Who Cares about Consent Requirements for Sourcing Human Embryonic Stem Cells? Are Errors In the Past Really Errors Of the Past?
Through an Access to Information Act request, we have obtained the consent forms used by the providers of every human embryonic stem cell (hESC) line approved for use by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), and examined them to verify whether or not they meet the consent requirements e...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Accountability in research 2011-07, Vol.18 (4), p.248 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 248 |
container_title | Accountability in research |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Krahn, Timothy M Wallwork, Thomas E |
description | Through an Access to Information Act request, we have obtained the consent forms used by the providers of every human embryonic stem cell (hESC) line approved for use by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), and examined them to verify whether or not they meet the consent requirements established by Canadian law and regulations. Our findings show that at least seven out of ten consent forms studied did not satisfy these minimum requirements. We then outline various options for responding to this situation in terms of: (i) remedial measures for dealing with executive problems with regulatory oversight procedures; and (ii) remedial measures for dealing with the impugned lines. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1002679012</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2637891971</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_10026790123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjcFqwkAURQdpwbT1Hx64DszERJOVSIjoqqJClzLKi0YmM_rezMKVv24E23VX98I53NsTkcrSLM5ylb2JSOZFHhfjRPXFB_NZSpkmozQS95-Tg1ITMui9Cx5KZxmthzVeQ0PYdp2hdgQbF-jQ2CMsQqstVO2ebs42B9h4bKFEY3gKM0KoiBwxLC34E8JK83NMG3P7Jd_1H5l-ifdaG8bBKz_FcF5ty0V8IXcNyH537n5th3ZKymQ8KaRKRv-zHkPXT_A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1002679012</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Who Cares about Consent Requirements for Sourcing Human Embryonic Stem Cells? Are Errors In the Past Really Errors Of the Past?</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Krahn, Timothy M ; Wallwork, Thomas E</creator><creatorcontrib>Krahn, Timothy M ; Wallwork, Thomas E</creatorcontrib><description>Through an Access to Information Act request, we have obtained the consent forms used by the providers of every human embryonic stem cell (hESC) line approved for use by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), and examined them to verify whether or not they meet the consent requirements established by Canadian law and regulations. Our findings show that at least seven out of ten consent forms studied did not satisfy these minimum requirements. We then outline various options for responding to this situation in terms of: (i) remedial measures for dealing with executive problems with regulatory oversight procedures; and (ii) remedial measures for dealing with the impugned lines. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0898-9621</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-5815</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Taylor & Francis Ltd</publisher><subject>Access to information ; Information ; Legislation ; Stem cells</subject><ispartof>Accountability in research, 2011-07, Vol.18 (4), p.248</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Ltd. 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krahn, Timothy M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallwork, Thomas E</creatorcontrib><title>Who Cares about Consent Requirements for Sourcing Human Embryonic Stem Cells? Are Errors In the Past Really Errors Of the Past?</title><title>Accountability in research</title><description>Through an Access to Information Act request, we have obtained the consent forms used by the providers of every human embryonic stem cell (hESC) line approved for use by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), and examined them to verify whether or not they meet the consent requirements established by Canadian law and regulations. Our findings show that at least seven out of ten consent forms studied did not satisfy these minimum requirements. We then outline various options for responding to this situation in terms of: (i) remedial measures for dealing with executive problems with regulatory oversight procedures; and (ii) remedial measures for dealing with the impugned lines. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Access to information</subject><subject>Information</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Stem cells</subject><issn>0898-9621</issn><issn>1545-5815</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqNjcFqwkAURQdpwbT1Hx64DszERJOVSIjoqqJClzLKi0YmM_rezMKVv24E23VX98I53NsTkcrSLM5ylb2JSOZFHhfjRPXFB_NZSpkmozQS95-Tg1ITMui9Cx5KZxmthzVeQ0PYdp2hdgQbF-jQ2CMsQqstVO2ebs42B9h4bKFEY3gKM0KoiBwxLC34E8JK83NMG3P7Jd_1H5l-ifdaG8bBKz_FcF5ty0V8IXcNyH537n5th3ZKymQ8KaRKRv-zHkPXT_A</recordid><startdate>20110701</startdate><enddate>20110701</enddate><creator>Krahn, Timothy M</creator><creator>Wallwork, Thomas E</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20110701</creationdate><title>Who Cares about Consent Requirements for Sourcing Human Embryonic Stem Cells? Are Errors In the Past Really Errors Of the Past?</title><author>Krahn, Timothy M ; Wallwork, Thomas E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_10026790123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Access to information</topic><topic>Information</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Stem cells</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krahn, Timothy M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallwork, Thomas E</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Accountability in research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krahn, Timothy M</au><au>Wallwork, Thomas E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Who Cares about Consent Requirements for Sourcing Human Embryonic Stem Cells? Are Errors In the Past Really Errors Of the Past?</atitle><jtitle>Accountability in research</jtitle><date>2011-07-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>248</spage><pages>248-</pages><issn>0898-9621</issn><eissn>1545-5815</eissn><abstract>Through an Access to Information Act request, we have obtained the consent forms used by the providers of every human embryonic stem cell (hESC) line approved for use by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), and examined them to verify whether or not they meet the consent requirements established by Canadian law and regulations. Our findings show that at least seven out of ten consent forms studied did not satisfy these minimum requirements. We then outline various options for responding to this situation in terms of: (i) remedial measures for dealing with executive problems with regulatory oversight procedures; and (ii) remedial measures for dealing with the impugned lines. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Ltd</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0898-9621 |
ispartof | Accountability in research, 2011-07, Vol.18 (4), p.248 |
issn | 0898-9621 1545-5815 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1002679012 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Access to information Information Legislation Stem cells |
title | Who Cares about Consent Requirements for Sourcing Human Embryonic Stem Cells? Are Errors In the Past Really Errors Of the Past? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T10%3A15%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Who%20Cares%20about%20Consent%20Requirements%20for%20Sourcing%20Human%20Embryonic%20Stem%20Cells?%20Are%20Errors%20In%20the%20Past%20Really%20Errors%20Of%20the%20Past?&rft.jtitle=Accountability%20in%20research&rft.au=Krahn,%20Timothy%20M&rft.date=2011-07-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=248&rft.pages=248-&rft.issn=0898-9621&rft.eissn=1545-5815&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2637891971%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1002679012&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |