Canonical Tough Cases

Canonical Tough Cases

In a steady stream of influential work over the years, Grev Corbett has clarified and cleared up question after question in morphosyntactic description and comparison, Slavic and general. His path-breaking notion of canonicality and the theoretical work it has triggered (Corbett 2007, 2013, 2015; Co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Johanna Nichols
Format: Buchkapitel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 148
container_title
container_volume
creator Johanna Nichols
description In a steady stream of influential work over the years, Grev Corbett has clarified and cleared up question after question in morphosyntactic description and comparison, Slavic and general. His path-breaking notion of canonicality and the theoretical work it has triggered (Corbett 2007, 2013, 2015; Corbett and Fedden 2016; and many other publications) has solved a number of thorny problems in descriptive and comparative morphosyntax, and it can force us to look closely at familiar but underexamined phenomena and in some cases can make it possible to ask entirely new questions. This paper gives some examples of what I consider familiar
format Book Chapter
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_ebookcentralchapters_6145382_14_170</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.3366/j.ctvggx4p0.11</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.3366/j.ctvggx4p0.11</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j700-d99cdbc7cc63e46d2affdb1f57327848c26d37d07d99e6734b73616ff2d6e7f03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1jMtOwzAURI0QCChZsi8fEOnavvF1lijiJVVik73l-JESqjjEKeLzaVW6Go3mnLlgdxwJERUIumRFTfrcQV0fRo5ak1a1vGFFzgMAiIq4AH7LHho7pvHT2d26Tft-u25sDvmeXUW7y6H4zxVrX57b5q3cfLy-N0-bciCA0te1850j55QMqLywMfqOx4qkII3aCeUleaADGBRJ7EgqrmIUXgWKIFdMnm6nOX3vQ15M6FL6cmFcZrtzWzstYc5GcaykFoaj4XS0Hk_WkJc0m6ORzWDc8tP3vziB4Vz-AbKES6M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>book_chapter</recordtype><pqid>EBC6145382_14_170</pqid></control><display><type>book_chapter</type><title>Canonical Tough Cases</title><source>eBook Academic Collection - Worldwide</source><creator>Johanna Nichols</creator><contributor>Andrew Hippisley ; Oliver Bond ; Matthew Baerman ; Baerman, Matthew ; Bond, Oliver ; Hippisley, Andrew</contributor><creatorcontrib>Johanna Nichols ; Andrew Hippisley ; Oliver Bond ; Matthew Baerman ; Baerman, Matthew ; Bond, Oliver ; Hippisley, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>In a steady stream of influential work over the years, Grev Corbett has clarified and cleared up question after question in morphosyntactic description and comparison, Slavic and general. His path-breaking notion of canonicality and the theoretical work it has triggered (Corbett 2007, 2013, 2015; Corbett and Fedden 2016; and many other publications) has solved a number of thorny problems in descriptive and comparative morphosyntax, and it can force us to look closely at familiar but underexamined phenomena and in some cases can make it possible to ask entirely new questions. This paper gives some examples of what I consider familiar</description><identifier>ISBN: 9781474446006</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1474446000</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1474446027</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781474446020</identifier><identifier>OCLC: 1148878693</identifier><identifier>LCCallNum: P241$b.M67 2019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United Kingdom: Edinburgh University Press</publisher><ispartof>Morphological Perspectives, 2019, p.148</ispartof><rights>2019 Oliver Bond</rights><rights>2019 Andrew Hippisley</rights><rights>2019 Matthew Baerman</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://ebookcentral.proquest.com/covers/6145382-l.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>779,780,784,793</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Andrew Hippisley</contributor><contributor>Oliver Bond</contributor><contributor>Matthew Baerman</contributor><contributor>Baerman, Matthew</contributor><contributor>Bond, Oliver</contributor><contributor>Hippisley, Andrew</contributor><creatorcontrib>Johanna Nichols</creatorcontrib><title>Canonical Tough Cases</title><title>Morphological Perspectives</title><description>In a steady stream of influential work over the years, Grev Corbett has clarified and cleared up question after question in morphosyntactic description and comparison, Slavic and general. His path-breaking notion of canonicality and the theoretical work it has triggered (Corbett 2007, 2013, 2015; Corbett and Fedden 2016; and many other publications) has solved a number of thorny problems in descriptive and comparative morphosyntax, and it can force us to look closely at familiar but underexamined phenomena and in some cases can make it possible to ask entirely new questions. This paper gives some examples of what I consider familiar</description><isbn>9781474446006</isbn><isbn>1474446000</isbn><isbn>1474446027</isbn><isbn>9781474446020</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>book_chapter</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>book_chapter</recordtype><recordid>eNo1jMtOwzAURI0QCChZsi8fEOnavvF1lijiJVVik73l-JESqjjEKeLzaVW6Go3mnLlgdxwJERUIumRFTfrcQV0fRo5ak1a1vGFFzgMAiIq4AH7LHho7pvHT2d26Tft-u25sDvmeXUW7y6H4zxVrX57b5q3cfLy-N0-bciCA0te1850j55QMqLywMfqOx4qkII3aCeUleaADGBRJ7EgqrmIUXgWKIFdMnm6nOX3vQ15M6FL6cmFcZrtzWzstYc5GcaykFoaj4XS0Hk_WkJc0m6ORzWDc8tP3vziB4Vz-AbKES6M</recordid><startdate>20190422</startdate><enddate>20190422</enddate><creator>Johanna Nichols</creator><general>Edinburgh University Press</general><scope>FFUUA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190422</creationdate><title>Canonical Tough Cases</title><author>Johanna Nichols</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j700-d99cdbc7cc63e46d2affdb1f57327848c26d37d07d99e6734b73616ff2d6e7f03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>book_chapters</rsrctype><prefilter>book_chapters</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johanna Nichols</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Ebook Central - Book Chapters - Demo use only</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johanna Nichols</au><au>Andrew Hippisley</au><au>Oliver Bond</au><au>Matthew Baerman</au><au>Baerman, Matthew</au><au>Bond, Oliver</au><au>Hippisley, Andrew</au><format>book</format><genre>bookitem</genre><ristype>CHAP</ristype><atitle>Canonical Tough Cases</atitle><btitle>Morphological Perspectives</btitle><date>2019-04-22</date><risdate>2019</risdate><spage>148</spage><pages>148-</pages><isbn>9781474446006</isbn><isbn>1474446000</isbn><eisbn>1474446027</eisbn><eisbn>9781474446020</eisbn><abstract>In a steady stream of influential work over the years, Grev Corbett has clarified and cleared up question after question in morphosyntactic description and comparison, Slavic and general. His path-breaking notion of canonicality and the theoretical work it has triggered (Corbett 2007, 2013, 2015; Corbett and Fedden 2016; and many other publications) has solved a number of thorny problems in descriptive and comparative morphosyntax, and it can force us to look closely at familiar but underexamined phenomena and in some cases can make it possible to ask entirely new questions. This paper gives some examples of what I consider familiar</abstract><cop>United Kingdom</cop><pub>Edinburgh University Press</pub><oclcid>1148878693</oclcid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISBN: 9781474446006
ispartof Morphological Perspectives, 2019, p.148
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_ebookcentralchapters_6145382_14_170
source eBook Academic Collection - Worldwide
title Canonical Tough Cases
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T16%3A15%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=bookitem&rft.atitle=Canonical%20Tough%20Cases&rft.btitle=Morphological%20Perspectives&rft.au=Johanna%20Nichols&rft.date=2019-04-22&rft.spage=148&rft.pages=148-&rft.isbn=9781474446006&rft.isbn_list=1474446000&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.3366/j.ctvggx4p0.11%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=1474446027&rft.eisbn_list=9781474446020&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=EBC6145382_14_170&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=10.3366/j.ctvggx4p0.11&rfr_iscdi=true