Targeted Cytoplasmic Irradiation Induces Bystander Responses

The observation of radiation-induced bystander responses, in which cells respond to their neighbors being irradiated, has important implications for understanding mechanisms of radiation action particularly after low-dose exposure. Much of this questions the current dogma of direct DNA damage drivin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS 2004-09, Vol.101 (37), p.13495-13500
Hauptverfasser: Shao, Chunlin, Folkard, Melvyn, Michael, Barry D., Prise, Kevin M., Setlow, Richard B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 13500
container_issue 37
container_start_page 13495
container_title Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS
container_volume 101
creator Shao, Chunlin
Folkard, Melvyn
Michael, Barry D.
Prise, Kevin M.
Setlow, Richard B.
description The observation of radiation-induced bystander responses, in which cells respond to their neighbors being irradiated, has important implications for understanding mechanisms of radiation action particularly after low-dose exposure. Much of this questions the current dogma of direct DNA damage driving response in irradiated systems. In this study, we have used a charged-particle microbeam to target individual helium ions (3 He2+) to individual cells within a population of radioresistant glioma cells cultured alone or in coculture with primary human fibroblasts. We found that even when a single cell within the glioma population was precisely traversed through its cytoplasm with one 3 He2+ ion, bystander responses were induced in the neighboring nonirradiated glioma or fibroblasts so that the yield of micronuclei was increased by 36% for the glioma population and 78% for the bystander fibroblast population. Importantly, the yield of bystander-induced micronuclei was independent of whether the cytoplasm or nucleus of a cell was targeted. The bystander responses were fully eliminated when the populations were treated with 2-(4-carboxyphenyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-imidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxide or filipin, which scavenge nitric oxide (NO) and disrupt membrane rafts, respectively. By using the probe 4-amino-5-methylamino-2′,7′-difluorofluorescein, it was found that the NO level in the glioma population was increased by 15% after 1 or 10 cytoplasmic traversals, and this NO production was inhibited by filipin. This finding shows that direct DNA damage is not required for switching on of important cell-signaling mechanisms after low-dose irradiation and that, under these conditions, the whole cell should be considered a sensor of radiation exposure.
doi_str_mv 10.1073/pnas.0404930101
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pnas_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pnas_primary_101_37_13495_fulltext</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3373339</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3373339</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c592t-a2d5a1a4833243b6fa1dd453a9acd3016e0aea9256290c543192700b237955903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0cFrFDEUBvAgil2rZy8igwfBw7QveclkAnqwi7YLhYLUc3g7k62zzE7GJCPuf98su3Stl-aSQ37fI8nH2FsOZxw0no8DxTOQIA0CB_6MzTgYXlbSwHM2AxC6rKWQJ-xVjGsAMKqGl-yEK5RKSzFjn28p3Lnk2mK-TX7sKW66pliEQG1HqfNDsRjaqXGxuNjGREPrQvHDxdEP0cXX7MWK-ujeHPZT9vP7t9v5VXl9c7mYf70uG2VEKkm0ijjJGlFIXFYr4m0rFZKhps33rhyQIyNUJQw0SiI3QgMsBWqjlAE8ZV_2c8dpuXFt44YUqLdj6DYUttZTZx-fDN0ve-f_WMVrXauc_3jIB_97cjHZTRcb1_c0OD9FW1V1DVDhk5DXoLjGOsMP_8G1n8KQP8EK4FipvDI636Mm-BiDWz3cmIPd1Wd39dljfTnx_t-HHv2hrww-HcAueRzHLWrLURplV1PfJ_c3ZVs8YTN5tyfrmHx4MIgaEQ3eAwTktzk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>201365555</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Targeted Cytoplasmic Irradiation Induces Bystander Responses</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Shao, Chunlin ; Folkard, Melvyn ; Michael, Barry D. ; Prise, Kevin M. ; Setlow, Richard B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shao, Chunlin ; Folkard, Melvyn ; Michael, Barry D. ; Prise, Kevin M. ; Setlow, Richard B.</creatorcontrib><description>The observation of radiation-induced bystander responses, in which cells respond to their neighbors being irradiated, has important implications for understanding mechanisms of radiation action particularly after low-dose exposure. Much of this questions the current dogma of direct DNA damage driving response in irradiated systems. In this study, we have used a charged-particle microbeam to target individual helium ions (3 He2+) to individual cells within a population of radioresistant glioma cells cultured alone or in coculture with primary human fibroblasts. We found that even when a single cell within the glioma population was precisely traversed through its cytoplasm with one 3 He2+ ion, bystander responses were induced in the neighboring nonirradiated glioma or fibroblasts so that the yield of micronuclei was increased by 36% for the glioma population and 78% for the bystander fibroblast population. Importantly, the yield of bystander-induced micronuclei was independent of whether the cytoplasm or nucleus of a cell was targeted. The bystander responses were fully eliminated when the populations were treated with 2-(4-carboxyphenyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-imidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxide or filipin, which scavenge nitric oxide (NO) and disrupt membrane rafts, respectively. By using the probe 4-amino-5-methylamino-2′,7′-difluorofluorescein, it was found that the NO level in the glioma population was increased by 15% after 1 or 10 cytoplasmic traversals, and this NO production was inhibited by filipin. This finding shows that direct DNA damage is not required for switching on of important cell-signaling mechanisms after low-dose irradiation and that, under these conditions, the whole cell should be considered a sensor of radiation exposure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0027-8424</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1091-6490</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0404930101</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15345742</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Academy of Sciences</publisher><subject>Biological Factors - metabolism ; Biological Sciences ; Bystander Effect - radiation effects ; Cell culture techniques ; Cell Line, Tumor ; Cell lines ; Cell Membrane - metabolism ; Cell Membrane - radiation effects ; Cell membranes ; Cell nucleus ; Cellular biology ; Cytoplasm ; Cytoplasm - radiation effects ; DNA damage ; Fibroblasts ; Glioma ; Humans ; Irradiation ; Microbeams ; Micronuclei, Chromosome-Defective - radiation effects ; Nitric oxide ; Nitric Oxide - metabolism ; Population growth ; Radiation ; Radiation damage ; Signal transduction ; Signal Transduction - radiation effects ; Solubility</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2004-09, Vol.101 (37), p.13495-13500</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1993/2004 The National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America</rights><rights>Copyright National Academy of Sciences Sep 14, 2004</rights><rights>Copyright © 2004, The National Academy of Sciences 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c592t-a2d5a1a4833243b6fa1dd453a9acd3016e0aea9256290c543192700b237955903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c592t-a2d5a1a4833243b6fa1dd453a9acd3016e0aea9256290c543192700b237955903</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://www.pnas.org/content/101/37.cover.gif</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3373339$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3373339$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,803,885,27924,27925,53791,53793,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15345742$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shao, Chunlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Folkard, Melvyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michael, Barry D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prise, Kevin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Setlow, Richard B.</creatorcontrib><title>Targeted Cytoplasmic Irradiation Induces Bystander Responses</title><title>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</title><addtitle>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</addtitle><description>The observation of radiation-induced bystander responses, in which cells respond to their neighbors being irradiated, has important implications for understanding mechanisms of radiation action particularly after low-dose exposure. Much of this questions the current dogma of direct DNA damage driving response in irradiated systems. In this study, we have used a charged-particle microbeam to target individual helium ions (3 He2+) to individual cells within a population of radioresistant glioma cells cultured alone or in coculture with primary human fibroblasts. We found that even when a single cell within the glioma population was precisely traversed through its cytoplasm with one 3 He2+ ion, bystander responses were induced in the neighboring nonirradiated glioma or fibroblasts so that the yield of micronuclei was increased by 36% for the glioma population and 78% for the bystander fibroblast population. Importantly, the yield of bystander-induced micronuclei was independent of whether the cytoplasm or nucleus of a cell was targeted. The bystander responses were fully eliminated when the populations were treated with 2-(4-carboxyphenyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-imidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxide or filipin, which scavenge nitric oxide (NO) and disrupt membrane rafts, respectively. By using the probe 4-amino-5-methylamino-2′,7′-difluorofluorescein, it was found that the NO level in the glioma population was increased by 15% after 1 or 10 cytoplasmic traversals, and this NO production was inhibited by filipin. This finding shows that direct DNA damage is not required for switching on of important cell-signaling mechanisms after low-dose irradiation and that, under these conditions, the whole cell should be considered a sensor of radiation exposure.</description><subject>Biological Factors - metabolism</subject><subject>Biological Sciences</subject><subject>Bystander Effect - radiation effects</subject><subject>Cell culture techniques</subject><subject>Cell Line, Tumor</subject><subject>Cell lines</subject><subject>Cell Membrane - metabolism</subject><subject>Cell Membrane - radiation effects</subject><subject>Cell membranes</subject><subject>Cell nucleus</subject><subject>Cellular biology</subject><subject>Cytoplasm</subject><subject>Cytoplasm - radiation effects</subject><subject>DNA damage</subject><subject>Fibroblasts</subject><subject>Glioma</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Irradiation</subject><subject>Microbeams</subject><subject>Micronuclei, Chromosome-Defective - radiation effects</subject><subject>Nitric oxide</subject><subject>Nitric Oxide - metabolism</subject><subject>Population growth</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Radiation damage</subject><subject>Signal transduction</subject><subject>Signal Transduction - radiation effects</subject><subject>Solubility</subject><issn>0027-8424</issn><issn>1091-6490</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0cFrFDEUBvAgil2rZy8igwfBw7QveclkAnqwi7YLhYLUc3g7k62zzE7GJCPuf98su3Stl-aSQ37fI8nH2FsOZxw0no8DxTOQIA0CB_6MzTgYXlbSwHM2AxC6rKWQJ-xVjGsAMKqGl-yEK5RKSzFjn28p3Lnk2mK-TX7sKW66pliEQG1HqfNDsRjaqXGxuNjGREPrQvHDxdEP0cXX7MWK-ujeHPZT9vP7t9v5VXl9c7mYf70uG2VEKkm0ijjJGlFIXFYr4m0rFZKhps33rhyQIyNUJQw0SiI3QgMsBWqjlAE8ZV_2c8dpuXFt44YUqLdj6DYUttZTZx-fDN0ve-f_WMVrXauc_3jIB_97cjHZTRcb1_c0OD9FW1V1DVDhk5DXoLjGOsMP_8G1n8KQP8EK4FipvDI636Mm-BiDWz3cmIPd1Wd39dljfTnx_t-HHv2hrww-HcAueRzHLWrLURplV1PfJ_c3ZVs8YTN5tyfrmHx4MIgaEQ3eAwTktzk</recordid><startdate>20040914</startdate><enddate>20040914</enddate><creator>Shao, Chunlin</creator><creator>Folkard, Melvyn</creator><creator>Michael, Barry D.</creator><creator>Prise, Kevin M.</creator><creator>Setlow, Richard B.</creator><general>National Academy of Sciences</general><general>National Acad Sciences</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040914</creationdate><title>Targeted Cytoplasmic Irradiation Induces Bystander Responses</title><author>Shao, Chunlin ; Folkard, Melvyn ; Michael, Barry D. ; Prise, Kevin M. ; Setlow, Richard B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c592t-a2d5a1a4833243b6fa1dd453a9acd3016e0aea9256290c543192700b237955903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Biological Factors - metabolism</topic><topic>Biological Sciences</topic><topic>Bystander Effect - radiation effects</topic><topic>Cell culture techniques</topic><topic>Cell Line, Tumor</topic><topic>Cell lines</topic><topic>Cell Membrane - metabolism</topic><topic>Cell Membrane - radiation effects</topic><topic>Cell membranes</topic><topic>Cell nucleus</topic><topic>Cellular biology</topic><topic>Cytoplasm</topic><topic>Cytoplasm - radiation effects</topic><topic>DNA damage</topic><topic>Fibroblasts</topic><topic>Glioma</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Irradiation</topic><topic>Microbeams</topic><topic>Micronuclei, Chromosome-Defective - radiation effects</topic><topic>Nitric oxide</topic><topic>Nitric Oxide - metabolism</topic><topic>Population growth</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Radiation damage</topic><topic>Signal transduction</topic><topic>Signal Transduction - radiation effects</topic><topic>Solubility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shao, Chunlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Folkard, Melvyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michael, Barry D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prise, Kevin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Setlow, Richard B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shao, Chunlin</au><au>Folkard, Melvyn</au><au>Michael, Barry D.</au><au>Prise, Kevin M.</au><au>Setlow, Richard B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Targeted Cytoplasmic Irradiation Induces Bystander Responses</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle><addtitle>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</addtitle><date>2004-09-14</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>37</issue><spage>13495</spage><epage>13500</epage><pages>13495-13500</pages><issn>0027-8424</issn><eissn>1091-6490</eissn><abstract>The observation of radiation-induced bystander responses, in which cells respond to their neighbors being irradiated, has important implications for understanding mechanisms of radiation action particularly after low-dose exposure. Much of this questions the current dogma of direct DNA damage driving response in irradiated systems. In this study, we have used a charged-particle microbeam to target individual helium ions (3 He2+) to individual cells within a population of radioresistant glioma cells cultured alone or in coculture with primary human fibroblasts. We found that even when a single cell within the glioma population was precisely traversed through its cytoplasm with one 3 He2+ ion, bystander responses were induced in the neighboring nonirradiated glioma or fibroblasts so that the yield of micronuclei was increased by 36% for the glioma population and 78% for the bystander fibroblast population. Importantly, the yield of bystander-induced micronuclei was independent of whether the cytoplasm or nucleus of a cell was targeted. The bystander responses were fully eliminated when the populations were treated with 2-(4-carboxyphenyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-imidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxide or filipin, which scavenge nitric oxide (NO) and disrupt membrane rafts, respectively. By using the probe 4-amino-5-methylamino-2′,7′-difluorofluorescein, it was found that the NO level in the glioma population was increased by 15% after 1 or 10 cytoplasmic traversals, and this NO production was inhibited by filipin. This finding shows that direct DNA damage is not required for switching on of important cell-signaling mechanisms after low-dose irradiation and that, under these conditions, the whole cell should be considered a sensor of radiation exposure.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Academy of Sciences</pub><pmid>15345742</pmid><doi>10.1073/pnas.0404930101</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0027-8424
ispartof Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2004-09, Vol.101 (37), p.13495-13500
issn 0027-8424
1091-6490
language eng
recordid cdi_pnas_primary_101_37_13495_fulltext
source MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Biological Factors - metabolism
Biological Sciences
Bystander Effect - radiation effects
Cell culture techniques
Cell Line, Tumor
Cell lines
Cell Membrane - metabolism
Cell Membrane - radiation effects
Cell membranes
Cell nucleus
Cellular biology
Cytoplasm
Cytoplasm - radiation effects
DNA damage
Fibroblasts
Glioma
Humans
Irradiation
Microbeams
Micronuclei, Chromosome-Defective - radiation effects
Nitric oxide
Nitric Oxide - metabolism
Population growth
Radiation
Radiation damage
Signal transduction
Signal Transduction - radiation effects
Solubility
title Targeted Cytoplasmic Irradiation Induces Bystander Responses
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T19%3A01%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pnas_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Targeted%20Cytoplasmic%20Irradiation%20Induces%20Bystander%20Responses&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20National%20Academy%20of%20Sciences%20-%20PNAS&rft.au=Shao,%20Chunlin&rft.date=2004-09-14&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=37&rft.spage=13495&rft.epage=13500&rft.pages=13495-13500&rft.issn=0027-8424&rft.eissn=1091-6490&rft_id=info:doi/10.1073/pnas.0404930101&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pnas_%3E3373339%3C/jstor_pnas_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=201365555&rft_id=info:pmid/15345742&rft_jstor_id=3373339&rfr_iscdi=true