Social dimensions of biodiversity conservation programs

Respond to landholder motivations for biodiversity conservation. Understand the socio-demographic profile of potential participants. Support those already making the change. Design programs to achieve compatibility between financial and biodiversity outcomes. Social dimensions play an important role...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Ansell, Dean, Salt, David, Gibson, Fiona
Format: Buchkapitel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 151
container_title
container_volume
creator Ansell, Dean
Salt, David
Gibson, Fiona
description Respond to landholder motivations for biodiversity conservation. Understand the socio-demographic profile of potential participants. Support those already making the change. Design programs to achieve compatibility between financial and biodiversity outcomes. Social dimensions play an important role in landholder participation in natural resource management (NRM) programs. Many regional-and community-based NRM organisations have a good understanding of landholder characteristics and capacity from data collected through national, regional, or catchment scale landholder surveys and other social studies. But, often, NRM plans only include aspirations for integrating this data into program design, project communications and evaluation. While various frameworks have been developed to do
format Book Chapter
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_ebookcentralchapters_4562280_20_179</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>j.ctt1d10hdp.19</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>j.ctt1d10hdp.19</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j719-971858b69dc25c725937d6df7383f0eaac4ea85c7897ddf73210604fdbe451cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVjstqwzAURFVKS0PqfzDdG_SyrrQsoS8IdNHshSzJjVzHci010L-vQrrJargznDtzhSoFkoDAXGAi4PribvEtWilOgVEAfoeqlEKHGVYKY6FWCD6iDWasXTj4KYU4pTr2dReiC0e_pJB_a1tMvxxNLmk9L_FzMYd0j256MyZf_esa7Z6fdpvXZvv-8rZ53DYDENUoILKVnVDO0tYCbRUDJ1wPTLIee2Ms90aWRCpwJ5sSXHb3rvO8JdayNWLnt6X3-8enrH0X45f1U17MaPdmzmWl5q2gVGJNsSagCvVwpoaU46JPRNKDtjkTR_DezZoo9geCwVok</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>book_chapter</recordtype><pqid>EBC4562280_20_179</pqid></control><display><type>book_chapter</type><title>Social dimensions of biodiversity conservation programs</title><source>OAPEN</source><source>DOAB: Directory of Open Access Books</source><source>JSTOR eBooks: Open Access</source><creator>Ansell, Dean ; Salt, David ; Gibson, Fiona</creator><contributor>Fiona Gibson ; David Salt ; Dean Ansell</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ansell, Dean ; Salt, David ; Gibson, Fiona ; Fiona Gibson ; David Salt ; Dean Ansell</creatorcontrib><description>Respond to landholder motivations for biodiversity conservation. Understand the socio-demographic profile of potential participants. Support those already making the change. Design programs to achieve compatibility between financial and biodiversity outcomes. Social dimensions play an important role in landholder participation in natural resource management (NRM) programs. Many regional-and community-based NRM organisations have a good understanding of landholder characteristics and capacity from data collected through national, regional, or catchment scale landholder surveys and other social studies. But, often, NRM plans only include aspirations for integrating this data into program design, project communications and evaluation. While various frameworks have been developed to do</description><identifier>ISBN: 9781760460150</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 176046015X</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781760460167</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1760460168</identifier><identifier>OCLC: 942732774</identifier><identifier>LCCallNum: QH541.15.E267 .L437 2016</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: ANU Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural sciences ; Agriculture ; Agroecology ; Applied ecology ; Biodiversity conservation ; Biological sciences ; Biology ; Conservation agriculture ; Conservation biology ; Conservation policy ; Conservation practices ; Conservation programs ; Ecology ; Environmental conservation ; Environmental management ; Environmental policy ; Environmental programs ; Government ; Land management ; Natural resource management ; Natural resources conservation ; Nature conservation ; On farm conservation ; Political science ; Public administration ; Public policy ; Sustainable agriculture ; Sustainable land management ; Sustainable management</subject><ispartof>Learning from Agri-Environment Schemes in Australia, 2016, p.151</ispartof><rights>2016 ANU Press</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://ebookcentral.proquest.com/covers/4562280-l.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>775,776,780,789,24340</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Fiona Gibson</contributor><contributor>David Salt</contributor><contributor>Dean Ansell</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ansell, Dean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salt, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibson, Fiona</creatorcontrib><title>Social dimensions of biodiversity conservation programs</title><title>Learning from Agri-Environment Schemes in Australia</title><description>Respond to landholder motivations for biodiversity conservation. Understand the socio-demographic profile of potential participants. Support those already making the change. Design programs to achieve compatibility between financial and biodiversity outcomes. Social dimensions play an important role in landholder participation in natural resource management (NRM) programs. Many regional-and community-based NRM organisations have a good understanding of landholder characteristics and capacity from data collected through national, regional, or catchment scale landholder surveys and other social studies. But, often, NRM plans only include aspirations for integrating this data into program design, project communications and evaluation. While various frameworks have been developed to do</description><subject>Agricultural sciences</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agroecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biodiversity conservation</subject><subject>Biological sciences</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Conservation agriculture</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Conservation policy</subject><subject>Conservation practices</subject><subject>Conservation programs</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental conservation</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Environmental programs</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Land management</subject><subject>Natural resource management</subject><subject>Natural resources conservation</subject><subject>Nature conservation</subject><subject>On farm conservation</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Public administration</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Sustainable agriculture</subject><subject>Sustainable land management</subject><subject>Sustainable management</subject><isbn>9781760460150</isbn><isbn>176046015X</isbn><isbn>9781760460167</isbn><isbn>1760460168</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>book_chapter</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>book_chapter</recordtype><sourceid>BAHZO</sourceid><recordid>eNpVjstqwzAURFVKS0PqfzDdG_SyrrQsoS8IdNHshSzJjVzHci010L-vQrrJargznDtzhSoFkoDAXGAi4PribvEtWilOgVEAfoeqlEKHGVYKY6FWCD6iDWasXTj4KYU4pTr2dReiC0e_pJB_a1tMvxxNLmk9L_FzMYd0j256MyZf_esa7Z6fdpvXZvv-8rZ53DYDENUoILKVnVDO0tYCbRUDJ1wPTLIee2Ms90aWRCpwJ5sSXHb3rvO8JdayNWLnt6X3-8enrH0X45f1U17MaPdmzmWl5q2gVGJNsSagCvVwpoaU46JPRNKDtjkTR_DezZoo9geCwVok</recordid><startdate>20160510</startdate><enddate>20160510</enddate><creator>Ansell, Dean</creator><creator>Salt, David</creator><creator>Gibson, Fiona</creator><general>ANU Press</general><scope>BAHZO</scope><scope>FFUUA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160510</creationdate><title>Social dimensions of biodiversity conservation programs</title><author>Ansell, Dean ; Salt, David ; Gibson, Fiona</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j719-971858b69dc25c725937d6df7383f0eaac4ea85c7897ddf73210604fdbe451cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>book_chapters</rsrctype><prefilter>book_chapters</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Agricultural sciences</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agroecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biodiversity conservation</topic><topic>Biological sciences</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Conservation agriculture</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Conservation policy</topic><topic>Conservation practices</topic><topic>Conservation programs</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental conservation</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Environmental programs</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Land management</topic><topic>Natural resource management</topic><topic>Natural resources conservation</topic><topic>Nature conservation</topic><topic>On farm conservation</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Public administration</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Sustainable agriculture</topic><topic>Sustainable land management</topic><topic>Sustainable management</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ansell, Dean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salt, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibson, Fiona</creatorcontrib><collection>JSTOR eBooks: Open Access</collection><collection>ProQuest Ebook Central - Book Chapters - Demo use only</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ansell, Dean</au><au>Salt, David</au><au>Gibson, Fiona</au><au>Fiona Gibson</au><au>David Salt</au><au>Dean Ansell</au><format>book</format><genre>bookitem</genre><ristype>CHAP</ristype><atitle>Social dimensions of biodiversity conservation programs</atitle><btitle>Learning from Agri-Environment Schemes in Australia</btitle><date>2016-05-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><spage>151</spage><pages>151-</pages><isbn>9781760460150</isbn><isbn>176046015X</isbn><eisbn>9781760460167</eisbn><eisbn>1760460168</eisbn><abstract>Respond to landholder motivations for biodiversity conservation. Understand the socio-demographic profile of potential participants. Support those already making the change. Design programs to achieve compatibility between financial and biodiversity outcomes. Social dimensions play an important role in landholder participation in natural resource management (NRM) programs. Many regional-and community-based NRM organisations have a good understanding of landholder characteristics and capacity from data collected through national, regional, or catchment scale landholder surveys and other social studies. But, often, NRM plans only include aspirations for integrating this data into program design, project communications and evaluation. While various frameworks have been developed to do</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>ANU Press</pub><oclcid>942732774</oclcid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISBN: 9781760460150
ispartof Learning from Agri-Environment Schemes in Australia, 2016, p.151
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_ebookcentralchapters_4562280_20_179
source OAPEN; DOAB: Directory of Open Access Books; JSTOR eBooks: Open Access
subjects Agricultural sciences
Agriculture
Agroecology
Applied ecology
Biodiversity conservation
Biological sciences
Biology
Conservation agriculture
Conservation biology
Conservation policy
Conservation practices
Conservation programs
Ecology
Environmental conservation
Environmental management
Environmental policy
Environmental programs
Government
Land management
Natural resource management
Natural resources conservation
Nature conservation
On farm conservation
Political science
Public administration
Public policy
Sustainable agriculture
Sustainable land management
Sustainable management
title Social dimensions of biodiversity conservation programs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T14%3A14%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=bookitem&rft.atitle=Social%20dimensions%20of%20biodiversity%20conservation%20programs&rft.btitle=Learning%20from%20Agri-Environment%20Schemes%20in%20Australia&rft.au=Ansell,%20Dean&rft.date=2016-05-10&rft.spage=151&rft.pages=151-&rft.isbn=9781760460150&rft.isbn_list=176046015X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3Ej.ctt1d10hdp.19%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=9781760460167&rft.eisbn_list=1760460168&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=EBC4562280_20_179&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=j.ctt1d10hdp.19&rfr_iscdi=true