Testing space-scale methodologies for automatic geomorphic feature extraction from lidar in a complex mountainous landscape
The next generation of digital elevation data (≤3 m resolution) calls for the development of new algorithms for the objective extraction of geomorphic features, such as channel networks, channel heads, bank geometry, landslide scars, and service roads. In this work, we test the performance of two ne...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water resources research 2010-11, Vol.46 (11), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Water resources research |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Passalacqua, Paola Tarolli, Paolo Foufoula-Georgiou, Efi |
description | The next generation of digital elevation data (≤3 m resolution) calls for the development of new algorithms for the objective extraction of geomorphic features, such as channel networks, channel heads, bank geometry, landslide scars, and service roads. In this work, we test the performance of two newly developed algorithms for the extraction of geomorphic features: the wavelet‐based extraction methodology developed by Lashermes et al. (2007) and the GeoNet nonlinear diffusion and geodesic paths methodology proposed by Passalacqua et al. (2010). The study area is part of the Rio Cordon basin, a headwater alpine catchment located in the Dolomites, a mountainous region in the eastern Italian Alps. The aim of this work is to compare the capability of the two new algorithms in extracting the channel network and capturing channel heads, relevant channel disruptions corresponding to landslides, and representative channel cross sections. The extracted channel networks are also compared to the ones obtained using classical methodologies on the basis of an area threshold and an area‐slope threshold. A high‐resolution digital terrain model of 1 m served as the basis for such analysis. The results suggest that, although the wavelet‐based methodology performs well in the channel network extraction and is able to detect channel heads and channel disruptions, the local nonlinear filter together with the global geodesic optimization used in GeoNet is more robust and computationally efficient while achieving better localization and extraction of features, especially in areas where gentle slopes prevail. We conclude that these new methodologies should be considered as valid alternatives to classical methodologies for channel network extraction from lidar, in addition to offering the potential for calibration‐free channel source identification and also extraction of additional features of interest. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2009WR008812 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1000431764</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2634689171</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4064-bb548f77cefac54dd5bfa33991560782823e4cb61205a4e788301fd71310fd313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFq3DAQhkVoIduktz6AoNc6lSzJso_J0iSFJYElyR7FrDzaKLUtV5LJhr58vWwpPfU0c_j--ZifkE-cXXBWNl9LxprNmrG65uUJWfBGykI3WrwjC8akKLho9Cn5kNILY1yqSi_IrwdM2Q87mkawWCQLHdIe83NoQxd2HhN1IVKYcughe0t3GPoQx-d5dQh5ikhxnyPY7MNAXQw97XwLkfqBArWhHzvc0z5MQwY_hCnRDoZ29ox4Tt476BJ-_DPPyOP1t4flbbG6v_m-vFwVIFkli-1WydppbdGBVbJt1daBEE3DVcV0XdalQGm3FS-ZAom6rgXjrtVccOZawcUZ-Xy8O8bwc5r_NS9hisOsNJwdiuG6kjP15UjZGFKK6MwYfQ_xbYbMoV7zb70zLo74q-_w7b-s2ayXa14qcZAUx5RPGfd_UxB_mEoLrczm7sasrtTdUyW4qcRvUh-MxA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1000431764</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Testing space-scale methodologies for automatic geomorphic feature extraction from lidar in a complex mountainous landscape</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><creator>Passalacqua, Paola ; Tarolli, Paolo ; Foufoula-Georgiou, Efi</creator><creatorcontrib>Passalacqua, Paola ; Tarolli, Paolo ; Foufoula-Georgiou, Efi</creatorcontrib><description>The next generation of digital elevation data (≤3 m resolution) calls for the development of new algorithms for the objective extraction of geomorphic features, such as channel networks, channel heads, bank geometry, landslide scars, and service roads. In this work, we test the performance of two newly developed algorithms for the extraction of geomorphic features: the wavelet‐based extraction methodology developed by Lashermes et al. (2007) and the GeoNet nonlinear diffusion and geodesic paths methodology proposed by Passalacqua et al. (2010). The study area is part of the Rio Cordon basin, a headwater alpine catchment located in the Dolomites, a mountainous region in the eastern Italian Alps. The aim of this work is to compare the capability of the two new algorithms in extracting the channel network and capturing channel heads, relevant channel disruptions corresponding to landslides, and representative channel cross sections. The extracted channel networks are also compared to the ones obtained using classical methodologies on the basis of an area threshold and an area‐slope threshold. A high‐resolution digital terrain model of 1 m served as the basis for such analysis. The results suggest that, although the wavelet‐based methodology performs well in the channel network extraction and is able to detect channel heads and channel disruptions, the local nonlinear filter together with the global geodesic optimization used in GeoNet is more robust and computationally efficient while achieving better localization and extraction of features, especially in areas where gentle slopes prevail. We conclude that these new methodologies should be considered as valid alternatives to classical methodologies for channel network extraction from lidar, in addition to offering the potential for calibration‐free channel source identification and also extraction of additional features of interest.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1397</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7973</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2009WR008812</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; channel cross sections ; channel heads ; Geomorphology ; Geophysics ; High performance computing ; Hydrology ; Landslides ; Landslides & mudslides ; Lasers ; Lidar ; Morphology ; Mountain regions ; Mountains ; nonlinear filtering ; Rain ; river network extraction ; Rivers ; Topography ; wavelets</subject><ispartof>Water resources research, 2010-11, Vol.46 (11), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2010 by the American Geophysical Union.</rights><rights>Copyright 2010 by American Geophysical Union</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4064-bb548f77cefac54dd5bfa33991560782823e4cb61205a4e788301fd71310fd313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4064-bb548f77cefac54dd5bfa33991560782823e4cb61205a4e788301fd71310fd313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2009WR008812$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2009WR008812$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,11497,27907,27908,45557,45558,46451,46875</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Passalacqua, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarolli, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foufoula-Georgiou, Efi</creatorcontrib><title>Testing space-scale methodologies for automatic geomorphic feature extraction from lidar in a complex mountainous landscape</title><title>Water resources research</title><addtitle>Water Resour. Res</addtitle><description>The next generation of digital elevation data (≤3 m resolution) calls for the development of new algorithms for the objective extraction of geomorphic features, such as channel networks, channel heads, bank geometry, landslide scars, and service roads. In this work, we test the performance of two newly developed algorithms for the extraction of geomorphic features: the wavelet‐based extraction methodology developed by Lashermes et al. (2007) and the GeoNet nonlinear diffusion and geodesic paths methodology proposed by Passalacqua et al. (2010). The study area is part of the Rio Cordon basin, a headwater alpine catchment located in the Dolomites, a mountainous region in the eastern Italian Alps. The aim of this work is to compare the capability of the two new algorithms in extracting the channel network and capturing channel heads, relevant channel disruptions corresponding to landslides, and representative channel cross sections. The extracted channel networks are also compared to the ones obtained using classical methodologies on the basis of an area threshold and an area‐slope threshold. A high‐resolution digital terrain model of 1 m served as the basis for such analysis. The results suggest that, although the wavelet‐based methodology performs well in the channel network extraction and is able to detect channel heads and channel disruptions, the local nonlinear filter together with the global geodesic optimization used in GeoNet is more robust and computationally efficient while achieving better localization and extraction of features, especially in areas where gentle slopes prevail. We conclude that these new methodologies should be considered as valid alternatives to classical methodologies for channel network extraction from lidar, in addition to offering the potential for calibration‐free channel source identification and also extraction of additional features of interest.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>channel cross sections</subject><subject>channel heads</subject><subject>Geomorphology</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>High performance computing</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Landslides</subject><subject>Landslides & mudslides</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Lidar</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Mountain regions</subject><subject>Mountains</subject><subject>nonlinear filtering</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>river network extraction</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Topography</subject><subject>wavelets</subject><issn>0043-1397</issn><issn>1944-7973</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFq3DAQhkVoIduktz6AoNc6lSzJso_J0iSFJYElyR7FrDzaKLUtV5LJhr58vWwpPfU0c_j--ZifkE-cXXBWNl9LxprNmrG65uUJWfBGykI3WrwjC8akKLho9Cn5kNILY1yqSi_IrwdM2Q87mkawWCQLHdIe83NoQxd2HhN1IVKYcughe0t3GPoQx-d5dQh5ikhxnyPY7MNAXQw97XwLkfqBArWhHzvc0z5MQwY_hCnRDoZ29ox4Tt476BJ-_DPPyOP1t4flbbG6v_m-vFwVIFkli-1WydppbdGBVbJt1daBEE3DVcV0XdalQGm3FS-ZAom6rgXjrtVccOZawcUZ-Xy8O8bwc5r_NS9hisOsNJwdiuG6kjP15UjZGFKK6MwYfQ_xbYbMoV7zb70zLo74q-_w7b-s2ayXa14qcZAUx5RPGfd_UxB_mEoLrczm7sasrtTdUyW4qcRvUh-MxA</recordid><startdate>201011</startdate><enddate>201011</enddate><creator>Passalacqua, Paola</creator><creator>Tarolli, Paolo</creator><creator>Foufoula-Georgiou, Efi</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201011</creationdate><title>Testing space-scale methodologies for automatic geomorphic feature extraction from lidar in a complex mountainous landscape</title><author>Passalacqua, Paola ; Tarolli, Paolo ; Foufoula-Georgiou, Efi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4064-bb548f77cefac54dd5bfa33991560782823e4cb61205a4e788301fd71310fd313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>channel cross sections</topic><topic>channel heads</topic><topic>Geomorphology</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>High performance computing</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Landslides</topic><topic>Landslides & mudslides</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Lidar</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Mountain regions</topic><topic>Mountains</topic><topic>nonlinear filtering</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>river network extraction</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Topography</topic><topic>wavelets</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Passalacqua, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarolli, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foufoula-Georgiou, Efi</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Passalacqua, Paola</au><au>Tarolli, Paolo</au><au>Foufoula-Georgiou, Efi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Testing space-scale methodologies for automatic geomorphic feature extraction from lidar in a complex mountainous landscape</atitle><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle><addtitle>Water Resour. Res</addtitle><date>2010-11</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>11</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0043-1397</issn><eissn>1944-7973</eissn><abstract>The next generation of digital elevation data (≤3 m resolution) calls for the development of new algorithms for the objective extraction of geomorphic features, such as channel networks, channel heads, bank geometry, landslide scars, and service roads. In this work, we test the performance of two newly developed algorithms for the extraction of geomorphic features: the wavelet‐based extraction methodology developed by Lashermes et al. (2007) and the GeoNet nonlinear diffusion and geodesic paths methodology proposed by Passalacqua et al. (2010). The study area is part of the Rio Cordon basin, a headwater alpine catchment located in the Dolomites, a mountainous region in the eastern Italian Alps. The aim of this work is to compare the capability of the two new algorithms in extracting the channel network and capturing channel heads, relevant channel disruptions corresponding to landslides, and representative channel cross sections. The extracted channel networks are also compared to the ones obtained using classical methodologies on the basis of an area threshold and an area‐slope threshold. A high‐resolution digital terrain model of 1 m served as the basis for such analysis. The results suggest that, although the wavelet‐based methodology performs well in the channel network extraction and is able to detect channel heads and channel disruptions, the local nonlinear filter together with the global geodesic optimization used in GeoNet is more robust and computationally efficient while achieving better localization and extraction of features, especially in areas where gentle slopes prevail. We conclude that these new methodologies should be considered as valid alternatives to classical methodologies for channel network extraction from lidar, in addition to offering the potential for calibration‐free channel source identification and also extraction of additional features of interest.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2009WR008812</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0043-1397 |
ispartof | Water resources research, 2010-11, Vol.46 (11), p.n/a |
issn | 0043-1397 1944-7973 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1000431764 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library |
subjects | Algorithms channel cross sections channel heads Geomorphology Geophysics High performance computing Hydrology Landslides Landslides & mudslides Lasers Lidar Morphology Mountain regions Mountains nonlinear filtering Rain river network extraction Rivers Topography wavelets |
title | Testing space-scale methodologies for automatic geomorphic feature extraction from lidar in a complex mountainous landscape |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T21%3A50%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Testing%20space-scale%20methodologies%20for%20automatic%20geomorphic%20feature%20extraction%20from%20lidar%20in%20a%20complex%20mountainous%20landscape&rft.jtitle=Water%20resources%20research&rft.au=Passalacqua,%20Paola&rft.date=2010-11&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=11&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0043-1397&rft.eissn=1944-7973&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2009WR008812&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2634689171%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1000431764&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |