A comparison between patient self-report and radiation therapists’ ability to identify anxiety and distress in head and neck cancer patients requiring immobilization for radiation therapy
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to identify the incidence of anxiety and distress among patients requiring immobilization during radiation therapy to the head and neck region; then to compare this with radiation therapists’ ability to identify anxiety in the same group of patients. Materials a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of radiotherapy in practice 2012-06, Vol.11 (2), p.74-82 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 82 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 74 |
container_title | Journal of radiotherapy in practice |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Oultram, S. Findlay, N. Clover, K. Cross, L. Ponman, L. Adams, C. |
description | Purpose: The purpose of this study is to identify the incidence of anxiety and distress among patients requiring immobilization during radiation therapy to the head and neck region; then to compare this with radiation therapists’ ability to identify anxiety in the same group of patients. Materials and methods: Data from a sample of 70 patients requiring an immobilization mask participated in this study. Patient self-report assessments and radiation therapists’ ratings were recorded at two time points, CT-Simulation and fraction 1 of treatment. Self-reported patient anxiety was assessed with the Brief Symptom Inventory-18. To determine radiation therapists’ ratings of patient anxiety, two rating scales were developed. Results: Patient self-report identified anxiety in 16% and 14% of patients at CT Simulation and fraction 1 of treatment, respectively. Radiation therapists identified anxiety in 24% patients at time point one and in 44% of patients at time point two. Conclusion: There was slight agreement between patient self-reported levels of anxiety and radiation therapists’ ratings of patient anxiety. This study suggests that there is scope for further investigation into the identification and management of anxiety and distress in head and neck cancer patients requiring immobilization. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1460396911000136 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1017870797</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1460396911000136</cupid><sourcerecordid>2674449071</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-405517ec057f6c47484049a159867be83f8b3f8cfd84ef197f95c6aa7536e6543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9KxDAQxosoqKsP4C3guZrQNGmPsvgPFjyo5yVNJxrdJt1JFq0nX8OH8WV8ErO7CsLiIUyY-X3fBzNZdsToCaNMnt4yLmhRi5oxSikrxFa2l1oyZ6xg26s_zZfz3Ww_hCdKOedU7mWfZ0T7rldog3ekgfgC4EivogUXSYCZyRF6j5Eo1xJUrU2jRMZHQNXbEMPX-wdRjZ3ZOJDoiW2T0Joh8a8W4rDStQlECIFYRx5BtaumA_1MtHIa8DcwEIT5wqJ1D8R2nV_avq0DjceN-OEg2zFqFuDwp46y-4vzu_FVPrm5vB6fTXJdCBpzTsuSSdC0lEZoLnnFKa8VK-tKyAaqwlRNetq0FQfDamnqUgulZFkIECUvRtnx2rdHP19AiNMnv0CXIqfL7VeSylomiq0pjT4EBDPt0XYKhwStuOnGlZKm-NGorkHbPsBf6_9U39-ama4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1017870797</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison between patient self-report and radiation therapists’ ability to identify anxiety and distress in head and neck cancer patients requiring immobilization for radiation therapy</title><source>Cambridge Journals</source><creator>Oultram, S. ; Findlay, N. ; Clover, K. ; Cross, L. ; Ponman, L. ; Adams, C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Oultram, S. ; Findlay, N. ; Clover, K. ; Cross, L. ; Ponman, L. ; Adams, C.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: The purpose of this study is to identify the incidence of anxiety and distress among patients requiring immobilization during radiation therapy to the head and neck region; then to compare this with radiation therapists’ ability to identify anxiety in the same group of patients. Materials and methods: Data from a sample of 70 patients requiring an immobilization mask participated in this study. Patient self-report assessments and radiation therapists’ ratings were recorded at two time points, CT-Simulation and fraction 1 of treatment. Self-reported patient anxiety was assessed with the Brief Symptom Inventory-18. To determine radiation therapists’ ratings of patient anxiety, two rating scales were developed. Results: Patient self-report identified anxiety in 16% and 14% of patients at CT Simulation and fraction 1 of treatment, respectively. Radiation therapists identified anxiety in 24% patients at time point one and in 44% of patients at time point two. Conclusion: There was slight agreement between patient self-reported levels of anxiety and radiation therapists’ ratings of patient anxiety. This study suggests that there is scope for further investigation into the identification and management of anxiety and distress in head and neck cancer patients requiring immobilization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1460-3969</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-1131</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1460396911000136</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Anxiety</subject><ispartof>Journal of radiotherapy in practice, 2012-06, Vol.11 (2), p.74-82</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-405517ec057f6c47484049a159867be83f8b3f8cfd84ef197f95c6aa7536e6543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-405517ec057f6c47484049a159867be83f8b3f8cfd84ef197f95c6aa7536e6543</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1460396911000136/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oultram, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Findlay, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clover, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cross, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ponman, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, C.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison between patient self-report and radiation therapists’ ability to identify anxiety and distress in head and neck cancer patients requiring immobilization for radiation therapy</title><title>Journal of radiotherapy in practice</title><description>Purpose: The purpose of this study is to identify the incidence of anxiety and distress among patients requiring immobilization during radiation therapy to the head and neck region; then to compare this with radiation therapists’ ability to identify anxiety in the same group of patients. Materials and methods: Data from a sample of 70 patients requiring an immobilization mask participated in this study. Patient self-report assessments and radiation therapists’ ratings were recorded at two time points, CT-Simulation and fraction 1 of treatment. Self-reported patient anxiety was assessed with the Brief Symptom Inventory-18. To determine radiation therapists’ ratings of patient anxiety, two rating scales were developed. Results: Patient self-report identified anxiety in 16% and 14% of patients at CT Simulation and fraction 1 of treatment, respectively. Radiation therapists identified anxiety in 24% patients at time point one and in 44% of patients at time point two. Conclusion: There was slight agreement between patient self-reported levels of anxiety and radiation therapists’ ratings of patient anxiety. This study suggests that there is scope for further investigation into the identification and management of anxiety and distress in head and neck cancer patients requiring immobilization.</description><subject>Anxiety</subject><issn>1460-3969</issn><issn>1467-1131</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9KxDAQxosoqKsP4C3guZrQNGmPsvgPFjyo5yVNJxrdJt1JFq0nX8OH8WV8ErO7CsLiIUyY-X3fBzNZdsToCaNMnt4yLmhRi5oxSikrxFa2l1oyZ6xg26s_zZfz3Ww_hCdKOedU7mWfZ0T7rldog3ekgfgC4EivogUXSYCZyRF6j5Eo1xJUrU2jRMZHQNXbEMPX-wdRjZ3ZOJDoiW2T0Joh8a8W4rDStQlECIFYRx5BtaumA_1MtHIa8DcwEIT5wqJ1D8R2nV_avq0DjceN-OEg2zFqFuDwp46y-4vzu_FVPrm5vB6fTXJdCBpzTsuSSdC0lEZoLnnFKa8VK-tKyAaqwlRNetq0FQfDamnqUgulZFkIECUvRtnx2rdHP19AiNMnv0CXIqfL7VeSylomiq0pjT4EBDPt0XYKhwStuOnGlZKm-NGorkHbPsBf6_9U39-ama4</recordid><startdate>201206</startdate><enddate>201206</enddate><creator>Oultram, S.</creator><creator>Findlay, N.</creator><creator>Clover, K.</creator><creator>Cross, L.</creator><creator>Ponman, L.</creator><creator>Adams, C.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201206</creationdate><title>A comparison between patient self-report and radiation therapists’ ability to identify anxiety and distress in head and neck cancer patients requiring immobilization for radiation therapy</title><author>Oultram, S. ; Findlay, N. ; Clover, K. ; Cross, L. ; Ponman, L. ; Adams, C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-405517ec057f6c47484049a159867be83f8b3f8cfd84ef197f95c6aa7536e6543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Anxiety</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oultram, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Findlay, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clover, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cross, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ponman, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Journal of radiotherapy in practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oultram, S.</au><au>Findlay, N.</au><au>Clover, K.</au><au>Cross, L.</au><au>Ponman, L.</au><au>Adams, C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison between patient self-report and radiation therapists’ ability to identify anxiety and distress in head and neck cancer patients requiring immobilization for radiation therapy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of radiotherapy in practice</jtitle><date>2012-06</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>74</spage><epage>82</epage><pages>74-82</pages><issn>1460-3969</issn><eissn>1467-1131</eissn><abstract>Purpose: The purpose of this study is to identify the incidence of anxiety and distress among patients requiring immobilization during radiation therapy to the head and neck region; then to compare this with radiation therapists’ ability to identify anxiety in the same group of patients. Materials and methods: Data from a sample of 70 patients requiring an immobilization mask participated in this study. Patient self-report assessments and radiation therapists’ ratings were recorded at two time points, CT-Simulation and fraction 1 of treatment. Self-reported patient anxiety was assessed with the Brief Symptom Inventory-18. To determine radiation therapists’ ratings of patient anxiety, two rating scales were developed. Results: Patient self-report identified anxiety in 16% and 14% of patients at CT Simulation and fraction 1 of treatment, respectively. Radiation therapists identified anxiety in 24% patients at time point one and in 44% of patients at time point two. Conclusion: There was slight agreement between patient self-reported levels of anxiety and radiation therapists’ ratings of patient anxiety. This study suggests that there is scope for further investigation into the identification and management of anxiety and distress in head and neck cancer patients requiring immobilization.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1460396911000136</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1460-3969 |
ispartof | Journal of radiotherapy in practice, 2012-06, Vol.11 (2), p.74-82 |
issn | 1460-3969 1467-1131 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1017870797 |
source | Cambridge Journals |
subjects | Anxiety |
title | A comparison between patient self-report and radiation therapists’ ability to identify anxiety and distress in head and neck cancer patients requiring immobilization for radiation therapy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T20%3A35%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20between%20patient%20self-report%20and%20radiation%20therapists%E2%80%99%20ability%20to%20identify%20anxiety%20and%20distress%20in%20head%20and%20neck%20cancer%20patients%20requiring%20immobilization%20for%20radiation%20therapy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20radiotherapy%20in%20practice&rft.au=Oultram,%20S.&rft.date=2012-06&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=74&rft.epage=82&rft.pages=74-82&rft.issn=1460-3969&rft.eissn=1467-1131&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1460396911000136&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2674449071%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1017870797&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1460396911000136&rfr_iscdi=true |