Competition, going enterprise, and economic activity
Post-Keynesians from the 1970s onwards utilized various pricing models in their theoretical work. The most popular one was mark-up pricing which consisted of either marking up average direct labor costs or average direct material and labor costs to set the price, with the mark-up covering overhead c...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buchkapitel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 173 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 160 |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Lee, Frederic S. |
description | Post-Keynesians from the 1970s onwards utilized various pricing models in their theoretical work. The most popular one was mark-up pricing which consisted of either marking up average direct labor costs or average direct material and labor costs to set the price, with the mark-up covering overhead costs and profits.
1
In addition, it was often assumed that average direct costs were constant and labor was the only input used to produce output. This latter assumption was derived from the view that circular production, as represented in input-output tables and Sraffian production models, was a fact that was irrelevant for theoretical work. Finally, it was assumed that the profit mark-up used for pricing was determined by the investment needs of the enterprise or by a degree of monopoly, which in some cases was defined in terms of price elasticity of demand (see Lee 1998: 11-16). |
doi_str_mv | 10.4324/9780203102671-8 |
format | Book Chapter |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_ebookcentralchapters_1046877_18_183</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>EBC1046877_18_183</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i178t-56fd18dd6665378c9a7e8504d0c0d4cfcb6935760f6ebfd625cea716c7bc28553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE9LAzEQxSOiWGvPXvcDdDWz-btHKVqFghc9h2ySrcHtZk1ipd_elHoRBoYZeL958xC6BXxHSUPvWyFxgwnghguo5RlalA0A4Q0F4HCOrssgRduCIJdoJkFIKQRpr9AiJd9hgilrJYEZoquwm1z22YdxWW2DH7eVG7OLU_TJLSs92sqZMIadN5U22e99Ptygi14PyS3--hy9Pz2-rZ7rzev6ZfWwqX05mGvGewvSWs45I0KaVgsnGaYWG2yp6U3HW8IExz13XW95w4zTArgRnWkkY2SOyIk7xfD17VJWrgvh0xSDUQ_mQ0_FaFKAKS_vKZClSFGtTyo_9iHu9E-Ig1VZH4YQ-6hH49ORctSpY5rqX5pKqn2Bljga8gvBDmke</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>book_chapter</recordtype><pqid>EBC1046877_18_183</pqid></control><display><type>book_chapter</type><title>Competition, going enterprise, and economic activity</title><source>eBooks on EBSCOhost</source><creator>Lee, Frederic S.</creator><contributor>Moudud, Jamee K. ; Bina, Cyrus ; Mason, Patrick L.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lee, Frederic S. ; Moudud, Jamee K. ; Bina, Cyrus ; Mason, Patrick L.</creatorcontrib><description>Post-Keynesians from the 1970s onwards utilized various pricing models in their theoretical work. The most popular one was mark-up pricing which consisted of either marking up average direct labor costs or average direct material and labor costs to set the price, with the mark-up covering overhead costs and profits.
1
In addition, it was often assumed that average direct costs were constant and labor was the only input used to produce output. This latter assumption was derived from the view that circular production, as represented in input-output tables and Sraffian production models, was a fact that was irrelevant for theoretical work. Finally, it was assumed that the profit mark-up used for pricing was determined by the investment needs of the enterprise or by a degree of monopoly, which in some cases was defined in terms of price elasticity of demand (see Lee 1998: 11-16).</description><edition>1</edition><identifier>ISBN: 1138799173</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781138799172</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 0415686873</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9780415686877</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781136241161</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1136241159</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9780203102671</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1136241167</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781136241154</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 0203102673</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4324/9780203102671-8</identifier><identifier>OCLC: 817887739</identifier><identifier>LCCallNum: HB238 .A48 2012</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United Kingdom: Routledge</publisher><subject>Business competition ; Economic theory & philosophy</subject><ispartof>Alternative Theories of Competition, 2013, p.160-173</ispartof><rights>2013 Selection and editorial matter, Jamee K. Moudud, Cyrus Bina and Patrick L. Mason; individual chapters, the contributors</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://ebookcentral.proquest.com/covers/1046877-l.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>775,776,780,789,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Moudud, Jamee K.</contributor><contributor>Bina, Cyrus</contributor><contributor>Mason, Patrick L.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lee, Frederic S.</creatorcontrib><title>Competition, going enterprise, and economic activity</title><title>Alternative Theories of Competition</title><description>Post-Keynesians from the 1970s onwards utilized various pricing models in their theoretical work. The most popular one was mark-up pricing which consisted of either marking up average direct labor costs or average direct material and labor costs to set the price, with the mark-up covering overhead costs and profits.
1
In addition, it was often assumed that average direct costs were constant and labor was the only input used to produce output. This latter assumption was derived from the view that circular production, as represented in input-output tables and Sraffian production models, was a fact that was irrelevant for theoretical work. Finally, it was assumed that the profit mark-up used for pricing was determined by the investment needs of the enterprise or by a degree of monopoly, which in some cases was defined in terms of price elasticity of demand (see Lee 1998: 11-16).</description><subject>Business competition</subject><subject>Economic theory & philosophy</subject><isbn>1138799173</isbn><isbn>9781138799172</isbn><isbn>0415686873</isbn><isbn>9780415686877</isbn><isbn>9781136241161</isbn><isbn>1136241159</isbn><isbn>9780203102671</isbn><isbn>1136241167</isbn><isbn>9781136241154</isbn><isbn>0203102673</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>book_chapter</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>book_chapter</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkE9LAzEQxSOiWGvPXvcDdDWz-btHKVqFghc9h2ySrcHtZk1ipd_elHoRBoYZeL958xC6BXxHSUPvWyFxgwnghguo5RlalA0A4Q0F4HCOrssgRduCIJdoJkFIKQRpr9AiJd9hgilrJYEZoquwm1z22YdxWW2DH7eVG7OLU_TJLSs92sqZMIadN5U22e99Ptygi14PyS3--hy9Pz2-rZ7rzev6ZfWwqX05mGvGewvSWs45I0KaVgsnGaYWG2yp6U3HW8IExz13XW95w4zTArgRnWkkY2SOyIk7xfD17VJWrgvh0xSDUQ_mQ0_FaFKAKS_vKZClSFGtTyo_9iHu9E-Ig1VZH4YQ-6hH49ORctSpY5rqX5pKqn2Bljga8gvBDmke</recordid><startdate>2013</startdate><enddate>2013</enddate><creator>Lee, Frederic S.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>FFUUA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2013</creationdate><title>Competition, going enterprise, and economic activity</title><author>Lee, Frederic S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i178t-56fd18dd6665378c9a7e8504d0c0d4cfcb6935760f6ebfd625cea716c7bc28553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>book_chapters</rsrctype><prefilter>book_chapters</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Business competition</topic><topic>Economic theory & philosophy</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Frederic S.</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Ebook Central - Book Chapters - Demo use only</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Frederic S.</au><au>Moudud, Jamee K.</au><au>Bina, Cyrus</au><au>Mason, Patrick L.</au><format>book</format><genre>bookitem</genre><ristype>CHAP</ristype><atitle>Competition, going enterprise, and economic activity</atitle><btitle>Alternative Theories of Competition</btitle><date>2013</date><risdate>2013</risdate><spage>160</spage><epage>173</epage><pages>160-173</pages><isbn>1138799173</isbn><isbn>9781138799172</isbn><isbn>0415686873</isbn><isbn>9780415686877</isbn><eisbn>9781136241161</eisbn><eisbn>1136241159</eisbn><eisbn>9780203102671</eisbn><eisbn>1136241167</eisbn><eisbn>9781136241154</eisbn><eisbn>0203102673</eisbn><abstract>Post-Keynesians from the 1970s onwards utilized various pricing models in their theoretical work. The most popular one was mark-up pricing which consisted of either marking up average direct labor costs or average direct material and labor costs to set the price, with the mark-up covering overhead costs and profits.
1
In addition, it was often assumed that average direct costs were constant and labor was the only input used to produce output. This latter assumption was derived from the view that circular production, as represented in input-output tables and Sraffian production models, was a fact that was irrelevant for theoretical work. Finally, it was assumed that the profit mark-up used for pricing was determined by the investment needs of the enterprise or by a degree of monopoly, which in some cases was defined in terms of price elasticity of demand (see Lee 1998: 11-16).</abstract><cop>United Kingdom</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.4324/9780203102671-8</doi><oclcid>817887739</oclcid><tpages>14</tpages><edition>1</edition></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISBN: 1138799173 |
ispartof | Alternative Theories of Competition, 2013, p.160-173 |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_ebookcentralchapters_1046877_18_183 |
source | eBooks on EBSCOhost |
subjects | Business competition Economic theory & philosophy |
title | Competition, going enterprise, and economic activity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T12%3A24%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=bookitem&rft.atitle=Competition,%20going%20enterprise,%20and%20economic%20activity&rft.btitle=Alternative%20Theories%20of%20Competition&rft.au=Lee,%20Frederic%20S.&rft.date=2013&rft.spage=160&rft.epage=173&rft.pages=160-173&rft.isbn=1138799173&rft.isbn_list=9781138799172&rft.isbn_list=0415686873&rft.isbn_list=9780415686877&rft_id=info:doi/10.4324/9780203102671-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3EEBC1046877_18_183%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=9781136241161&rft.eisbn_list=1136241159&rft.eisbn_list=9780203102671&rft.eisbn_list=1136241167&rft.eisbn_list=9781136241154&rft.eisbn_list=0203102673&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=EBC1046877_18_183&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |