Recursive categoricity and persistence
This paper is concerned with recursive structures and the persistance of an effective notion of categoricity. The terminology and notational conventions are standard. We will devote the rest of this paragraph to a cursory review of some of the assumed conventions. If θ is a formula, then θ k denotes...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of symbolic logic 1986-06, Vol.51 (2), p.430-434 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 434 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 430 |
container_title | The Journal of symbolic logic |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Millar, Terrence |
description | This paper is concerned with recursive structures and the persistance of an effective notion of categoricity. The terminology and notational conventions are standard. We will devote the rest of this paragraph to a cursory review of some of the assumed conventions. If
θ
is a formula, then
θ
k
denotes
θ
if
k
is zero, and ¬
θ
if
k
is one. If
A
is a sequence with domain a subset of
ω
, then
A
∣
n
denotes the sequence obtained by restricting the domain of
A
to
n
. For an effective first order language
L
, let {
c
i
∣
i
<
ω
} be distinct new constants, and let {
θ
i
∣
i
<
ω
} be an effective enumeration of all sentences in the language
L
∪ {
c
i
∣
j
<
ω
}. An infinite L-structure
is
recursive
iff it has universe
ω
and the set
is recursive, where
c
n
is interpreted by
n
. In general we say that a set of formulas is recursive if the set of its indices with respect to an enumeration such as above is recursive. The ∃-diagram of a structure
is recursive if the structure is recursive and the set
and
θ
i
is an existential sentence} is also recursive. The definition of “the ∀∃-diagram of
is recursive” is similar. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0022481200031297 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proje</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_projecteuclid_primary_oai_CULeuclid_euclid_jsl_1183742108</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2274066</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2274066</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2425-1cfb098c20155bbf32bb2603b1bfae79a2589ec6e301d70711c901d7462222c83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkFFLwzAUhYMoOKc_wLeB4lv13pumSd-U4TZxIGr3HNoslda5zqQV_fembAzBvNyQ851zw2HsHOEaAeXNKwBRrJAAgCOl8oANMI15JJRKDtmgl6NeP2Yn3teBEmmsBuzqxZrO-erLjkze2rfGVaZqf0b5ejna2CD41q6NPWVHZb7y9mw3h2wxuc_Gs2j-NH0Y380jQzGJCE1ZQKoMAQpRFCWnoqAEeIFFmVuZ5iRUak1iOeBSgkQ0aX-LEwrHKD5kt9vcjWtqa1rbmVW11BtXfeTuRzd5pceL-e51N2q_0oiKy5gQ-oiLfcRnZ32r66Zz6_BrHXoBKVJFIlC4pYxrvHe23O9A0H2j-l-jwXO59dS-bdxfA3GQmkjGkCQBi7ZY3933Hsvdu04kl0In02c9m2T0OMuyYP0FZAOBVQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1290759825</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Recursive categoricity and persistence</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>JSTOR Mathematics & Statistics</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Millar, Terrence</creator><creatorcontrib>Millar, Terrence</creatorcontrib><description>This paper is concerned with recursive structures and the persistance of an effective notion of categoricity. The terminology and notational conventions are standard. We will devote the rest of this paragraph to a cursory review of some of the assumed conventions. If
θ
is a formula, then
θ
k
denotes
θ
if
k
is zero, and ¬
θ
if
k
is one. If
A
is a sequence with domain a subset of
ω
, then
A
∣
n
denotes the sequence obtained by restricting the domain of
A
to
n
. For an effective first order language
L
, let {
c
i
∣
i
<
ω
} be distinct new constants, and let {
θ
i
∣
i
<
ω
} be an effective enumeration of all sentences in the language
L
∪ {
c
i
∣
j
<
ω
}. An infinite L-structure
is
recursive
iff it has universe
ω
and the set
is recursive, where
c
n
is interpreted by
n
. In general we say that a set of formulas is recursive if the set of its indices with respect to an enumeration such as above is recursive. The ∃-diagram of a structure
is recursive if the structure is recursive and the set
and
θ
i
is an existential sentence} is also recursive. The definition of “the ∀∃-diagram of
is recursive” is similar.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-5886</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0022481200031297</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Categoricity ; Induction assumption ; Mathematical induction</subject><ispartof>The Journal of symbolic logic, 1986-06, Vol.51 (2), p.430-434</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1986 Association for Symbolic Logic, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright 1986 Association for Symbolic Logic</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2425-1cfb098c20155bbf32bb2603b1bfae79a2589ec6e301d70711c901d7462222c83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2274066$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2274066$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,799,828,881,27848,27903,27904,57995,57999,58228,58232</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Millar, Terrence</creatorcontrib><title>Recursive categoricity and persistence</title><title>The Journal of symbolic logic</title><description>This paper is concerned with recursive structures and the persistance of an effective notion of categoricity. The terminology and notational conventions are standard. We will devote the rest of this paragraph to a cursory review of some of the assumed conventions. If
θ
is a formula, then
θ
k
denotes
θ
if
k
is zero, and ¬
θ
if
k
is one. If
A
is a sequence with domain a subset of
ω
, then
A
∣
n
denotes the sequence obtained by restricting the domain of
A
to
n
. For an effective first order language
L
, let {
c
i
∣
i
<
ω
} be distinct new constants, and let {
θ
i
∣
i
<
ω
} be an effective enumeration of all sentences in the language
L
∪ {
c
i
∣
j
<
ω
}. An infinite L-structure
is
recursive
iff it has universe
ω
and the set
is recursive, where
c
n
is interpreted by
n
. In general we say that a set of formulas is recursive if the set of its indices with respect to an enumeration such as above is recursive. The ∃-diagram of a structure
is recursive if the structure is recursive and the set
and
θ
i
is an existential sentence} is also recursive. The definition of “the ∀∃-diagram of
is recursive” is similar.</description><subject>Categoricity</subject><subject>Induction assumption</subject><subject>Mathematical induction</subject><issn>0022-4812</issn><issn>1943-5886</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNplkFFLwzAUhYMoOKc_wLeB4lv13pumSd-U4TZxIGr3HNoslda5zqQV_fembAzBvNyQ851zw2HsHOEaAeXNKwBRrJAAgCOl8oANMI15JJRKDtmgl6NeP2Yn3teBEmmsBuzqxZrO-erLjkze2rfGVaZqf0b5ejna2CD41q6NPWVHZb7y9mw3h2wxuc_Gs2j-NH0Y380jQzGJCE1ZQKoMAQpRFCWnoqAEeIFFmVuZ5iRUak1iOeBSgkQ0aX-LEwrHKD5kt9vcjWtqa1rbmVW11BtXfeTuRzd5pceL-e51N2q_0oiKy5gQ-oiLfcRnZ32r66Zz6_BrHXoBKVJFIlC4pYxrvHe23O9A0H2j-l-jwXO59dS-bdxfA3GQmkjGkCQBi7ZY3933Hsvdu04kl0In02c9m2T0OMuyYP0FZAOBVQ</recordid><startdate>19860601</startdate><enddate>19860601</enddate><creator>Millar, Terrence</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Association for Symbolic Logic, Inc</general><general>Association for Symbolic Logic</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19860601</creationdate><title>Recursive categoricity and persistence</title><author>Millar, Terrence</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2425-1cfb098c20155bbf32bb2603b1bfae79a2589ec6e301d70711c901d7462222c83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Categoricity</topic><topic>Induction assumption</topic><topic>Mathematical induction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Millar, Terrence</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>The Journal of symbolic logic</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Millar, Terrence</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Recursive categoricity and persistence</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of symbolic logic</jtitle><date>1986-06-01</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>430</spage><epage>434</epage><pages>430-434</pages><issn>0022-4812</issn><eissn>1943-5886</eissn><abstract>This paper is concerned with recursive structures and the persistance of an effective notion of categoricity. The terminology and notational conventions are standard. We will devote the rest of this paragraph to a cursory review of some of the assumed conventions. If
θ
is a formula, then
θ
k
denotes
θ
if
k
is zero, and ¬
θ
if
k
is one. If
A
is a sequence with domain a subset of
ω
, then
A
∣
n
denotes the sequence obtained by restricting the domain of
A
to
n
. For an effective first order language
L
, let {
c
i
∣
i
<
ω
} be distinct new constants, and let {
θ
i
∣
i
<
ω
} be an effective enumeration of all sentences in the language
L
∪ {
c
i
∣
j
<
ω
}. An infinite L-structure
is
recursive
iff it has universe
ω
and the set
is recursive, where
c
n
is interpreted by
n
. In general we say that a set of formulas is recursive if the set of its indices with respect to an enumeration such as above is recursive. The ∃-diagram of a structure
is recursive if the structure is recursive and the set
and
θ
i
is an existential sentence} is also recursive. The definition of “the ∀∃-diagram of
is recursive” is similar.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0022481200031297</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-4812 |
ispartof | The Journal of symbolic logic, 1986-06, Vol.51 (2), p.430-434 |
issn | 0022-4812 1943-5886 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_projecteuclid_primary_oai_CULeuclid_euclid_jsl_1183742108 |
source | Periodicals Index Online; JSTOR Mathematics & Statistics; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Categoricity Induction assumption Mathematical induction |
title | Recursive categoricity and persistence |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T19%3A55%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proje&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Recursive%20categoricity%20and%20persistence&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20symbolic%20logic&rft.au=Millar,%20Terrence&rft.date=1986-06-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=430&rft.epage=434&rft.pages=430-434&rft.issn=0022-4812&rft.eissn=1943-5886&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0022481200031297&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proje%3E2274066%3C/jstor_proje%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1290759825&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2274066&rfr_iscdi=true |