Online Learning Based on Essential Concepts and Formative Assessment
Background Engineers are increasingly learning from online courses, in school and the workplace, using online social and informational networks for instruction and to access expertise. Small effective changes in online learning can have large cumulative impact through‐out an organization. Purpose (H...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of engineering education (Washington, D.C.) D.C.), 2012-04, Vol.101 (2), p.244-287 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 287 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 244 |
container_title | Journal of engineering education (Washington, D.C.) |
container_volume | 101 |
creator | Lawton, Daryl Vye, Nancy Bransford, John Sanders, Elizabeth Richey, Michael French, David Stephens, Rick |
description | Background
Engineers are increasingly learning from online courses, in school and the workplace, using online social and informational networks for instruction and to access expertise. Small effective changes in online learning can have large cumulative impact through‐out an organization.
Purpose (Hypothesis)
This study is a part of a research effort between industry and learning scientists to develop an evidence‐based methodology for online learning. We investigate how learning outcomes are impacted by online courses designed to support feedback and formative assessment during learning.
Design/Method
We compared two versions of an online course derived from identical resources. The new course (treatment) used integrated formative assessments to provide feedback to students during learning; focused video resources to anchor the formative assessments; and an instructional design process based on essential concepts to organize the overall design. The course was implemented with a freely available Learning Management System (LMS).
Results
Treatment course participants learned more overall than did control course participants, with more positive attitudes towards the course content and their future learning. Learning had less dependence on initial knowledge. The collaboration capabilities of the LMS supported course development, but had limited spontaneous use by students during the experiment.
Conclusions
The paper demonstrates that formative feedback and design methods which stress essential concepts can make significant differences in learning outcomes in online courses, a straightforward format for implementation, and ways of measuring effectiveness. Areas for further work are integrating feedback with authentic tasks and mining the data produced by student's online activities. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00050.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1016488788</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2670740751</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3830-5d86bf87eb018009f0b7dc48b6da62218a040b9f9fb8f480c0150e6b46f421d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkEFPwjAUgBujiYj-h0XPm69d13UmHgAHaogkqOHYdFtnNqHDdij8e7uMePf0Dv2-vpcPoWsMAQYgt3VAMON-wkMICGAStBkARBDsT9Dg7-kUDTCwxKdxCOfowtraQQmweIAeFnpdaeXNlTS60h_eWFpVeI32UmuVbiu59iaNztW2tZ7UhTdtzEa21bfyRg6wduOgS3RWyrVVV8c5RO_T9G3y6M8Xs6fJaO7nobvCjwrOspLHKgPM3QElZHGRU56xQjJCMJdAIUvKpMx4STnkgCNQLKOspAQXNByim_7frWm-dsq2om52RruVAgNmlPOYc0fd9VRuGmuNKsXWVBtpDg4SXTVRiy6N6NKIrpo4VhN7J9_38k-1Vod_mOI5TSNwvt_7lW3V_s-X5lOwOIwjsXqZieWUjOlyNRav4S9qOoIx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1016488788</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Online Learning Based on Essential Concepts and Formative Assessment</title><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Lawton, Daryl ; Vye, Nancy ; Bransford, John ; Sanders, Elizabeth ; Richey, Michael ; French, David ; Stephens, Rick</creator><creatorcontrib>Lawton, Daryl ; Vye, Nancy ; Bransford, John ; Sanders, Elizabeth ; Richey, Michael ; French, David ; Stephens, Rick</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Engineers are increasingly learning from online courses, in school and the workplace, using online social and informational networks for instruction and to access expertise. Small effective changes in online learning can have large cumulative impact through‐out an organization.
Purpose (Hypothesis)
This study is a part of a research effort between industry and learning scientists to develop an evidence‐based methodology for online learning. We investigate how learning outcomes are impacted by online courses designed to support feedback and formative assessment during learning.
Design/Method
We compared two versions of an online course derived from identical resources. The new course (treatment) used integrated formative assessments to provide feedback to students during learning; focused video resources to anchor the formative assessments; and an instructional design process based on essential concepts to organize the overall design. The course was implemented with a freely available Learning Management System (LMS).
Results
Treatment course participants learned more overall than did control course participants, with more positive attitudes towards the course content and their future learning. Learning had less dependence on initial knowledge. The collaboration capabilities of the LMS supported course development, but had limited spontaneous use by students during the experiment.
Conclusions
The paper demonstrates that formative feedback and design methods which stress essential concepts can make significant differences in learning outcomes in online courses, a straightforward format for implementation, and ways of measuring effectiveness. Areas for further work are integrating feedback with authentic tasks and mining the data produced by student's online activities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1069-4730</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-9830</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00050.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEEDEQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aerospace engineering ; Course Content ; Distance learning ; Education ; Engineering Education ; Engineers ; formative assessment ; Instructional design ; Learning Activities ; Online Courses ; Online instruction ; online learning ; randomized experiment ; Studies ; Teaching Methods</subject><ispartof>Journal of engineering education (Washington, D.C.), 2012-04, Vol.101 (2), p.244-287</ispartof><rights>2012 American Society for Engineering Education</rights><rights>Copyright AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR ENGINEERING EDUCATION Apr 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3830-5d86bf87eb018009f0b7dc48b6da62218a040b9f9fb8f480c0150e6b46f421d43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3830-5d86bf87eb018009f0b7dc48b6da62218a040b9f9fb8f480c0150e6b46f421d43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fj.2168-9830.2012.tb00050.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fj.2168-9830.2012.tb00050.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lawton, Daryl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vye, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bransford, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanders, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richey, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>French, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephens, Rick</creatorcontrib><title>Online Learning Based on Essential Concepts and Formative Assessment</title><title>Journal of engineering education (Washington, D.C.)</title><description>Background
Engineers are increasingly learning from online courses, in school and the workplace, using online social and informational networks for instruction and to access expertise. Small effective changes in online learning can have large cumulative impact through‐out an organization.
Purpose (Hypothesis)
This study is a part of a research effort between industry and learning scientists to develop an evidence‐based methodology for online learning. We investigate how learning outcomes are impacted by online courses designed to support feedback and formative assessment during learning.
Design/Method
We compared two versions of an online course derived from identical resources. The new course (treatment) used integrated formative assessments to provide feedback to students during learning; focused video resources to anchor the formative assessments; and an instructional design process based on essential concepts to organize the overall design. The course was implemented with a freely available Learning Management System (LMS).
Results
Treatment course participants learned more overall than did control course participants, with more positive attitudes towards the course content and their future learning. Learning had less dependence on initial knowledge. The collaboration capabilities of the LMS supported course development, but had limited spontaneous use by students during the experiment.
Conclusions
The paper demonstrates that formative feedback and design methods which stress essential concepts can make significant differences in learning outcomes in online courses, a straightforward format for implementation, and ways of measuring effectiveness. Areas for further work are integrating feedback with authentic tasks and mining the data produced by student's online activities.</description><subject>Aerospace engineering</subject><subject>Course Content</subject><subject>Distance learning</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Engineering Education</subject><subject>Engineers</subject><subject>formative assessment</subject><subject>Instructional design</subject><subject>Learning Activities</subject><subject>Online Courses</subject><subject>Online instruction</subject><subject>online learning</subject><subject>randomized experiment</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><issn>1069-4730</issn><issn>2168-9830</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkEFPwjAUgBujiYj-h0XPm69d13UmHgAHaogkqOHYdFtnNqHDdij8e7uMePf0Dv2-vpcPoWsMAQYgt3VAMON-wkMICGAStBkARBDsT9Dg7-kUDTCwxKdxCOfowtraQQmweIAeFnpdaeXNlTS60h_eWFpVeI32UmuVbiu59iaNztW2tZ7UhTdtzEa21bfyRg6wduOgS3RWyrVVV8c5RO_T9G3y6M8Xs6fJaO7nobvCjwrOspLHKgPM3QElZHGRU56xQjJCMJdAIUvKpMx4STnkgCNQLKOspAQXNByim_7frWm-dsq2om52RruVAgNmlPOYc0fd9VRuGmuNKsXWVBtpDg4SXTVRiy6N6NKIrpo4VhN7J9_38k-1Vod_mOI5TSNwvt_7lW3V_s-X5lOwOIwjsXqZieWUjOlyNRav4S9qOoIx</recordid><startdate>201204</startdate><enddate>201204</enddate><creator>Lawton, Daryl</creator><creator>Vye, Nancy</creator><creator>Bransford, John</creator><creator>Sanders, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Richey, Michael</creator><creator>French, David</creator><creator>Stephens, Rick</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0W</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201204</creationdate><title>Online Learning Based on Essential Concepts and Formative Assessment</title><author>Lawton, Daryl ; Vye, Nancy ; Bransford, John ; Sanders, Elizabeth ; Richey, Michael ; French, David ; Stephens, Rick</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3830-5d86bf87eb018009f0b7dc48b6da62218a040b9f9fb8f480c0150e6b46f421d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Aerospace engineering</topic><topic>Course Content</topic><topic>Distance learning</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Engineering Education</topic><topic>Engineers</topic><topic>formative assessment</topic><topic>Instructional design</topic><topic>Learning Activities</topic><topic>Online Courses</topic><topic>Online instruction</topic><topic>online learning</topic><topic>randomized experiment</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lawton, Daryl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vye, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bransford, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanders, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richey, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>French, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephens, Rick</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DELNET Engineering & Technology Collection</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of engineering education (Washington, D.C.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lawton, Daryl</au><au>Vye, Nancy</au><au>Bransford, John</au><au>Sanders, Elizabeth</au><au>Richey, Michael</au><au>French, David</au><au>Stephens, Rick</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Online Learning Based on Essential Concepts and Formative Assessment</atitle><jtitle>Journal of engineering education (Washington, D.C.)</jtitle><date>2012-04</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>244</spage><epage>287</epage><pages>244-287</pages><issn>1069-4730</issn><eissn>2168-9830</eissn><coden>JEEDEQ</coden><abstract>Background
Engineers are increasingly learning from online courses, in school and the workplace, using online social and informational networks for instruction and to access expertise. Small effective changes in online learning can have large cumulative impact through‐out an organization.
Purpose (Hypothesis)
This study is a part of a research effort between industry and learning scientists to develop an evidence‐based methodology for online learning. We investigate how learning outcomes are impacted by online courses designed to support feedback and formative assessment during learning.
Design/Method
We compared two versions of an online course derived from identical resources. The new course (treatment) used integrated formative assessments to provide feedback to students during learning; focused video resources to anchor the formative assessments; and an instructional design process based on essential concepts to organize the overall design. The course was implemented with a freely available Learning Management System (LMS).
Results
Treatment course participants learned more overall than did control course participants, with more positive attitudes towards the course content and their future learning. Learning had less dependence on initial knowledge. The collaboration capabilities of the LMS supported course development, but had limited spontaneous use by students during the experiment.
Conclusions
The paper demonstrates that formative feedback and design methods which stress essential concepts can make significant differences in learning outcomes in online courses, a straightforward format for implementation, and ways of measuring effectiveness. Areas for further work are integrating feedback with authentic tasks and mining the data produced by student's online activities.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00050.x</doi><tpages>44</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1069-4730 |
ispartof | Journal of engineering education (Washington, D.C.), 2012-04, Vol.101 (2), p.244-287 |
issn | 1069-4730 2168-9830 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1016488788 |
source | EBSCOhost Education Source; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Aerospace engineering Course Content Distance learning Education Engineering Education Engineers formative assessment Instructional design Learning Activities Online Courses Online instruction online learning randomized experiment Studies Teaching Methods |
title | Online Learning Based on Essential Concepts and Formative Assessment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T18%3A32%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Online%20Learning%20Based%20on%20Essential%20Concepts%20and%20Formative%20Assessment&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20engineering%20education%20(Washington,%20D.C.)&rft.au=Lawton,%20Daryl&rft.date=2012-04&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=244&rft.epage=287&rft.pages=244-287&rft.issn=1069-4730&rft.eissn=2168-9830&rft.coden=JEEDEQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00050.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2670740751%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1016488788&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |