Key barriers and decision supports in revitalizing heritage buildings from investors' perspective in China: A case study in Guangzhou, China

In the decision-making process for investing in heritage buildings (HBs), various factors such as costs, interests, and tenancy terms influence investors decisions. Understanding the motivations of these investors can facilitate the involvement of social forces with diverse interests in adaptive reu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2025-01, Vol.20 (1), p.e0311757
Hauptverfasser: Fang, Kailun, Wu, Yifei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page e0311757
container_title PloS one
container_volume 20
creator Fang, Kailun
Wu, Yifei
description In the decision-making process for investing in heritage buildings (HBs), various factors such as costs, interests, and tenancy terms influence investors decisions. Understanding the motivations of these investors can facilitate the involvement of social forces with diverse interests in adaptive reuse projects. This paper examines the primary barriers to revitalizing heritage buildings through adaptive reuse decision-making. The specific objectives of this study are as follows: i) To explore the barriers faced by investors in the adaptive reuse of heritage buildings. ii) To provide a comprehensive review of the factors influencing the adaptive reuse of heritage buildings, with a particular focus on developing countries. Through structured interviews with 19 investors and field research, three typical categories in the adaptive reuse decision-making process were identified: i) tenancy terms, ii) function, and iii) fire control problems. These findings indicate that vacancy is detrimental to the protection of heritage buildings, while rent plays a significant role in safeguarding them, as revealed by a correlation analysis using quantitative methods. Policymakers should better understand the expectations and needs of the public investors better to enhance support for optimal adaptive reuse decisions.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0311757
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_3159628755</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A824728769</galeid><sourcerecordid>A824728769</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3755-950f64f9e9c57b6aac3d0e697466c663f728959441b198263e02e63b40eecd543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7jr6D0QDgh_gjEnTpK03Mgy6Li4s-HUb0vS0zdImNWkHZ3-DP9qU6S4zshfSizYnz_ue5uSNoqcErwhNybsrOzoj21VvDawwJSRl6b3olOQ0XvIY0_sH3yfRI--vMGY04_xhdELzjCUs46fRny-wQ4V0ToPzSJoSlaC019YgP_a9dYNH2iAHWz3IVl9rU6MGXFjUgIpRt2WoeFQ52wVuC36wzr9CfXDrQQ16C5N802gj36M1UtID8sNY7qby2ShNfd3Y8e2eeBw9qGTr4cn8XkQ_Pn38vvm8vLg8O9-sL5aKpowtc4YrnlQ55IqlBZdS0RIDz9OEc8U5rdI4y1meJKQgeRZzCjgGTosEA6iSJXQRPd_79q31Yh6kF5SwnMdZaBGIDzMxFh2UCszgZCt6pzvpdsJKLY53jG5EbbciXAMnOJ0cXs8Ozv4aw1xEp72CtpUG7Dg3yymP04C--Ae9-5dmqpYtCG0qGxqryVSsszgJZ06D3yJa3UGFp4ROqxCVSof6keDNkSAwA_weajl6L86_ff1_9vLnMfvygG1AtkPjbTsOIVr-GEz2oHLWewfV7ZQJFlPSb6YhpqSLOelB9uzwhm5FN9GmfwF_tPo-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3159628755</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Key barriers and decision supports in revitalizing heritage buildings from investors' perspective in China: A case study in Guangzhou, China</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Fang, Kailun ; Wu, Yifei</creator><creatorcontrib>Fang, Kailun ; Wu, Yifei</creatorcontrib><description>In the decision-making process for investing in heritage buildings (HBs), various factors such as costs, interests, and tenancy terms influence investors decisions. Understanding the motivations of these investors can facilitate the involvement of social forces with diverse interests in adaptive reuse projects. This paper examines the primary barriers to revitalizing heritage buildings through adaptive reuse decision-making. The specific objectives of this study are as follows: i) To explore the barriers faced by investors in the adaptive reuse of heritage buildings. ii) To provide a comprehensive review of the factors influencing the adaptive reuse of heritage buildings, with a particular focus on developing countries. Through structured interviews with 19 investors and field research, three typical categories in the adaptive reuse decision-making process were identified: i) tenancy terms, ii) function, and iii) fire control problems. These findings indicate that vacancy is detrimental to the protection of heritage buildings, while rent plays a significant role in safeguarding them, as revealed by a correlation analysis using quantitative methods. Policymakers should better understand the expectations and needs of the public investors better to enhance support for optimal adaptive reuse decisions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311757</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39854586</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Barriers ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Buildings ; Case studies ; China ; Conservation ; Correlation analysis ; Cultural heritage ; Cultural identity ; Decision Making ; Developing countries ; Engineering and Technology ; Fire control ; Fire prevention ; Historic preservation ; Historical buildings ; Humans ; Investments ; Investors ; LDCs ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; Policy making ; Protection and preservation ; Quantitative analysis ; Smart growth ; Social aspects ; Social Sciences ; Sustainable development ; Urban development</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2025-01, Vol.20 (1), p.e0311757</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2025 Fang, Wu. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2025 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2025 Fang, Wu. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2025 Fang, Wu 2025 Fang, Wu</rights><rights>2025 Fang, Wu. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3755-950f64f9e9c57b6aac3d0e697466c663f728959441b198263e02e63b40eecd543</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2181-528X ; 0000-0001-7574-9479</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11761075/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11761075/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2915,23845,27321,27901,27902,33751,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39854586$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fang, Kailun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Yifei</creatorcontrib><title>Key barriers and decision supports in revitalizing heritage buildings from investors' perspective in China: A case study in Guangzhou, China</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>In the decision-making process for investing in heritage buildings (HBs), various factors such as costs, interests, and tenancy terms influence investors decisions. Understanding the motivations of these investors can facilitate the involvement of social forces with diverse interests in adaptive reuse projects. This paper examines the primary barriers to revitalizing heritage buildings through adaptive reuse decision-making. The specific objectives of this study are as follows: i) To explore the barriers faced by investors in the adaptive reuse of heritage buildings. ii) To provide a comprehensive review of the factors influencing the adaptive reuse of heritage buildings, with a particular focus on developing countries. Through structured interviews with 19 investors and field research, three typical categories in the adaptive reuse decision-making process were identified: i) tenancy terms, ii) function, and iii) fire control problems. These findings indicate that vacancy is detrimental to the protection of heritage buildings, while rent plays a significant role in safeguarding them, as revealed by a correlation analysis using quantitative methods. Policymakers should better understand the expectations and needs of the public investors better to enhance support for optimal adaptive reuse decisions.</description><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Cultural heritage</subject><subject>Cultural identity</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Fire control</subject><subject>Fire prevention</subject><subject>Historic preservation</subject><subject>Historical buildings</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Investors</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Protection and preservation</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Smart growth</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Urban development</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7jr6D0QDgh_gjEnTpK03Mgy6Li4s-HUb0vS0zdImNWkHZ3-DP9qU6S4zshfSizYnz_ue5uSNoqcErwhNybsrOzoj21VvDawwJSRl6b3olOQ0XvIY0_sH3yfRI--vMGY04_xhdELzjCUs46fRny-wQ4V0ToPzSJoSlaC019YgP_a9dYNH2iAHWz3IVl9rU6MGXFjUgIpRt2WoeFQ52wVuC36wzr9CfXDrQQ16C5N802gj36M1UtID8sNY7qby2ShNfd3Y8e2eeBw9qGTr4cn8XkQ_Pn38vvm8vLg8O9-sL5aKpowtc4YrnlQ55IqlBZdS0RIDz9OEc8U5rdI4y1meJKQgeRZzCjgGTosEA6iSJXQRPd_79q31Yh6kF5SwnMdZaBGIDzMxFh2UCszgZCt6pzvpdsJKLY53jG5EbbciXAMnOJ0cXs8Ozv4aw1xEp72CtpUG7Dg3yymP04C--Ae9-5dmqpYtCG0qGxqryVSsszgJZ06D3yJa3UGFp4ROqxCVSof6keDNkSAwA_weajl6L86_ff1_9vLnMfvygG1AtkPjbTsOIVr-GEz2oHLWewfV7ZQJFlPSb6YhpqSLOelB9uzwhm5FN9GmfwF_tPo-</recordid><startdate>20250124</startdate><enddate>20250124</enddate><creator>Fang, Kailun</creator><creator>Wu, Yifei</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2181-528X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7574-9479</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20250124</creationdate><title>Key barriers and decision supports in revitalizing heritage buildings from investors' perspective in China: A case study in Guangzhou, China</title><author>Fang, Kailun ; Wu, Yifei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3755-950f64f9e9c57b6aac3d0e697466c663f728959441b198263e02e63b40eecd543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Cultural heritage</topic><topic>Cultural identity</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Fire control</topic><topic>Fire prevention</topic><topic>Historic preservation</topic><topic>Historical buildings</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Investors</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Protection and preservation</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Smart growth</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Urban development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fang, Kailun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Yifei</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fang, Kailun</au><au>Wu, Yifei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Key barriers and decision supports in revitalizing heritage buildings from investors' perspective in China: A case study in Guangzhou, China</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2025-01-24</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e0311757</spage><pages>e0311757-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>In the decision-making process for investing in heritage buildings (HBs), various factors such as costs, interests, and tenancy terms influence investors decisions. Understanding the motivations of these investors can facilitate the involvement of social forces with diverse interests in adaptive reuse projects. This paper examines the primary barriers to revitalizing heritage buildings through adaptive reuse decision-making. The specific objectives of this study are as follows: i) To explore the barriers faced by investors in the adaptive reuse of heritage buildings. ii) To provide a comprehensive review of the factors influencing the adaptive reuse of heritage buildings, with a particular focus on developing countries. Through structured interviews with 19 investors and field research, three typical categories in the adaptive reuse decision-making process were identified: i) tenancy terms, ii) function, and iii) fire control problems. These findings indicate that vacancy is detrimental to the protection of heritage buildings, while rent plays a significant role in safeguarding them, as revealed by a correlation analysis using quantitative methods. Policymakers should better understand the expectations and needs of the public investors better to enhance support for optimal adaptive reuse decisions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>39854586</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0311757</doi><tpages>e0311757</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2181-528X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7574-9479</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2025-01, Vol.20 (1), p.e0311757
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_3159628755
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Sociological Abstracts; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
subjects Barriers
Biology and Life Sciences
Buildings
Case studies
China
Conservation
Correlation analysis
Cultural heritage
Cultural identity
Decision Making
Developing countries
Engineering and Technology
Fire control
Fire prevention
Historic preservation
Historical buildings
Humans
Investments
Investors
LDCs
Medicine and Health Sciences
Methods
Policy making
Protection and preservation
Quantitative analysis
Smart growth
Social aspects
Social Sciences
Sustainable development
Urban development
title Key barriers and decision supports in revitalizing heritage buildings from investors' perspective in China: A case study in Guangzhou, China
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T14%3A50%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Key%20barriers%20and%20decision%20supports%20in%20revitalizing%20heritage%20buildings%20from%20investors'%20perspective%20in%20China:%20A%20case%20study%20in%20Guangzhou,%20China&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Fang,%20Kailun&rft.date=2025-01-24&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e0311757&rft.pages=e0311757-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0311757&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA824728769%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3159628755&rft_id=info:pmid/39854586&rft_galeid=A824728769&rfr_iscdi=true