Assessment of Two Nonnative Poeciliid Fishes for Monitoring Selenium Exposure in the Endangered Desert Pupfish

We assessed the suitability of two nonnative poeciliid fishes—western mosquitofish ( Gambusia affinis ) and sailfin mollies ( Poecilia latipinna )—for monitoring selenium exposure in desert pupfish ( Cyprinodon macularius ). Our investigation was prompted by a need to avoid lethal take of an endange...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water, air, and soil pollution air, and soil pollution, 2012-05, Vol.223 (4), p.1671-1683
Hauptverfasser: Saiki, Michael K., Martin, Barbara A., May, Thomas W., Brumbaugh, William G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1683
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1671
container_title Water, air, and soil pollution
container_volume 223
creator Saiki, Michael K.
Martin, Barbara A.
May, Thomas W.
Brumbaugh, William G.
description We assessed the suitability of two nonnative poeciliid fishes—western mosquitofish ( Gambusia affinis ) and sailfin mollies ( Poecilia latipinna )—for monitoring selenium exposure in desert pupfish ( Cyprinodon macularius ). Our investigation was prompted by a need to avoid lethal take of an endangered species (pupfish) when sampling fish for chemical analysis. Total selenium (SeTot) concentrations in both poeciliids were highly correlated with SeTot concentrations in pupfish. However, mean SeTot concentrations varied among fish species, with higher concentrations measured in mosquitofish than in mollies and pupfish from one of three sampled agricultural drains. Moreover, regression equations describing the relationship of selenomethionine to SeTot differed between mosquitofish and pupfish, but not between mollies and pupfish. Because selenium accumulates in animals primarily through dietary exposure, we examined fish trophic relationships by measuring stable isotopes ( δ 13 C and δ 15 N) and gut contents. According to δ 13 C measurements, the trophic pathway leading to mosquitofish was more carbon-depleted than trophic pathways leading to mollies and pupfish, suggesting that energy flow to mosquitofish originated from allochthonous sources (terrestrial vegetation, emergent macrophytes, or both), whereas energy flow to mollies and pupfish originated from autochthonous sources (filamentous algae, submerged macrophytes, or both). The δ 15 N measurements indicated that mosquitofish and mollies occupied similar trophic levels, whereas pupfish occupied a slightly higher trophic level. Analysis of gut contents showed that mosquitofish consumed mostly winged insects (an indication of terrestrial taxa), whereas mollies and pupfish consumed mostly organic detritus. Judging from our results, only mollies (not mosquitofish) are suitable for monitoring selenium exposure in pupfish.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11270-011-0974-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1008901055</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A360475055</galeid><sourcerecordid>A360475055</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-e29a295093a6a0531edba1e0c3f0acf82758e5d48a487ec1d715e6ab248ef2b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1PwzAMhiMEEmPwA7hF4lxw0qZpjhOMD2nAJHavstYZQVtSkpaPf0-mcuCCfbBk-Xlt-SXknMElA5BXkTEuIQPGMlCyyOQBmTAh84yrnB-SCUChslJJdUxOYnyDFKqSE-JmMWKMO3Q99YauPj198s7p3n4gXXps7Nbalt7a-IqRGh_oo3e298G6DX3BLTo77Oj8q_NxCEito_0r0rlrtdtgwJbeYMTQ0-XQmaRxSo6M3kY8-61Tsrqdr67vs8Xz3cP1bJE1Ocg-Q640VwJUrksNImfYrjVDaHIDujEVl6JC0RaVLiqJDWslE1jqNS8qNHydT8nFKNsF_z5g7Os3PwSXNtbpW5UCBkKkqctxaqO3WFtnfB90k7LFnW28Q2NTf5aXUEgxAmwEmuBjDGjqLtidDt9JdS8s69GGOtlQ722oZWL4yMRu_zMMf0_5D_oBwHyLSw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1008901055</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of Two Nonnative Poeciliid Fishes for Monitoring Selenium Exposure in the Endangered Desert Pupfish</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Saiki, Michael K. ; Martin, Barbara A. ; May, Thomas W. ; Brumbaugh, William G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Saiki, Michael K. ; Martin, Barbara A. ; May, Thomas W. ; Brumbaugh, William G.</creatorcontrib><description>We assessed the suitability of two nonnative poeciliid fishes—western mosquitofish ( Gambusia affinis ) and sailfin mollies ( Poecilia latipinna )—for monitoring selenium exposure in desert pupfish ( Cyprinodon macularius ). Our investigation was prompted by a need to avoid lethal take of an endangered species (pupfish) when sampling fish for chemical analysis. Total selenium (SeTot) concentrations in both poeciliids were highly correlated with SeTot concentrations in pupfish. However, mean SeTot concentrations varied among fish species, with higher concentrations measured in mosquitofish than in mollies and pupfish from one of three sampled agricultural drains. Moreover, regression equations describing the relationship of selenomethionine to SeTot differed between mosquitofish and pupfish, but not between mollies and pupfish. Because selenium accumulates in animals primarily through dietary exposure, we examined fish trophic relationships by measuring stable isotopes ( δ 13 C and δ 15 N) and gut contents. According to δ 13 C measurements, the trophic pathway leading to mosquitofish was more carbon-depleted than trophic pathways leading to mollies and pupfish, suggesting that energy flow to mosquitofish originated from allochthonous sources (terrestrial vegetation, emergent macrophytes, or both), whereas energy flow to mollies and pupfish originated from autochthonous sources (filamentous algae, submerged macrophytes, or both). The δ 15 N measurements indicated that mosquitofish and mollies occupied similar trophic levels, whereas pupfish occupied a slightly higher trophic level. Analysis of gut contents showed that mosquitofish consumed mostly winged insects (an indication of terrestrial taxa), whereas mollies and pupfish consumed mostly organic detritus. Judging from our results, only mollies (not mosquitofish) are suitable for monitoring selenium exposure in pupfish.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0049-6979</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2932</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11270-011-0974-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Adults ; Algae ; Analysis ; Analytical chemistry ; Aquatic plants ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Bioassays ; Carbon sources ; Chemical analysis ; Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts ; Cyprinodon macularius ; Deserts ; Detritus ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Endangered &amp; extinct species ; Endangered species ; Energy flow ; Environment ; Environmental monitoring ; Environmental research ; Fish ; Fishes ; Food chains ; Geology ; Hydrogeology ; Indicator organisms ; Isotopes ; Macrophytes ; Poecilia ; Selenium ; Selenomethionine ; Soil Science &amp; Conservation ; Stable isotopes ; Studies ; Trophic levels ; Trophic relationships ; Water pollution ; Water Quality/Water Pollution</subject><ispartof>Water, air, and soil pollution, 2012-05, Vol.223 (4), p.1671-1683</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-e29a295093a6a0531edba1e0c3f0acf82758e5d48a487ec1d715e6ab248ef2b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11270-011-0974-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11270-011-0974-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saiki, Michael K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Barbara A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>May, Thomas W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brumbaugh, William G.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of Two Nonnative Poeciliid Fishes for Monitoring Selenium Exposure in the Endangered Desert Pupfish</title><title>Water, air, and soil pollution</title><addtitle>Water Air Soil Pollut</addtitle><description>We assessed the suitability of two nonnative poeciliid fishes—western mosquitofish ( Gambusia affinis ) and sailfin mollies ( Poecilia latipinna )—for monitoring selenium exposure in desert pupfish ( Cyprinodon macularius ). Our investigation was prompted by a need to avoid lethal take of an endangered species (pupfish) when sampling fish for chemical analysis. Total selenium (SeTot) concentrations in both poeciliids were highly correlated with SeTot concentrations in pupfish. However, mean SeTot concentrations varied among fish species, with higher concentrations measured in mosquitofish than in mollies and pupfish from one of three sampled agricultural drains. Moreover, regression equations describing the relationship of selenomethionine to SeTot differed between mosquitofish and pupfish, but not between mollies and pupfish. Because selenium accumulates in animals primarily through dietary exposure, we examined fish trophic relationships by measuring stable isotopes ( δ 13 C and δ 15 N) and gut contents. According to δ 13 C measurements, the trophic pathway leading to mosquitofish was more carbon-depleted than trophic pathways leading to mollies and pupfish, suggesting that energy flow to mosquitofish originated from allochthonous sources (terrestrial vegetation, emergent macrophytes, or both), whereas energy flow to mollies and pupfish originated from autochthonous sources (filamentous algae, submerged macrophytes, or both). The δ 15 N measurements indicated that mosquitofish and mollies occupied similar trophic levels, whereas pupfish occupied a slightly higher trophic level. Analysis of gut contents showed that mosquitofish consumed mostly winged insects (an indication of terrestrial taxa), whereas mollies and pupfish consumed mostly organic detritus. Judging from our results, only mollies (not mosquitofish) are suitable for monitoring selenium exposure in pupfish.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Analytical chemistry</subject><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Bioassays</subject><subject>Carbon sources</subject><subject>Chemical analysis</subject><subject>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</subject><subject>Cyprinodon macularius</subject><subject>Deserts</subject><subject>Detritus</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Endangered &amp; extinct species</subject><subject>Endangered species</subject><subject>Energy flow</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental research</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fishes</subject><subject>Food chains</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Indicator organisms</subject><subject>Isotopes</subject><subject>Macrophytes</subject><subject>Poecilia</subject><subject>Selenium</subject><subject>Selenomethionine</subject><subject>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</subject><subject>Stable isotopes</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Trophic levels</subject><subject>Trophic relationships</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><subject>Water Quality/Water Pollution</subject><issn>0049-6979</issn><issn>1573-2932</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1PwzAMhiMEEmPwA7hF4lxw0qZpjhOMD2nAJHavstYZQVtSkpaPf0-mcuCCfbBk-Xlt-SXknMElA5BXkTEuIQPGMlCyyOQBmTAh84yrnB-SCUChslJJdUxOYnyDFKqSE-JmMWKMO3Q99YauPj198s7p3n4gXXps7Nbalt7a-IqRGh_oo3e298G6DX3BLTo77Oj8q_NxCEito_0r0rlrtdtgwJbeYMTQ0-XQmaRxSo6M3kY8-61Tsrqdr67vs8Xz3cP1bJE1Ocg-Q640VwJUrksNImfYrjVDaHIDujEVl6JC0RaVLiqJDWslE1jqNS8qNHydT8nFKNsF_z5g7Os3PwSXNtbpW5UCBkKkqctxaqO3WFtnfB90k7LFnW28Q2NTf5aXUEgxAmwEmuBjDGjqLtidDt9JdS8s69GGOtlQ722oZWL4yMRu_zMMf0_5D_oBwHyLSw</recordid><startdate>20120501</startdate><enddate>20120501</enddate><creator>Saiki, Michael K.</creator><creator>Martin, Barbara A.</creator><creator>May, Thomas W.</creator><creator>Brumbaugh, William G.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120501</creationdate><title>Assessment of Two Nonnative Poeciliid Fishes for Monitoring Selenium Exposure in the Endangered Desert Pupfish</title><author>Saiki, Michael K. ; Martin, Barbara A. ; May, Thomas W. ; Brumbaugh, William G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-e29a295093a6a0531edba1e0c3f0acf82758e5d48a487ec1d715e6ab248ef2b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Analytical chemistry</topic><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Bioassays</topic><topic>Carbon sources</topic><topic>Chemical analysis</topic><topic>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</topic><topic>Cyprinodon macularius</topic><topic>Deserts</topic><topic>Detritus</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Endangered &amp; extinct species</topic><topic>Endangered species</topic><topic>Energy flow</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental research</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fishes</topic><topic>Food chains</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Indicator organisms</topic><topic>Isotopes</topic><topic>Macrophytes</topic><topic>Poecilia</topic><topic>Selenium</topic><topic>Selenomethionine</topic><topic>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</topic><topic>Stable isotopes</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Trophic levels</topic><topic>Trophic relationships</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><topic>Water Quality/Water Pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saiki, Michael K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Barbara A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>May, Thomas W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brumbaugh, William G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Water, air, and soil pollution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saiki, Michael K.</au><au>Martin, Barbara A.</au><au>May, Thomas W.</au><au>Brumbaugh, William G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of Two Nonnative Poeciliid Fishes for Monitoring Selenium Exposure in the Endangered Desert Pupfish</atitle><jtitle>Water, air, and soil pollution</jtitle><stitle>Water Air Soil Pollut</stitle><date>2012-05-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>223</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1671</spage><epage>1683</epage><pages>1671-1683</pages><issn>0049-6979</issn><eissn>1573-2932</eissn><abstract>We assessed the suitability of two nonnative poeciliid fishes—western mosquitofish ( Gambusia affinis ) and sailfin mollies ( Poecilia latipinna )—for monitoring selenium exposure in desert pupfish ( Cyprinodon macularius ). Our investigation was prompted by a need to avoid lethal take of an endangered species (pupfish) when sampling fish for chemical analysis. Total selenium (SeTot) concentrations in both poeciliids were highly correlated with SeTot concentrations in pupfish. However, mean SeTot concentrations varied among fish species, with higher concentrations measured in mosquitofish than in mollies and pupfish from one of three sampled agricultural drains. Moreover, regression equations describing the relationship of selenomethionine to SeTot differed between mosquitofish and pupfish, but not between mollies and pupfish. Because selenium accumulates in animals primarily through dietary exposure, we examined fish trophic relationships by measuring stable isotopes ( δ 13 C and δ 15 N) and gut contents. According to δ 13 C measurements, the trophic pathway leading to mosquitofish was more carbon-depleted than trophic pathways leading to mollies and pupfish, suggesting that energy flow to mosquitofish originated from allochthonous sources (terrestrial vegetation, emergent macrophytes, or both), whereas energy flow to mollies and pupfish originated from autochthonous sources (filamentous algae, submerged macrophytes, or both). The δ 15 N measurements indicated that mosquitofish and mollies occupied similar trophic levels, whereas pupfish occupied a slightly higher trophic level. Analysis of gut contents showed that mosquitofish consumed mostly winged insects (an indication of terrestrial taxa), whereas mollies and pupfish consumed mostly organic detritus. Judging from our results, only mollies (not mosquitofish) are suitable for monitoring selenium exposure in pupfish.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11270-011-0974-7</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0049-6979
ispartof Water, air, and soil pollution, 2012-05, Vol.223 (4), p.1671-1683
issn 0049-6979
1573-2932
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1008901055
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Adults
Algae
Analysis
Analytical chemistry
Aquatic plants
Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution
Bioassays
Carbon sources
Chemical analysis
Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts
Cyprinodon macularius
Deserts
Detritus
Earth and Environmental Science
Endangered & extinct species
Endangered species
Energy flow
Environment
Environmental monitoring
Environmental research
Fish
Fishes
Food chains
Geology
Hydrogeology
Indicator organisms
Isotopes
Macrophytes
Poecilia
Selenium
Selenomethionine
Soil Science & Conservation
Stable isotopes
Studies
Trophic levels
Trophic relationships
Water pollution
Water Quality/Water Pollution
title Assessment of Two Nonnative Poeciliid Fishes for Monitoring Selenium Exposure in the Endangered Desert Pupfish
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T08%3A54%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20Two%20Nonnative%20Poeciliid%20Fishes%20for%20Monitoring%20Selenium%20Exposure%20in%20the%20Endangered%20Desert%20Pupfish&rft.jtitle=Water,%20air,%20and%20soil%20pollution&rft.au=Saiki,%20Michael%20K.&rft.date=2012-05-01&rft.volume=223&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1671&rft.epage=1683&rft.pages=1671-1683&rft.issn=0049-6979&rft.eissn=1573-2932&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11270-011-0974-7&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA360475055%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1008901055&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A360475055&rfr_iscdi=true