Fairness

There are many situations where negotiators talk about fairness. Negotiators may claim that what they are asking for is fair or that the other party is being unfair. The claims may relate to outcomes or to process and are often the basis for failure to reach mutually beneficial outcomes. Perceptions...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: De Cremer, David, Pillutla, Madan
Format: Buchkapitel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 143
container_issue
container_start_page 136
container_title
container_volume
creator De Cremer, David
Pillutla, Madan
description There are many situations where negotiators talk about fairness. Negotiators may claim that what they are asking for is fair or that the other party is being unfair. The claims may relate to outcomes or to process and are often the basis for failure to reach mutually beneficial outcomes. Perceptions of fairness, or more accurately unfairness, are often accompanied by negative emotions. These negative emotions override individuals’ impulses to look for a good bargain leading them to ‘irrationally’ reject a seemingly good outcome. A good example of where fairness issues override the desire for self-gain is the ultimatum game that we discussed in the first chapter. In this game, people reject small offers (that are clearly of some value) and take nothing for themselves in order to ensure fairness.
doi_str_mv 10.1057/9781137024794_8
format Book Chapter
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_sprin</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_ebookcentralchapters_4308989_10_142</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>EBC4308989_10_142</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-3c91e875cfabc9064fb1f064bc48e83330dbc832d95a095bae2f1aa1fa15e2243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNj8FOwzAQRI1QUas2Z74isOt18PqIKgpIlbjA2bJdGwpVEuzw_6QUDu2JvYx2NG-kEeIS4Qqh0ddGMyJpkEobZflMVEfO-dHP-kLMGI2ShMRTUZXyDuMxEBqaienKbXMbS1mISXK7EqtfnYuX1d3z8qFeP90_Lm_XdS8Rh5qCwci6Ccn5YOBGJY9pFB8URyYi2PjAJDemcWAa76JM6Bwmh02UUtFc1Ife0udt-xqz9V33USyC3a-zJ-vGPB3yfe4-v2IZbNwDIbZDdrvw5voh5mIVARs2PzXj1n9SiGCQ9R_1DRfeYCQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>book_chapter</recordtype><pqid>EBC1109187_10_142</pqid></control><display><type>book_chapter</type><title>Fairness</title><source>eBooks on EBSCOhost</source><creator>De Cremer, David ; Pillutla, Madan</creator><creatorcontrib>De Cremer, David ; Pillutla, Madan</creatorcontrib><description>There are many situations where negotiators talk about fairness. Negotiators may claim that what they are asking for is fair or that the other party is being unfair. The claims may relate to outcomes or to process and are often the basis for failure to reach mutually beneficial outcomes. Perceptions of fairness, or more accurately unfairness, are often accompanied by negative emotions. These negative emotions override individuals’ impulses to look for a good bargain leading them to ‘irrationally’ reject a seemingly good outcome. A good example of where fairness issues override the desire for self-gain is the ultimatum game that we discussed in the first chapter. In this game, people reject small offers (that are clearly of some value) and take nothing for themselves in order to ensure fairness.</description><identifier>ISBN: 9781137024787</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 113702478X</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1349438650</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781349438655</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781137024794</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1137024798</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1057/9781137024794_8</identifier><identifier>OCLC: 819423138</identifier><identifier>LCCallNum: T57.6-.97</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan UK</publisher><subject>Business &amp; management ; Business strategy ; Capita Emission ; Capitalist Society ; Fairness Issue ; Negative Emotion ; Operational research ; Ultimatum Game</subject><ispartof>Making Negotiations Predictable, 2012, p.136-143</ispartof><rights>David De Cremer and Madan M. Pillutla 2012</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://ebookcentral.proquest.com/covers/1109187-l.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>775,776,780,789,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>De Cremer, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pillutla, Madan</creatorcontrib><title>Fairness</title><title>Making Negotiations Predictable</title><description>There are many situations where negotiators talk about fairness. Negotiators may claim that what they are asking for is fair or that the other party is being unfair. The claims may relate to outcomes or to process and are often the basis for failure to reach mutually beneficial outcomes. Perceptions of fairness, or more accurately unfairness, are often accompanied by negative emotions. These negative emotions override individuals’ impulses to look for a good bargain leading them to ‘irrationally’ reject a seemingly good outcome. A good example of where fairness issues override the desire for self-gain is the ultimatum game that we discussed in the first chapter. In this game, people reject small offers (that are clearly of some value) and take nothing for themselves in order to ensure fairness.</description><subject>Business &amp; management</subject><subject>Business strategy</subject><subject>Capita Emission</subject><subject>Capitalist Society</subject><subject>Fairness Issue</subject><subject>Negative Emotion</subject><subject>Operational research</subject><subject>Ultimatum Game</subject><isbn>9781137024787</isbn><isbn>113702478X</isbn><isbn>1349438650</isbn><isbn>9781349438655</isbn><isbn>9781137024794</isbn><isbn>1137024798</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>book_chapter</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>book_chapter</recordtype><recordid>eNqNj8FOwzAQRI1QUas2Z74isOt18PqIKgpIlbjA2bJdGwpVEuzw_6QUDu2JvYx2NG-kEeIS4Qqh0ddGMyJpkEobZflMVEfO-dHP-kLMGI2ShMRTUZXyDuMxEBqaienKbXMbS1mISXK7EqtfnYuX1d3z8qFeP90_Lm_XdS8Rh5qCwci6Ccn5YOBGJY9pFB8URyYi2PjAJDemcWAa76JM6Bwmh02UUtFc1Ife0udt-xqz9V33USyC3a-zJ-vGPB3yfe4-v2IZbNwDIbZDdrvw5voh5mIVARs2PzXj1n9SiGCQ9R_1DRfeYCQ</recordid><startdate>2012</startdate><enddate>2012</enddate><creator>De Cremer, David</creator><creator>Pillutla, Madan</creator><general>Palgrave Macmillan UK</general><scope>FFUUA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2012</creationdate><title>Fairness</title><author>De Cremer, David ; Pillutla, Madan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-3c91e875cfabc9064fb1f064bc48e83330dbc832d95a095bae2f1aa1fa15e2243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>book_chapters</rsrctype><prefilter>book_chapters</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Business &amp; management</topic><topic>Business strategy</topic><topic>Capita Emission</topic><topic>Capitalist Society</topic><topic>Fairness Issue</topic><topic>Negative Emotion</topic><topic>Operational research</topic><topic>Ultimatum Game</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Cremer, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pillutla, Madan</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Ebook Central - Book Chapters - Demo use only</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Cremer, David</au><au>Pillutla, Madan</au><format>book</format><genre>bookitem</genre><ristype>CHAP</ristype><atitle>Fairness</atitle><btitle>Making Negotiations Predictable</btitle><date>2012</date><risdate>2012</risdate><spage>136</spage><epage>143</epage><pages>136-143</pages><isbn>9781137024787</isbn><isbn>113702478X</isbn><isbn>1349438650</isbn><isbn>9781349438655</isbn><eisbn>9781137024794</eisbn><eisbn>1137024798</eisbn><abstract>There are many situations where negotiators talk about fairness. Negotiators may claim that what they are asking for is fair or that the other party is being unfair. The claims may relate to outcomes or to process and are often the basis for failure to reach mutually beneficial outcomes. Perceptions of fairness, or more accurately unfairness, are often accompanied by negative emotions. These negative emotions override individuals’ impulses to look for a good bargain leading them to ‘irrationally’ reject a seemingly good outcome. A good example of where fairness issues override the desire for self-gain is the ultimatum game that we discussed in the first chapter. In this game, people reject small offers (that are clearly of some value) and take nothing for themselves in order to ensure fairness.</abstract><cop>United Kingdom</cop><pub>Palgrave Macmillan UK</pub><doi>10.1057/9781137024794_8</doi><oclcid>819423138</oclcid><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISBN: 9781137024787
ispartof Making Negotiations Predictable, 2012, p.136-143
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_ebookcentralchapters_4308989_10_142
source eBooks on EBSCOhost
subjects Business & management
Business strategy
Capita Emission
Capitalist Society
Fairness Issue
Negative Emotion
Operational research
Ultimatum Game
title Fairness
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T09%3A23%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_sprin&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=bookitem&rft.atitle=Fairness&rft.btitle=Making%20Negotiations%20Predictable&rft.au=De%20Cremer,%20David&rft.date=2012&rft.spage=136&rft.epage=143&rft.pages=136-143&rft.isbn=9781137024787&rft.isbn_list=113702478X&rft.isbn_list=1349438650&rft.isbn_list=9781349438655&rft_id=info:doi/10.1057/9781137024794_8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_sprin%3EEBC4308989_10_142%3C/proquest_sprin%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=9781137024794&rft.eisbn_list=1137024798&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=EBC1109187_10_142&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true