Navigating Urban Agroecological Research with the Social Sciences

This chapter discusses agroecology as a critical, reflexive social science praxis useful for learning about (and changing) urban agroecosystems. Urban agroecosystems as social-ecological spaces are often explored through participatory action research in which social relations––particularly power rel...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Bowness, Evan, Nicklay, Jennifer A., Liebman, Alex, Cadieux, Kirsten Valentine, Blumberg, Renata
Format: Buchkapitel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 298
container_issue
container_start_page 275
container_title
container_volume 1
creator Bowness, Evan
Nicklay, Jennifer A.
Liebman, Alex
Cadieux, Kirsten Valentine
Blumberg, Renata
description This chapter discusses agroecology as a critical, reflexive social science praxis useful for learning about (and changing) urban agroecosystems. Urban agroecosystems as social-ecological spaces are often explored through participatory action research in which social relations––particularly power relations––are central concerns. This is true whether or not research teams are aware of such dynamics. From our collective experience––usually in teams lucky enough to include both community and university expertise on social relationships––we identified five “lineages” that have influenced our urban political agroecology research. Considering how these lineages enable teams to retain a focus on important social questions as part of their work, we seek to make the social sciences easier to engage for urban agroecology researchers. We also hope to build competency and recognition around the complexity and daunting nature of the colonial, gendered, racialized, and classist power relations embedded in urban agroecologies––both as social and ecological spaces and as sites of research. For urban food cultivation projects to serve the community goals often associated with them, we argue it is important for researchers to expand their research methods toolkits to include: adequate humility about the scope of work possible, respect for knowledge embedded in relationships, and commitment to the challenging politics of truly participatory collaboration. This chapter discusses agroecology as a critical, reflexive social science praxis useful for learning about (and changing) urban agroecosystems. It focuses on urban agroecology research that is informed by the social sciences. In its broadest sense, social science contributes rich histories, insights, tools, and action strategies for exploring society–environment relationships within urban agoroecologies. The chapter introduces social science concepts to help scholars navigate the complex social relations that are always present in urban agroecologies. Urban agroecological research methodologies growing from environmental justice lineages might, therefore, not only ask whether the remediation and redevelopment reduces the toxicity, but also study, for example, the economics of how surrounding land values change. Urban agroecology can therefore be seen as an emerging branch of the critical social science, an engaged research praxis embedded within the scholarly traditions and the part of wider agroecology movements.
doi_str_mv 10.1201/9780429290992-13
format Book Chapter
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_ebookcentralchapters_6384428_24_294</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>EBC6384428_24_294</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i1094-3a3aa821e4a28cb5e90445cadadd95787b795d4b0a92a470967e9ff8954fba923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkMtOwzAQRY0QCFq6Z5kfCIwfSexlVQFFqkCidG1NHCcxhLjYoRV_T6oiJFajO1fnLC4h1xRuKAN6qwoJgimmQCmWUn5CJn-Zn46B5wXLAag8J5OREJQLAH5BZjG-AQCTOc2ZvCTzJ9y5BgfXN8kmlNgn8yZ4a3znG2ewS15stBhMm-zd0CZDa5O1N24s1sbZ3th4Rc5q7KKd_d4p2dzfvS6W6er54XExX6WOghIpR44oGbUCmTRlZhUIkRmssKpUVsiiLFRWiRJQMRQFqLywqq6lykRdjj8-Jfzo3Qb_-WXjoG3p_bux_RCwMy1uBxuizrkUgknNhGZKjNTySLm-9uED9z50lR7wu_OhDtgbFw-WqCnow7L637Kacr0brc73jP8AKkds9A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>book_chapter</recordtype><pqid>EBC6384428_24_294</pqid></control><display><type>book_chapter</type><title>Navigating Urban Agroecological Research with the Social Sciences</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis eBooks A-Z</source><creator>Bowness, Evan ; Nicklay, Jennifer A. ; Liebman, Alex ; Cadieux, Kirsten Valentine ; Blumberg, Renata</creator><contributor>Cohen, Hamutahl ; Cohen, Hamutahl ; Egerer, Monika</contributor><creatorcontrib>Bowness, Evan ; Nicklay, Jennifer A. ; Liebman, Alex ; Cadieux, Kirsten Valentine ; Blumberg, Renata ; Cohen, Hamutahl ; Cohen, Hamutahl ; Egerer, Monika</creatorcontrib><description>This chapter discusses agroecology as a critical, reflexive social science praxis useful for learning about (and changing) urban agroecosystems. Urban agroecosystems as social-ecological spaces are often explored through participatory action research in which social relations––particularly power relations––are central concerns. This is true whether or not research teams are aware of such dynamics. From our collective experience––usually in teams lucky enough to include both community and university expertise on social relationships––we identified five “lineages” that have influenced our urban political agroecology research. Considering how these lineages enable teams to retain a focus on important social questions as part of their work, we seek to make the social sciences easier to engage for urban agroecology researchers. We also hope to build competency and recognition around the complexity and daunting nature of the colonial, gendered, racialized, and classist power relations embedded in urban agroecologies––both as social and ecological spaces and as sites of research. For urban food cultivation projects to serve the community goals often associated with them, we argue it is important for researchers to expand their research methods toolkits to include: adequate humility about the scope of work possible, respect for knowledge embedded in relationships, and commitment to the challenging politics of truly participatory collaboration. This chapter discusses agroecology as a critical, reflexive social science praxis useful for learning about (and changing) urban agroecosystems. It focuses on urban agroecology research that is informed by the social sciences. In its broadest sense, social science contributes rich histories, insights, tools, and action strategies for exploring society–environment relationships within urban agoroecologies. The chapter introduces social science concepts to help scholars navigate the complex social relations that are always present in urban agroecologies. Urban agroecological research methodologies growing from environmental justice lineages might, therefore, not only ask whether the remediation and redevelopment reduces the toxicity, but also study, for example, the economics of how surrounding land values change. Urban agroecology can therefore be seen as an emerging branch of the critical social science, an engaged research praxis embedded within the scholarly traditions and the part of wider agroecology movements.</description><edition>1</edition><identifier>ISBN: 0367260018</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 0367636646</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9780367636647</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9780367260019</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 0429290993</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1000259501</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781000259506</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9780429290992</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781000259445</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1000259447</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1201/9780429290992-13</identifier><identifier>OCLC: 1204134003</identifier><identifier>LCCallNum: S589.7$b.U733 2021</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United Kingdom: CRC Press</publisher><ispartof>Urban Agroecology, 2021, Vol.1, p.275-298</ispartof><rights>2021 Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0003-1649-5143 ; 0000-0003-0959-8152 ; 0000-0002-8666-0952 ; 0000-0002-8528-1993 ; 0000-0001-6038-960X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://ebookcentral.proquest.com/covers/6384428-l.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>779,780,784,793,4040,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Cohen, Hamutahl</contributor><contributor>Cohen, Hamutahl</contributor><contributor>Egerer, Monika</contributor><creatorcontrib>Bowness, Evan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicklay, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liebman, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cadieux, Kirsten Valentine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blumberg, Renata</creatorcontrib><title>Navigating Urban Agroecological Research with the Social Sciences</title><title>Urban Agroecology</title><description>This chapter discusses agroecology as a critical, reflexive social science praxis useful for learning about (and changing) urban agroecosystems. Urban agroecosystems as social-ecological spaces are often explored through participatory action research in which social relations––particularly power relations––are central concerns. This is true whether or not research teams are aware of such dynamics. From our collective experience––usually in teams lucky enough to include both community and university expertise on social relationships––we identified five “lineages” that have influenced our urban political agroecology research. Considering how these lineages enable teams to retain a focus on important social questions as part of their work, we seek to make the social sciences easier to engage for urban agroecology researchers. We also hope to build competency and recognition around the complexity and daunting nature of the colonial, gendered, racialized, and classist power relations embedded in urban agroecologies––both as social and ecological spaces and as sites of research. For urban food cultivation projects to serve the community goals often associated with them, we argue it is important for researchers to expand their research methods toolkits to include: adequate humility about the scope of work possible, respect for knowledge embedded in relationships, and commitment to the challenging politics of truly participatory collaboration. This chapter discusses agroecology as a critical, reflexive social science praxis useful for learning about (and changing) urban agroecosystems. It focuses on urban agroecology research that is informed by the social sciences. In its broadest sense, social science contributes rich histories, insights, tools, and action strategies for exploring society–environment relationships within urban agoroecologies. The chapter introduces social science concepts to help scholars navigate the complex social relations that are always present in urban agroecologies. Urban agroecological research methodologies growing from environmental justice lineages might, therefore, not only ask whether the remediation and redevelopment reduces the toxicity, but also study, for example, the economics of how surrounding land values change. Urban agroecology can therefore be seen as an emerging branch of the critical social science, an engaged research praxis embedded within the scholarly traditions and the part of wider agroecology movements.</description><isbn>0367260018</isbn><isbn>0367636646</isbn><isbn>9780367636647</isbn><isbn>9780367260019</isbn><isbn>0429290993</isbn><isbn>1000259501</isbn><isbn>9781000259506</isbn><isbn>9780429290992</isbn><isbn>9781000259445</isbn><isbn>1000259447</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>book_chapter</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>book_chapter</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkMtOwzAQRY0QCFq6Z5kfCIwfSexlVQFFqkCidG1NHCcxhLjYoRV_T6oiJFajO1fnLC4h1xRuKAN6qwoJgimmQCmWUn5CJn-Zn46B5wXLAag8J5OREJQLAH5BZjG-AQCTOc2ZvCTzJ9y5BgfXN8kmlNgn8yZ4a3znG2ewS15stBhMm-zd0CZDa5O1N24s1sbZ3th4Rc5q7KKd_d4p2dzfvS6W6er54XExX6WOghIpR44oGbUCmTRlZhUIkRmssKpUVsiiLFRWiRJQMRQFqLywqq6lykRdjj8-Jfzo3Qb_-WXjoG3p_bux_RCwMy1uBxuizrkUgknNhGZKjNTySLm-9uED9z50lR7wu_OhDtgbFw-WqCnow7L637Kacr0brc73jP8AKkds9A</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Bowness, Evan</creator><creator>Nicklay, Jennifer A.</creator><creator>Liebman, Alex</creator><creator>Cadieux, Kirsten Valentine</creator><creator>Blumberg, Renata</creator><general>CRC Press</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><scope>FFUUA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1649-5143</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0959-8152</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8666-0952</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8528-1993</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6038-960X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Navigating Urban Agroecological Research with the Social Sciences</title><author>Bowness, Evan ; Nicklay, Jennifer A. ; Liebman, Alex ; Cadieux, Kirsten Valentine ; Blumberg, Renata</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i1094-3a3aa821e4a28cb5e90445cadadd95787b795d4b0a92a470967e9ff8954fba923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>book_chapters</rsrctype><prefilter>book_chapters</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bowness, Evan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicklay, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liebman, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cadieux, Kirsten Valentine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blumberg, Renata</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Ebook Central - Book Chapters - Demo use only</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bowness, Evan</au><au>Nicklay, Jennifer A.</au><au>Liebman, Alex</au><au>Cadieux, Kirsten Valentine</au><au>Blumberg, Renata</au><au>Cohen, Hamutahl</au><au>Cohen, Hamutahl</au><au>Egerer, Monika</au><format>book</format><genre>bookitem</genre><ristype>CHAP</ristype><atitle>Navigating Urban Agroecological Research with the Social Sciences</atitle><btitle>Urban Agroecology</btitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>1</volume><spage>275</spage><epage>298</epage><pages>275-298</pages><isbn>0367260018</isbn><isbn>0367636646</isbn><isbn>9780367636647</isbn><isbn>9780367260019</isbn><eisbn>0429290993</eisbn><eisbn>1000259501</eisbn><eisbn>9781000259506</eisbn><eisbn>9780429290992</eisbn><eisbn>9781000259445</eisbn><eisbn>1000259447</eisbn><abstract>This chapter discusses agroecology as a critical, reflexive social science praxis useful for learning about (and changing) urban agroecosystems. Urban agroecosystems as social-ecological spaces are often explored through participatory action research in which social relations––particularly power relations––are central concerns. This is true whether or not research teams are aware of such dynamics. From our collective experience––usually in teams lucky enough to include both community and university expertise on social relationships––we identified five “lineages” that have influenced our urban political agroecology research. Considering how these lineages enable teams to retain a focus on important social questions as part of their work, we seek to make the social sciences easier to engage for urban agroecology researchers. We also hope to build competency and recognition around the complexity and daunting nature of the colonial, gendered, racialized, and classist power relations embedded in urban agroecologies––both as social and ecological spaces and as sites of research. For urban food cultivation projects to serve the community goals often associated with them, we argue it is important for researchers to expand their research methods toolkits to include: adequate humility about the scope of work possible, respect for knowledge embedded in relationships, and commitment to the challenging politics of truly participatory collaboration. This chapter discusses agroecology as a critical, reflexive social science praxis useful for learning about (and changing) urban agroecosystems. It focuses on urban agroecology research that is informed by the social sciences. In its broadest sense, social science contributes rich histories, insights, tools, and action strategies for exploring society–environment relationships within urban agoroecologies. The chapter introduces social science concepts to help scholars navigate the complex social relations that are always present in urban agroecologies. Urban agroecological research methodologies growing from environmental justice lineages might, therefore, not only ask whether the remediation and redevelopment reduces the toxicity, but also study, for example, the economics of how surrounding land values change. Urban agroecology can therefore be seen as an emerging branch of the critical social science, an engaged research praxis embedded within the scholarly traditions and the part of wider agroecology movements.</abstract><cop>United Kingdom</cop><pub>CRC Press</pub><doi>10.1201/9780429290992-13</doi><oclcid>1204134003</oclcid><tpages>24</tpages><edition>1</edition><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1649-5143</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0959-8152</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8666-0952</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8528-1993</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6038-960X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISBN: 0367260018
ispartof Urban Agroecology, 2021, Vol.1, p.275-298
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_ebookcentralchapters_6384428_24_294
source Taylor & Francis eBooks A-Z
title Navigating Urban Agroecological Research with the Social Sciences
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T13%3A09%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=bookitem&rft.atitle=Navigating%20Urban%20Agroecological%20Research%20with%20the%20Social%20Sciences&rft.btitle=Urban%20Agroecology&rft.au=Bowness,%20Evan&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=1&rft.spage=275&rft.epage=298&rft.pages=275-298&rft.isbn=0367260018&rft.isbn_list=0367636646&rft.isbn_list=9780367636647&rft.isbn_list=9780367260019&rft_id=info:doi/10.1201/9780429290992-13&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3EEBC6384428_24_294%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=0429290993&rft.eisbn_list=1000259501&rft.eisbn_list=9781000259506&rft.eisbn_list=9780429290992&rft.eisbn_list=9781000259445&rft.eisbn_list=1000259447&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=EBC6384428_24_294&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true