Does the site of research evidence generation impact on its translation to clinical practice? A protocol paper
The research-to-practice gap is a well-known phenomenon. The adoption of evidence into clinical practice needs to consider the complexity of the health care system and a multitude of contextual issues. Research evidence is usually a form of extrinsic motivation for practice change, but works best wh...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2024-12, Vol.19 (12), p.e0314956 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 12 |
| container_start_page | e0314956 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 19 |
| creator | Pu, Dai Mitchell, Debra Brusco, Natasha Stephen, Kelly Hutchinson, Ana Griffith, Anna McDonald, Cassie Irwin, Lucy Said, Cathy O'Brien, Lisa Weller-Newton, Jennifer Haines, Terry P |
| description | The research-to-practice gap is a well-known phenomenon. The adoption of evidence into clinical practice needs to consider the complexity of the health care system and a multitude of contextual issues. Research evidence is usually a form of extrinsic motivation for practice change, but works best when it aligns with the intrinsic values of the system and the people in it. Health professionals tend to refer to internal, local policies, information sources and procedures more than external academic research evidence. This protocol paper describes a mixed-methods study with a quasi-experimental design that seeks to investigate how involvement in research might impact the uptake or implementation of recommendations arising from that research. Research evidence for the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of mobilisation alarms for falls prevention will be disseminated at 36 hospital wards in Victoria, Australia. Eighteen of these wards will be sites where this research evidence was generated; another 18 wards will not have been involved in evidence generation. The uptake of research evidence will be measured across three time points using quantitative and qualitative data. Trial registration: This study has been registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12621000823875p. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0314956 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_3144310678</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A819867806</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_a8fb35d478304e6a88af870a85159910</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A819867806</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4676-6066b6d4613802e8df774b87d96ee36517e78b1054c86902e97163315857b11b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1r2zAUhs3YWLtu_2BsgsHYLpJJkS3JVyN0X4FCYV-3QpaPEwXFciV5bP9-J41bmtGLoQsdjp_3HPnlLYrnjM4Zl-zdNoyxN34-hB7mlLOyrsSD4pTVfDETC8of3qlPiicpbSmtuBLicXHCayEZV-y06D8ESCRvgCSXgYSOREhgot0Q-OVa6C2QNfQQTXahJ243GJvJvsooi6ZP_vAlB2K96501ngwRIWfhPVliHXKwAZtmgPi0eNQZn-DZdJ8VPz59_H7-ZXZx-Xl1vryY2VJIMRNUiEa0pcBH0gWotpOybJRsawHARcUkSNUwWpVWiRqJWjLBOatUJRvGGn5WvDzMHXxIerIqaXSp5IwKqZBYHYg2mK0eotuZ-EcH4_R1I8S1NhF_woM2qmt41ZaooiUIo5TplKRGVayqa0Zx1ptpWwxXI6Ssdy5Z8N70EMbrtULSWooS0Vf_oPc_bqLWBve7vgtotd0P1UvFaoUMFUjN76HwtLBzFmPROewfCd4eCZDJ8DuvzZiSXn37-v_s5c9j9vUddgPG500KftwHIx2D5QG0MaQUobs1nlG9T_WNG3qfaj2lGmUvJtPGZgftregmxvwvPObunQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3144310678</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does the site of research evidence generation impact on its translation to clinical practice? A protocol paper</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Pu, Dai ; Mitchell, Debra ; Brusco, Natasha ; Stephen, Kelly ; Hutchinson, Ana ; Griffith, Anna ; McDonald, Cassie ; Irwin, Lucy ; Said, Cathy ; O'Brien, Lisa ; Weller-Newton, Jennifer ; Haines, Terry P</creator><creatorcontrib>Pu, Dai ; Mitchell, Debra ; Brusco, Natasha ; Stephen, Kelly ; Hutchinson, Ana ; Griffith, Anna ; McDonald, Cassie ; Irwin, Lucy ; Said, Cathy ; O'Brien, Lisa ; Weller-Newton, Jennifer ; Haines, Terry P</creatorcontrib><description>The research-to-practice gap is a well-known phenomenon. The adoption of evidence into clinical practice needs to consider the complexity of the health care system and a multitude of contextual issues. Research evidence is usually a form of extrinsic motivation for practice change, but works best when it aligns with the intrinsic values of the system and the people in it. Health professionals tend to refer to internal, local policies, information sources and procedures more than external academic research evidence. This protocol paper describes a mixed-methods study with a quasi-experimental design that seeks to investigate how involvement in research might impact the uptake or implementation of recommendations arising from that research. Research evidence for the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of mobilisation alarms for falls prevention will be disseminated at 36 hospital wards in Victoria, Australia. Eighteen of these wards will be sites where this research evidence was generated; another 18 wards will not have been involved in evidence generation. The uptake of research evidence will be measured across three time points using quantitative and qualitative data. Trial registration: This study has been registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12621000823875p.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314956</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39671381</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Accidental Falls - prevention & control ; Clinical medicine ; Clinical trials ; Consent ; Cost effectiveness ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Design of experiments ; Evidence-Based Medicine - methods ; Experimental design ; Falls ; Health services ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Information sources ; Medical personnel ; Medical research ; Medicine, Experimental ; Methods ; Public health ; Qualitative analysis ; Research Design ; Translational Research, Biomedical - methods ; Victoria</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2024-12, Vol.19 (12), p.e0314956</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2024 Pu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2024 Pu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2024 Pu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4676-6066b6d4613802e8df774b87d96ee36517e78b1054c86902e97163315857b11b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5863-5274 ; 0000-0002-6268-4378 ; 0000-0001-9518-5869 ; 0000-0002-0270-8497 ; 0000-0003-2488-9337 ; 0000-0002-4149-6669</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0314956&type=printable$$EPDF$$P50$$Gplos$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0314956$$EHTML$$P50$$Gplos$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39671381$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pu, Dai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Debra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brusco, Natasha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephen, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutchinson, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffith, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Cassie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irwin, Lucy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Said, Cathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weller-Newton, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haines, Terry P</creatorcontrib><title>Does the site of research evidence generation impact on its translation to clinical practice? A protocol paper</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The research-to-practice gap is a well-known phenomenon. The adoption of evidence into clinical practice needs to consider the complexity of the health care system and a multitude of contextual issues. Research evidence is usually a form of extrinsic motivation for practice change, but works best when it aligns with the intrinsic values of the system and the people in it. Health professionals tend to refer to internal, local policies, information sources and procedures more than external academic research evidence. This protocol paper describes a mixed-methods study with a quasi-experimental design that seeks to investigate how involvement in research might impact the uptake or implementation of recommendations arising from that research. Research evidence for the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of mobilisation alarms for falls prevention will be disseminated at 36 hospital wards in Victoria, Australia. Eighteen of these wards will be sites where this research evidence was generated; another 18 wards will not have been involved in evidence generation. The uptake of research evidence will be measured across three time points using quantitative and qualitative data. Trial registration: This study has been registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12621000823875p.</description><subject>Accidental Falls - prevention & control</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Consent</subject><subject>Cost effectiveness</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Design of experiments</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine - methods</subject><subject>Experimental design</subject><subject>Falls</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information sources</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Translational Research, Biomedical - methods</subject><subject>Victoria</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1r2zAUhs3YWLtu_2BsgsHYLpJJkS3JVyN0X4FCYV-3QpaPEwXFciV5bP9-J41bmtGLoQsdjp_3HPnlLYrnjM4Zl-zdNoyxN34-hB7mlLOyrsSD4pTVfDETC8of3qlPiicpbSmtuBLicXHCayEZV-y06D8ESCRvgCSXgYSOREhgot0Q-OVa6C2QNfQQTXahJ243GJvJvsooi6ZP_vAlB2K96501ngwRIWfhPVliHXKwAZtmgPi0eNQZn-DZdJ8VPz59_H7-ZXZx-Xl1vryY2VJIMRNUiEa0pcBH0gWotpOybJRsawHARcUkSNUwWpVWiRqJWjLBOatUJRvGGn5WvDzMHXxIerIqaXSp5IwKqZBYHYg2mK0eotuZ-EcH4_R1I8S1NhF_woM2qmt41ZaooiUIo5TplKRGVayqa0Zx1ptpWwxXI6Ssdy5Z8N70EMbrtULSWooS0Vf_oPc_bqLWBve7vgtotd0P1UvFaoUMFUjN76HwtLBzFmPROewfCd4eCZDJ8DuvzZiSXn37-v_s5c9j9vUddgPG500KftwHIx2D5QG0MaQUobs1nlG9T_WNG3qfaj2lGmUvJtPGZgftregmxvwvPObunQ</recordid><startdate>20241213</startdate><enddate>20241213</enddate><creator>Pu, Dai</creator><creator>Mitchell, Debra</creator><creator>Brusco, Natasha</creator><creator>Stephen, Kelly</creator><creator>Hutchinson, Ana</creator><creator>Griffith, Anna</creator><creator>McDonald, Cassie</creator><creator>Irwin, Lucy</creator><creator>Said, Cathy</creator><creator>O'Brien, Lisa</creator><creator>Weller-Newton, Jennifer</creator><creator>Haines, Terry P</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5863-5274</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6268-4378</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9518-5869</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0270-8497</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2488-9337</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4149-6669</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241213</creationdate><title>Does the site of research evidence generation impact on its translation to clinical practice? A protocol paper</title><author>Pu, Dai ; Mitchell, Debra ; Brusco, Natasha ; Stephen, Kelly ; Hutchinson, Ana ; Griffith, Anna ; McDonald, Cassie ; Irwin, Lucy ; Said, Cathy ; O'Brien, Lisa ; Weller-Newton, Jennifer ; Haines, Terry P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4676-6066b6d4613802e8df774b87d96ee36517e78b1054c86902e97163315857b11b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accidental Falls - prevention & control</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Consent</topic><topic>Cost effectiveness</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Design of experiments</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine - methods</topic><topic>Experimental design</topic><topic>Falls</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information sources</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Translational Research, Biomedical - methods</topic><topic>Victoria</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pu, Dai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Debra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brusco, Natasha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephen, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutchinson, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffith, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Cassie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irwin, Lucy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Said, Cathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weller-Newton, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haines, Terry P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pu, Dai</au><au>Mitchell, Debra</au><au>Brusco, Natasha</au><au>Stephen, Kelly</au><au>Hutchinson, Ana</au><au>Griffith, Anna</au><au>McDonald, Cassie</au><au>Irwin, Lucy</au><au>Said, Cathy</au><au>O'Brien, Lisa</au><au>Weller-Newton, Jennifer</au><au>Haines, Terry P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does the site of research evidence generation impact on its translation to clinical practice? A protocol paper</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2024-12-13</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e0314956</spage><pages>e0314956-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The research-to-practice gap is a well-known phenomenon. The adoption of evidence into clinical practice needs to consider the complexity of the health care system and a multitude of contextual issues. Research evidence is usually a form of extrinsic motivation for practice change, but works best when it aligns with the intrinsic values of the system and the people in it. Health professionals tend to refer to internal, local policies, information sources and procedures more than external academic research evidence. This protocol paper describes a mixed-methods study with a quasi-experimental design that seeks to investigate how involvement in research might impact the uptake or implementation of recommendations arising from that research. Research evidence for the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of mobilisation alarms for falls prevention will be disseminated at 36 hospital wards in Victoria, Australia. Eighteen of these wards will be sites where this research evidence was generated; another 18 wards will not have been involved in evidence generation. The uptake of research evidence will be measured across three time points using quantitative and qualitative data. Trial registration: This study has been registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12621000823875p.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>39671381</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0314956</doi><tpages>e0314956</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5863-5274</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6268-4378</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9518-5869</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0270-8497</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2488-9337</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4149-6669</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2024-12, Vol.19 (12), p.e0314956 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_3144310678 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| subjects | Accidental Falls - prevention & control Clinical medicine Clinical trials Consent Cost effectiveness Cost-Benefit Analysis Design of experiments Evidence-Based Medicine - methods Experimental design Falls Health services Hospitals Humans Information sources Medical personnel Medical research Medicine, Experimental Methods Public health Qualitative analysis Research Design Translational Research, Biomedical - methods Victoria |
| title | Does the site of research evidence generation impact on its translation to clinical practice? A protocol paper |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T10%3A25%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20the%20site%20of%20research%20evidence%20generation%20impact%20on%20its%20translation%20to%20clinical%20practice?%20A%20protocol%20paper&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Pu,%20Dai&rft.date=2024-12-13&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e0314956&rft.pages=e0314956-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0314956&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA819867806%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3144310678&rft_id=info:pmid/39671381&rft_galeid=A819867806&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_a8fb35d478304e6a88af870a85159910&rfr_iscdi=true |