Paradigm Uniformity and the French Gender System

Paradigm Uniformity and the French Gender System

Corbett’s view of canonical inflection (see, for example, Corbett 2009) holds that, in the canonical case, all lexemes belonging to the same part of speech should have the same paradigm structure. Obvious violations of the canon are defectivity (a lexeme missing a paradigm cell) and overdifferentiat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Olivier Bonami, Gilles Boyé
Format: Buchkapitel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 171
container_title
container_volume
creator Olivier Bonami
Gilles Boyé
description Corbett’s view of canonical inflection (see, for example, Corbett 2009) holds that, in the canonical case, all lexemes belonging to the same part of speech should have the same paradigm structure. Obvious violations of the canon are defectivity (a lexeme missing a paradigm cell) and overdifferentiation (a lexeme with an extra paradigm cell). These are usually defined in terms of lexical exceptionalism: we have an expected paradigm shape, and a few irregular lexemes unexpectedly deviate from that paradigm shape. Another interesting family of deviations from paradigm uniformity involve situations where there is a systematic distinction of multiple paradigm shapes within
format Book Chapter
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_ebookcentralchapters_6145382_16_193</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.3366/j.ctvggx4p0.12</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.3366/j.ctvggx4p0.12</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j703-404bc45f43c1e38e2c1cd6d081073d70a5e617719d25b89853df14f3b01760fb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1zFFLwzAUBeCIKOrcf6g_YHBvkibpoww3hYGC8zmkye3aurUzieL-vZPp0-Fw-M4Zu0GppZQKuD5n00qb_w7q8jiiNEYbVYkrNk2pBwBeauSA1wxeXHSh2-yKt6Frxrjr8qFwQyhyS8Ui0uDbYklDoFi8HlKm3S27aNw20fQvJ2y9eFjPH2er5-XT_H416zWImQRZe1k2UngkYYh79EEFMAhaBA2uJIVaYxV4WZvKlCI0KBtRA2oFTS0mTJxu93H8-KSULdXj-O5pyNFtfev2mWKyCmUpDLeoLFbiqO5Oqk95jPZXJNtbn782m2-5B4tc_AA1DVSq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>book_chapter</recordtype><pqid>EBC6145382_16_193</pqid></control><display><type>book_chapter</type><title>Paradigm Uniformity and the French Gender System</title><source>eBook Academic Collection - Worldwide</source><creator>Olivier Bonami ; Gilles Boyé</creator><contributor>Andrew Hippisley ; Oliver Bond ; Matthew Baerman ; Baerman, Matthew ; Bond, Oliver ; Hippisley, Andrew</contributor><creatorcontrib>Olivier Bonami ; Gilles Boyé ; Andrew Hippisley ; Oliver Bond ; Matthew Baerman ; Baerman, Matthew ; Bond, Oliver ; Hippisley, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>Corbett’s view of canonical inflection (see, for example, Corbett 2009) holds that, in the canonical case, all lexemes belonging to the same part of speech should have the same paradigm structure. Obvious violations of the canon are defectivity (a lexeme missing a paradigm cell) and overdifferentiation (a lexeme with an extra paradigm cell). These are usually defined in terms of lexical exceptionalism: we have an expected paradigm shape, and a few irregular lexemes unexpectedly deviate from that paradigm shape. Another interesting family of deviations from paradigm uniformity involve situations where there is a systematic distinction of multiple paradigm shapes within</description><identifier>ISBN: 9781474446006</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1474446000</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1474446027</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781474446020</identifier><identifier>OCLC: 1148878693</identifier><identifier>LCCallNum: P241$b.M67 2019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United Kingdom: Edinburgh University Press</publisher><ispartof>Morphological Perspectives, 2019, p.171</ispartof><rights>2019 Oliver Bond</rights><rights>2019 Andrew Hippisley</rights><rights>2019 Matthew Baerman</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://ebookcentral.proquest.com/covers/6145382-l.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>777,778,782,791</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Andrew Hippisley</contributor><contributor>Oliver Bond</contributor><contributor>Matthew Baerman</contributor><contributor>Baerman, Matthew</contributor><contributor>Bond, Oliver</contributor><contributor>Hippisley, Andrew</contributor><creatorcontrib>Olivier Bonami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilles Boyé</creatorcontrib><title>Paradigm Uniformity and the French Gender System</title><title>Morphological Perspectives</title><description>Corbett’s view of canonical inflection (see, for example, Corbett 2009) holds that, in the canonical case, all lexemes belonging to the same part of speech should have the same paradigm structure. Obvious violations of the canon are defectivity (a lexeme missing a paradigm cell) and overdifferentiation (a lexeme with an extra paradigm cell). These are usually defined in terms of lexical exceptionalism: we have an expected paradigm shape, and a few irregular lexemes unexpectedly deviate from that paradigm shape. Another interesting family of deviations from paradigm uniformity involve situations where there is a systematic distinction of multiple paradigm shapes within</description><isbn>9781474446006</isbn><isbn>1474446000</isbn><isbn>1474446027</isbn><isbn>9781474446020</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>book_chapter</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>book_chapter</recordtype><recordid>eNo1zFFLwzAUBeCIKOrcf6g_YHBvkibpoww3hYGC8zmkye3aurUzieL-vZPp0-Fw-M4Zu0GppZQKuD5n00qb_w7q8jiiNEYbVYkrNk2pBwBeauSA1wxeXHSh2-yKt6Frxrjr8qFwQyhyS8Ui0uDbYklDoFi8HlKm3S27aNw20fQvJ2y9eFjPH2er5-XT_H416zWImQRZe1k2UngkYYh79EEFMAhaBA2uJIVaYxV4WZvKlCI0KBtRA2oFTS0mTJxu93H8-KSULdXj-O5pyNFtfev2mWKyCmUpDLeoLFbiqO5Oqk95jPZXJNtbn782m2-5B4tc_AA1DVSq</recordid><startdate>20190422</startdate><enddate>20190422</enddate><creator>Olivier Bonami</creator><creator>Gilles Boyé</creator><general>Edinburgh University Press</general><scope>FFUUA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190422</creationdate><title>Paradigm Uniformity and the French Gender System</title><author>Olivier Bonami ; Gilles Boyé</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j703-404bc45f43c1e38e2c1cd6d081073d70a5e617719d25b89853df14f3b01760fb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>book_chapters</rsrctype><prefilter>book_chapters</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Olivier Bonami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilles Boyé</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Ebook Central - Book Chapters - Demo use only</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Olivier Bonami</au><au>Gilles Boyé</au><au>Andrew Hippisley</au><au>Oliver Bond</au><au>Matthew Baerman</au><au>Baerman, Matthew</au><au>Bond, Oliver</au><au>Hippisley, Andrew</au><format>book</format><genre>bookitem</genre><ristype>CHAP</ristype><atitle>Paradigm Uniformity and the French Gender System</atitle><btitle>Morphological Perspectives</btitle><date>2019-04-22</date><risdate>2019</risdate><spage>171</spage><pages>171-</pages><isbn>9781474446006</isbn><isbn>1474446000</isbn><eisbn>1474446027</eisbn><eisbn>9781474446020</eisbn><abstract>Corbett’s view of canonical inflection (see, for example, Corbett 2009) holds that, in the canonical case, all lexemes belonging to the same part of speech should have the same paradigm structure. Obvious violations of the canon are defectivity (a lexeme missing a paradigm cell) and overdifferentiation (a lexeme with an extra paradigm cell). These are usually defined in terms of lexical exceptionalism: we have an expected paradigm shape, and a few irregular lexemes unexpectedly deviate from that paradigm shape. Another interesting family of deviations from paradigm uniformity involve situations where there is a systematic distinction of multiple paradigm shapes within</abstract><cop>United Kingdom</cop><pub>Edinburgh University Press</pub><oclcid>1148878693</oclcid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISBN: 9781474446006
ispartof Morphological Perspectives, 2019, p.171
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_ebookcentralchapters_6145382_16_193
source eBook Academic Collection - Worldwide
title Paradigm Uniformity and the French Gender System
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T21%3A16%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=bookitem&rft.atitle=Paradigm%20Uniformity%20and%20the%20French%20Gender%20System&rft.btitle=Morphological%20Perspectives&rft.au=Olivier%20Bonami&rft.date=2019-04-22&rft.spage=171&rft.pages=171-&rft.isbn=9781474446006&rft.isbn_list=1474446000&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.3366/j.ctvggx4p0.12%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=1474446027&rft.eisbn_list=9781474446020&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=EBC6145382_16_193&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=10.3366/j.ctvggx4p0.12&rfr_iscdi=true