Noninvasive in vivo imaging reveals differences between tectorial membrane and basilar membrane traveling waves in the mouse cochlea

Significance The membranes within the cochlea vibrate in response to sound. However, measuring these vibrations to study the sense of hearing has been a technological challenge because invasive techniques have been required. Herein, we describe a new technique capable of depth-resolved displacement...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS 2015-03, Vol.112 (10), p.3128-3133
Hauptverfasser: Lee, Hee Yoon, Raphael, Patrick D., Park, Jesung, Ellerbee, Audrey K., Applegate, Brian E., Oghalai, John S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3133
container_issue 10
container_start_page 3128
container_title Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS
container_volume 112
creator Lee, Hee Yoon
Raphael, Patrick D.
Park, Jesung
Ellerbee, Audrey K.
Applegate, Brian E.
Oghalai, John S.
description Significance The membranes within the cochlea vibrate in response to sound. However, measuring these vibrations to study the sense of hearing has been a technological challenge because invasive techniques have been required. Herein, we describe a new technique capable of depth-resolved displacement measurements in 3D space with picometer sensitivity within the unopened mouse cochlea. We used this technique to make, to our knowledge, the first measurements of the tectorial membrane, the structure that overlies the sensory hair cell stereociliary bundles, within a healthy cochlea. We found that the tectorial membrane sustains traveling wave propagation differently than the more commonly measured basilar membrane. This finding provides a clearer understanding of the mechanical stimulus at the level of the inner hair cell responsible for non-linear sound encoding. Sound is encoded within the auditory portion of the inner ear, the cochlea, after propagating down its length as a traveling wave. For over half a century, vibratory measurements to study cochlear traveling waves have been made using invasive approaches such as laser Doppler vibrometry. Although these studies have provided critical information regarding the nonlinear processes within the living cochlea that increase the amplitude of vibration and sharpen frequency tuning, the data have typically been limited to point measurements of basilar membrane vibration. In addition, opening the cochlea may alter its function and affect the findings. Here we describe volumetric optical coherence tomography vibrometry, a technique that overcomes these limitations by providing depth-resolved displacement measurements at 200 kHz inside a 3D volume of tissue with picometer sensitivity. We studied the mouse cochlea by imaging noninvasively through the surrounding bone to measure sound-induced vibrations of the sensory structures in vivo, and report, to our knowledge, the first measures of tectorial membrane vibration within the unopened cochlea. We found that the tectorial membrane sustains traveling wave propagation. Compared with basilar membrane traveling waves, tectorial membrane traveling waves have larger dynamic ranges, sharper frequency tuning, and apically shifted positions of peak vibration. These findings explain discrepancies between previously published basilar membrane vibration and auditory nerve single unit data. Because the tectorial membrane directly overlies the inner hair cell stereociliary bundl
doi_str_mv 10.1073/pnas.1500038112
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pnas_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pnas_primary_112_10_3128</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26461777</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26461777</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c590t-1e8ba639df86906d921b54756094f3aa3c8b03f23edfad986ceff12c4160eaf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkktvEzEQgFcIRNPCmRNgqRcuaf3Y9eNSCVW8pAoOlLPl9Y4TR7t2sDdbceeH41VCAlw42bK_-Tzjmap6QfAVwYJdb4PJV6TBGDNJCH1ULQhWZMlrhR9XC4ypWMqa1mfVec6bQqlG4qfVGW0EEw3ji-rn5xh8mEz2EyAf0OSniPxgVj6sUIIJTJ9R552DBMFCRi2MDwABjWDHmLzp0QBDm0wAZEKH2mLqTTodjslM0M-2h7LJ8xvjGtAQdxmQjXbdg3lWPXHlHXh-WC-q-_fv7m8_Lu--fPh0-_ZuaRuFxyUB2RrOVOckV5h3ipK2qUXDsaodM4ZZ2WLmKIPOmU5JbsE5Qm1NOAbj2EV1s9dud-0AnYVQkuv1NpV60w8djdd_3wS_1qs46ZrxmkhWBG8OghS_7yCPevDZQt-XQks9mkjMCGZK4f-jnFPOhOKyoJf_oJu4S6F8xEwxRaQSpFDXe8qmmHMCd8ybYD3Pgp5nQZ9moUS8-rPcI_-7-QV4fQDmyKOO0FnJCJ1Te7knNrk0-2TgNSdCiJPBmajNKvmsv32luPw3JkzWjWS_AL46z_U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1663918971</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Noninvasive in vivo imaging reveals differences between tectorial membrane and basilar membrane traveling waves in the mouse cochlea</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Lee, Hee Yoon ; Raphael, Patrick D. ; Park, Jesung ; Ellerbee, Audrey K. ; Applegate, Brian E. ; Oghalai, John S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hee Yoon ; Raphael, Patrick D. ; Park, Jesung ; Ellerbee, Audrey K. ; Applegate, Brian E. ; Oghalai, John S.</creatorcontrib><description>Significance The membranes within the cochlea vibrate in response to sound. However, measuring these vibrations to study the sense of hearing has been a technological challenge because invasive techniques have been required. Herein, we describe a new technique capable of depth-resolved displacement measurements in 3D space with picometer sensitivity within the unopened mouse cochlea. We used this technique to make, to our knowledge, the first measurements of the tectorial membrane, the structure that overlies the sensory hair cell stereociliary bundles, within a healthy cochlea. We found that the tectorial membrane sustains traveling wave propagation differently than the more commonly measured basilar membrane. This finding provides a clearer understanding of the mechanical stimulus at the level of the inner hair cell responsible for non-linear sound encoding. Sound is encoded within the auditory portion of the inner ear, the cochlea, after propagating down its length as a traveling wave. For over half a century, vibratory measurements to study cochlear traveling waves have been made using invasive approaches such as laser Doppler vibrometry. Although these studies have provided critical information regarding the nonlinear processes within the living cochlea that increase the amplitude of vibration and sharpen frequency tuning, the data have typically been limited to point measurements of basilar membrane vibration. In addition, opening the cochlea may alter its function and affect the findings. Here we describe volumetric optical coherence tomography vibrometry, a technique that overcomes these limitations by providing depth-resolved displacement measurements at 200 kHz inside a 3D volume of tissue with picometer sensitivity. We studied the mouse cochlea by imaging noninvasively through the surrounding bone to measure sound-induced vibrations of the sensory structures in vivo, and report, to our knowledge, the first measures of tectorial membrane vibration within the unopened cochlea. We found that the tectorial membrane sustains traveling wave propagation. Compared with basilar membrane traveling waves, tectorial membrane traveling waves have larger dynamic ranges, sharper frequency tuning, and apically shifted positions of peak vibration. These findings explain discrepancies between previously published basilar membrane vibration and auditory nerve single unit data. Because the tectorial membrane directly overlies the inner hair cell stereociliary bundles, these data provide the most accurate characterization of the stimulus shaping the afferent auditory response available to date.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0027-8424</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1091-6490</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1500038112</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25737536</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Academy of Sciences</publisher><subject>Animals ; Basilar Membrane - physiology ; Biological Sciences ; Cochlea - physiology ; hearing ; image analysis ; Membranes ; Mice ; Propagation ; Tectorial Membrane - physiology ; Tissues ; Tomography ; Tomography, Optical Coherence ; Vibration</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2015-03, Vol.112 (10), p.3128-3133</ispartof><rights>Volumes 1–89 and 106–112, copyright as a collective work only; author(s) retains copyright to individual articles</rights><rights>Copyright National Academy of Sciences Mar 10, 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c590t-1e8ba639df86906d921b54756094f3aa3c8b03f23edfad986ceff12c4160eaf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c590t-1e8ba639df86906d921b54756094f3aa3c8b03f23edfad986ceff12c4160eaf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://www.pnas.org/content/112/10.cover.gif</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26461777$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26461777$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,799,881,27903,27904,53769,53771,57995,58228</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25737536$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hee Yoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raphael, Patrick D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Jesung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellerbee, Audrey K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Applegate, Brian E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oghalai, John S.</creatorcontrib><title>Noninvasive in vivo imaging reveals differences between tectorial membrane and basilar membrane traveling waves in the mouse cochlea</title><title>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</title><addtitle>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</addtitle><description>Significance The membranes within the cochlea vibrate in response to sound. However, measuring these vibrations to study the sense of hearing has been a technological challenge because invasive techniques have been required. Herein, we describe a new technique capable of depth-resolved displacement measurements in 3D space with picometer sensitivity within the unopened mouse cochlea. We used this technique to make, to our knowledge, the first measurements of the tectorial membrane, the structure that overlies the sensory hair cell stereociliary bundles, within a healthy cochlea. We found that the tectorial membrane sustains traveling wave propagation differently than the more commonly measured basilar membrane. This finding provides a clearer understanding of the mechanical stimulus at the level of the inner hair cell responsible for non-linear sound encoding. Sound is encoded within the auditory portion of the inner ear, the cochlea, after propagating down its length as a traveling wave. For over half a century, vibratory measurements to study cochlear traveling waves have been made using invasive approaches such as laser Doppler vibrometry. Although these studies have provided critical information regarding the nonlinear processes within the living cochlea that increase the amplitude of vibration and sharpen frequency tuning, the data have typically been limited to point measurements of basilar membrane vibration. In addition, opening the cochlea may alter its function and affect the findings. Here we describe volumetric optical coherence tomography vibrometry, a technique that overcomes these limitations by providing depth-resolved displacement measurements at 200 kHz inside a 3D volume of tissue with picometer sensitivity. We studied the mouse cochlea by imaging noninvasively through the surrounding bone to measure sound-induced vibrations of the sensory structures in vivo, and report, to our knowledge, the first measures of tectorial membrane vibration within the unopened cochlea. We found that the tectorial membrane sustains traveling wave propagation. Compared with basilar membrane traveling waves, tectorial membrane traveling waves have larger dynamic ranges, sharper frequency tuning, and apically shifted positions of peak vibration. These findings explain discrepancies between previously published basilar membrane vibration and auditory nerve single unit data. Because the tectorial membrane directly overlies the inner hair cell stereociliary bundles, these data provide the most accurate characterization of the stimulus shaping the afferent auditory response available to date.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Basilar Membrane - physiology</subject><subject>Biological Sciences</subject><subject>Cochlea - physiology</subject><subject>hearing</subject><subject>image analysis</subject><subject>Membranes</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Propagation</subject><subject>Tectorial Membrane - physiology</subject><subject>Tissues</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tomography, Optical Coherence</subject><subject>Vibration</subject><issn>0027-8424</issn><issn>1091-6490</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkktvEzEQgFcIRNPCmRNgqRcuaf3Y9eNSCVW8pAoOlLPl9Y4TR7t2sDdbceeH41VCAlw42bK_-Tzjmap6QfAVwYJdb4PJV6TBGDNJCH1ULQhWZMlrhR9XC4ypWMqa1mfVec6bQqlG4qfVGW0EEw3ji-rn5xh8mEz2EyAf0OSniPxgVj6sUIIJTJ9R552DBMFCRi2MDwABjWDHmLzp0QBDm0wAZEKH2mLqTTodjslM0M-2h7LJ8xvjGtAQdxmQjXbdg3lWPXHlHXh-WC-q-_fv7m8_Lu--fPh0-_ZuaRuFxyUB2RrOVOckV5h3ipK2qUXDsaodM4ZZ2WLmKIPOmU5JbsE5Qm1NOAbj2EV1s9dud-0AnYVQkuv1NpV60w8djdd_3wS_1qs46ZrxmkhWBG8OghS_7yCPevDZQt-XQks9mkjMCGZK4f-jnFPOhOKyoJf_oJu4S6F8xEwxRaQSpFDXe8qmmHMCd8ybYD3Pgp5nQZ9moUS8-rPcI_-7-QV4fQDmyKOO0FnJCJ1Te7knNrk0-2TgNSdCiJPBmajNKvmsv32luPw3JkzWjWS_AL46z_U</recordid><startdate>20150310</startdate><enddate>20150310</enddate><creator>Lee, Hee Yoon</creator><creator>Raphael, Patrick D.</creator><creator>Park, Jesung</creator><creator>Ellerbee, Audrey K.</creator><creator>Applegate, Brian E.</creator><creator>Oghalai, John S.</creator><general>National Academy of Sciences</general><general>National Acad Sciences</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150310</creationdate><title>Noninvasive in vivo imaging reveals differences between tectorial membrane and basilar membrane traveling waves in the mouse cochlea</title><author>Lee, Hee Yoon ; Raphael, Patrick D. ; Park, Jesung ; Ellerbee, Audrey K. ; Applegate, Brian E. ; Oghalai, John S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c590t-1e8ba639df86906d921b54756094f3aa3c8b03f23edfad986ceff12c4160eaf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Basilar Membrane - physiology</topic><topic>Biological Sciences</topic><topic>Cochlea - physiology</topic><topic>hearing</topic><topic>image analysis</topic><topic>Membranes</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Propagation</topic><topic>Tectorial Membrane - physiology</topic><topic>Tissues</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tomography, Optical Coherence</topic><topic>Vibration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hee Yoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raphael, Patrick D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Jesung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellerbee, Audrey K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Applegate, Brian E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oghalai, John S.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Hee Yoon</au><au>Raphael, Patrick D.</au><au>Park, Jesung</au><au>Ellerbee, Audrey K.</au><au>Applegate, Brian E.</au><au>Oghalai, John S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Noninvasive in vivo imaging reveals differences between tectorial membrane and basilar membrane traveling waves in the mouse cochlea</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle><addtitle>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</addtitle><date>2015-03-10</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>112</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>3128</spage><epage>3133</epage><pages>3128-3133</pages><issn>0027-8424</issn><eissn>1091-6490</eissn><abstract>Significance The membranes within the cochlea vibrate in response to sound. However, measuring these vibrations to study the sense of hearing has been a technological challenge because invasive techniques have been required. Herein, we describe a new technique capable of depth-resolved displacement measurements in 3D space with picometer sensitivity within the unopened mouse cochlea. We used this technique to make, to our knowledge, the first measurements of the tectorial membrane, the structure that overlies the sensory hair cell stereociliary bundles, within a healthy cochlea. We found that the tectorial membrane sustains traveling wave propagation differently than the more commonly measured basilar membrane. This finding provides a clearer understanding of the mechanical stimulus at the level of the inner hair cell responsible for non-linear sound encoding. Sound is encoded within the auditory portion of the inner ear, the cochlea, after propagating down its length as a traveling wave. For over half a century, vibratory measurements to study cochlear traveling waves have been made using invasive approaches such as laser Doppler vibrometry. Although these studies have provided critical information regarding the nonlinear processes within the living cochlea that increase the amplitude of vibration and sharpen frequency tuning, the data have typically been limited to point measurements of basilar membrane vibration. In addition, opening the cochlea may alter its function and affect the findings. Here we describe volumetric optical coherence tomography vibrometry, a technique that overcomes these limitations by providing depth-resolved displacement measurements at 200 kHz inside a 3D volume of tissue with picometer sensitivity. We studied the mouse cochlea by imaging noninvasively through the surrounding bone to measure sound-induced vibrations of the sensory structures in vivo, and report, to our knowledge, the first measures of tectorial membrane vibration within the unopened cochlea. We found that the tectorial membrane sustains traveling wave propagation. Compared with basilar membrane traveling waves, tectorial membrane traveling waves have larger dynamic ranges, sharper frequency tuning, and apically shifted positions of peak vibration. These findings explain discrepancies between previously published basilar membrane vibration and auditory nerve single unit data. Because the tectorial membrane directly overlies the inner hair cell stereociliary bundles, these data provide the most accurate characterization of the stimulus shaping the afferent auditory response available to date.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Academy of Sciences</pub><pmid>25737536</pmid><doi>10.1073/pnas.1500038112</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0027-8424
ispartof Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2015-03, Vol.112 (10), p.3128-3133
issn 0027-8424
1091-6490
language eng
recordid cdi_pnas_primary_112_10_3128
source MEDLINE; Jstor Complete Legacy; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Animals
Basilar Membrane - physiology
Biological Sciences
Cochlea - physiology
hearing
image analysis
Membranes
Mice
Propagation
Tectorial Membrane - physiology
Tissues
Tomography
Tomography, Optical Coherence
Vibration
title Noninvasive in vivo imaging reveals differences between tectorial membrane and basilar membrane traveling waves in the mouse cochlea
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T13%3A31%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pnas_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Noninvasive%20in%20vivo%20imaging%20reveals%20differences%20between%20tectorial%20membrane%20and%20basilar%20membrane%20traveling%20waves%20in%20the%20mouse%20cochlea&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20National%20Academy%20of%20Sciences%20-%20PNAS&rft.au=Lee,%20Hee%20Yoon&rft.date=2015-03-10&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=3128&rft.epage=3133&rft.pages=3128-3133&rft.issn=0027-8424&rft.eissn=1091-6490&rft_id=info:doi/10.1073/pnas.1500038112&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pnas_%3E26461777%3C/jstor_pnas_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1663918971&rft_id=info:pmid/25737536&rft_jstor_id=26461777&rfr_iscdi=true