dominate the railway accident landscape in Europe, thus considerably damaging the reputation of railway transportation. LC accidents cause more than 300 fatalities every year throughout Europe, which represents up to 50% of all deaths for railways. That is why LC safety is a major concern for railway stakeholders in particular and transportation authorities in general. LCs with an important traffic moment 1 are generally equipped with automatic protection systems (APSs). Here, we focus on two main risky situations, which have caused several accidents at LCs. The first is the short opening duration between successive closure cycles relative to trains passing in opposite directions. The second is the long LC closure duration relative to slow trains. In this paper, we suggest a new APS architecture that prevents these kinds of scenarios and therefore increases the global safety of LCs. To validate the new architecture, a method based on well-formalized means has been developed, allowing us to obtain sound and trustworthy results. Our method uses a formal notation, i.e., timed automata (TA), for the specification phase and the model-checking formal technique for the verification process. All the steps are progressively discussed and illustrated. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TITS.2011.2178238 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1018464216</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6134674</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>1365136991</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-53d9ed00ab40e1b7f31252a892c2e5e75c71cc15c67bf3aaa13f810fafbe39963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUlPwzAQhSMEEusPQFwscYFDyowdZzlWZWmlskgUrpbrTqghjSFOqPj3xBRx4GDZev5m0XtRdIwwQITiYjaZPQ44IA44ZjkX-Va0h1LmMQCm2-HNk7gACbvRvvevvZpIxL1o_awru9CtdTVzJdPsjtbsuqtNUHTFLsnbl5-vYde6VQ8a9tC4ln4A9vjlW1p5pls2pU-q2Khx3tv6xbO1bZfs1i2oikdLMm-9yGZklrX96MgfRjulrjwd_d4H0dP11Ww0jqf3N5PRcBobkUIbS7EoaAGg5wkQzrNSIJdc5wU3nCRl0mRoDEqTZvNSaK1RlDlCqcs5iaJIxUF0vum71JV6b-xKN1_KaavGw6kKGkAOCAI-sWfPNux748KOrVpZb6iqdE2u8wpFKvtTFAE9_Ye-uq7pDespwDxJE45hOG4oE1xpqPzbAEGF2FSITYXY1G9sfc3JpsYS0R-fokjSLBHfXhKTYw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1018464216</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of a New Functional Design of Automatic Protection Systems at Level Crossings with Model-Checking Techniques</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Mekki, A. ; Ghazel, M. ; Toguyeni, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mekki, A. ; Ghazel, M. ; Toguyeni, A.</creatorcontrib><description>Level crossings (LCs) are considered to be a safety black spot for railway transportation since LC accidents/incidents dominate the railway accident landscape in Europe, thus considerably damaging the reputation of railway transportation. LC accidents cause more than 300 fatalities every year throughout Europe, which represents up to 50% of all deaths for railways. That is why LC safety is a major concern for railway stakeholders in particular and transportation authorities in general. LCs with an important traffic moment 1 are generally equipped with automatic protection systems (APSs). Here, we focus on two main risky situations, which have caused several accidents at LCs. The first is the short opening duration between successive closure cycles relative to trains passing in opposite directions. The second is the long LC closure duration relative to slow trains. In this paper, we suggest a new APS architecture that prevents these kinds of scenarios and therefore increases the global safety of LCs. To validate the new architecture, a method based on well-formalized means has been developed, allowing us to obtain sound and trustworthy results. Our method uses a formal notation, i.e., timed automata (TA), for the specification phase and the model-checking formal technique for the verification process. All the steps are progressively discussed and illustrated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1524-9050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-0016</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2011.2178238</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITISFG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Accidents ; Automatic Control Engineering ; Computer Science ; Delay ; Europe ; Level crossing (LC) ; model checking ; Protection systems ; Rail transportation ; Railroads ; Railway engineering ; Railways ; Roads ; Safety ; Sensors ; specification ; timed automata (TA) ; Trains ; Transportation ; verification and validation</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems, 2012-06, Vol.13 (2), p.714-723</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) Jun 2012</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-53d9ed00ab40e1b7f31252a892c2e5e75c71cc15c67bf3aaa13f810fafbe39963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-53d9ed00ab40e1b7f31252a892c2e5e75c71cc15c67bf3aaa13f810fafbe39963</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1160-7997</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6134674$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,792,881,27903,27904,54736</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6134674$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-00801030$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mekki, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghazel, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toguyeni, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of a New Functional Design of Automatic Protection Systems at Level Crossings with Model-Checking Techniques</title><title>IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems</title><addtitle>TITS</addtitle><description>Level crossings (LCs) are considered to be a safety black spot for railway transportation since LC accidents/incidents dominate the railway accident landscape in Europe, thus considerably damaging the reputation of railway transportation. LC accidents cause more than 300 fatalities every year throughout Europe, which represents up to 50% of all deaths for railways. That is why LC safety is a major concern for railway stakeholders in particular and transportation authorities in general. LCs with an important traffic moment 1 are generally equipped with automatic protection systems (APSs). Here, we focus on two main risky situations, which have caused several accidents at LCs. The first is the short opening duration between successive closure cycles relative to trains passing in opposite directions. The second is the long LC closure duration relative to slow trains. In this paper, we suggest a new APS architecture that prevents these kinds of scenarios and therefore increases the global safety of LCs. To validate the new architecture, a method based on well-formalized means has been developed, allowing us to obtain sound and trustworthy results. Our method uses a formal notation, i.e., timed automata (TA), for the specification phase and the model-checking formal technique for the verification process. All the steps are progressively discussed and illustrated.</description><subject>Accidents</subject><subject>Automatic Control Engineering</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Delay</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Level crossing (LC)</subject><subject>model checking</subject><subject>Protection systems</subject><subject>Rail transportation</subject><subject>Railroads</subject><subject>Railway engineering</subject><subject>Railways</subject><subject>Roads</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>specification</subject><subject>timed automata (TA)</subject><subject>Trains</subject><subject>Transportation</subject><subject>verification and validation</subject><issn>1524-9050</issn><issn>1558-0016</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUlPwzAQhSMEEusPQFwscYFDyowdZzlWZWmlskgUrpbrTqghjSFOqPj3xBRx4GDZev5m0XtRdIwwQITiYjaZPQ44IA44ZjkX-Va0h1LmMQCm2-HNk7gACbvRvvevvZpIxL1o_awru9CtdTVzJdPsjtbsuqtNUHTFLsnbl5-vYde6VQ8a9tC4ln4A9vjlW1p5pls2pU-q2Khx3tv6xbO1bZfs1i2oikdLMm-9yGZklrX96MgfRjulrjwd_d4H0dP11Ww0jqf3N5PRcBobkUIbS7EoaAGg5wkQzrNSIJdc5wU3nCRl0mRoDEqTZvNSaK1RlDlCqcs5iaJIxUF0vum71JV6b-xKN1_KaavGw6kKGkAOCAI-sWfPNux748KOrVpZb6iqdE2u8wpFKvtTFAE9_Ye-uq7pDespwDxJE45hOG4oE1xpqPzbAEGF2FSITYXY1G9sfc3JpsYS0R-fokjSLBHfXhKTYw</recordid><startdate>20120601</startdate><enddate>20120601</enddate><creator>Mekki, A.</creator><creator>Ghazel, M.</creator><creator>Toguyeni, A.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1160-7997</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20120601</creationdate><title>Validation of a New Functional Design of Automatic Protection Systems at Level Crossings with Model-Checking Techniques</title><author>Mekki, A. ; Ghazel, M. ; Toguyeni, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-53d9ed00ab40e1b7f31252a892c2e5e75c71cc15c67bf3aaa13f810fafbe39963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Accidents</topic><topic>Automatic Control Engineering</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Delay</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Level crossing (LC)</topic><topic>model checking</topic><topic>Protection systems</topic><topic>Rail transportation</topic><topic>Railroads</topic><topic>Railway engineering</topic><topic>Railways</topic><topic>Roads</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>specification</topic><topic>timed automata (TA)</topic><topic>Trains</topic><topic>Transportation</topic><topic>verification and validation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mekki, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghazel, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toguyeni, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mekki, A.</au><au>Ghazel, M.</au><au>Toguyeni, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of a New Functional Design of Automatic Protection Systems at Level Crossings with Model-Checking Techniques</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems</jtitle><stitle>TITS</stitle><date>2012-06-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>714</spage><epage>723</epage><pages>714-723</pages><issn>1524-9050</issn><eissn>1558-0016</eissn><coden>ITISFG</coden><abstract>Level crossings (LCs) are considered to be a safety black spot for railway transportation since LC accidents/incidents dominate the railway accident landscape in Europe, thus considerably damaging the reputation of railway transportation. LC accidents cause more than 300 fatalities every year throughout Europe, which represents up to 50% of all deaths for railways. That is why LC safety is a major concern for railway stakeholders in particular and transportation authorities in general. LCs with an important traffic moment 1 are generally equipped with automatic protection systems (APSs). Here, we focus on two main risky situations, which have caused several accidents at LCs. The first is the short opening duration between successive closure cycles relative to trains passing in opposite directions. The second is the long LC closure duration relative to slow trains. In this paper, we suggest a new APS architecture that prevents these kinds of scenarios and therefore increases the global safety of LCs. To validate the new architecture, a method based on well-formalized means has been developed, allowing us to obtain sound and trustworthy results. Our method uses a formal notation, i.e., timed automata (TA), for the specification phase and the model-checking formal technique for the verification process. All the steps are progressively discussed and illustrated.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TITS.2011.2178238</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1160-7997</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1524-9050 |
ispartof | IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems, 2012-06, Vol.13 (2), p.714-723 |
issn | 1524-9050 1558-0016 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1018464216 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
subjects | Accidents Automatic Control Engineering Computer Science Delay Europe Level crossing (LC) model checking Protection systems Rail transportation Railroads Railway engineering Railways Roads Safety Sensors specification timed automata (TA) Trains Transportation verification and validation |
title | Validation of a New Functional Design of Automatic Protection Systems at Level Crossings with Model-Checking Techniques |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T23%3A46%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20a%20New%20Functional%20Design%20of%20Automatic%20Protection%20Systems%20at%20Level%20Crossings%20with%20Model-Checking%20Techniques&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20intelligent%20transportation%20systems&rft.au=Mekki,%20A.&rft.date=2012-06-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=714&rft.epage=723&rft.pages=714-723&rft.issn=1524-9050&rft.eissn=1558-0016&rft.coden=ITISFG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TITS.2011.2178238&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E1365136991%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1018464216&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6134674&rfr_iscdi=true |